Shebangs as comments

[mcandre]

Can we treat shebangs as comments for those who like doing #!/usr/bin/env rustx?

It would be nice to compile or interpret the same Rust code as desired, but currently, when you try to compile Rust code with a shebang, you get an ugly syntax error.

hello.rs:

#!/usr/bin/env rustx

use std;

fn main() {
 std::io::println("Hello World!");
}

expected output:

$ rustc hello.rs 
$ ./hello
Hello World!

actual output:

$ rustc hello.rs 
hello.rs:1:1: 1:2 error: expecting '[' but found '!'
hello.rs:1 #!/usr/bin/env rustx

[brson]

It seems pretty harmless to allow the first line to be a shebang. rustx could also filter it out and feed the script to rustc via stdin.

[killerswan]

True, but the drawback to making rustx filter it out is that then you'd have to manually edit the program source to start using rustc.

[brson]

good point

[mcandre]

Agreed. That's how a lot of languages do it (Pascal, OCaml). And it's a pain.

Many people have trouble understanding why anyone would like to dot slash their compiled scripts. I guess dot slash is preferable because it standardizes the cli for scripts from different languages. It's POSIX, it's treating every piece of code, compiled, interpreted, whathaveyou, as if it were recombinant bash script, pipable to unix commands and other scripts.

[killerswan]

Another alternative to try, on some platforms, is binfmt:
http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/oneiric/man8/update-binfmts.8.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binfmt_misc

This is what I was trying to remember earlier, @mcandre.

[graydon]

Yeah, I'd be ok with this. And agree with @Wensleydale that this would be a not-too-awful way of marking a file with "pre-parse" metadata such as "version of rust grammar this file depends on, in order to even parse". A problem we've been discussing elsewhere.

[catamorphism]

I'm hearing consensus for "yes, implement as @mcandre suggested". If I'm wrong, yell.

[brson]

Fixed by @mmeyerho

[killerswan]

Nice!

[mqudsi]

Complete necro, but thank you for implementing this. I just abused it considerably to write a rust “script” that is simultaneously a valid rust program and a valid bash/sh script, primarily just to see if it would be realistic to do so. Much obliged!

[guest271314]

@mqudsi How would I do that using the Rust archive that I extract rustc and rust-std-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu folder from, yet don't install in PATH?

#!/bin/sh
//usr/bin/env /home/user/bin/rustc/bin/rustc $0 -o a.out && ./a.out; rm -f a.out; exit

use std::env;

fn main() {
 let args: Vec<String> = env::args().collect();
 if args.len() > 1 {
 println!("Hello {}!", &args[1]);
 } else {
 println!("Hello world!");
 }
}

$ ./rust.sh


You need to link your code to the relevant crate in order to be able to use it (through
Cargo or the -L option of rustc, for example).

Common causes
* The crate is not present at all. If using Cargo, add it to [dependencies]
 in Cargo.toml.
* The crate is present, but under a different name. If using Cargo, look for package
 = under [dependencies] in Cargo.toml.

Common causes for missing std or core
* You are cross-compiling for a target
 which doesn't have std prepackaged. Consider one of the following: + Adding
 a pre-compiled version of std with rustup target add + Building std from
 source with cargo build -Z build-std + Using #![no_std] at the crate root,
 so you won't need std in the first place.
* You are developing the compiler itself and haven't built libstd from source. You
 can usually build it with x.py build library/std. More information about
:

[guest271314]

@mqudsi I figured it out for the test script using -L /home/user/bin/rust-std-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/rustlib/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib