Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Consolidating ProjectUsing to ConvertUsing - #2807
Merged
Merged
Conversation
lbargaoanu
commented
Sep 26, 2018
Contributor
This needs a page in the docs explaining what changed, how to upgrade and the breaking scenarios. |
jbogard
commented
Sep 26, 2018
ContributorAuthor
@lbargaoanu added an 8.0 migration guide |
lbargaoanu
commented
Sep 26, 2018
Contributor
Smth about ConstructUsing and ConstructProjectionUsing. Maybe also a note that until now ConvertUsing and ConstructUsing were used only for Map. |
jbogard
commented
Sep 26, 2018
ContributorAuthor
The other changes will be in subsequent PRs. |
This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Per discussion in #2795