Commit 0ea079b

Browse files
joyeecheungaduh95
joyeecheung
authored and
aduh95
committed
test: remove impact of tier-up changes in worker stack size test
The depth of the stack depends not only on the stack size, but also on the size of each stack frame, which in turn depends on which tier the recursive function happens to be running at when the overflow occurs. Under load the background tier-up can land at a non-deterministic point in the recursion and flake the test. Keep the recursive function in the interpreter with %NeverOptimizeFunction() so the frame size - and thus the depth - is deterministic. Signed-off-by: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com> PR-URL: #64271 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
1 parent 236dc4d commit 0ea079b

1 file changed

Lines changed: 9 additions & 0 deletions

File tree

‎test/parallel/test-worker-stack-overflow-stack-size.js‎

Lines changed: 9 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -8,6 +8,14 @@ const { Worker } = require('worker_threads');
88
// Verify that Workers don't care about --stack-size, as they have their own
99
// fixed and known stack sizes.
1010

11+
// The depth of the stack depends not only on the stack size, but also on the size of each
12+
// stack frame, which in turn depends on which tier the recursive function happens to be
13+
// running at when the overflow occurs. Under load the background tier-up can land at a
14+
// non-deterministic point in the recursion and flake the test. Keep the recursive
15+
// function in the interpreter with %NeverOptimizeFunction() so the frame size -
16+
// and thus the depth - is deterministic.
17+
v8.setFlagsFromString('--allow-natives-syntax');
18+
1119
asyncfunctionrunWorker(options={}){
1220
constempiricalStackDepth=newUint32Array(newSharedArrayBuffer(4));
1321
constworker=newWorker(`
@@ -16,6 +24,7 @@ async function runWorker(options = {}) {
1624
empiricalStackDepth[0]++;
1725
f();
1826
}
27+
%NeverOptimizeFunction(f);
1928
f();`,{
2029
eval: true,
2130
workerData: { empiricalStackDepth },

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all 
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '

Skip to content
Commit 0ea079b
Browse files
joyeecheungaduh95
joyeecheung
authored and
aduh95
committed
test: remove impact of tier-up changes in worker stack size test
The depth of the stack depends not only on the stack size, but
also on the size of each stack frame, which in turn depends on
which tier the recursive function happens to be running at when
the overflow occurs. Under load the background tier-up can land
at a non-deterministic point in the recursion and flake the test.
Keep the recursive function in the interpreter with
%NeverOptimizeFunction() so the frame size - and thus the depth
- is deterministic.
Signed-off-by: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #64271
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
1 parent 236dc4d commit 0ea079b
1 file changed
Lines changed: 9 additions & 0 deletions
File tree
‎test/parallel/test-worker-stack-overflow-stack-size.js‎
Lines changed: 9 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -8,6 +8,14 @@ const { Worker } = require('worker_threads');
88
// Verify that Workers don't care about --stack-size, as they have their own
99
// fixed and known stack sizes.
1010

11+
// The depth of the stack depends not only on the stack size, but also on the size of each
12+
// stack frame, which in turn depends on which tier the recursive function happens to be
13+
// running at when the overflow occurs. Under load the background tier-up can land at a
14+
// non-deterministic point in the recursion and flake the test. Keep the recursive
15+
// function in the interpreter with %NeverOptimizeFunction() so the frame size -
16+
// and thus the depth - is deterministic.
17+
v8.setFlagsFromString('--allow-natives-syntax');
18+
1119
asyncfunctionrunWorker(options={}){
1220
constempiricalStackDepth=newUint32Array(newSharedArrayBuffer(4));
1321
constworker=newWorker(`
@@ -16,6 +24,7 @@ async function runWorker(options = {}) {
1624
 empiricalStackDepth[0]++;
1725
 f();
1826
 }
27+
 %NeverOptimizeFunction(f);
1928
 f();`,{
2029
eval: true,
2130
workerData: { empiricalStackDepth },
0 commit comments
Comments
 (0)

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Commit 0ea079b
Browse files
joyeecheungaduh95
joyeecheung
authored and
aduh95
committed
test: remove impact of tier-up changes in worker stack size test
The depth of the stack depends not only on the stack size, but
also on the size of each stack frame, which in turn depends on
which tier the recursive function happens to be running at when
the overflow occurs. Under load the background tier-up can land
at a non-deterministic point in the recursion and flake the test.
Keep the recursive function in the interpreter with
%NeverOptimizeFunction() so the frame size - and thus the depth
- is deterministic.
Signed-off-by: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #64271
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
1 parent 236dc4d commit 0ea079b
1 file changed
Lines changed: 9 additions & 0 deletions
File tree
‎test/parallel/test-worker-stack-overflow-stack-size.js‎
Lines changed: 9 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -8,6 +8,14 @@ const { Worker } = require('worker_threads');
88
// Verify that Workers don't care about --stack-size, as they have their own
99
// fixed and known stack sizes.
1010

11+
// The depth of the stack depends not only on the stack size, but also on the size of each
12+
// stack frame, which in turn depends on which tier the recursive function happens to be
13+
// running at when the overflow occurs. Under load the background tier-up can land at a
14+
// non-deterministic point in the recursion and flake the test. Keep the recursive
15+
// function in the interpreter with %NeverOptimizeFunction() so the frame size -
16+
// and thus the depth - is deterministic.
17+
v8.setFlagsFromString('--allow-natives-syntax');
18+
1119
asyncfunctionrunWorker(options={}){
1220
constempiricalStackDepth=newUint32Array(newSharedArrayBuffer(4));
1321
constworker=newWorker(`
@@ -16,6 +24,7 @@ async function runWorker(options = {}) {
1624
 empiricalStackDepth[0]++;
1725
 f();
1826
 }
27+
 %NeverOptimizeFunction(f);
1928
 f();`,{
2029
eval: true,
2130
workerData: { empiricalStackDepth },
0 commit comments
Comments
 (0)

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Commit 0ea079b
Browse files
joyeecheungaduh95
joyeecheung
authored and
aduh95
committed
test: remove impact of tier-up changes in worker stack size test
The depth of the stack depends not only on the stack size, but
also on the size of each stack frame, which in turn depends on
which tier the recursive function happens to be running at when
the overflow occurs. Under load the background tier-up can land
at a non-deterministic point in the recursion and flake the test.
Keep the recursive function in the interpreter with
%NeverOptimizeFunction() so the frame size - and thus the depth
- is deterministic.
Signed-off-by: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #64271
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
1 parent 236dc4d commit 0ea079b
1 file changed
Lines changed: 9 additions & 0 deletions
File tree
‎test/parallel/test-worker-stack-overflow-stack-size.js‎
Lines changed: 9 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -8,6 +8,14 @@ const { Worker } = require('worker_threads');
88
// Verify that Workers don't care about --stack-size, as they have their own
99
// fixed and known stack sizes.
1010

11+
// The depth of the stack depends not only on the stack size, but also on the size of each
12+
// stack frame, which in turn depends on which tier the recursive function happens to be
13+
// running at when the overflow occurs. Under load the background tier-up can land at a
14+
// non-deterministic point in the recursion and flake the test. Keep the recursive
15+
// function in the interpreter with %NeverOptimizeFunction() so the frame size -
16+
// and thus the depth - is deterministic.
17+
v8.setFlagsFromString('--allow-natives-syntax');
18+
1119
asyncfunctionrunWorker(options={}){
1220
constempiricalStackDepth=newUint32Array(newSharedArrayBuffer(4));
1321
constworker=newWorker(`
@@ -16,6 +24,7 @@ async function runWorker(options = {}) {
1624
 empiricalStackDepth[0]++;
1725
 f();
1826
 }
27+
 %NeverOptimizeFunction(f);
1928
 f();`,{
2029
eval: true,
2130
workerData: { empiricalStackDepth },
0 commit comments
Comments
 (0)

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "youtube.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '

Skip to content
Commit 0ea079b
Browse files
joyeecheungaduh95
joyeecheung
authored and
aduh95
committed
test: remove impact of tier-up changes in worker stack size test
The depth of the stack depends not only on the stack size, but
also on the size of each stack frame, which in turn depends on
which tier the recursive function happens to be running at when
the overflow occurs. Under load the background tier-up can land
at a non-deterministic point in the recursion and flake the test.
Keep the recursive function in the interpreter with
%NeverOptimizeFunction() so the frame size - and thus the depth
- is deterministic.
Signed-off-by: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #64271
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
1 parent 236dc4d commit 0ea079b
1 file changed
Lines changed: 9 additions & 0 deletions
File tree
‎test/parallel/test-worker-stack-overflow-stack-size.js‎
Lines changed: 9 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -8,6 +8,14 @@ const { Worker } = require('worker_threads');
88
// Verify that Workers don't care about --stack-size, as they have their own
99
// fixed and known stack sizes.
1010

11+
// The depth of the stack depends not only on the stack size, but also on the size of each
12+
// stack frame, which in turn depends on which tier the recursive function happens to be
13+
// running at when the overflow occurs. Under load the background tier-up can land at a
14+
// non-deterministic point in the recursion and flake the test. Keep the recursive
15+
// function in the interpreter with %NeverOptimizeFunction() so the frame size -
16+
// and thus the depth - is deterministic.
17+
v8.setFlagsFromString('--allow-natives-syntax');
18+
1119
asyncfunctionrunWorker(options={}){
1220
constempiricalStackDepth=newUint32Array(newSharedArrayBuffer(4));
1321
constworker=newWorker(`
@@ -16,6 +24,7 @@ async function runWorker(options = {}) {
1624
 empiricalStackDepth[0]++;
1725
 f();
1826
 }
27+
 %NeverOptimizeFunction(f);
1928
 f();`,{
2029
eval: true,
2130
workerData: { empiricalStackDepth },
0 commit comments
Comments
 (0)

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Commit 0ea079b
Browse files
joyeecheungaduh95
joyeecheung
authored and
aduh95
committed
test: remove impact of tier-up changes in worker stack size test
The depth of the stack depends not only on the stack size, but
also on the size of each stack frame, which in turn depends on
which tier the recursive function happens to be running at when
the overflow occurs. Under load the background tier-up can land
at a non-deterministic point in the recursion and flake the test.
Keep the recursive function in the interpreter with
%NeverOptimizeFunction() so the frame size - and thus the depth
- is deterministic.
Signed-off-by: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #64271
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
1 parent 236dc4d commit 0ea079b
1 file changed
Lines changed: 9 additions & 0 deletions
File tree
‎test/parallel/test-worker-stack-overflow-stack-size.js‎
Lines changed: 9 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -8,6 +8,14 @@ const { Worker } = require('worker_threads');
88
// Verify that Workers don't care about --stack-size, as they have their own
99
// fixed and known stack sizes.
1010

11+
// The depth of the stack depends not only on the stack size, but also on the size of each
12+
// stack frame, which in turn depends on which tier the recursive function happens to be
13+
// running at when the overflow occurs. Under load the background tier-up can land at a
14+
// non-deterministic point in the recursion and flake the test. Keep the recursive
15+
// function in the interpreter with %NeverOptimizeFunction() so the frame size -
16+
// and thus the depth - is deterministic.
17+
v8.setFlagsFromString('--allow-natives-syntax');
18+
1119
asyncfunctionrunWorker(options={}){
1220
constempiricalStackDepth=newUint32Array(newSharedArrayBuffer(4));
1321
constworker=newWorker(`
@@ -16,6 +24,7 @@ async function runWorker(options = {}) {
1624
 empiricalStackDepth[0]++;
1725
 f();
1826
 }
27+
 %NeverOptimizeFunction(f);
1928
 f();`,{
2029
eval: true,
2130
workerData: { empiricalStackDepth },
0 commit comments
Comments
 (0)

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Commit 0ea079b
Browse files
joyeecheungaduh95
joyeecheung
authored and
aduh95
committed
test: remove impact of tier-up changes in worker stack size test
The depth of the stack depends not only on the stack size, but
also on the size of each stack frame, which in turn depends on
which tier the recursive function happens to be running at when
the overflow occurs. Under load the background tier-up can land
at a non-deterministic point in the recursion and flake the test.
Keep the recursive function in the interpreter with
%NeverOptimizeFunction() so the frame size - and thus the depth
- is deterministic.
Signed-off-by: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #64271
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
1 parent 236dc4d commit 0ea079b
1 file changed
Lines changed: 9 additions & 0 deletions
File tree
‎test/parallel/test-worker-stack-overflow-stack-size.js‎
Lines changed: 9 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -8,6 +8,14 @@ const { Worker } = require('worker_threads');
88
// Verify that Workers don't care about --stack-size, as they have their own
99
// fixed and known stack sizes.
1010

11+
// The depth of the stack depends not only on the stack size, but also on the size of each
12+
// stack frame, which in turn depends on which tier the recursive function happens to be
13+
// running at when the overflow occurs. Under load the background tier-up can land at a
14+
// non-deterministic point in the recursion and flake the test. Keep the recursive
15+
// function in the interpreter with %NeverOptimizeFunction() so the frame size -
16+
// and thus the depth - is deterministic.
17+
v8.setFlagsFromString('--allow-natives-syntax');
18+
1119
asyncfunctionrunWorker(options={}){
1220
constempiricalStackDepth=newUint32Array(newSharedArrayBuffer(4));
1321
constworker=newWorker(`
@@ -16,6 +24,7 @@ async function runWorker(options = {}) {
1624
 empiricalStackDepth[0]++;
1725
 f();
1826
 }
27+
 %NeverOptimizeFunction(f);
1928
 f();`,{
2029
eval: true,
2130
workerData: { empiricalStackDepth },
0 commit comments
Comments
 (0)

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); }
})();
})();

Skip to content
Commit 0ea079b
Browse files
joyeecheungaduh95
joyeecheung
authored and
aduh95
committed
test: remove impact of tier-up changes in worker stack size test
The depth of the stack depends not only on the stack size, but
also on the size of each stack frame, which in turn depends on
which tier the recursive function happens to be running at when
the overflow occurs. Under load the background tier-up can land
at a non-deterministic point in the recursion and flake the test.
Keep the recursive function in the interpreter with
%NeverOptimizeFunction() so the frame size - and thus the depth
- is deterministic.
Signed-off-by: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #64271
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
1 parent 236dc4d commit 0ea079b
1 file changed
Lines changed: 9 additions & 0 deletions
File tree
‎test/parallel/test-worker-stack-overflow-stack-size.js‎
Lines changed: 9 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -8,6 +8,14 @@ const { Worker } = require('worker_threads');
88
// Verify that Workers don't care about --stack-size, as they have their own
99
// fixed and known stack sizes.
1010

11+
// The depth of the stack depends not only on the stack size, but also on the size of each
12+
// stack frame, which in turn depends on which tier the recursive function happens to be
13+
// running at when the overflow occurs. Under load the background tier-up can land at a
14+
// non-deterministic point in the recursion and flake the test. Keep the recursive
15+
// function in the interpreter with %NeverOptimizeFunction() so the frame size -
16+
// and thus the depth - is deterministic.
17+
v8.setFlagsFromString('--allow-natives-syntax');
18+
1119
asyncfunctionrunWorker(options={}){
1220
constempiricalStackDepth=newUint32Array(newSharedArrayBuffer(4));
1321
constworker=newWorker(`
@@ -16,6 +24,7 @@ async function runWorker(options = {}) {
1624
 empiricalStackDepth[0]++;
1725
 f();
1826
 }
27+
 %NeverOptimizeFunction(f);
1928
 f();`,{
2029
eval: true,
2130
workerData: { empiricalStackDepth },
0 commit comments
Comments
 (0)