Skip to content

[Flight] Fix hasReadable flag in Node.js clients' debug channel - #35039

Merged
unstubbable merged 1 commit into
react:mainfrom
unstubbable:fix-debug-channel-has-readable-flag-node-clients
Nov 4, 2025
Merged

[Flight] Fix hasReadable flag in Node.js clients' debug channel#35039
unstubbable merged 1 commit into
react:mainfrom
unstubbable:fix-debug-channel-has-readable-flag-node-clients

Conversation

@unstubbable

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

For Edge Flight servers, that use Web Streams, we're defining the debugChannel option as:

debugChannel?: {readable?: ReadableStream, writable?: WritableStream, ...}

Whereas for Node.js Flight servers, that use Node.js Streams, we're defining it as:

debugChannel?: Readable | Writable | Duplex | WebSocket

For the Edge Flight clients, there is currently only one direction of the debug channel supported, so we define the option as:

debugChannel?: {readable?: ReadableStream, ...}

Consequently, for the Node.js Flight clients, we define the option as:

debugChannel?: Readable

The presence of a readable debug channel is passed to the Flight client internally via the hasReadable flag on the internal debugChannel option. For the Node.js clients, that flag was accidentally derived from the public option debugChannel.readable, which is conceptually incorrect, because debugChannel is a Readable stream, not an options
object with a readable property. However, a Readable also has a readable property, which is a boolean that indicates whether the stream is in a readable state. This meant that the hasReadable flag was incidentally still set correctly. Regardless, this was confusing and unintentional, so we're now fixing it to always set hasReadable to true when a debugChannel is provided to the Node.js clients. We'll revisit this in case we ever add support for writable debug channels in Node.js (and Edge) clients.

For Edge Flight servers, that use Web Streams, we're defining the
`debugChannel` option as:
```
debugChannel?: {readable?: ReadableStream, writable?: WritableStream, ...}
```
Whereas for Node.js Flight servers, that use Node.js Streams, we're
defining it as:
```
debugChannel?: Readable | Writable | Duplex | WebSocket
```
For the Edge Flight clients, there is currently only one direction of
the debug channel supported, so we define the option as:
```
debugChannel?: {readable?: ReadableStream, ...}
```
Consequently, for the Node.js Flight clients, we define the option as:
```
debugChannel?: Readable
```
The presence of a readable debug channel is passed to the Flight client
internally via the `hasReadable` flag on the internal `debugChannel`
option. For the Node.js clients, that flag was accidentally derived from
the public option `debugChannel.readable`, which is conceptually
incorrect, because `debugChannel` is a `Readable` stream, not an options
object with a `readable` property. However, a `Readable` also has a
`readable` property, which is a boolean that indicates whether the
stream is in a readable state. This meant that the `hasReadable` flag
was incidentally still set correctly. Regardless, this was confusing and
unintentional, so we're now fixing it to always set `hasReadable` to
`true` when a `debugChannel` is provided to the Node.js clients. We'll
revisit this in case we ever add support for writable debug channels in
Node.js (and Edge) clients.
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added the React Core Team Opened by a member of the React Core Team label Nov 4, 2025
@react-sizebot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Comparing: edd05f1...1340a57

Critical size changes

Includes critical production bundles, as well as any change greater than 2%:

Name+/-BaseCurrent+/- gzipBase gzipCurrent gzip
oss-stable/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.production.js=6.68 kB6.68 kB+0.11%1.83 kB1.83 kB
oss-stable/react-dom/cjs/react-dom-client.production.js=606.23 kB606.23 kB=107.38 kB107.38 kB
oss-experimental/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.production.js=6.69 kB6.69 kB+0.11%1.83 kB1.83 kB
oss-experimental/react-dom/cjs/react-dom-client.production.js=665.20 kB665.20 kB=117.26 kB117.26 kB
facebook-www/ReactDOM-prod.classic.js=690.02 kB690.02 kB=121.46 kB121.46 kB
facebook-www/ReactDOM-prod.modern.js=680.45 kB680.45 kB=119.84 kB119.85 kB

Significant size changes

Includes any change greater than 0.2%:

(No significant changes)

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against 1340a57

@unstubbable
unstubbable merged commit f646e8f into react:mainNov 4, 2025
249 checks passed
@unstubbable
unstubbable deleted the fix-debug-channel-has-readable-flag-node-clients branch November 4, 2025 15:30
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CLA SignedReact Core TeamOpened by a member of the React Core Team

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@unstubbable@react-sizebot@sebmarkbage
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
[Flight] Fix `hasReadable` flag in Node.js clients' debug channel by unstubbable · Pull Request #35039 · react/react · GitHub
Skip to content

[Flight] Fix hasReadable flag in Node.js clients' debug channel - #35039

Merged
unstubbable merged 1 commit into
react:mainfrom
unstubbable:fix-debug-channel-has-readable-flag-node-clients
Nov 4, 2025
Merged

[Flight] Fix hasReadable flag in Node.js clients' debug channel#35039
unstubbable merged 1 commit into
react:mainfrom
unstubbable:fix-debug-channel-has-readable-flag-node-clients

Conversation

@unstubbable

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

For Edge Flight servers, that use Web Streams, we're defining the debugChannel option as:

debugChannel?: {readable?: ReadableStream, writable?: WritableStream, ...}

Whereas for Node.js Flight servers, that use Node.js Streams, we're defining it as:

debugChannel?: Readable | Writable | Duplex | WebSocket

For the Edge Flight clients, there is currently only one direction of the debug channel supported, so we define the option as:

debugChannel?: {readable?: ReadableStream, ...}

Consequently, for the Node.js Flight clients, we define the option as:

debugChannel?: Readable

The presence of a readable debug channel is passed to the Flight client internally via the hasReadable flag on the internal debugChannel option. For the Node.js clients, that flag was accidentally derived from the public option debugChannel.readable, which is conceptually incorrect, because debugChannel is a Readable stream, not an options
object with a readable property. However, a Readable also has a readable property, which is a boolean that indicates whether the stream is in a readable state. This meant that the hasReadable flag was incidentally still set correctly. Regardless, this was confusing and unintentional, so we're now fixing it to always set hasReadable to true when a debugChannel is provided to the Node.js clients. We'll revisit this in case we ever add support for writable debug channels in Node.js (and Edge) clients.

For Edge Flight servers, that use Web Streams, we're defining the
`debugChannel` option as:
```
debugChannel?: {readable?: ReadableStream, writable?: WritableStream, ...}
```
Whereas for Node.js Flight servers, that use Node.js Streams, we're
defining it as:
```
debugChannel?: Readable | Writable | Duplex | WebSocket
```
For the Edge Flight clients, there is currently only one direction of
the debug channel supported, so we define the option as:
```
debugChannel?: {readable?: ReadableStream, ...}
```
Consequently, for the Node.js Flight clients, we define the option as:
```
debugChannel?: Readable
```
The presence of a readable debug channel is passed to the Flight client
internally via the `hasReadable` flag on the internal `debugChannel`
option. For the Node.js clients, that flag was accidentally derived from
the public option `debugChannel.readable`, which is conceptually
incorrect, because `debugChannel` is a `Readable` stream, not an options
object with a `readable` property. However, a `Readable` also has a
`readable` property, which is a boolean that indicates whether the
stream is in a readable state. This meant that the `hasReadable` flag
was incidentally still set correctly. Regardless, this was confusing and
unintentional, so we're now fixing it to always set `hasReadable` to
`true` when a `debugChannel` is provided to the Node.js clients. We'll
revisit this in case we ever add support for writable debug channels in
Node.js (and Edge) clients.
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added the React Core Team Opened by a member of the React Core Team label Nov 4, 2025
@react-sizebot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Comparing: edd05f1...1340a57

Critical size changes

Includes critical production bundles, as well as any change greater than 2%:

Name+/-BaseCurrent+/- gzipBase gzipCurrent gzip
oss-stable/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.production.js=6.68 kB6.68 kB+0.11%1.83 kB1.83 kB
oss-stable/react-dom/cjs/react-dom-client.production.js=606.23 kB606.23 kB=107.38 kB107.38 kB
oss-experimental/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.production.js=6.69 kB6.69 kB+0.11%1.83 kB1.83 kB
oss-experimental/react-dom/cjs/react-dom-client.production.js=665.20 kB665.20 kB=117.26 kB117.26 kB
facebook-www/ReactDOM-prod.classic.js=690.02 kB690.02 kB=121.46 kB121.46 kB
facebook-www/ReactDOM-prod.modern.js=680.45 kB680.45 kB=119.84 kB119.85 kB

Significant size changes

Includes any change greater than 0.2%:

(No significant changes)

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against 1340a57

@unstubbable
unstubbable merged commit f646e8f into react:mainNov 4, 2025
249 checks passed
@unstubbable
unstubbable deleted the fix-debug-channel-has-readable-flag-node-clients branch November 4, 2025 15:30
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CLA SignedReact Core TeamOpened by a member of the React Core Team

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@unstubbable@react-sizebot@sebmarkbage
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' [Flight] Fix `hasReadable` flag in Node.js clients' debug channel by unstubbable · Pull Request #35039 · react/react · GitHub
Skip to content

[Flight] Fix hasReadable flag in Node.js clients' debug channel - #35039

Merged
unstubbable merged 1 commit into
react:mainfrom
unstubbable:fix-debug-channel-has-readable-flag-node-clients
Nov 4, 2025
Merged

[Flight] Fix hasReadable flag in Node.js clients' debug channel#35039
unstubbable merged 1 commit into
react:mainfrom
unstubbable:fix-debug-channel-has-readable-flag-node-clients

Conversation

@unstubbable

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

For Edge Flight servers, that use Web Streams, we're defining the debugChannel option as:

debugChannel?: {readable?: ReadableStream, writable?: WritableStream, ...}

Whereas for Node.js Flight servers, that use Node.js Streams, we're defining it as:

debugChannel?: Readable | Writable | Duplex | WebSocket

For the Edge Flight clients, there is currently only one direction of the debug channel supported, so we define the option as:

debugChannel?: {readable?: ReadableStream, ...}

Consequently, for the Node.js Flight clients, we define the option as:

debugChannel?: Readable

The presence of a readable debug channel is passed to the Flight client internally via the hasReadable flag on the internal debugChannel option. For the Node.js clients, that flag was accidentally derived from the public option debugChannel.readable, which is conceptually incorrect, because debugChannel is a Readable stream, not an options
object with a readable property. However, a Readable also has a readable property, which is a boolean that indicates whether the stream is in a readable state. This meant that the hasReadable flag was incidentally still set correctly. Regardless, this was confusing and unintentional, so we're now fixing it to always set hasReadable to true when a debugChannel is provided to the Node.js clients. We'll revisit this in case we ever add support for writable debug channels in Node.js (and Edge) clients.

For Edge Flight servers, that use Web Streams, we're defining the
`debugChannel` option as:
```
debugChannel?: {readable?: ReadableStream, writable?: WritableStream, ...}
```
Whereas for Node.js Flight servers, that use Node.js Streams, we're
defining it as:
```
debugChannel?: Readable | Writable | Duplex | WebSocket
```
For the Edge Flight clients, there is currently only one direction of
the debug channel supported, so we define the option as:
```
debugChannel?: {readable?: ReadableStream, ...}
```
Consequently, for the Node.js Flight clients, we define the option as:
```
debugChannel?: Readable
```
The presence of a readable debug channel is passed to the Flight client
internally via the `hasReadable` flag on the internal `debugChannel`
option. For the Node.js clients, that flag was accidentally derived from
the public option `debugChannel.readable`, which is conceptually
incorrect, because `debugChannel` is a `Readable` stream, not an options
object with a `readable` property. However, a `Readable` also has a
`readable` property, which is a boolean that indicates whether the
stream is in a readable state. This meant that the `hasReadable` flag
was incidentally still set correctly. Regardless, this was confusing and
unintentional, so we're now fixing it to always set `hasReadable` to
`true` when a `debugChannel` is provided to the Node.js clients. We'll
revisit this in case we ever add support for writable debug channels in
Node.js (and Edge) clients.
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added the React Core Team Opened by a member of the React Core Team label Nov 4, 2025
@react-sizebot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Comparing: edd05f1...1340a57

Critical size changes

Includes critical production bundles, as well as any change greater than 2%:

Name+/-BaseCurrent+/- gzipBase gzipCurrent gzip
oss-stable/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.production.js=6.68 kB6.68 kB+0.11%1.83 kB1.83 kB
oss-stable/react-dom/cjs/react-dom-client.production.js=606.23 kB606.23 kB=107.38 kB107.38 kB
oss-experimental/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.production.js=6.69 kB6.69 kB+0.11%1.83 kB1.83 kB
oss-experimental/react-dom/cjs/react-dom-client.production.js=665.20 kB665.20 kB=117.26 kB117.26 kB
facebook-www/ReactDOM-prod.classic.js=690.02 kB690.02 kB=121.46 kB121.46 kB
facebook-www/ReactDOM-prod.modern.js=680.45 kB680.45 kB=119.84 kB119.85 kB

Significant size changes

Includes any change greater than 0.2%:

(No significant changes)

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against 1340a57

@unstubbable
unstubbable merged commit f646e8f into react:mainNov 4, 2025
249 checks passed
@unstubbable
unstubbable deleted the fix-debug-channel-has-readable-flag-node-clients branch November 4, 2025 15:30
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CLA SignedReact Core TeamOpened by a member of the React Core Team

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@unstubbable@react-sizebot@sebmarkbage
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' [Flight] Fix `hasReadable` flag in Node.js clients' debug channel by unstubbable · Pull Request #35039 · react/react · GitHub
Skip to content

[Flight] Fix hasReadable flag in Node.js clients' debug channel - #35039

Merged
unstubbable merged 1 commit into
react:mainfrom
unstubbable:fix-debug-channel-has-readable-flag-node-clients
Nov 4, 2025
Merged

[Flight] Fix hasReadable flag in Node.js clients' debug channel#35039
unstubbable merged 1 commit into
react:mainfrom
unstubbable:fix-debug-channel-has-readable-flag-node-clients

Conversation

@unstubbable

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

For Edge Flight servers, that use Web Streams, we're defining the debugChannel option as:

debugChannel?: {readable?: ReadableStream, writable?: WritableStream, ...}

Whereas for Node.js Flight servers, that use Node.js Streams, we're defining it as:

debugChannel?: Readable | Writable | Duplex | WebSocket

For the Edge Flight clients, there is currently only one direction of the debug channel supported, so we define the option as:

debugChannel?: {readable?: ReadableStream, ...}

Consequently, for the Node.js Flight clients, we define the option as:

debugChannel?: Readable

The presence of a readable debug channel is passed to the Flight client internally via the hasReadable flag on the internal debugChannel option. For the Node.js clients, that flag was accidentally derived from the public option debugChannel.readable, which is conceptually incorrect, because debugChannel is a Readable stream, not an options
object with a readable property. However, a Readable also has a readable property, which is a boolean that indicates whether the stream is in a readable state. This meant that the hasReadable flag was incidentally still set correctly. Regardless, this was confusing and unintentional, so we're now fixing it to always set hasReadable to true when a debugChannel is provided to the Node.js clients. We'll revisit this in case we ever add support for writable debug channels in Node.js (and Edge) clients.

For Edge Flight servers, that use Web Streams, we're defining the
`debugChannel` option as:
```
debugChannel?: {readable?: ReadableStream, writable?: WritableStream, ...}
```
Whereas for Node.js Flight servers, that use Node.js Streams, we're
defining it as:
```
debugChannel?: Readable | Writable | Duplex | WebSocket
```
For the Edge Flight clients, there is currently only one direction of
the debug channel supported, so we define the option as:
```
debugChannel?: {readable?: ReadableStream, ...}
```
Consequently, for the Node.js Flight clients, we define the option as:
```
debugChannel?: Readable
```
The presence of a readable debug channel is passed to the Flight client
internally via the `hasReadable` flag on the internal `debugChannel`
option. For the Node.js clients, that flag was accidentally derived from
the public option `debugChannel.readable`, which is conceptually
incorrect, because `debugChannel` is a `Readable` stream, not an options
object with a `readable` property. However, a `Readable` also has a
`readable` property, which is a boolean that indicates whether the
stream is in a readable state. This meant that the `hasReadable` flag
was incidentally still set correctly. Regardless, this was confusing and
unintentional, so we're now fixing it to always set `hasReadable` to
`true` when a `debugChannel` is provided to the Node.js clients. We'll
revisit this in case we ever add support for writable debug channels in
Node.js (and Edge) clients.
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added the React Core Team Opened by a member of the React Core Team label Nov 4, 2025
@react-sizebot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Comparing: edd05f1...1340a57

Critical size changes

Includes critical production bundles, as well as any change greater than 2%:

Name+/-BaseCurrent+/- gzipBase gzipCurrent gzip
oss-stable/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.production.js=6.68 kB6.68 kB+0.11%1.83 kB1.83 kB
oss-stable/react-dom/cjs/react-dom-client.production.js=606.23 kB606.23 kB=107.38 kB107.38 kB
oss-experimental/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.production.js=6.69 kB6.69 kB+0.11%1.83 kB1.83 kB
oss-experimental/react-dom/cjs/react-dom-client.production.js=665.20 kB665.20 kB=117.26 kB117.26 kB
facebook-www/ReactDOM-prod.classic.js=690.02 kB690.02 kB=121.46 kB121.46 kB
facebook-www/ReactDOM-prod.modern.js=680.45 kB680.45 kB=119.84 kB119.85 kB

Significant size changes

Includes any change greater than 0.2%:

(No significant changes)

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against 1340a57

@unstubbable
unstubbable merged commit f646e8f into react:mainNov 4, 2025
249 checks passed
@unstubbable
unstubbable deleted the fix-debug-channel-has-readable-flag-node-clients branch November 4, 2025 15:30
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CLA SignedReact Core TeamOpened by a member of the React Core Team

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@unstubbable@react-sizebot@sebmarkbage
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' [Flight] Fix `hasReadable` flag in Node.js clients' debug channel by unstubbable · Pull Request #35039 · react/react · GitHub
Skip to content

[Flight] Fix hasReadable flag in Node.js clients' debug channel - #35039

Merged
unstubbable merged 1 commit into
react:mainfrom
unstubbable:fix-debug-channel-has-readable-flag-node-clients
Nov 4, 2025
Merged

[Flight] Fix hasReadable flag in Node.js clients' debug channel#35039
unstubbable merged 1 commit into
react:mainfrom
unstubbable:fix-debug-channel-has-readable-flag-node-clients

Conversation

@unstubbable

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

For Edge Flight servers, that use Web Streams, we're defining the debugChannel option as:

debugChannel?: {readable?: ReadableStream, writable?: WritableStream, ...}

Whereas for Node.js Flight servers, that use Node.js Streams, we're defining it as:

debugChannel?: Readable | Writable | Duplex | WebSocket

For the Edge Flight clients, there is currently only one direction of the debug channel supported, so we define the option as:

debugChannel?: {readable?: ReadableStream, ...}

Consequently, for the Node.js Flight clients, we define the option as:

debugChannel?: Readable

The presence of a readable debug channel is passed to the Flight client internally via the hasReadable flag on the internal debugChannel option. For the Node.js clients, that flag was accidentally derived from the public option debugChannel.readable, which is conceptually incorrect, because debugChannel is a Readable stream, not an options
object with a readable property. However, a Readable also has a readable property, which is a boolean that indicates whether the stream is in a readable state. This meant that the hasReadable flag was incidentally still set correctly. Regardless, this was confusing and unintentional, so we're now fixing it to always set hasReadable to true when a debugChannel is provided to the Node.js clients. We'll revisit this in case we ever add support for writable debug channels in Node.js (and Edge) clients.

For Edge Flight servers, that use Web Streams, we're defining the
`debugChannel` option as:
```
debugChannel?: {readable?: ReadableStream, writable?: WritableStream, ...}
```
Whereas for Node.js Flight servers, that use Node.js Streams, we're
defining it as:
```
debugChannel?: Readable | Writable | Duplex | WebSocket
```
For the Edge Flight clients, there is currently only one direction of
the debug channel supported, so we define the option as:
```
debugChannel?: {readable?: ReadableStream, ...}
```
Consequently, for the Node.js Flight clients, we define the option as:
```
debugChannel?: Readable
```
The presence of a readable debug channel is passed to the Flight client
internally via the `hasReadable` flag on the internal `debugChannel`
option. For the Node.js clients, that flag was accidentally derived from
the public option `debugChannel.readable`, which is conceptually
incorrect, because `debugChannel` is a `Readable` stream, not an options
object with a `readable` property. However, a `Readable` also has a
`readable` property, which is a boolean that indicates whether the
stream is in a readable state. This meant that the `hasReadable` flag
was incidentally still set correctly. Regardless, this was confusing and
unintentional, so we're now fixing it to always set `hasReadable` to
`true` when a `debugChannel` is provided to the Node.js clients. We'll
revisit this in case we ever add support for writable debug channels in
Node.js (and Edge) clients.
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added the React Core Team Opened by a member of the React Core Team label Nov 4, 2025
@react-sizebot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Comparing: edd05f1...1340a57

Critical size changes

Includes critical production bundles, as well as any change greater than 2%:

Name+/-BaseCurrent+/- gzipBase gzipCurrent gzip
oss-stable/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.production.js=6.68 kB6.68 kB+0.11%1.83 kB1.83 kB
oss-stable/react-dom/cjs/react-dom-client.production.js=606.23 kB606.23 kB=107.38 kB107.38 kB
oss-experimental/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.production.js=6.69 kB6.69 kB+0.11%1.83 kB1.83 kB
oss-experimental/react-dom/cjs/react-dom-client.production.js=665.20 kB665.20 kB=117.26 kB117.26 kB
facebook-www/ReactDOM-prod.classic.js=690.02 kB690.02 kB=121.46 kB121.46 kB
facebook-www/ReactDOM-prod.modern.js=680.45 kB680.45 kB=119.84 kB119.85 kB

Significant size changes

Includes any change greater than 0.2%:

(No significant changes)

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against 1340a57

@unstubbable
unstubbable merged commit f646e8f into react:mainNov 4, 2025
249 checks passed
@unstubbable
unstubbable deleted the fix-debug-channel-has-readable-flag-node-clients branch November 4, 2025 15:30
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CLA SignedReact Core TeamOpened by a member of the React Core Team

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@unstubbable@react-sizebot@sebmarkbage
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' [Flight] Fix `hasReadable` flag in Node.js clients' debug channel by unstubbable · Pull Request #35039 · react/react · GitHub
Skip to content

[Flight] Fix hasReadable flag in Node.js clients' debug channel - #35039

Merged
unstubbable merged 1 commit into
react:mainfrom
unstubbable:fix-debug-channel-has-readable-flag-node-clients
Nov 4, 2025
Merged

[Flight] Fix hasReadable flag in Node.js clients' debug channel#35039
unstubbable merged 1 commit into
react:mainfrom
unstubbable:fix-debug-channel-has-readable-flag-node-clients

Conversation

@unstubbable

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

For Edge Flight servers, that use Web Streams, we're defining the debugChannel option as:

debugChannel?: {readable?: ReadableStream, writable?: WritableStream, ...}

Whereas for Node.js Flight servers, that use Node.js Streams, we're defining it as:

debugChannel?: Readable | Writable | Duplex | WebSocket

For the Edge Flight clients, there is currently only one direction of the debug channel supported, so we define the option as:

debugChannel?: {readable?: ReadableStream, ...}

Consequently, for the Node.js Flight clients, we define the option as:

debugChannel?: Readable

The presence of a readable debug channel is passed to the Flight client internally via the hasReadable flag on the internal debugChannel option. For the Node.js clients, that flag was accidentally derived from the public option debugChannel.readable, which is conceptually incorrect, because debugChannel is a Readable stream, not an options
object with a readable property. However, a Readable also has a readable property, which is a boolean that indicates whether the stream is in a readable state. This meant that the hasReadable flag was incidentally still set correctly. Regardless, this was confusing and unintentional, so we're now fixing it to always set hasReadable to true when a debugChannel is provided to the Node.js clients. We'll revisit this in case we ever add support for writable debug channels in Node.js (and Edge) clients.

For Edge Flight servers, that use Web Streams, we're defining the
`debugChannel` option as:
```
debugChannel?: {readable?: ReadableStream, writable?: WritableStream, ...}
```
Whereas for Node.js Flight servers, that use Node.js Streams, we're
defining it as:
```
debugChannel?: Readable | Writable | Duplex | WebSocket
```
For the Edge Flight clients, there is currently only one direction of
the debug channel supported, so we define the option as:
```
debugChannel?: {readable?: ReadableStream, ...}
```
Consequently, for the Node.js Flight clients, we define the option as:
```
debugChannel?: Readable
```
The presence of a readable debug channel is passed to the Flight client
internally via the `hasReadable` flag on the internal `debugChannel`
option. For the Node.js clients, that flag was accidentally derived from
the public option `debugChannel.readable`, which is conceptually
incorrect, because `debugChannel` is a `Readable` stream, not an options
object with a `readable` property. However, a `Readable` also has a
`readable` property, which is a boolean that indicates whether the
stream is in a readable state. This meant that the `hasReadable` flag
was incidentally still set correctly. Regardless, this was confusing and
unintentional, so we're now fixing it to always set `hasReadable` to
`true` when a `debugChannel` is provided to the Node.js clients. We'll
revisit this in case we ever add support for writable debug channels in
Node.js (and Edge) clients.
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added the React Core Team Opened by a member of the React Core Team label Nov 4, 2025
@react-sizebot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Comparing: edd05f1...1340a57

Critical size changes

Includes critical production bundles, as well as any change greater than 2%:

Name+/-BaseCurrent+/- gzipBase gzipCurrent gzip
oss-stable/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.production.js=6.68 kB6.68 kB+0.11%1.83 kB1.83 kB
oss-stable/react-dom/cjs/react-dom-client.production.js=606.23 kB606.23 kB=107.38 kB107.38 kB
oss-experimental/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.production.js=6.69 kB6.69 kB+0.11%1.83 kB1.83 kB
oss-experimental/react-dom/cjs/react-dom-client.production.js=665.20 kB665.20 kB=117.26 kB117.26 kB
facebook-www/ReactDOM-prod.classic.js=690.02 kB690.02 kB=121.46 kB121.46 kB
facebook-www/ReactDOM-prod.modern.js=680.45 kB680.45 kB=119.84 kB119.85 kB

Significant size changes

Includes any change greater than 0.2%:

(No significant changes)

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against 1340a57

@unstubbable
unstubbable merged commit f646e8f into react:mainNov 4, 2025
249 checks passed
@unstubbable
unstubbable deleted the fix-debug-channel-has-readable-flag-node-clients branch November 4, 2025 15:30
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CLA SignedReact Core TeamOpened by a member of the React Core Team

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@unstubbable@react-sizebot@sebmarkbage
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' [Flight] Fix `hasReadable` flag in Node.js clients' debug channel by unstubbable · Pull Request #35039 · react/react · GitHub
Skip to content

[Flight] Fix hasReadable flag in Node.js clients' debug channel - #35039

Merged
unstubbable merged 1 commit into
react:mainfrom
unstubbable:fix-debug-channel-has-readable-flag-node-clients
Nov 4, 2025
Merged

[Flight] Fix hasReadable flag in Node.js clients' debug channel#35039
unstubbable merged 1 commit into
react:mainfrom
unstubbable:fix-debug-channel-has-readable-flag-node-clients

Conversation

@unstubbable

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

For Edge Flight servers, that use Web Streams, we're defining the debugChannel option as:

debugChannel?: {readable?: ReadableStream, writable?: WritableStream, ...}

Whereas for Node.js Flight servers, that use Node.js Streams, we're defining it as:

debugChannel?: Readable | Writable | Duplex | WebSocket

For the Edge Flight clients, there is currently only one direction of the debug channel supported, so we define the option as:

debugChannel?: {readable?: ReadableStream, ...}

Consequently, for the Node.js Flight clients, we define the option as:

debugChannel?: Readable

The presence of a readable debug channel is passed to the Flight client internally via the hasReadable flag on the internal debugChannel option. For the Node.js clients, that flag was accidentally derived from the public option debugChannel.readable, which is conceptually incorrect, because debugChannel is a Readable stream, not an options
object with a readable property. However, a Readable also has a readable property, which is a boolean that indicates whether the stream is in a readable state. This meant that the hasReadable flag was incidentally still set correctly. Regardless, this was confusing and unintentional, so we're now fixing it to always set hasReadable to true when a debugChannel is provided to the Node.js clients. We'll revisit this in case we ever add support for writable debug channels in Node.js (and Edge) clients.

For Edge Flight servers, that use Web Streams, we're defining the
`debugChannel` option as:
```
debugChannel?: {readable?: ReadableStream, writable?: WritableStream, ...}
```
Whereas for Node.js Flight servers, that use Node.js Streams, we're
defining it as:
```
debugChannel?: Readable | Writable | Duplex | WebSocket
```
For the Edge Flight clients, there is currently only one direction of
the debug channel supported, so we define the option as:
```
debugChannel?: {readable?: ReadableStream, ...}
```
Consequently, for the Node.js Flight clients, we define the option as:
```
debugChannel?: Readable
```
The presence of a readable debug channel is passed to the Flight client
internally via the `hasReadable` flag on the internal `debugChannel`
option. For the Node.js clients, that flag was accidentally derived from
the public option `debugChannel.readable`, which is conceptually
incorrect, because `debugChannel` is a `Readable` stream, not an options
object with a `readable` property. However, a `Readable` also has a
`readable` property, which is a boolean that indicates whether the
stream is in a readable state. This meant that the `hasReadable` flag
was incidentally still set correctly. Regardless, this was confusing and
unintentional, so we're now fixing it to always set `hasReadable` to
`true` when a `debugChannel` is provided to the Node.js clients. We'll
revisit this in case we ever add support for writable debug channels in
Node.js (and Edge) clients.
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added the React Core Team Opened by a member of the React Core Team label Nov 4, 2025
@react-sizebot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Comparing: edd05f1...1340a57

Critical size changes

Includes critical production bundles, as well as any change greater than 2%:

Name+/-BaseCurrent+/- gzipBase gzipCurrent gzip
oss-stable/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.production.js=6.68 kB6.68 kB+0.11%1.83 kB1.83 kB
oss-stable/react-dom/cjs/react-dom-client.production.js=606.23 kB606.23 kB=107.38 kB107.38 kB
oss-experimental/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.production.js=6.69 kB6.69 kB+0.11%1.83 kB1.83 kB
oss-experimental/react-dom/cjs/react-dom-client.production.js=665.20 kB665.20 kB=117.26 kB117.26 kB
facebook-www/ReactDOM-prod.classic.js=690.02 kB690.02 kB=121.46 kB121.46 kB
facebook-www/ReactDOM-prod.modern.js=680.45 kB680.45 kB=119.84 kB119.85 kB

Significant size changes

Includes any change greater than 0.2%:

(No significant changes)

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against 1340a57

@unstubbable
unstubbable merged commit f646e8f into react:mainNov 4, 2025
249 checks passed
@unstubbable
unstubbable deleted the fix-debug-channel-has-readable-flag-node-clients branch November 4, 2025 15:30
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CLA SignedReact Core TeamOpened by a member of the React Core Team

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@unstubbable@react-sizebot@sebmarkbage
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })(); [Flight] Fix `hasReadable` flag in Node.js clients' debug channel by unstubbable · Pull Request #35039 · react/react · GitHub
Skip to content

[Flight] Fix hasReadable flag in Node.js clients' debug channel - #35039

Merged
unstubbable merged 1 commit into
react:mainfrom
unstubbable:fix-debug-channel-has-readable-flag-node-clients
Nov 4, 2025
Merged

[Flight] Fix hasReadable flag in Node.js clients' debug channel#35039
unstubbable merged 1 commit into
react:mainfrom
unstubbable:fix-debug-channel-has-readable-flag-node-clients

Conversation

@unstubbable

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

For Edge Flight servers, that use Web Streams, we're defining the debugChannel option as:

debugChannel?: {readable?: ReadableStream, writable?: WritableStream, ...}

Whereas for Node.js Flight servers, that use Node.js Streams, we're defining it as:

debugChannel?: Readable | Writable | Duplex | WebSocket

For the Edge Flight clients, there is currently only one direction of the debug channel supported, so we define the option as:

debugChannel?: {readable?: ReadableStream, ...}

Consequently, for the Node.js Flight clients, we define the option as:

debugChannel?: Readable

The presence of a readable debug channel is passed to the Flight client internally via the hasReadable flag on the internal debugChannel option. For the Node.js clients, that flag was accidentally derived from the public option debugChannel.readable, which is conceptually incorrect, because debugChannel is a Readable stream, not an options
object with a readable property. However, a Readable also has a readable property, which is a boolean that indicates whether the stream is in a readable state. This meant that the hasReadable flag was incidentally still set correctly. Regardless, this was confusing and unintentional, so we're now fixing it to always set hasReadable to true when a debugChannel is provided to the Node.js clients. We'll revisit this in case we ever add support for writable debug channels in Node.js (and Edge) clients.

For Edge Flight servers, that use Web Streams, we're defining the
`debugChannel` option as:
```
debugChannel?: {readable?: ReadableStream, writable?: WritableStream, ...}
```
Whereas for Node.js Flight servers, that use Node.js Streams, we're
defining it as:
```
debugChannel?: Readable | Writable | Duplex | WebSocket
```
For the Edge Flight clients, there is currently only one direction of
the debug channel supported, so we define the option as:
```
debugChannel?: {readable?: ReadableStream, ...}
```
Consequently, for the Node.js Flight clients, we define the option as:
```
debugChannel?: Readable
```
The presence of a readable debug channel is passed to the Flight client
internally via the `hasReadable` flag on the internal `debugChannel`
option. For the Node.js clients, that flag was accidentally derived from
the public option `debugChannel.readable`, which is conceptually
incorrect, because `debugChannel` is a `Readable` stream, not an options
object with a `readable` property. However, a `Readable` also has a
`readable` property, which is a boolean that indicates whether the
stream is in a readable state. This meant that the `hasReadable` flag
was incidentally still set correctly. Regardless, this was confusing and
unintentional, so we're now fixing it to always set `hasReadable` to
`true` when a `debugChannel` is provided to the Node.js clients. We'll
revisit this in case we ever add support for writable debug channels in
Node.js (and Edge) clients.
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added the React Core Team Opened by a member of the React Core Team label Nov 4, 2025
@react-sizebot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Comparing: edd05f1...1340a57

Critical size changes

Includes critical production bundles, as well as any change greater than 2%:

Name+/-BaseCurrent+/- gzipBase gzipCurrent gzip
oss-stable/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.production.js=6.68 kB6.68 kB+0.11%1.83 kB1.83 kB
oss-stable/react-dom/cjs/react-dom-client.production.js=606.23 kB606.23 kB=107.38 kB107.38 kB
oss-experimental/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.production.js=6.69 kB6.69 kB+0.11%1.83 kB1.83 kB
oss-experimental/react-dom/cjs/react-dom-client.production.js=665.20 kB665.20 kB=117.26 kB117.26 kB
facebook-www/ReactDOM-prod.classic.js=690.02 kB690.02 kB=121.46 kB121.46 kB
facebook-www/ReactDOM-prod.modern.js=680.45 kB680.45 kB=119.84 kB119.85 kB

Significant size changes

Includes any change greater than 0.2%:

(No significant changes)

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against 1340a57

@unstubbable
unstubbable merged commit f646e8f into react:mainNov 4, 2025
249 checks passed
@unstubbable
unstubbable deleted the fix-debug-channel-has-readable-flag-node-clients branch November 4, 2025 15:30
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CLA SignedReact Core TeamOpened by a member of the React Core Team

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@unstubbable@react-sizebot@sebmarkbage