[Flight] Fix debug channel flag in Node.js server renderToPipeableStream - #35724

Merged
unstubbable merged 1 commit into
react:mainfrom
feedthejim:fix-debug-channel-readable-flag
Feb 8, 2026
Merged

[Flight] Fix debug channel flag in Node.js server renderToPipeableStream#35724
unstubbable merged 1 commit into
react:mainfrom
feedthejim:fix-debug-channel-readable-flag

Conversation

@feedthejim

@feedthejimfeedthejim commented Feb 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Fixes the createRequest call in renderToPipeableStream to pass debugChannelReadable !== undefined instead of debugChannel !== undefined in the turbopack, esm, and parcel Node.js server implementations
  • The webpack version already had the correct check; this brings the other bundler implementations in line

The bug was introduced in #33754. With debugChannel !== undefined, the server could signal that debug info should be emitted even when only a write-only debug channel is provided (no readable side), potentially causing the client to block forever waiting for debug data that never arrives.

Test plan

  • Existing Flight tests continue to pass
  • Verify the fix matches the webpack implementation at packages/react-server-dom-webpack/src/server/ReactFlightDOMServerNode.js:196

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

@feedthejim@claude
[Flight] Fix debug channel flag in Node.js server renderToPipeableStream
9c5d311
The `createRequest` call in `renderToPipeableStream` was passing
`debugChannel !== undefined` instead of `debugChannelReadable !== undefined`
in the turbopack, esm, and parcel server implementations. The webpack
version already had the correct check.
This could cause the server to emit debug info even when only a write-only
debug channel is provided with no readable side, potentially causing the
client to block forever waiting for debug data.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@react-sizebot

react-sizebot commented Feb 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Comparing: 65db100...9c5d311

Critical size changes

Includes critical production bundles, as well as any change greater than 2%:

Name+/-BaseCurrent+/- gzipBase gzipCurrent gzip
oss-stable/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.production.js=6.84 kB6.84 kB=1.88 kB1.88 kB
oss-stable/react-dom/cjs/react-dom-client.production.js=610.35 kB610.35 kB=107.89 kB107.89 kB
oss-experimental/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.production.js=6.84 kB6.84 kB=1.88 kB1.88 kB
oss-experimental/react-dom/cjs/react-dom-client.production.js=676.28 kB676.28 kB=118.85 kB118.85 kB
facebook-www/ReactDOM-prod.classic.js=696.77 kB696.77 kB=122.49 kB122.49 kB
facebook-www/ReactDOM-prod.modern.js=687.15 kB687.15 kB=120.89 kB120.89 kB

Significant size changes

Includes any change greater than 0.2%:

(No significant changes)

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against 9c5d311

@feedthejim
feedthejim marked this pull request as draft February 8, 2026 18:34
@unstubbable
unstubbable marked this pull request as ready for review February 8, 2026 19:13
@unstubbable
unstubbable merged commit 2dd9b7c into react:mainFeb 8, 2026
243 checks passed
@nextjs-botnextjs-bot mentioned this pull request Feb 8, 2026
Merged
unstubbable pushed a commit to vercel/next.js that referenced this pull request Feb 8, 2026
@nextjs-bot
Upgrade React from95ffd6cd-20260205to2dd9b7cf-20260208(#89681)
ec38eb3
[diff
react/react@95ffd6cd...2dd9b7cf](react/react@95ffd6c...2dd9b7c)
<details>
<summary>React upstream changes</summary>
- react/react#35724
- react/react#35711
- react/react#35710
- react/react#35708
- react/react#35705
- react/react#35700
</details>
github-actionsBot pushed a commit to anatolyshipov/react that referenced this pull request Feb 9, 2026
@anatolyshipov
[Flight] Fix debug channel flag in Node.js server renderToPipeableStr…
bfdd10f
…eam (react#35724)
## Summary
- Fixes the `createRequest` call in `renderToPipeableStream` to pass
`debugChannelReadable !== undefined` instead of `debugChannel !==
undefined` in the turbopack, esm, and parcel Node.js server
implementations
- The webpack version already had the correct check; this brings the
other bundler implementations in line
The bug was introduced in react#33754. With `debugChannel !== undefined`, the
server could signal that debug info should be emitted even when only a
write-only debug channel is provided (no readable side), potentially
causing the client to block forever waiting for debug data that never
arrives.
DiffTrain build for [2dd9b7c](react@2dd9b7c)
github-actionsBot pushed a commit to anatolyshipov/react that referenced this pull request Feb 9, 2026
@anatolyshipov
[Flight] Fix debug channel flag in Node.js server renderToPipeableStr…
00d31ca
…eam (react#35724)
## Summary
- Fixes the `createRequest` call in `renderToPipeableStream` to pass
`debugChannelReadable !== undefined` instead of `debugChannel !==
undefined` in the turbopack, esm, and parcel Node.js server
implementations
- The webpack version already had the correct check; this brings the
other bundler implementations in line
The bug was introduced in react#33754. With `debugChannel !== undefined`, the
server could signal that debug info should be emitted even when only a
write-only debug channel is provided (no readable side), potentially
causing the client to block forever waiting for debug data that never
arrives.
DiffTrain build for [2dd9b7c](react@2dd9b7c)
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot mentioned this pull request Feb 10, 2026
Open
@rubennorterubennorte mentioned this pull request Jun 5, 2026
Closed
m-kawafuji pushed a commit to m-kawafuji/next.js that referenced this pull request Aug 8, 2026
@nextjs-bot@m-kawafuji
Upgrade React from95ffd6cd-20260205to2dd9b7cf-20260208(vercel…
7e572f5
…#89681)
[diff
react/react@95ffd6cd...2dd9b7cf](react/react@95ffd6c...2dd9b7c)
<details>
<summary>React upstream changes</summary>
- react/react#35724
- react/react#35711
- react/react#35710
- react/react#35708
- react/react#35705
- react/react#35700
</details>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@unstubbableunstubbableunstubbable approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

CLA Signed

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@feedthejim@react-sizebot@unstubbable
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all 
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '

Skip to content
[Flight] Fix debug channel flag in Node.js server renderToPipeableStream - #35724
Merged
unstubbable merged 1 commit into
react:mainfrom 
feedthejim:fix-debug-channel-readable-flag
Feb 8, 2026
Merged
[Flight] Fix debug channel flag in Node.js server renderToPipeableStream#35724
unstubbable merged 1 commit into
react:mainfrom 
feedthejim:fix-debug-channel-readable-flag
Conversation
@feedthejim
@feedthejimfeedthejim
commented
Feb 8, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Summary
  • Fixes the createRequest call in renderToPipeableStream to pass debugChannelReadable !== undefined instead of debugChannel !== undefined in the turbopack, esm, and parcel Node.js server implementations
  • The webpack version already had the correct check; this brings the other bundler implementations in line
The bug was introduced in #33754. With debugChannel !== undefined, the server could signal that debug info should be emitted even when only a write-only debug channel is provided (no readable side), potentially causing the client to block forever waiting for debug data that never arrives.
Test plan
  •  Existing Flight tests continue to pass
  •  Verify the fix matches the webpack implementation at packages/react-server-dom-webpack/src/server/ReactFlightDOMServerNode.js:196
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
@feedthejim@claude
[Flight] Fix debug channel flag in Node.js server renderToPipeableStream
9c5d311
The `createRequest` call in `renderToPipeableStream` was passing
`debugChannel !== undefined` instead of `debugChannelReadable !== undefined`
in the turbopack, esm, and parcel server implementations. The webpack
version already had the correct check.
This could cause the server to emit debug info even when only a write-only
debug channel is provided with no readable side, potentially causing the
client to block forever waiting for debug data.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@react-sizebot
react-sizebot
commented
Feb 8, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Comparing: 65db100...9c5d311
Critical size changes
Includes critical production bundles, as well as any change greater than 2%:
Name+/-BaseCurrent+/- gzipBase gzipCurrent gzip
oss-stable/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.production.js=6.84 kB6.84 kB=1.88 kB1.88 kB
oss-stable/react-dom/cjs/react-dom-client.production.js=610.35 kB610.35 kB=107.89 kB107.89 kB
oss-experimental/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.production.js=6.84 kB6.84 kB=1.88 kB1.88 kB
oss-experimental/react-dom/cjs/react-dom-client.production.js=676.28 kB676.28 kB=118.85 kB118.85 kB
facebook-www/ReactDOM-prod.classic.js=696.77 kB696.77 kB=122.49 kB122.49 kB
facebook-www/ReactDOM-prod.modern.js=687.15 kB687.15 kB=120.89 kB120.89 kB
Significant size changes
Includes any change greater than 0.2%:
(No significant changes)

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against 9c5d311
@feedthejim
feedthejim
marked this pull request as draft
February 8, 2026 18:34
@unstubbable
unstubbable
marked this pull request as ready for review
February 8, 2026 19:13
@unstubbable
unstubbable
merged commit 2dd9b7c
into
react:mainFeb 8, 2026

243 checks passed

@nextjs-botnextjs-bot
mentioned this pull request
Feb 8, 2026
 Merged

unstubbable pushed a commit
to vercel/next.js
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 8, 2026
@nextjs-bot
Upgrade React from95ffd6cd-20260205to2dd9b7cf-20260208(#89681)
ec38eb3
[diff
react/react@95ffd6cd...2dd9b7cf](react/react@95ffd6c...2dd9b7c)
<details>
<summary>React upstream changes</summary>
- react/react#35724
- react/react#35711
- react/react#35710
- react/react#35708
- react/react#35705
- react/react#35700
</details>
github-actionsBot
pushed a commit
to anatolyshipov/react
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 9, 2026
@anatolyshipov
[Flight] Fix debug channel flag in Node.js server renderToPipeableStr…
bfdd10f
…eam (react#35724)
## Summary
- Fixes the `createRequest` call in `renderToPipeableStream` to pass
`debugChannelReadable !== undefined` instead of `debugChannel !==
undefined` in the turbopack, esm, and parcel Node.js server
implementations
- The webpack version already had the correct check; this brings the
other bundler implementations in line
The bug was introduced in react#33754. With `debugChannel !== undefined`, the
server could signal that debug info should be emitted even when only a
write-only debug channel is provided (no readable side), potentially
causing the client to block forever waiting for debug data that never
arrives.
DiffTrain build for [2dd9b7c](react@2dd9b7c)
github-actionsBot
pushed a commit
to anatolyshipov/react
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 9, 2026
@anatolyshipov
[Flight] Fix debug channel flag in Node.js server renderToPipeableStr…
00d31ca
…eam (react#35724)
## Summary
- Fixes the `createRequest` call in `renderToPipeableStream` to pass
`debugChannelReadable !== undefined` instead of `debugChannel !==
undefined` in the turbopack, esm, and parcel Node.js server
implementations
- The webpack version already had the correct check; this brings the
other bundler implementations in line
The bug was introduced in react#33754. With `debugChannel !== undefined`, the
server could signal that debug info should be emitted even when only a
write-only debug channel is provided (no readable side), potentially
causing the client to block forever waiting for debug data that never
arrives.
DiffTrain build for [2dd9b7c](react@2dd9b7c)
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot
mentioned this pull request
Feb 10, 2026

Open

@rubennorterubennorte
mentioned this pull request
Jun 5, 2026
 Closed

m-kawafuji pushed a commit
to m-kawafuji/next.js
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 8, 2026
@nextjs-bot@m-kawafuji
Upgrade React from95ffd6cd-20260205to2dd9b7cf-20260208(vercel…
7e572f5
…#89681)
[diff
react/react@95ffd6cd...2dd9b7cf](react/react@95ffd6c...2dd9b7c)
<details>
<summary>React upstream changes</summary>
- react/react#35724
- react/react#35711
- react/react#35710
- react/react#35708
- react/react#35705
- react/react#35700
</details>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@unstubbableunstubbableunstubbable approved these changes

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

CLA Signed

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@feedthejim@react-sizebot@unstubbable

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode
(function() {
var style = document.createElement('style');
style.textContent = '
.markdown-body {
color-scheme: dark light;
}
.markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }
.markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }
.markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }
.markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }
.markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }
.markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }
';
document.head.appendChild(style);
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
[Flight] Fix debug channel flag in Node.js server renderToPipeableStream - #35724
Merged
unstubbable merged 1 commit into
react:mainfrom 
feedthejim:fix-debug-channel-readable-flag
Feb 8, 2026
Merged
[Flight] Fix debug channel flag in Node.js server renderToPipeableStream#35724
unstubbable merged 1 commit into
react:mainfrom 
feedthejim:fix-debug-channel-readable-flag
Conversation
@feedthejim
@feedthejimfeedthejim
commented
Feb 8, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Summary
  • Fixes the createRequest call in renderToPipeableStream to pass debugChannelReadable !== undefined instead of debugChannel !== undefined in the turbopack, esm, and parcel Node.js server implementations
  • The webpack version already had the correct check; this brings the other bundler implementations in line
The bug was introduced in #33754. With debugChannel !== undefined, the server could signal that debug info should be emitted even when only a write-only debug channel is provided (no readable side), potentially causing the client to block forever waiting for debug data that never arrives.
Test plan
  •  Existing Flight tests continue to pass
  •  Verify the fix matches the webpack implementation at packages/react-server-dom-webpack/src/server/ReactFlightDOMServerNode.js:196
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
@feedthejim@claude
[Flight] Fix debug channel flag in Node.js server renderToPipeableStream
9c5d311
The `createRequest` call in `renderToPipeableStream` was passing
`debugChannel !== undefined` instead of `debugChannelReadable !== undefined`
in the turbopack, esm, and parcel server implementations. The webpack
version already had the correct check.
This could cause the server to emit debug info even when only a write-only
debug channel is provided with no readable side, potentially causing the
client to block forever waiting for debug data.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@react-sizebot
react-sizebot
commented
Feb 8, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Comparing: 65db100...9c5d311
Critical size changes
Includes critical production bundles, as well as any change greater than 2%:
Name+/-BaseCurrent+/- gzipBase gzipCurrent gzip
oss-stable/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.production.js=6.84 kB6.84 kB=1.88 kB1.88 kB
oss-stable/react-dom/cjs/react-dom-client.production.js=610.35 kB610.35 kB=107.89 kB107.89 kB
oss-experimental/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.production.js=6.84 kB6.84 kB=1.88 kB1.88 kB
oss-experimental/react-dom/cjs/react-dom-client.production.js=676.28 kB676.28 kB=118.85 kB118.85 kB
facebook-www/ReactDOM-prod.classic.js=696.77 kB696.77 kB=122.49 kB122.49 kB
facebook-www/ReactDOM-prod.modern.js=687.15 kB687.15 kB=120.89 kB120.89 kB
Significant size changes
Includes any change greater than 0.2%:
(No significant changes)

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against 9c5d311
@feedthejim
feedthejim
marked this pull request as draft
February 8, 2026 18:34
@unstubbable
unstubbable
marked this pull request as ready for review
February 8, 2026 19:13
@unstubbable
unstubbable
merged commit 2dd9b7c
into
react:mainFeb 8, 2026

243 checks passed

@nextjs-botnextjs-bot
mentioned this pull request
Feb 8, 2026
 Merged

unstubbable pushed a commit
to vercel/next.js
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 8, 2026
@nextjs-bot
Upgrade React from95ffd6cd-20260205to2dd9b7cf-20260208(#89681)
ec38eb3
[diff
react/react@95ffd6cd...2dd9b7cf](react/react@95ffd6c...2dd9b7c)
<details>
<summary>React upstream changes</summary>
- react/react#35724
- react/react#35711
- react/react#35710
- react/react#35708
- react/react#35705
- react/react#35700
</details>
github-actionsBot
pushed a commit
to anatolyshipov/react
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 9, 2026
@anatolyshipov
[Flight] Fix debug channel flag in Node.js server renderToPipeableStr…
bfdd10f
…eam (react#35724)
## Summary
- Fixes the `createRequest` call in `renderToPipeableStream` to pass
`debugChannelReadable !== undefined` instead of `debugChannel !==
undefined` in the turbopack, esm, and parcel Node.js server
implementations
- The webpack version already had the correct check; this brings the
other bundler implementations in line
The bug was introduced in react#33754. With `debugChannel !== undefined`, the
server could signal that debug info should be emitted even when only a
write-only debug channel is provided (no readable side), potentially
causing the client to block forever waiting for debug data that never
arrives.
DiffTrain build for [2dd9b7c](react@2dd9b7c)
github-actionsBot
pushed a commit
to anatolyshipov/react
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 9, 2026
@anatolyshipov
[Flight] Fix debug channel flag in Node.js server renderToPipeableStr…
00d31ca
…eam (react#35724)
## Summary
- Fixes the `createRequest` call in `renderToPipeableStream` to pass
`debugChannelReadable !== undefined` instead of `debugChannel !==
undefined` in the turbopack, esm, and parcel Node.js server
implementations
- The webpack version already had the correct check; this brings the
other bundler implementations in line
The bug was introduced in react#33754. With `debugChannel !== undefined`, the
server could signal that debug info should be emitted even when only a
write-only debug channel is provided (no readable side), potentially
causing the client to block forever waiting for debug data that never
arrives.
DiffTrain build for [2dd9b7c](react@2dd9b7c)
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot
mentioned this pull request
Feb 10, 2026

Open

@rubennorterubennorte
mentioned this pull request
Jun 5, 2026
 Closed

m-kawafuji pushed a commit
to m-kawafuji/next.js
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 8, 2026
@nextjs-bot@m-kawafuji
Upgrade React from95ffd6cd-20260205to2dd9b7cf-20260208(vercel…
7e572f5
…#89681)
[diff
react/react@95ffd6cd...2dd9b7cf](react/react@95ffd6c...2dd9b7c)
<details>
<summary>React upstream changes</summary>
- react/react#35724
- react/react#35711
- react/react#35710
- react/react#35708
- react/react#35705
- react/react#35700
</details>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@unstubbableunstubbableunstubbable approved these changes

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

CLA Signed

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@feedthejim@react-sizebot@unstubbable

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer
(function() {
var ref = document.referrer;
var terms = [];
if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {
var url = new URL(ref);
var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');
if (q) {
terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });
}
}
if (terms.length === 0) return;
var style = document.createElement('style');
style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';
document.head.appendChild(style);
function highlight(node) {
if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node
var text = node.textContent;
var found = false;
terms.forEach(function(term) {
var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi');
if (regex.test(text)) {
found = true;
var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();
var parts = text.split(regex);
parts.forEach(function(part, i) {
if (i % 2 === 0) {
frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));
} else {
var span = document.createElement('span');
span.className = 'userscript-highlight';
span.textContent = part;
frag.appendChild(span);
}
});
node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);
}
});
} else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element
var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];
if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {
Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);
}
}
}
highlight(document.body);
// Re-highlight on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {
mutations.forEach(function(m) {
m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {
if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);
});
});
});
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
[Flight] Fix debug channel flag in Node.js server renderToPipeableStream - #35724
Merged
unstubbable merged 1 commit into
react:mainfrom 
feedthejim:fix-debug-channel-readable-flag
Feb 8, 2026
Merged
[Flight] Fix debug channel flag in Node.js server renderToPipeableStream#35724
unstubbable merged 1 commit into
react:mainfrom 
feedthejim:fix-debug-channel-readable-flag
Conversation
@feedthejim
@feedthejimfeedthejim
commented
Feb 8, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Summary
  • Fixes the createRequest call in renderToPipeableStream to pass debugChannelReadable !== undefined instead of debugChannel !== undefined in the turbopack, esm, and parcel Node.js server implementations
  • The webpack version already had the correct check; this brings the other bundler implementations in line
The bug was introduced in #33754. With debugChannel !== undefined, the server could signal that debug info should be emitted even when only a write-only debug channel is provided (no readable side), potentially causing the client to block forever waiting for debug data that never arrives.
Test plan
  •  Existing Flight tests continue to pass
  •  Verify the fix matches the webpack implementation at packages/react-server-dom-webpack/src/server/ReactFlightDOMServerNode.js:196
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
@feedthejim@claude
[Flight] Fix debug channel flag in Node.js server renderToPipeableStream
9c5d311
The `createRequest` call in `renderToPipeableStream` was passing
`debugChannel !== undefined` instead of `debugChannelReadable !== undefined`
in the turbopack, esm, and parcel server implementations. The webpack
version already had the correct check.
This could cause the server to emit debug info even when only a write-only
debug channel is provided with no readable side, potentially causing the
client to block forever waiting for debug data.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@react-sizebot
react-sizebot
commented
Feb 8, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Comparing: 65db100...9c5d311
Critical size changes
Includes critical production bundles, as well as any change greater than 2%:
Name+/-BaseCurrent+/- gzipBase gzipCurrent gzip
oss-stable/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.production.js=6.84 kB6.84 kB=1.88 kB1.88 kB
oss-stable/react-dom/cjs/react-dom-client.production.js=610.35 kB610.35 kB=107.89 kB107.89 kB
oss-experimental/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.production.js=6.84 kB6.84 kB=1.88 kB1.88 kB
oss-experimental/react-dom/cjs/react-dom-client.production.js=676.28 kB676.28 kB=118.85 kB118.85 kB
facebook-www/ReactDOM-prod.classic.js=696.77 kB696.77 kB=122.49 kB122.49 kB
facebook-www/ReactDOM-prod.modern.js=687.15 kB687.15 kB=120.89 kB120.89 kB
Significant size changes
Includes any change greater than 0.2%:
(No significant changes)

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against 9c5d311
@feedthejim
feedthejim
marked this pull request as draft
February 8, 2026 18:34
@unstubbable
unstubbable
marked this pull request as ready for review
February 8, 2026 19:13
@unstubbable
unstubbable
merged commit 2dd9b7c
into
react:mainFeb 8, 2026

243 checks passed

@nextjs-botnextjs-bot
mentioned this pull request
Feb 8, 2026
 Merged

unstubbable pushed a commit
to vercel/next.js
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 8, 2026
@nextjs-bot
Upgrade React from95ffd6cd-20260205to2dd9b7cf-20260208(#89681)
ec38eb3
[diff
react/react@95ffd6cd...2dd9b7cf](react/react@95ffd6c...2dd9b7c)
<details>
<summary>React upstream changes</summary>
- react/react#35724
- react/react#35711
- react/react#35710
- react/react#35708
- react/react#35705
- react/react#35700
</details>
github-actionsBot
pushed a commit
to anatolyshipov/react
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 9, 2026
@anatolyshipov
[Flight] Fix debug channel flag in Node.js server renderToPipeableStr…
bfdd10f
…eam (react#35724)
## Summary
- Fixes the `createRequest` call in `renderToPipeableStream` to pass
`debugChannelReadable !== undefined` instead of `debugChannel !==
undefined` in the turbopack, esm, and parcel Node.js server
implementations
- The webpack version already had the correct check; this brings the
other bundler implementations in line
The bug was introduced in react#33754. With `debugChannel !== undefined`, the
server could signal that debug info should be emitted even when only a
write-only debug channel is provided (no readable side), potentially
causing the client to block forever waiting for debug data that never
arrives.
DiffTrain build for [2dd9b7c](react@2dd9b7c)
github-actionsBot
pushed a commit
to anatolyshipov/react
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 9, 2026
@anatolyshipov
[Flight] Fix debug channel flag in Node.js server renderToPipeableStr…
00d31ca
…eam (react#35724)
## Summary
- Fixes the `createRequest` call in `renderToPipeableStream` to pass
`debugChannelReadable !== undefined` instead of `debugChannel !==
undefined` in the turbopack, esm, and parcel Node.js server
implementations
- The webpack version already had the correct check; this brings the
other bundler implementations in line
The bug was introduced in react#33754. With `debugChannel !== undefined`, the
server could signal that debug info should be emitted even when only a
write-only debug channel is provided (no readable side), potentially
causing the client to block forever waiting for debug data that never
arrives.
DiffTrain build for [2dd9b7c](react@2dd9b7c)
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot
mentioned this pull request
Feb 10, 2026

Open

@rubennorterubennorte
mentioned this pull request
Jun 5, 2026
 Closed

m-kawafuji pushed a commit
to m-kawafuji/next.js
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 8, 2026
@nextjs-bot@m-kawafuji
Upgrade React from95ffd6cd-20260205to2dd9b7cf-20260208(vercel…
7e572f5
…#89681)
[diff
react/react@95ffd6cd...2dd9b7cf](react/react@95ffd6c...2dd9b7c)
<details>
<summary>React upstream changes</summary>
- react/react#35724
- react/react#35711
- react/react#35710
- react/react#35708
- react/react#35705
- react/react#35700
</details>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@unstubbableunstubbableunstubbable approved these changes

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

CLA Signed

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@feedthejim@react-sizebot@unstubbable

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page
(function() {
var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',
'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',
'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];
function cleanUrl(url) {
try {
var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);
var changed = false;
trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {
if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {
u.searchParams.delete(p);
changed = true;
}
});
return changed ? u.toString() : url;
} catch (e) {
return url;
}
}
function cleanLinks() {
document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {
var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);
if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;
});
}
cleanLinks();
var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {
mutations.forEach(function(m) {
m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {
if (node.nodeType === 1) {
if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();
node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {
var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);
if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;
});
}
});
});
});
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "youtube.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '

Skip to content
[Flight] Fix debug channel flag in Node.js server renderToPipeableStream - #35724
Merged
unstubbable merged 1 commit into
react:mainfrom 
feedthejim:fix-debug-channel-readable-flag
Feb 8, 2026
Merged
[Flight] Fix debug channel flag in Node.js server renderToPipeableStream#35724
unstubbable merged 1 commit into
react:mainfrom 
feedthejim:fix-debug-channel-readable-flag
Conversation
@feedthejim
@feedthejimfeedthejim
commented
Feb 8, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Summary
  • Fixes the createRequest call in renderToPipeableStream to pass debugChannelReadable !== undefined instead of debugChannel !== undefined in the turbopack, esm, and parcel Node.js server implementations
  • The webpack version already had the correct check; this brings the other bundler implementations in line
The bug was introduced in #33754. With debugChannel !== undefined, the server could signal that debug info should be emitted even when only a write-only debug channel is provided (no readable side), potentially causing the client to block forever waiting for debug data that never arrives.
Test plan
  •  Existing Flight tests continue to pass
  •  Verify the fix matches the webpack implementation at packages/react-server-dom-webpack/src/server/ReactFlightDOMServerNode.js:196
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
@feedthejim@claude
[Flight] Fix debug channel flag in Node.js server renderToPipeableStream
9c5d311
The `createRequest` call in `renderToPipeableStream` was passing
`debugChannel !== undefined` instead of `debugChannelReadable !== undefined`
in the turbopack, esm, and parcel server implementations. The webpack
version already had the correct check.
This could cause the server to emit debug info even when only a write-only
debug channel is provided with no readable side, potentially causing the
client to block forever waiting for debug data.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@react-sizebot
react-sizebot
commented
Feb 8, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Comparing: 65db100...9c5d311
Critical size changes
Includes critical production bundles, as well as any change greater than 2%:
Name+/-BaseCurrent+/- gzipBase gzipCurrent gzip
oss-stable/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.production.js=6.84 kB6.84 kB=1.88 kB1.88 kB
oss-stable/react-dom/cjs/react-dom-client.production.js=610.35 kB610.35 kB=107.89 kB107.89 kB
oss-experimental/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.production.js=6.84 kB6.84 kB=1.88 kB1.88 kB
oss-experimental/react-dom/cjs/react-dom-client.production.js=676.28 kB676.28 kB=118.85 kB118.85 kB
facebook-www/ReactDOM-prod.classic.js=696.77 kB696.77 kB=122.49 kB122.49 kB
facebook-www/ReactDOM-prod.modern.js=687.15 kB687.15 kB=120.89 kB120.89 kB
Significant size changes
Includes any change greater than 0.2%:
(No significant changes)

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against 9c5d311
@feedthejim
feedthejim
marked this pull request as draft
February 8, 2026 18:34
@unstubbable
unstubbable
marked this pull request as ready for review
February 8, 2026 19:13
@unstubbable
unstubbable
merged commit 2dd9b7c
into
react:mainFeb 8, 2026

243 checks passed

@nextjs-botnextjs-bot
mentioned this pull request
Feb 8, 2026
 Merged

unstubbable pushed a commit
to vercel/next.js
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 8, 2026
@nextjs-bot
Upgrade React from95ffd6cd-20260205to2dd9b7cf-20260208(#89681)
ec38eb3
[diff
react/react@95ffd6cd...2dd9b7cf](react/react@95ffd6c...2dd9b7c)
<details>
<summary>React upstream changes</summary>
- react/react#35724
- react/react#35711
- react/react#35710
- react/react#35708
- react/react#35705
- react/react#35700
</details>
github-actionsBot
pushed a commit
to anatolyshipov/react
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 9, 2026
@anatolyshipov
[Flight] Fix debug channel flag in Node.js server renderToPipeableStr…
bfdd10f
…eam (react#35724)
## Summary
- Fixes the `createRequest` call in `renderToPipeableStream` to pass
`debugChannelReadable !== undefined` instead of `debugChannel !==
undefined` in the turbopack, esm, and parcel Node.js server
implementations
- The webpack version already had the correct check; this brings the
other bundler implementations in line
The bug was introduced in react#33754. With `debugChannel !== undefined`, the
server could signal that debug info should be emitted even when only a
write-only debug channel is provided (no readable side), potentially
causing the client to block forever waiting for debug data that never
arrives.
DiffTrain build for [2dd9b7c](react@2dd9b7c)
github-actionsBot
pushed a commit
to anatolyshipov/react
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 9, 2026
@anatolyshipov
[Flight] Fix debug channel flag in Node.js server renderToPipeableStr…
00d31ca
…eam (react#35724)
## Summary
- Fixes the `createRequest` call in `renderToPipeableStream` to pass
`debugChannelReadable !== undefined` instead of `debugChannel !==
undefined` in the turbopack, esm, and parcel Node.js server
implementations
- The webpack version already had the correct check; this brings the
other bundler implementations in line
The bug was introduced in react#33754. With `debugChannel !== undefined`, the
server could signal that debug info should be emitted even when only a
write-only debug channel is provided (no readable side), potentially
causing the client to block forever waiting for debug data that never
arrives.
DiffTrain build for [2dd9b7c](react@2dd9b7c)
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot
mentioned this pull request
Feb 10, 2026

Open

@rubennorterubennorte
mentioned this pull request
Jun 5, 2026
 Closed

m-kawafuji pushed a commit
to m-kawafuji/next.js
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 8, 2026
@nextjs-bot@m-kawafuji
Upgrade React from95ffd6cd-20260205to2dd9b7cf-20260208(vercel…
7e572f5
…#89681)
[diff
react/react@95ffd6cd...2dd9b7cf](react/react@95ffd6c...2dd9b7c)
<details>
<summary>React upstream changes</summary>
- react/react#35724
- react/react#35711
- react/react#35710
- react/react#35708
- react/react#35705
- react/react#35700
</details>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@unstubbableunstubbableunstubbable approved these changes

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

CLA Signed

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@feedthejim@react-sizebot@unstubbable

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube
(function() {
function tryTheater() {
var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]');
if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {
btn.click();
}
}
// Try immediately
tryTheater();
// Try after navigation (SPA)
var lastUrl = location.href;
setInterval(function() {
if (location.href !== lastUrl) {
lastUrl = location.href;
setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);
}
}, 1000);
// Also try on player load
var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
[Flight] Fix debug channel flag in Node.js server renderToPipeableStream - #35724
Merged
unstubbable merged 1 commit into
react:mainfrom 
feedthejim:fix-debug-channel-readable-flag
Feb 8, 2026
Merged
[Flight] Fix debug channel flag in Node.js server renderToPipeableStream#35724
unstubbable merged 1 commit into
react:mainfrom 
feedthejim:fix-debug-channel-readable-flag
Conversation
@feedthejim
@feedthejimfeedthejim
commented
Feb 8, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Summary
  • Fixes the createRequest call in renderToPipeableStream to pass debugChannelReadable !== undefined instead of debugChannel !== undefined in the turbopack, esm, and parcel Node.js server implementations
  • The webpack version already had the correct check; this brings the other bundler implementations in line
The bug was introduced in #33754. With debugChannel !== undefined, the server could signal that debug info should be emitted even when only a write-only debug channel is provided (no readable side), potentially causing the client to block forever waiting for debug data that never arrives.
Test plan
  •  Existing Flight tests continue to pass
  •  Verify the fix matches the webpack implementation at packages/react-server-dom-webpack/src/server/ReactFlightDOMServerNode.js:196
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
@feedthejim@claude
[Flight] Fix debug channel flag in Node.js server renderToPipeableStream
9c5d311
The `createRequest` call in `renderToPipeableStream` was passing
`debugChannel !== undefined` instead of `debugChannelReadable !== undefined`
in the turbopack, esm, and parcel server implementations. The webpack
version already had the correct check.
This could cause the server to emit debug info even when only a write-only
debug channel is provided with no readable side, potentially causing the
client to block forever waiting for debug data.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@react-sizebot
react-sizebot
commented
Feb 8, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Comparing: 65db100...9c5d311
Critical size changes
Includes critical production bundles, as well as any change greater than 2%:
Name+/-BaseCurrent+/- gzipBase gzipCurrent gzip
oss-stable/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.production.js=6.84 kB6.84 kB=1.88 kB1.88 kB
oss-stable/react-dom/cjs/react-dom-client.production.js=610.35 kB610.35 kB=107.89 kB107.89 kB
oss-experimental/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.production.js=6.84 kB6.84 kB=1.88 kB1.88 kB
oss-experimental/react-dom/cjs/react-dom-client.production.js=676.28 kB676.28 kB=118.85 kB118.85 kB
facebook-www/ReactDOM-prod.classic.js=696.77 kB696.77 kB=122.49 kB122.49 kB
facebook-www/ReactDOM-prod.modern.js=687.15 kB687.15 kB=120.89 kB120.89 kB
Significant size changes
Includes any change greater than 0.2%:
(No significant changes)

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against 9c5d311
@feedthejim
feedthejim
marked this pull request as draft
February 8, 2026 18:34
@unstubbable
unstubbable
marked this pull request as ready for review
February 8, 2026 19:13
@unstubbable
unstubbable
merged commit 2dd9b7c
into
react:mainFeb 8, 2026

243 checks passed

@nextjs-botnextjs-bot
mentioned this pull request
Feb 8, 2026
 Merged

unstubbable pushed a commit
to vercel/next.js
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 8, 2026
@nextjs-bot
Upgrade React from95ffd6cd-20260205to2dd9b7cf-20260208(#89681)
ec38eb3
[diff
react/react@95ffd6cd...2dd9b7cf](react/react@95ffd6c...2dd9b7c)
<details>
<summary>React upstream changes</summary>
- react/react#35724
- react/react#35711
- react/react#35710
- react/react#35708
- react/react#35705
- react/react#35700
</details>
github-actionsBot
pushed a commit
to anatolyshipov/react
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 9, 2026
@anatolyshipov
[Flight] Fix debug channel flag in Node.js server renderToPipeableStr…
bfdd10f
…eam (react#35724)
## Summary
- Fixes the `createRequest` call in `renderToPipeableStream` to pass
`debugChannelReadable !== undefined` instead of `debugChannel !==
undefined` in the turbopack, esm, and parcel Node.js server
implementations
- The webpack version already had the correct check; this brings the
other bundler implementations in line
The bug was introduced in react#33754. With `debugChannel !== undefined`, the
server could signal that debug info should be emitted even when only a
write-only debug channel is provided (no readable side), potentially
causing the client to block forever waiting for debug data that never
arrives.
DiffTrain build for [2dd9b7c](react@2dd9b7c)
github-actionsBot
pushed a commit
to anatolyshipov/react
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 9, 2026
@anatolyshipov
[Flight] Fix debug channel flag in Node.js server renderToPipeableStr…
00d31ca
…eam (react#35724)
## Summary
- Fixes the `createRequest` call in `renderToPipeableStream` to pass
`debugChannelReadable !== undefined` instead of `debugChannel !==
undefined` in the turbopack, esm, and parcel Node.js server
implementations
- The webpack version already had the correct check; this brings the
other bundler implementations in line
The bug was introduced in react#33754. With `debugChannel !== undefined`, the
server could signal that debug info should be emitted even when only a
write-only debug channel is provided (no readable side), potentially
causing the client to block forever waiting for debug data that never
arrives.
DiffTrain build for [2dd9b7c](react@2dd9b7c)
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot
mentioned this pull request
Feb 10, 2026

Open

@rubennorterubennorte
mentioned this pull request
Jun 5, 2026
 Closed

m-kawafuji pushed a commit
to m-kawafuji/next.js
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 8, 2026
@nextjs-bot@m-kawafuji
Upgrade React from95ffd6cd-20260205to2dd9b7cf-20260208(vercel…
7e572f5
…#89681)
[diff
react/react@95ffd6cd...2dd9b7cf](react/react@95ffd6c...2dd9b7c)
<details>
<summary>React upstream changes</summary>
- react/react#35724
- react/react#35711
- react/react#35710
- react/react#35708
- react/react#35705
- react/react#35700
</details>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@unstubbableunstubbableunstubbable approved these changes

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

CLA Signed

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@feedthejim@react-sizebot@unstubbable

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content
(function() {
function unstick() {
document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) {
if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {
el.style.position = 'static';
el.style.top = 'auto';
el.style.zIndex = 'auto';
}
});
}
unstick();
var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
[Flight] Fix debug channel flag in Node.js server renderToPipeableStream - #35724
Merged
unstubbable merged 1 commit into
react:mainfrom 
feedthejim:fix-debug-channel-readable-flag
Feb 8, 2026
Merged
[Flight] Fix debug channel flag in Node.js server renderToPipeableStream#35724
unstubbable merged 1 commit into
react:mainfrom 
feedthejim:fix-debug-channel-readable-flag
Conversation
@feedthejim
@feedthejimfeedthejim
commented
Feb 8, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Summary
  • Fixes the createRequest call in renderToPipeableStream to pass debugChannelReadable !== undefined instead of debugChannel !== undefined in the turbopack, esm, and parcel Node.js server implementations
  • The webpack version already had the correct check; this brings the other bundler implementations in line
The bug was introduced in #33754. With debugChannel !== undefined, the server could signal that debug info should be emitted even when only a write-only debug channel is provided (no readable side), potentially causing the client to block forever waiting for debug data that never arrives.
Test plan
  •  Existing Flight tests continue to pass
  •  Verify the fix matches the webpack implementation at packages/react-server-dom-webpack/src/server/ReactFlightDOMServerNode.js:196
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
@feedthejim@claude
[Flight] Fix debug channel flag in Node.js server renderToPipeableStream
9c5d311
The `createRequest` call in `renderToPipeableStream` was passing
`debugChannel !== undefined` instead of `debugChannelReadable !== undefined`
in the turbopack, esm, and parcel server implementations. The webpack
version already had the correct check.
This could cause the server to emit debug info even when only a write-only
debug channel is provided with no readable side, potentially causing the
client to block forever waiting for debug data.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@react-sizebot
react-sizebot
commented
Feb 8, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Comparing: 65db100...9c5d311
Critical size changes
Includes critical production bundles, as well as any change greater than 2%:
Name+/-BaseCurrent+/- gzipBase gzipCurrent gzip
oss-stable/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.production.js=6.84 kB6.84 kB=1.88 kB1.88 kB
oss-stable/react-dom/cjs/react-dom-client.production.js=610.35 kB610.35 kB=107.89 kB107.89 kB
oss-experimental/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.production.js=6.84 kB6.84 kB=1.88 kB1.88 kB
oss-experimental/react-dom/cjs/react-dom-client.production.js=676.28 kB676.28 kB=118.85 kB118.85 kB
facebook-www/ReactDOM-prod.classic.js=696.77 kB696.77 kB=122.49 kB122.49 kB
facebook-www/ReactDOM-prod.modern.js=687.15 kB687.15 kB=120.89 kB120.89 kB
Significant size changes
Includes any change greater than 0.2%:
(No significant changes)

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against 9c5d311
@feedthejim
feedthejim
marked this pull request as draft
February 8, 2026 18:34
@unstubbable
unstubbable
marked this pull request as ready for review
February 8, 2026 19:13
@unstubbable
unstubbable
merged commit 2dd9b7c
into
react:mainFeb 8, 2026

243 checks passed

@nextjs-botnextjs-bot
mentioned this pull request
Feb 8, 2026
 Merged

unstubbable pushed a commit
to vercel/next.js
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 8, 2026
@nextjs-bot
Upgrade React from95ffd6cd-20260205to2dd9b7cf-20260208(#89681)
ec38eb3
[diff
react/react@95ffd6cd...2dd9b7cf](react/react@95ffd6c...2dd9b7c)
<details>
<summary>React upstream changes</summary>
- react/react#35724
- react/react#35711
- react/react#35710
- react/react#35708
- react/react#35705
- react/react#35700
</details>
github-actionsBot
pushed a commit
to anatolyshipov/react
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 9, 2026
@anatolyshipov
[Flight] Fix debug channel flag in Node.js server renderToPipeableStr…
bfdd10f
…eam (react#35724)
## Summary
- Fixes the `createRequest` call in `renderToPipeableStream` to pass
`debugChannelReadable !== undefined` instead of `debugChannel !==
undefined` in the turbopack, esm, and parcel Node.js server
implementations
- The webpack version already had the correct check; this brings the
other bundler implementations in line
The bug was introduced in react#33754. With `debugChannel !== undefined`, the
server could signal that debug info should be emitted even when only a
write-only debug channel is provided (no readable side), potentially
causing the client to block forever waiting for debug data that never
arrives.
DiffTrain build for [2dd9b7c](react@2dd9b7c)
github-actionsBot
pushed a commit
to anatolyshipov/react
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 9, 2026
@anatolyshipov
[Flight] Fix debug channel flag in Node.js server renderToPipeableStr…
00d31ca
…eam (react#35724)
## Summary
- Fixes the `createRequest` call in `renderToPipeableStream` to pass
`debugChannelReadable !== undefined` instead of `debugChannel !==
undefined` in the turbopack, esm, and parcel Node.js server
implementations
- The webpack version already had the correct check; this brings the
other bundler implementations in line
The bug was introduced in react#33754. With `debugChannel !== undefined`, the
server could signal that debug info should be emitted even when only a
write-only debug channel is provided (no readable side), potentially
causing the client to block forever waiting for debug data that never
arrives.
DiffTrain build for [2dd9b7c](react@2dd9b7c)
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot
mentioned this pull request
Feb 10, 2026

Open

@rubennorterubennorte
mentioned this pull request
Jun 5, 2026
 Closed

m-kawafuji pushed a commit
to m-kawafuji/next.js
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 8, 2026
@nextjs-bot@m-kawafuji
Upgrade React from95ffd6cd-20260205to2dd9b7cf-20260208(vercel…
7e572f5
…#89681)
[diff
react/react@95ffd6cd...2dd9b7cf](react/react@95ffd6c...2dd9b7c)
<details>
<summary>React upstream changes</summary>
- react/react#35724
- react/react#35711
- react/react#35710
- react/react#35708
- react/react#35705
- react/react#35700
</details>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@unstubbableunstubbableunstubbable approved these changes

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

CLA Signed

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@feedthejim@react-sizebot@unstubbable

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site
(function() {
var enabled = true;
function applyDarkMode() {
if (!enabled) return;
// Create style element if it doesn't exist
var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');
if (!style) {
style = document.createElement('style');
style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';
document.head.appendChild(style);
}
// Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video
style.textContent = '
/* Invert everything except media */
html {
filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;
background: #1a1a2e !important;
}
/* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */
img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] {
filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;
}
/* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */
.no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,
[data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"],
.ace_editor, .ace_editor *,
.CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,
.monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,
.markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,
.highlight, .highlight *,
pre code, pre code * {
filter: none !important;
}
/* Fix common UI elements */
.modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {
filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;
background: #2d2d44 !important;
border-color: #444 !important;
}
/* Scrollbars */
::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }
::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }
::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }
/* Selection */
::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }
::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }
';
}
function removeDarkMode() {
var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');
if (style) style.remove();
}
// Toggle with Alt+Shift+D
document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {
if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {
e.preventDefault();
enabled = !enabled;
if (enabled) {
applyDarkMode();
console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');
} else {
removeDarkMode();
console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');
}
}
});
// Apply on load
applyDarkMode();
// Re-apply on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {
if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {
applyDarkMode();
}
});
observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });
console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); }
})();
})();

Skip to content
[Flight] Fix debug channel flag in Node.js server renderToPipeableStream - #35724
Merged
unstubbable merged 1 commit into
react:mainfrom 
feedthejim:fix-debug-channel-readable-flag
Feb 8, 2026
Merged
[Flight] Fix debug channel flag in Node.js server renderToPipeableStream#35724
unstubbable merged 1 commit into
react:mainfrom 
feedthejim:fix-debug-channel-readable-flag
Conversation
@feedthejim
@feedthejimfeedthejim
commented
Feb 8, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Summary
  • Fixes the createRequest call in renderToPipeableStream to pass debugChannelReadable !== undefined instead of debugChannel !== undefined in the turbopack, esm, and parcel Node.js server implementations
  • The webpack version already had the correct check; this brings the other bundler implementations in line
The bug was introduced in #33754. With debugChannel !== undefined, the server could signal that debug info should be emitted even when only a write-only debug channel is provided (no readable side), potentially causing the client to block forever waiting for debug data that never arrives.
Test plan
  •  Existing Flight tests continue to pass
  •  Verify the fix matches the webpack implementation at packages/react-server-dom-webpack/src/server/ReactFlightDOMServerNode.js:196
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
@feedthejim@claude
[Flight] Fix debug channel flag in Node.js server renderToPipeableStream
9c5d311
The `createRequest` call in `renderToPipeableStream` was passing
`debugChannel !== undefined` instead of `debugChannelReadable !== undefined`
in the turbopack, esm, and parcel server implementations. The webpack
version already had the correct check.
This could cause the server to emit debug info even when only a write-only
debug channel is provided with no readable side, potentially causing the
client to block forever waiting for debug data.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@react-sizebot
react-sizebot
commented
Feb 8, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Comparing: 65db100...9c5d311
Critical size changes
Includes critical production bundles, as well as any change greater than 2%:
Name+/-BaseCurrent+/- gzipBase gzipCurrent gzip
oss-stable/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.production.js=6.84 kB6.84 kB=1.88 kB1.88 kB
oss-stable/react-dom/cjs/react-dom-client.production.js=610.35 kB610.35 kB=107.89 kB107.89 kB
oss-experimental/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.production.js=6.84 kB6.84 kB=1.88 kB1.88 kB
oss-experimental/react-dom/cjs/react-dom-client.production.js=676.28 kB676.28 kB=118.85 kB118.85 kB
facebook-www/ReactDOM-prod.classic.js=696.77 kB696.77 kB=122.49 kB122.49 kB
facebook-www/ReactDOM-prod.modern.js=687.15 kB687.15 kB=120.89 kB120.89 kB
Significant size changes
Includes any change greater than 0.2%:
(No significant changes)

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against 9c5d311
@feedthejim
feedthejim
marked this pull request as draft
February 8, 2026 18:34
@unstubbable
unstubbable
marked this pull request as ready for review
February 8, 2026 19:13
@unstubbable
unstubbable
merged commit 2dd9b7c
into
react:mainFeb 8, 2026

243 checks passed

@nextjs-botnextjs-bot
mentioned this pull request
Feb 8, 2026
 Merged

unstubbable pushed a commit
to vercel/next.js
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 8, 2026
@nextjs-bot
Upgrade React from95ffd6cd-20260205to2dd9b7cf-20260208(#89681)
ec38eb3
[diff
react/react@95ffd6cd...2dd9b7cf](react/react@95ffd6c...2dd9b7c)
<details>
<summary>React upstream changes</summary>
- react/react#35724
- react/react#35711
- react/react#35710
- react/react#35708
- react/react#35705
- react/react#35700
</details>
github-actionsBot
pushed a commit
to anatolyshipov/react
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 9, 2026
@anatolyshipov
[Flight] Fix debug channel flag in Node.js server renderToPipeableStr…
bfdd10f
…eam (react#35724)
## Summary
- Fixes the `createRequest` call in `renderToPipeableStream` to pass
`debugChannelReadable !== undefined` instead of `debugChannel !==
undefined` in the turbopack, esm, and parcel Node.js server
implementations
- The webpack version already had the correct check; this brings the
other bundler implementations in line
The bug was introduced in react#33754. With `debugChannel !== undefined`, the
server could signal that debug info should be emitted even when only a
write-only debug channel is provided (no readable side), potentially
causing the client to block forever waiting for debug data that never
arrives.
DiffTrain build for [2dd9b7c](react@2dd9b7c)
github-actionsBot
pushed a commit
to anatolyshipov/react
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 9, 2026
@anatolyshipov
[Flight] Fix debug channel flag in Node.js server renderToPipeableStr…
00d31ca
…eam (react#35724)
## Summary
- Fixes the `createRequest` call in `renderToPipeableStream` to pass
`debugChannelReadable !== undefined` instead of `debugChannel !==
undefined` in the turbopack, esm, and parcel Node.js server
implementations
- The webpack version already had the correct check; this brings the
other bundler implementations in line
The bug was introduced in react#33754. With `debugChannel !== undefined`, the
server could signal that debug info should be emitted even when only a
write-only debug channel is provided (no readable side), potentially
causing the client to block forever waiting for debug data that never
arrives.
DiffTrain build for [2dd9b7c](react@2dd9b7c)
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot
mentioned this pull request
Feb 10, 2026

Open

@rubennorterubennorte
mentioned this pull request
Jun 5, 2026
 Closed

m-kawafuji pushed a commit
to m-kawafuji/next.js
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 8, 2026
@nextjs-bot@m-kawafuji
Upgrade React from95ffd6cd-20260205to2dd9b7cf-20260208(vercel…
7e572f5
…#89681)
[diff
react/react@95ffd6cd...2dd9b7cf](react/react@95ffd6c...2dd9b7c)
<details>
<summary>React upstream changes</summary>
- react/react#35724
- react/react#35711
- react/react#35710
- react/react#35708
- react/react#35705
- react/react#35700
</details>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@unstubbableunstubbableunstubbable approved these changes

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

CLA Signed

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@feedthejim@react-sizebot@unstubbable