test: use mustSucceed instead of mustCall

SiddharthDevulapalli · ruyadorno · commit eded29c5221f · 2023-09-27T23:16:57.000-04:00
PR-URL: #49788 Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
diff --git a/test/parallel/test-trace-events-bootstrap.js b/test/parallel/test-trace-events-bootstrap.js
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ if (process.argv[2] === 'child') {
 const file = tmpdir.resolve('node_trace.1.log');
 
 assert(fs.existsSync(file));
- fs.readFile(file, common.mustCall((err, data) => {
+ fs.readFile(file, common.mustSucceed((data) => {
 const traces = JSON.parse(data.toString()).traceEvents
 .filter((trace) => trace.cat !== '__metadata');
 traces.forEach((trace) => {

-Original file line number
+Diff line change
 constfile=tmpdir.resolve('node_trace.1.log');
 assert(fs.existsSync(file));
 -fs.readFile(file,common.mustCall((err,data)=>{
 +fs.readFile(file,common.mustSucceed((data)=>{
 consttraces=JSON.parse(data.toString()).traceEvents
 .filter((trace)=>trace.cat!=='__metadata');
 traces.forEach((trace)=>{