PARQUET-415: Fix ByteBuffer Binary serialization. - #305
Conversation
|
+1, LGTM. Good to have testSerializable() for unit tests! So, @rdblue , should we have more committers review on this, or can we get this committed? Cheers. |
|
Thanks for reviewing, @proflin! We will need a committer to have a look as well, but it really helps to have more than one person review. Like we said in the sync-up today, we love it when non-committers help out with reviews because it makes everything go faster. |
|
Sure. I'm familiar with the parquet-format/parquet-mr code base, and I would love to review more PRs. Things are going fast these days :) BTW congratulations on your new journey at Netflix :-) |
|
+1 |
This also adds a test to validate that serialization works for all Binary objects that are already test cases.
65bdcf0 to
4e75d54
Compare
This also adds a test to validate that serialization works for all Binary objects that are already test cases. Author: Ryan Blue <blue@apache.org> Closes apache#305 from rdblue/PARQUET-415-fix-bytebuffer-binary-serialization and squashes the following commits: 4e75d54 [Ryan Blue] PARQUET-415: Fix ByteBuffer Binary serialization.
This also adds a test to validate that serialization works for all Binary objects that are already test cases. Author: Ryan Blue <blue@apache.org> Closes apache#305 from rdblue/PARQUET-415-fix-bytebuffer-binary-serialization and squashes the following commits: 4e75d54 [Ryan Blue] PARQUET-415: Fix ByteBuffer Binary serialization.
|
@rdblue
|
|
@jinxing64, this is fixed in 1.9.0. It could result in the trace you pasted, I think. I'm not sure if that's actually happening though. |
|
@rdblue |
This also adds a test to validate that serialization works for all
Binary objects that are already test cases.