diff --git a/proposals/0036-a-value-required-only-under-a-condition.md b/proposals/0036-a-value-required-only-under-a-condition.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..962e681
--- /dev/null
+++ b/proposals/0036-a-value-required-only-under-a-condition.md
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
+# A value required only under a condition
+
+- **Status:** draft
+- **Issue:** https://github.com/eclipse-dirigible/dirigible/issues/7094
+
+## The problem
+
+`required: true` says a value must always be there. Most business rules about a missing value are
+not like that: the value is needed for ONE way of handling the record and meaningless for the
+others.
+
+```yaml
+- name: SalesInvoice
+  fields:
+    - { name: sentMethod, type: integer }   # 1 = e-mail, 2 = post, 3 = handed over
+  relations:
+    - { name: Customer, kind: manyToOne, to: Customer, required: true }
+```
+
+An invoice sent by e-mail needs the customer's e-mail address. One sent by post does not, and one
+handed over needs neither. `required` on the customer's address would refuse every customer who is
+never e-mailed, so it cannot be declared there; `checks:` has `exactlyOne`, `itemsSumEqual` and
+`itemsMin`, none of which say it either. So nothing said it: an invoice with Sent Method = E-mail
+whose customer carried no address went through Send, reached status SENT, and the mail step logged a
+no-op for a recipient it did not have. Nothing was mailed, nothing was stamped on the record, and
+the clerk who pressed the button was told it had succeeded.
+
+The rule also has to bite where the value is finally NEEDED, not from the first draft. An invoice
+being typed does not yet have a sent method, and a rule that fires on every save would refuse the
+draft.
+
+The same shape recurs across a suite: a bank transfer needs the counterparty's IBAN, a customs
+declaration needs the consignee's tax number, a shipment by courier needs a delivery address, an
+electronically filed return needs the signer's certificate id.
+
+## The proposed shape
+
+A row-level kind naming the value, the condition it is required under, and optionally the status at
+which the condition is evaluated:
+
+```yaml
+- name: SalesInvoice
+  checks:
+    # the address lives on the related customer
+    - { kind: requiredWhen, field: Customer.email, when: "sentMethod == 1", status: SENT,
+        message: "Sent Method is E-mail but the customer has no e-mail address" }
+    # ...and a rule about the record's own field, from the first save
+    - { kind: requiredWhen, field: reference, when: "kind == 'export'",
+        message: "An export needs a reference" }
+```
+
+- `field:` is the value that must be present: a field of the record, or a one-hop
+  `Relation.field` over a to-one - the same path vocabulary a notification placeholder and a
+  register lookup use, including a relation whose target is owned by another model.
+- `when:` is the condition, one or more `<Property> ==|!= <literal>` comparisons over the record's
+  own properties. A list is an implicit AND.
+- `status:` is optional, and its presence is what decides WHEN the rule is evaluated.
+- `message:` is what the person who wrote the record is told.
+
+## Expected behaviour
+
+- **Without `status:`** the rule holds on every user write, like `exactlyOne`: the write is refused
+  with the authored message (400 over HTTP) on every surface the record can be written through.
+- **With `status:`** the rule is evaluated when the record is persisted carrying that status - the
+  transition that sends the document, not the drafting before it. The transition is refused with the
+  authored message, and the refusal reaches whoever performed it.
+- A value is "present" when it is neither absent nor blank. A record where the condition does not
+  hold is unaffected.
+- The value is read THROUGH the relation when the path names one: the related record is loaded and
+  the field read from it. A relation that is not set is an absent value, so the check fires - which
+  is the honest answer, since the value the rule is about cannot be reached.
+
+## Edge rules
+
+- A path may hop over at most one relation whose target is owned by another model, and it must be
+  the last hop: what a foreign record points at in turn is known only to the model that owns it.
+- The condition is read off the record itself - nothing is loaded to evaluate it - so every property
+  it names must be the record's own field or to-one relation.
+- The condition compares strings, integers, booleans and a to-one's key: the types an equality is
+  exact on. A decimal, a double or a date is refused rather than compared for equality, which is a
+  question nobody means to ask of them.
+- A literal that is not a value of the compared property's type is refused. So is a condition that
+  does not have the comparison shape at all: reading an uninterpretable condition as "always true"
+  would turn the entry into an unconditional `required` nobody authored, and reading it as "always
+  false" would switch the rule off - both silently.
+- A status may be named by its seeded name rather than its id, as everywhere else a status is
+  referenced. A `status:` gate requires the entity to have a status relation to read it from.
+- Several `requiredWhen` entries on one entity are independent and all hold.
+
+## Prior art / workarounds
+
+Two, both worse than the rule they stand in for:
+
+- A **hand-written step before the sending action** - a class that reads the record, a decision that
+  branches on its answer, a hold task the record parks on, a form for that task, and a label for it:
+  roughly fifteen declarative lines plus a class for one sentence of rule. It works, and it lands
+  the clerk on a hold task instead of a refusal on the button they pressed.
+- A **hand-written step after it**, which is worse: by then the document has been sent, and the
+  refusal has nowhere to go but a background failure nobody is watching.