From 3c7789370dc6e762bc88ebb2c2382f2fe7ee661f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Billy Robert O'Neal III <bion@microsoft.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2020 18:50:00 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] Correct member comment for _List_val::_Sort.

Fixing a recent stack overflow answer and adding a link to our actual
implementation I discovered I didn't fix this comment when I last
overhauled this sort.
---
 stl/inc/list | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/stl/inc/list b/stl/inc/list
index 269cb3ed122..023db742732 100644
--- a/stl/inc/list
+++ b/stl/inc/list
@@ -555,7 +555,7 @@ public:
 
     template <class _Pr2>
     static _Nodeptr _Sort(_Nodeptr& _First, const size_type _Size, _Pr2 _Pred) {
-        // order [_First, _Last), return _First + _Size
+        // order [_First, _First + _Size), return _First + _Size
         switch (_Size) {
         case 0:
             return _First;