Fix misleading codecov failures

[cspotcode]

Tweaks codecov configuration.

Project coverage is allowed to fall up to 1% and will still get the green checkmark.

Patch coverage has no requirements and will always succeed. I didn't feel like automatically-failing patch coverage was particularly useful. For example, if a patch changes 2 lines, and only one is covered, then patch coverage is 50%. This is IMO not necessarily a bad thing.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #1159 (4068edc) into master (f848983) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@ Coverage Diff @@## master #1159 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 79.60% 79.60% =======================================
Files 7 7 Lines 711 711 Branches 158 158 =======================================
Hits 566 566 Misses 89 89 Partials 56 56 

Flag	Coverage Δ
node_10	76.11% <ø> (ø)
node_12_15	76.46% <ø> (ø)
node_12_16	76.46% <ø> (ø)
node_13	78.90% <ø> (ø)
node_14	78.90% <ø> (ø)
node_14_13_0	78.05% <ø> (ø)
node_15	78.90% <ø> (ø)
typescript_2_7	78.90% <ø> (ø)
typescript_latest	78.05% <ø> (ø)
typescript_next	78.05% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu	78.76% <ø> (ø)
windows	78.90% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update f848983...4068edc. Read the comment docs.