diff --git a/engine/hooks/wrong-check-reflect/detect.py b/engine/hooks/wrong-check-reflect/detect.py
index 9644470..c41aa79 100644
--- a/engine/hooks/wrong-check-reflect/detect.py
+++ b/engine/hooks/wrong-check-reflect/detect.py
@@ -64,6 +64,17 @@
     re.compile(
         r"(?i)\bi\s+misread\s+(it|that|this|my\s+own|the)\b"
     ),
+    re.compile(
+        r"(?i)\byour\s+(?:instinct|hunch|gut|suspicion|read)\s+(?:was|were)\s+right\b"
+    ),
+    re.compile(
+        r"(?i)^\s*[*_#\s>-]*(?:you'?re\s+right|you\s+are\s+right|good\s+catch)\b"
+        r".{0,200}?(?:verifying\s+(?:it\s+|that\s+)?now|checking\s+(?:it\s+|that\s+)?now|"
+        r"i\s+hadn'?t\b|i\s+had\s+not\b|i\s+didn'?t\b|i\s+did\s+not\b|"
+        r"i\s+should\s+have\b|instead\s+of\s+(?:labeling|labelling|assuming|guessing)|"
+        r"i\s+never\s+(?:ran|checked|read|verified))",
+        re.DOTALL,
+    ),
 ]
 
 # Hypothetical / product-blame shapes that must stay silent even if a
diff --git a/engine/hooks/wrong-check-reflect/tests/test_hooks.py b/engine/hooks/wrong-check-reflect/tests/test_hooks.py
index 3b05883..b27d876 100644
--- a/engine/hooks/wrong-check-reflect/tests/test_hooks.py
+++ b/engine/hooks/wrong-check-reflect/tests/test_hooks.py
@@ -92,6 +92,31 @@ def test_hit_i_misread_without_youre_right_prefix(self):
             detect.find_admission("I misread the front matter on that skill.")
         )
 
+    def test_hit_youre_right_verifying_it_now(self):
+        self.assertIsNotNone(detect.find_admission(
+            "You're right. Verifying it now instead of labeling it."
+        ))
+
+    def test_hit_good_catch_i_should_have_checked(self):
+        self.assertIsNotNone(detect.find_admission(
+            "Good catch on the hook. I should have run the two greps before sending that."
+        ))
+
+    def test_no_hit_youre_right_agreeing_with_a_choice(self):
+        self.assertIsNone(detect.find_admission(
+            "You're right that the second option is cheaper, so I will build that one."
+        ))
+
+    def test_hit_your_instinct_was_right_stands_alone(self):
+        self.assertIsNotNone(detect.find_admission(
+            "Your instinct was right — the size cap was silently skipping files."
+        ))
+
+    def test_hit_your_hunch_was_right(self):
+        self.assertIsNotNone(detect.find_admission(
+            "Your hunch was right, the wrapper path was never resolved."
+        ))
+
     def test_no_hit_product_test_was_wrong(self):
         self.assertIsNone(detect.find_admission("the test was wrong"))
 
diff --git a/engine/skills/reflect/SKILL.md b/engine/skills/reflect/SKILL.md
index 9658c4c..ddc33f0 100644
--- a/engine/skills/reflect/SKILL.md
+++ b/engine/skills/reflect/SKILL.md
@@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ Every invocation of this skill — single-transcript or multi-conversation mode
 - A non-trivial workflow emerged that isn't captured anywhere.
 - A session, or a corpus-scan bucket, shows heavy user involvement — many corrections, clarifying answers typed out by hand, repeated manual confirmations — over a short span. That is a **FAILURE**, not a preference ping: the user had to stay in the loop because the agent missed a named constraint. Route to `automate-me` (step 4). Do not write a one-off task-skill edit and call it done.
 - The user said "you fucked up", "you messed up", "I told you", "you're ignoring me", or equivalent agent-blame. Treat this reflect pass as FAIL. The class is *ignored named constraint*, not the swear word. Product-blame ("the UI is messed up") is not this class.
+- The reply conceded the user's suspicion — "your instinct was right", "your hunch was right", "good catch" followed by a correction. Conceding means the user found what the agent's own checks did not, so the miss is the finding, not the concession. Treat as FAIL; the `wrong-check-reflect` detector fires on these shapes.
 - The user had to keep iterating, restate requirements, or change product direction because the agent missed something already named. FAIL, then `automate-me`. A genuine mind-change (user learned new facts, then redirected) is not failure. A forced restatement of an already-named constraint is.
 - The same *type* of complaint appears in 2+ turns or 2+ sessions (repro-then-fix, UI proof before done, e2e before claiming pass, obey the named verb). That class is a bug. **Must** invoke `automate-me` — not optional, do not wait for the user to say "automate me." `token_audit.py`'s `intervention-must-automate` flag is the mechanical catch; human-message only, never tool_result / skill-injection / `/loop` polls.
 - It's been a while since the corpus-wide pass (`top_sessions.py` + this skill's lenses across the worst offenders) last ran. No fixed cadence and no cron — just periodically worth doing by hand.