Duplicate Fix Guard

fix(plugin-auth): ensureDefaultOrganization resolves the L4 config-derived owner when no grant row exists (#13514 follow-through) #8668

Sign in to view logs

fix(plugin-auth): ensureDefaultOrganization resolves the L4 config-derived owner when no grant row exists (#13514 follow-through)

fix(plugin-auth): ensureDefaultOrganization resolves the L4 config-derived owner when no grant row exists (#13514 follow-through) #8668

Workflow file for this run

.github/workflows/duplicate-fix-guard.yml at d6af213
# GitHub happily lets any number of open PRs declare `Fixes #N` for the same
# issue. On 2026-08-02 that cost a full duplicate implementation: #4555 and
# #4559 both declared `Fixes #4551`, both ran the whole gate suite green, and
# the duplication sat machine-detectable from the moment the second PR opened
# (03:08) until a human noticed it (08:52). All agents here share one GitHub
# identity, so the issue's assignee could not warn the second author either —
# "assigned to os-zhuang" reads the same whether it is you or another session.
# Full post-mortem: #4588.
#
# This gate makes the second PR red at open time. First come, first served —
# the EARLIER open PR (lower number) keeps its claim and stays green; the
# later one fails with a pointer to it. That matches the pm-dispatch claim
# convention ("first claim comment wins") already in .claude/skills/.
#
# Scope: same-repo references only (bare `#N` and qualified `<this repo>#N`).
# Cross-repo references are the cross-repo-issue-closer's territory, and a
# duplicate across repos cannot be resolved by failing one side's CI anyway.
name: Duplicate Fix Guard
# `edited` matters as much as `opened`: a PR that adds `Fixes #N` to its body
# after the fact must re-run this check, and one that drops the line must be
# able to go green again.
on:
pull_request:
types: [opened, edited, reopened, synchronize]
permissions:
pull-requests: read
jobs:
duplicate-fix-guard:
name: No other open PR may claim the same issue
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- name: Check declared issues against other open PRs
uses: actions/github-script@v9
with:
script: |
const pr = context.payload.pull_request;
const thisRepo = `${context.repo.owner}/${context.repo.repo}`;
// GitHub's own closing-keyword set. The optional colon is part of
// GitHub's accepted syntax (`Fixes: #123`). Two same-repo forms:
// bare `#N` and qualified `owner/repo#N` naming THIS repo.
const KEYWORDS = 'close|closes|closed|fix|fixes|fixed|resolve|resolves|resolved';
const pattern = new RegExp(
`\\b(?:${KEYWORDS}):?\\s+(?:([\\w.-]+)\\/([\\w.-]+))?#(\\d+)\\b`,
'gi',
);
// Strip fenced blocks and inline code spans before matching.
// GitHub's own closing-keyword parser ignores code formatting, and
// this guard must not be stricter than the linker it protects:
// this very PR's first run counted its own DISCUSSION of
// `Fixes #4551` (in backticks, describing the incident) as a
// declaration. Benign there — #4551 is closed — but a prose
// mention of an issue some other open PR really fixes would have
// been a spurious red.
const declaredIssues = (body) => {
const prose = (body || '')
.replace(/```[\s\S]*?```/g, ' ')
.replace(/`[^`\n]*`/g, ' ');
const found = new Set();
for (const [, owner, repo, number] of prose.matchAll(pattern)) {
// A qualified reference to ANOTHER repo is not ours to judge.
if (owner && `${owner}/${repo}`.toLowerCase() !== thisRepo.toLowerCase()) continue;
found.add(Number(number));
}
return found;
};
const mine = declaredIssues(pr.body);
if (mine.size === 0) {
core.info('This PR declares no same-repo closing keywords — nothing to guard.');
return;
}
core.info(`This PR declares: ${[...mine].map((n) => `#${n}`).join(', ')}`);
// Branch-name convention (advisory, never red): a fix branch named
// `claude/issue-<n>-<slug>` is discoverable by the next session
// with one `git ls-remote | grep issue-<n>`. #4555 vs #4559
// happened partly because the branches shared no token to grep.
// Warning only — existing branches must not go red retroactively.
const branch = pr.head.ref;
if (![...mine].some((n) => branch.includes(`issue-${n}`))) {
core.warning(
`Branch \`${branch}\` does not name any declared issue. ` +
`Convention: claude/issue-<n>-<slug> (e.g. claude/issue-${[...mine][0]}-short-slug) ` +
`so parallel sessions can discover in-flight work with git ls-remote.`,
);
}
// Drafts count: a draft PR is work in flight, which is exactly
// what the second session needs to see.
const openPrs = await github.paginate(github.rest.pulls.list, {
owner: context.repo.owner,
repo: context.repo.repo,
state: 'open',
per_page: 100,
});
const conflicts = [];
for (const other of openPrs) {
if (other.number === pr.number) continue;
const theirs = declaredIssues(other.body);
const shared = [...mine].filter((n) => theirs.has(n));
if (shared.length > 0) conflicts.push({ other, shared });
}
if (conflicts.length === 0) {
core.info('No other open PR declares these issues.');
return;
}
// First come, first served: only the LATER PR goes red. Failing
// both would leave the original author red through no action of
// their own; failing the earlier one would reward racing.
const older = conflicts.filter((c) => c.other.number < pr.number);
const newer = conflicts.filter((c) => c.other.number > pr.number);
for (const { other, shared } of newer) {
core.info(
`#${other.number} (newer) also declares ${shared.map((n) => `#${n}`).join(', ')} — ` +
`it will fail its own run of this guard; this PR keeps its claim.`,
);
}
if (older.length > 0) {
const lines = older.map(({ other, shared }) =>
` - ${shared.map((n) => `#${n}`).join(', ')} is already claimed by #${other.number} ` +
`(${other.html_url}, branch \`${other.head.ref}\`${other.draft ? ', draft' : ''})`,
);
core.setFailed(
`Another open PR already declares a fix for the same issue(s):\n${lines.join('\n')}\n` +
`If this PR is the duplicate, close it and add anything it uniquely covers to the ` +
`earlier PR or a follow-up issue (that is what saved #4560 when #4559 was closed). ` +
`If the EARLIER one is abandoned, close it first — this check re-runs on 'edited' ` +
`and 'synchronize', and goes green once the conflict is gone.`,
);
}
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all 
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '

Skip to content
 Duplicate Fix Guard

fix(plugin-auth): ensureDefaultOrganization resolves the L4 config-derived owner when no grant row exists (#13514 follow-through)
#8668
Sign in to view logs

fix(plugin-auth): ensureDefaultOrganization resolves the L4 config-derived owner when no grant row exists (#13514 follow-through)


fix(plugin-auth): ensureDefaultOrganization resolves the L4 config-derived owner when no grant row exists (#13514 follow-through) #8668
Workflow file for this run

.github/workflows/duplicate-fix-guard.yml
 at
d6af213
# GitHub happily lets any number of open PRs declare `Fixes #N` for the same
# issue. On 2026-08-02 that cost a full duplicate implementation: #4555 and
# #4559 both declared `Fixes #4551`, both ran the whole gate suite green, and
# the duplication sat machine-detectable from the moment the second PR opened
# (03:08) until a human noticed it (08:52). All agents here share one GitHub
# identity, so the issue's assignee could not warn the second author either —
# "assigned to os-zhuang" reads the same whether it is you or another session.
# Full post-mortem: #4588.
#
# This gate makes the second PR red at open time. First come, first served —
# the EARLIER open PR (lower number) keeps its claim and stays green; the
# later one fails with a pointer to it. That matches the pm-dispatch claim
# convention ("first claim comment wins") already in .claude/skills/.
#
# Scope: same-repo references only (bare `#N` and qualified `<this repo>#N`).
# Cross-repo references are the cross-repo-issue-closer's territory, and a
# duplicate across repos cannot be resolved by failing one side's CI anyway.
name: Duplicate Fix Guard
# `edited` matters as much as `opened`: a PR that adds `Fixes #N` to its body
# after the fact must re-run this check, and one that drops the line must be
# able to go green again.
on:
pull_request:
types: [opened, edited, reopened, synchronize]
permissions:
pull-requests: read
jobs:
duplicate-fix-guard:
name: No other open PR may claim the same issue
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
 - name: Check declared issues against other open PRs
uses: actions/github-script@v9
with:
script: |
 const pr = context.payload.pull_request;
 const thisRepo = `${context.repo.owner}/${context.repo.repo}`;
 // GitHub's own closing-keyword set. The optional colon is part of
 // GitHub's accepted syntax (`Fixes: #123`). Two same-repo forms:
 // bare `#N` and qualified `owner/repo#N` naming THIS repo.
 const KEYWORDS = 'close|closes|closed|fix|fixes|fixed|resolve|resolves|resolved';
 const pattern = new RegExp(
 `\\b(?:${KEYWORDS}):?\\s+(?:([\\w.-]+)\\/([\\w.-]+))?#(\\d+)\\b`,
 'gi',
 );
 // Strip fenced blocks and inline code spans before matching.
 // GitHub's own closing-keyword parser ignores code formatting, and
 // this guard must not be stricter than the linker it protects:
 // this very PR's first run counted its own DISCUSSION of
 // `Fixes #4551` (in backticks, describing the incident) as a
 // declaration. Benign there — #4551 is closed — but a prose
 // mention of an issue some other open PR really fixes would have
 // been a spurious red.
 const declaredIssues = (body) => {
 const prose = (body || '')
 .replace(/```[\s\S]*?```/g, ' ')
 .replace(/`[^`\n]*`/g, ' ');
 const found = new Set();
 for (const [, owner, repo, number] of prose.matchAll(pattern)) {
 // A qualified reference to ANOTHER repo is not ours to judge.
 if (owner && `${owner}/${repo}`.toLowerCase() !== thisRepo.toLowerCase()) continue;
 found.add(Number(number));
 }
 return found;
 };
 const mine = declaredIssues(pr.body);
 if (mine.size === 0) {
 core.info('This PR declares no same-repo closing keywords — nothing to guard.');
 return;
 }
 core.info(`This PR declares: ${[...mine].map((n) => `#${n}`).join(', ')}`);
 // Branch-name convention (advisory, never red): a fix branch named
 // `claude/issue-<n>-<slug>` is discoverable by the next session
 // with one `git ls-remote | grep issue-<n>`. #4555 vs #4559
 // happened partly because the branches shared no token to grep.
 // Warning only — existing branches must not go red retroactively.
 const branch = pr.head.ref;
 if (![...mine].some((n) => branch.includes(`issue-${n}`))) {
 core.warning(
 `Branch \`${branch}\` does not name any declared issue. ` +
 `Convention: claude/issue-<n>-<slug> (e.g. claude/issue-${[...mine][0]}-short-slug) ` +
 `so parallel sessions can discover in-flight work with git ls-remote.`,
 );
 }
 // Drafts count: a draft PR is work in flight, which is exactly
 // what the second session needs to see.
 const openPrs = await github.paginate(github.rest.pulls.list, {
 owner: context.repo.owner,
 repo: context.repo.repo,
 state: 'open',
 per_page: 100,
 });
 const conflicts = [];
 for (const other of openPrs) {
 if (other.number === pr.number) continue;
 const theirs = declaredIssues(other.body);
 const shared = [...mine].filter((n) => theirs.has(n));
 if (shared.length > 0) conflicts.push({ other, shared });
 }
 if (conflicts.length === 0) {
 core.info('No other open PR declares these issues.');
 return;
 }
 // First come, first served: only the LATER PR goes red. Failing
 // both would leave the original author red through no action of
 // their own; failing the earlier one would reward racing.
 const older = conflicts.filter((c) => c.other.number < pr.number);
 const newer = conflicts.filter((c) => c.other.number > pr.number);
 for (const { other, shared } of newer) {
 core.info(
 `#${other.number} (newer) also declares ${shared.map((n) => `#${n}`).join(', ')} — ` +
 `it will fail its own run of this guard; this PR keeps its claim.`,
 );
 }
 if (older.length > 0) {
 const lines = older.map(({ other, shared }) =>
 ` - ${shared.map((n) => `#${n}`).join(', ')} is already claimed by #${other.number} ` +
 `(${other.html_url}, branch \`${other.head.ref}\`${other.draft ? ', draft' : ''})`,
 );
 core.setFailed(
 `Another open PR already declares a fix for the same issue(s):\n${lines.join('\n')}\n` +
 `If this PR is the duplicate, close it and add anything it uniquely covers to the ` +
 `earlier PR or a follow-up issue (that is what saved #4560 when #4559 was closed). ` +
 `If the EARLIER one is abandoned, close it first — this check re-runs on 'edited' ` +
 `and 'synchronize', and goes green once the conflict is gone.`,
 );
 }

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode
(function() {
var style = document.createElement('style');
style.textContent = '
.markdown-body {
color-scheme: dark light;
}
.markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }
.markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }
.markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }
.markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }
.markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }
.markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }
';
document.head.appendChild(style);
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
 Duplicate Fix Guard

fix(plugin-auth): ensureDefaultOrganization resolves the L4 config-derived owner when no grant row exists (#13514 follow-through)
#8668
Sign in to view logs

fix(plugin-auth): ensureDefaultOrganization resolves the L4 config-derived owner when no grant row exists (#13514 follow-through)


fix(plugin-auth): ensureDefaultOrganization resolves the L4 config-derived owner when no grant row exists (#13514 follow-through) #8668
Workflow file for this run

.github/workflows/duplicate-fix-guard.yml
 at
d6af213
# GitHub happily lets any number of open PRs declare `Fixes #N` for the same
# issue. On 2026-08-02 that cost a full duplicate implementation: #4555 and
# #4559 both declared `Fixes #4551`, both ran the whole gate suite green, and
# the duplication sat machine-detectable from the moment the second PR opened
# (03:08) until a human noticed it (08:52). All agents here share one GitHub
# identity, so the issue's assignee could not warn the second author either —
# "assigned to os-zhuang" reads the same whether it is you or another session.
# Full post-mortem: #4588.
#
# This gate makes the second PR red at open time. First come, first served —
# the EARLIER open PR (lower number) keeps its claim and stays green; the
# later one fails with a pointer to it. That matches the pm-dispatch claim
# convention ("first claim comment wins") already in .claude/skills/.
#
# Scope: same-repo references only (bare `#N` and qualified `<this repo>#N`).
# Cross-repo references are the cross-repo-issue-closer's territory, and a
# duplicate across repos cannot be resolved by failing one side's CI anyway.
name: Duplicate Fix Guard
# `edited` matters as much as `opened`: a PR that adds `Fixes #N` to its body
# after the fact must re-run this check, and one that drops the line must be
# able to go green again.
on:
pull_request:
types: [opened, edited, reopened, synchronize]
permissions:
pull-requests: read
jobs:
duplicate-fix-guard:
name: No other open PR may claim the same issue
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
 - name: Check declared issues against other open PRs
uses: actions/github-script@v9
with:
script: |
 const pr = context.payload.pull_request;
 const thisRepo = `${context.repo.owner}/${context.repo.repo}`;
 // GitHub's own closing-keyword set. The optional colon is part of
 // GitHub's accepted syntax (`Fixes: #123`). Two same-repo forms:
 // bare `#N` and qualified `owner/repo#N` naming THIS repo.
 const KEYWORDS = 'close|closes|closed|fix|fixes|fixed|resolve|resolves|resolved';
 const pattern = new RegExp(
 `\\b(?:${KEYWORDS}):?\\s+(?:([\\w.-]+)\\/([\\w.-]+))?#(\\d+)\\b`,
 'gi',
 );
 // Strip fenced blocks and inline code spans before matching.
 // GitHub's own closing-keyword parser ignores code formatting, and
 // this guard must not be stricter than the linker it protects:
 // this very PR's first run counted its own DISCUSSION of
 // `Fixes #4551` (in backticks, describing the incident) as a
 // declaration. Benign there — #4551 is closed — but a prose
 // mention of an issue some other open PR really fixes would have
 // been a spurious red.
 const declaredIssues = (body) => {
 const prose = (body || '')
 .replace(/```[\s\S]*?```/g, ' ')
 .replace(/`[^`\n]*`/g, ' ');
 const found = new Set();
 for (const [, owner, repo, number] of prose.matchAll(pattern)) {
 // A qualified reference to ANOTHER repo is not ours to judge.
 if (owner && `${owner}/${repo}`.toLowerCase() !== thisRepo.toLowerCase()) continue;
 found.add(Number(number));
 }
 return found;
 };
 const mine = declaredIssues(pr.body);
 if (mine.size === 0) {
 core.info('This PR declares no same-repo closing keywords — nothing to guard.');
 return;
 }
 core.info(`This PR declares: ${[...mine].map((n) => `#${n}`).join(', ')}`);
 // Branch-name convention (advisory, never red): a fix branch named
 // `claude/issue-<n>-<slug>` is discoverable by the next session
 // with one `git ls-remote | grep issue-<n>`. #4555 vs #4559
 // happened partly because the branches shared no token to grep.
 // Warning only — existing branches must not go red retroactively.
 const branch = pr.head.ref;
 if (![...mine].some((n) => branch.includes(`issue-${n}`))) {
 core.warning(
 `Branch \`${branch}\` does not name any declared issue. ` +
 `Convention: claude/issue-<n>-<slug> (e.g. claude/issue-${[...mine][0]}-short-slug) ` +
 `so parallel sessions can discover in-flight work with git ls-remote.`,
 );
 }
 // Drafts count: a draft PR is work in flight, which is exactly
 // what the second session needs to see.
 const openPrs = await github.paginate(github.rest.pulls.list, {
 owner: context.repo.owner,
 repo: context.repo.repo,
 state: 'open',
 per_page: 100,
 });
 const conflicts = [];
 for (const other of openPrs) {
 if (other.number === pr.number) continue;
 const theirs = declaredIssues(other.body);
 const shared = [...mine].filter((n) => theirs.has(n));
 if (shared.length > 0) conflicts.push({ other, shared });
 }
 if (conflicts.length === 0) {
 core.info('No other open PR declares these issues.');
 return;
 }
 // First come, first served: only the LATER PR goes red. Failing
 // both would leave the original author red through no action of
 // their own; failing the earlier one would reward racing.
 const older = conflicts.filter((c) => c.other.number < pr.number);
 const newer = conflicts.filter((c) => c.other.number > pr.number);
 for (const { other, shared } of newer) {
 core.info(
 `#${other.number} (newer) also declares ${shared.map((n) => `#${n}`).join(', ')} — ` +
 `it will fail its own run of this guard; this PR keeps its claim.`,
 );
 }
 if (older.length > 0) {
 const lines = older.map(({ other, shared }) =>
 ` - ${shared.map((n) => `#${n}`).join(', ')} is already claimed by #${other.number} ` +
 `(${other.html_url}, branch \`${other.head.ref}\`${other.draft ? ', draft' : ''})`,
 );
 core.setFailed(
 `Another open PR already declares a fix for the same issue(s):\n${lines.join('\n')}\n` +
 `If this PR is the duplicate, close it and add anything it uniquely covers to the ` +
 `earlier PR or a follow-up issue (that is what saved #4560 when #4559 was closed). ` +
 `If the EARLIER one is abandoned, close it first — this check re-runs on 'edited' ` +
 `and 'synchronize', and goes green once the conflict is gone.`,
 );
 }

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer
(function() {
var ref = document.referrer;
var terms = [];
if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {
var url = new URL(ref);
var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');
if (q) {
terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });
}
}
if (terms.length === 0) return;
var style = document.createElement('style');
style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';
document.head.appendChild(style);
function highlight(node) {
if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node
var text = node.textContent;
var found = false;
terms.forEach(function(term) {
var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi');
if (regex.test(text)) {
found = true;
var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();
var parts = text.split(regex);
parts.forEach(function(part, i) {
if (i % 2 === 0) {
frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));
} else {
var span = document.createElement('span');
span.className = 'userscript-highlight';
span.textContent = part;
frag.appendChild(span);
}
});
node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);
}
});
} else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element
var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];
if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {
Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);
}
}
}
highlight(document.body);
// Re-highlight on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {
mutations.forEach(function(m) {
m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {
if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);
});
});
});
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
 Duplicate Fix Guard

fix(plugin-auth): ensureDefaultOrganization resolves the L4 config-derived owner when no grant row exists (#13514 follow-through)
#8668
Sign in to view logs

fix(plugin-auth): ensureDefaultOrganization resolves the L4 config-derived owner when no grant row exists (#13514 follow-through)


fix(plugin-auth): ensureDefaultOrganization resolves the L4 config-derived owner when no grant row exists (#13514 follow-through) #8668
Workflow file for this run

.github/workflows/duplicate-fix-guard.yml
 at
d6af213
# GitHub happily lets any number of open PRs declare `Fixes #N` for the same
# issue. On 2026-08-02 that cost a full duplicate implementation: #4555 and
# #4559 both declared `Fixes #4551`, both ran the whole gate suite green, and
# the duplication sat machine-detectable from the moment the second PR opened
# (03:08) until a human noticed it (08:52). All agents here share one GitHub
# identity, so the issue's assignee could not warn the second author either —
# "assigned to os-zhuang" reads the same whether it is you or another session.
# Full post-mortem: #4588.
#
# This gate makes the second PR red at open time. First come, first served —
# the EARLIER open PR (lower number) keeps its claim and stays green; the
# later one fails with a pointer to it. That matches the pm-dispatch claim
# convention ("first claim comment wins") already in .claude/skills/.
#
# Scope: same-repo references only (bare `#N` and qualified `<this repo>#N`).
# Cross-repo references are the cross-repo-issue-closer's territory, and a
# duplicate across repos cannot be resolved by failing one side's CI anyway.
name: Duplicate Fix Guard
# `edited` matters as much as `opened`: a PR that adds `Fixes #N` to its body
# after the fact must re-run this check, and one that drops the line must be
# able to go green again.
on:
pull_request:
types: [opened, edited, reopened, synchronize]
permissions:
pull-requests: read
jobs:
duplicate-fix-guard:
name: No other open PR may claim the same issue
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
 - name: Check declared issues against other open PRs
uses: actions/github-script@v9
with:
script: |
 const pr = context.payload.pull_request;
 const thisRepo = `${context.repo.owner}/${context.repo.repo}`;
 // GitHub's own closing-keyword set. The optional colon is part of
 // GitHub's accepted syntax (`Fixes: #123`). Two same-repo forms:
 // bare `#N` and qualified `owner/repo#N` naming THIS repo.
 const KEYWORDS = 'close|closes|closed|fix|fixes|fixed|resolve|resolves|resolved';
 const pattern = new RegExp(
 `\\b(?:${KEYWORDS}):?\\s+(?:([\\w.-]+)\\/([\\w.-]+))?#(\\d+)\\b`,
 'gi',
 );
 // Strip fenced blocks and inline code spans before matching.
 // GitHub's own closing-keyword parser ignores code formatting, and
 // this guard must not be stricter than the linker it protects:
 // this very PR's first run counted its own DISCUSSION of
 // `Fixes #4551` (in backticks, describing the incident) as a
 // declaration. Benign there — #4551 is closed — but a prose
 // mention of an issue some other open PR really fixes would have
 // been a spurious red.
 const declaredIssues = (body) => {
 const prose = (body || '')
 .replace(/```[\s\S]*?```/g, ' ')
 .replace(/`[^`\n]*`/g, ' ');
 const found = new Set();
 for (const [, owner, repo, number] of prose.matchAll(pattern)) {
 // A qualified reference to ANOTHER repo is not ours to judge.
 if (owner && `${owner}/${repo}`.toLowerCase() !== thisRepo.toLowerCase()) continue;
 found.add(Number(number));
 }
 return found;
 };
 const mine = declaredIssues(pr.body);
 if (mine.size === 0) {
 core.info('This PR declares no same-repo closing keywords — nothing to guard.');
 return;
 }
 core.info(`This PR declares: ${[...mine].map((n) => `#${n}`).join(', ')}`);
 // Branch-name convention (advisory, never red): a fix branch named
 // `claude/issue-<n>-<slug>` is discoverable by the next session
 // with one `git ls-remote | grep issue-<n>`. #4555 vs #4559
 // happened partly because the branches shared no token to grep.
 // Warning only — existing branches must not go red retroactively.
 const branch = pr.head.ref;
 if (![...mine].some((n) => branch.includes(`issue-${n}`))) {
 core.warning(
 `Branch \`${branch}\` does not name any declared issue. ` +
 `Convention: claude/issue-<n>-<slug> (e.g. claude/issue-${[...mine][0]}-short-slug) ` +
 `so parallel sessions can discover in-flight work with git ls-remote.`,
 );
 }
 // Drafts count: a draft PR is work in flight, which is exactly
 // what the second session needs to see.
 const openPrs = await github.paginate(github.rest.pulls.list, {
 owner: context.repo.owner,
 repo: context.repo.repo,
 state: 'open',
 per_page: 100,
 });
 const conflicts = [];
 for (const other of openPrs) {
 if (other.number === pr.number) continue;
 const theirs = declaredIssues(other.body);
 const shared = [...mine].filter((n) => theirs.has(n));
 if (shared.length > 0) conflicts.push({ other, shared });
 }
 if (conflicts.length === 0) {
 core.info('No other open PR declares these issues.');
 return;
 }
 // First come, first served: only the LATER PR goes red. Failing
 // both would leave the original author red through no action of
 // their own; failing the earlier one would reward racing.
 const older = conflicts.filter((c) => c.other.number < pr.number);
 const newer = conflicts.filter((c) => c.other.number > pr.number);
 for (const { other, shared } of newer) {
 core.info(
 `#${other.number} (newer) also declares ${shared.map((n) => `#${n}`).join(', ')} — ` +
 `it will fail its own run of this guard; this PR keeps its claim.`,
 );
 }
 if (older.length > 0) {
 const lines = older.map(({ other, shared }) =>
 ` - ${shared.map((n) => `#${n}`).join(', ')} is already claimed by #${other.number} ` +
 `(${other.html_url}, branch \`${other.head.ref}\`${other.draft ? ', draft' : ''})`,
 );
 core.setFailed(
 `Another open PR already declares a fix for the same issue(s):\n${lines.join('\n')}\n` +
 `If this PR is the duplicate, close it and add anything it uniquely covers to the ` +
 `earlier PR or a follow-up issue (that is what saved #4560 when #4559 was closed). ` +
 `If the EARLIER one is abandoned, close it first — this check re-runs on 'edited' ` +
 `and 'synchronize', and goes green once the conflict is gone.`,
 );
 }

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page
(function() {
var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',
'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',
'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];
function cleanUrl(url) {
try {
var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);
var changed = false;
trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {
if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {
u.searchParams.delete(p);
changed = true;
}
});
return changed ? u.toString() : url;
} catch (e) {
return url;
}
}
function cleanLinks() {
document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {
var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);
if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;
});
}
cleanLinks();
var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {
mutations.forEach(function(m) {
m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {
if (node.nodeType === 1) {
if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();
node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {
var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);
if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;
});
}
});
});
});
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "youtube.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '

Skip to content
 Duplicate Fix Guard

fix(plugin-auth): ensureDefaultOrganization resolves the L4 config-derived owner when no grant row exists (#13514 follow-through)
#8668
Sign in to view logs

fix(plugin-auth): ensureDefaultOrganization resolves the L4 config-derived owner when no grant row exists (#13514 follow-through)


fix(plugin-auth): ensureDefaultOrganization resolves the L4 config-derived owner when no grant row exists (#13514 follow-through) #8668
Workflow file for this run

.github/workflows/duplicate-fix-guard.yml
 at
d6af213
# GitHub happily lets any number of open PRs declare `Fixes #N` for the same
# issue. On 2026-08-02 that cost a full duplicate implementation: #4555 and
# #4559 both declared `Fixes #4551`, both ran the whole gate suite green, and
# the duplication sat machine-detectable from the moment the second PR opened
# (03:08) until a human noticed it (08:52). All agents here share one GitHub
# identity, so the issue's assignee could not warn the second author either —
# "assigned to os-zhuang" reads the same whether it is you or another session.
# Full post-mortem: #4588.
#
# This gate makes the second PR red at open time. First come, first served —
# the EARLIER open PR (lower number) keeps its claim and stays green; the
# later one fails with a pointer to it. That matches the pm-dispatch claim
# convention ("first claim comment wins") already in .claude/skills/.
#
# Scope: same-repo references only (bare `#N` and qualified `<this repo>#N`).
# Cross-repo references are the cross-repo-issue-closer's territory, and a
# duplicate across repos cannot be resolved by failing one side's CI anyway.
name: Duplicate Fix Guard
# `edited` matters as much as `opened`: a PR that adds `Fixes #N` to its body
# after the fact must re-run this check, and one that drops the line must be
# able to go green again.
on:
pull_request:
types: [opened, edited, reopened, synchronize]
permissions:
pull-requests: read
jobs:
duplicate-fix-guard:
name: No other open PR may claim the same issue
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
 - name: Check declared issues against other open PRs
uses: actions/github-script@v9
with:
script: |
 const pr = context.payload.pull_request;
 const thisRepo = `${context.repo.owner}/${context.repo.repo}`;
 // GitHub's own closing-keyword set. The optional colon is part of
 // GitHub's accepted syntax (`Fixes: #123`). Two same-repo forms:
 // bare `#N` and qualified `owner/repo#N` naming THIS repo.
 const KEYWORDS = 'close|closes|closed|fix|fixes|fixed|resolve|resolves|resolved';
 const pattern = new RegExp(
 `\\b(?:${KEYWORDS}):?\\s+(?:([\\w.-]+)\\/([\\w.-]+))?#(\\d+)\\b`,
 'gi',
 );
 // Strip fenced blocks and inline code spans before matching.
 // GitHub's own closing-keyword parser ignores code formatting, and
 // this guard must not be stricter than the linker it protects:
 // this very PR's first run counted its own DISCUSSION of
 // `Fixes #4551` (in backticks, describing the incident) as a
 // declaration. Benign there — #4551 is closed — but a prose
 // mention of an issue some other open PR really fixes would have
 // been a spurious red.
 const declaredIssues = (body) => {
 const prose = (body || '')
 .replace(/```[\s\S]*?```/g, ' ')
 .replace(/`[^`\n]*`/g, ' ');
 const found = new Set();
 for (const [, owner, repo, number] of prose.matchAll(pattern)) {
 // A qualified reference to ANOTHER repo is not ours to judge.
 if (owner && `${owner}/${repo}`.toLowerCase() !== thisRepo.toLowerCase()) continue;
 found.add(Number(number));
 }
 return found;
 };
 const mine = declaredIssues(pr.body);
 if (mine.size === 0) {
 core.info('This PR declares no same-repo closing keywords — nothing to guard.');
 return;
 }
 core.info(`This PR declares: ${[...mine].map((n) => `#${n}`).join(', ')}`);
 // Branch-name convention (advisory, never red): a fix branch named
 // `claude/issue-<n>-<slug>` is discoverable by the next session
 // with one `git ls-remote | grep issue-<n>`. #4555 vs #4559
 // happened partly because the branches shared no token to grep.
 // Warning only — existing branches must not go red retroactively.
 const branch = pr.head.ref;
 if (![...mine].some((n) => branch.includes(`issue-${n}`))) {
 core.warning(
 `Branch \`${branch}\` does not name any declared issue. ` +
 `Convention: claude/issue-<n>-<slug> (e.g. claude/issue-${[...mine][0]}-short-slug) ` +
 `so parallel sessions can discover in-flight work with git ls-remote.`,
 );
 }
 // Drafts count: a draft PR is work in flight, which is exactly
 // what the second session needs to see.
 const openPrs = await github.paginate(github.rest.pulls.list, {
 owner: context.repo.owner,
 repo: context.repo.repo,
 state: 'open',
 per_page: 100,
 });
 const conflicts = [];
 for (const other of openPrs) {
 if (other.number === pr.number) continue;
 const theirs = declaredIssues(other.body);
 const shared = [...mine].filter((n) => theirs.has(n));
 if (shared.length > 0) conflicts.push({ other, shared });
 }
 if (conflicts.length === 0) {
 core.info('No other open PR declares these issues.');
 return;
 }
 // First come, first served: only the LATER PR goes red. Failing
 // both would leave the original author red through no action of
 // their own; failing the earlier one would reward racing.
 const older = conflicts.filter((c) => c.other.number < pr.number);
 const newer = conflicts.filter((c) => c.other.number > pr.number);
 for (const { other, shared } of newer) {
 core.info(
 `#${other.number} (newer) also declares ${shared.map((n) => `#${n}`).join(', ')} — ` +
 `it will fail its own run of this guard; this PR keeps its claim.`,
 );
 }
 if (older.length > 0) {
 const lines = older.map(({ other, shared }) =>
 ` - ${shared.map((n) => `#${n}`).join(', ')} is already claimed by #${other.number} ` +
 `(${other.html_url}, branch \`${other.head.ref}\`${other.draft ? ', draft' : ''})`,
 );
 core.setFailed(
 `Another open PR already declares a fix for the same issue(s):\n${lines.join('\n')}\n` +
 `If this PR is the duplicate, close it and add anything it uniquely covers to the ` +
 `earlier PR or a follow-up issue (that is what saved #4560 when #4559 was closed). ` +
 `If the EARLIER one is abandoned, close it first — this check re-runs on 'edited' ` +
 `and 'synchronize', and goes green once the conflict is gone.`,
 );
 }

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube
(function() {
function tryTheater() {
var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]');
if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {
btn.click();
}
}
// Try immediately
tryTheater();
// Try after navigation (SPA)
var lastUrl = location.href;
setInterval(function() {
if (location.href !== lastUrl) {
lastUrl = location.href;
setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);
}
}, 1000);
// Also try on player load
var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
 Duplicate Fix Guard

fix(plugin-auth): ensureDefaultOrganization resolves the L4 config-derived owner when no grant row exists (#13514 follow-through)
#8668
Sign in to view logs

fix(plugin-auth): ensureDefaultOrganization resolves the L4 config-derived owner when no grant row exists (#13514 follow-through)


fix(plugin-auth): ensureDefaultOrganization resolves the L4 config-derived owner when no grant row exists (#13514 follow-through) #8668
Workflow file for this run

.github/workflows/duplicate-fix-guard.yml
 at
d6af213
# GitHub happily lets any number of open PRs declare `Fixes #N` for the same
# issue. On 2026-08-02 that cost a full duplicate implementation: #4555 and
# #4559 both declared `Fixes #4551`, both ran the whole gate suite green, and
# the duplication sat machine-detectable from the moment the second PR opened
# (03:08) until a human noticed it (08:52). All agents here share one GitHub
# identity, so the issue's assignee could not warn the second author either —
# "assigned to os-zhuang" reads the same whether it is you or another session.
# Full post-mortem: #4588.
#
# This gate makes the second PR red at open time. First come, first served —
# the EARLIER open PR (lower number) keeps its claim and stays green; the
# later one fails with a pointer to it. That matches the pm-dispatch claim
# convention ("first claim comment wins") already in .claude/skills/.
#
# Scope: same-repo references only (bare `#N` and qualified `<this repo>#N`).
# Cross-repo references are the cross-repo-issue-closer's territory, and a
# duplicate across repos cannot be resolved by failing one side's CI anyway.
name: Duplicate Fix Guard
# `edited` matters as much as `opened`: a PR that adds `Fixes #N` to its body
# after the fact must re-run this check, and one that drops the line must be
# able to go green again.
on:
pull_request:
types: [opened, edited, reopened, synchronize]
permissions:
pull-requests: read
jobs:
duplicate-fix-guard:
name: No other open PR may claim the same issue
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
 - name: Check declared issues against other open PRs
uses: actions/github-script@v9
with:
script: |
 const pr = context.payload.pull_request;
 const thisRepo = `${context.repo.owner}/${context.repo.repo}`;
 // GitHub's own closing-keyword set. The optional colon is part of
 // GitHub's accepted syntax (`Fixes: #123`). Two same-repo forms:
 // bare `#N` and qualified `owner/repo#N` naming THIS repo.
 const KEYWORDS = 'close|closes|closed|fix|fixes|fixed|resolve|resolves|resolved';
 const pattern = new RegExp(
 `\\b(?:${KEYWORDS}):?\\s+(?:([\\w.-]+)\\/([\\w.-]+))?#(\\d+)\\b`,
 'gi',
 );
 // Strip fenced blocks and inline code spans before matching.
 // GitHub's own closing-keyword parser ignores code formatting, and
 // this guard must not be stricter than the linker it protects:
 // this very PR's first run counted its own DISCUSSION of
 // `Fixes #4551` (in backticks, describing the incident) as a
 // declaration. Benign there — #4551 is closed — but a prose
 // mention of an issue some other open PR really fixes would have
 // been a spurious red.
 const declaredIssues = (body) => {
 const prose = (body || '')
 .replace(/```[\s\S]*?```/g, ' ')
 .replace(/`[^`\n]*`/g, ' ');
 const found = new Set();
 for (const [, owner, repo, number] of prose.matchAll(pattern)) {
 // A qualified reference to ANOTHER repo is not ours to judge.
 if (owner && `${owner}/${repo}`.toLowerCase() !== thisRepo.toLowerCase()) continue;
 found.add(Number(number));
 }
 return found;
 };
 const mine = declaredIssues(pr.body);
 if (mine.size === 0) {
 core.info('This PR declares no same-repo closing keywords — nothing to guard.');
 return;
 }
 core.info(`This PR declares: ${[...mine].map((n) => `#${n}`).join(', ')}`);
 // Branch-name convention (advisory, never red): a fix branch named
 // `claude/issue-<n>-<slug>` is discoverable by the next session
 // with one `git ls-remote | grep issue-<n>`. #4555 vs #4559
 // happened partly because the branches shared no token to grep.
 // Warning only — existing branches must not go red retroactively.
 const branch = pr.head.ref;
 if (![...mine].some((n) => branch.includes(`issue-${n}`))) {
 core.warning(
 `Branch \`${branch}\` does not name any declared issue. ` +
 `Convention: claude/issue-<n>-<slug> (e.g. claude/issue-${[...mine][0]}-short-slug) ` +
 `so parallel sessions can discover in-flight work with git ls-remote.`,
 );
 }
 // Drafts count: a draft PR is work in flight, which is exactly
 // what the second session needs to see.
 const openPrs = await github.paginate(github.rest.pulls.list, {
 owner: context.repo.owner,
 repo: context.repo.repo,
 state: 'open',
 per_page: 100,
 });
 const conflicts = [];
 for (const other of openPrs) {
 if (other.number === pr.number) continue;
 const theirs = declaredIssues(other.body);
 const shared = [...mine].filter((n) => theirs.has(n));
 if (shared.length > 0) conflicts.push({ other, shared });
 }
 if (conflicts.length === 0) {
 core.info('No other open PR declares these issues.');
 return;
 }
 // First come, first served: only the LATER PR goes red. Failing
 // both would leave the original author red through no action of
 // their own; failing the earlier one would reward racing.
 const older = conflicts.filter((c) => c.other.number < pr.number);
 const newer = conflicts.filter((c) => c.other.number > pr.number);
 for (const { other, shared } of newer) {
 core.info(
 `#${other.number} (newer) also declares ${shared.map((n) => `#${n}`).join(', ')} — ` +
 `it will fail its own run of this guard; this PR keeps its claim.`,
 );
 }
 if (older.length > 0) {
 const lines = older.map(({ other, shared }) =>
 ` - ${shared.map((n) => `#${n}`).join(', ')} is already claimed by #${other.number} ` +
 `(${other.html_url}, branch \`${other.head.ref}\`${other.draft ? ', draft' : ''})`,
 );
 core.setFailed(
 `Another open PR already declares a fix for the same issue(s):\n${lines.join('\n')}\n` +
 `If this PR is the duplicate, close it and add anything it uniquely covers to the ` +
 `earlier PR or a follow-up issue (that is what saved #4560 when #4559 was closed). ` +
 `If the EARLIER one is abandoned, close it first — this check re-runs on 'edited' ` +
 `and 'synchronize', and goes green once the conflict is gone.`,
 );
 }

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content
(function() {
function unstick() {
document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) {
if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {
el.style.position = 'static';
el.style.top = 'auto';
el.style.zIndex = 'auto';
}
});
}
unstick();
var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
 Duplicate Fix Guard

fix(plugin-auth): ensureDefaultOrganization resolves the L4 config-derived owner when no grant row exists (#13514 follow-through)
#8668
Sign in to view logs

fix(plugin-auth): ensureDefaultOrganization resolves the L4 config-derived owner when no grant row exists (#13514 follow-through)


fix(plugin-auth): ensureDefaultOrganization resolves the L4 config-derived owner when no grant row exists (#13514 follow-through) #8668
Workflow file for this run

.github/workflows/duplicate-fix-guard.yml
 at
d6af213
# GitHub happily lets any number of open PRs declare `Fixes #N` for the same
# issue. On 2026-08-02 that cost a full duplicate implementation: #4555 and
# #4559 both declared `Fixes #4551`, both ran the whole gate suite green, and
# the duplication sat machine-detectable from the moment the second PR opened
# (03:08) until a human noticed it (08:52). All agents here share one GitHub
# identity, so the issue's assignee could not warn the second author either —
# "assigned to os-zhuang" reads the same whether it is you or another session.
# Full post-mortem: #4588.
#
# This gate makes the second PR red at open time. First come, first served —
# the EARLIER open PR (lower number) keeps its claim and stays green; the
# later one fails with a pointer to it. That matches the pm-dispatch claim
# convention ("first claim comment wins") already in .claude/skills/.
#
# Scope: same-repo references only (bare `#N` and qualified `<this repo>#N`).
# Cross-repo references are the cross-repo-issue-closer's territory, and a
# duplicate across repos cannot be resolved by failing one side's CI anyway.
name: Duplicate Fix Guard
# `edited` matters as much as `opened`: a PR that adds `Fixes #N` to its body
# after the fact must re-run this check, and one that drops the line must be
# able to go green again.
on:
pull_request:
types: [opened, edited, reopened, synchronize]
permissions:
pull-requests: read
jobs:
duplicate-fix-guard:
name: No other open PR may claim the same issue
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
 - name: Check declared issues against other open PRs
uses: actions/github-script@v9
with:
script: |
 const pr = context.payload.pull_request;
 const thisRepo = `${context.repo.owner}/${context.repo.repo}`;
 // GitHub's own closing-keyword set. The optional colon is part of
 // GitHub's accepted syntax (`Fixes: #123`). Two same-repo forms:
 // bare `#N` and qualified `owner/repo#N` naming THIS repo.
 const KEYWORDS = 'close|closes|closed|fix|fixes|fixed|resolve|resolves|resolved';
 const pattern = new RegExp(
 `\\b(?:${KEYWORDS}):?\\s+(?:([\\w.-]+)\\/([\\w.-]+))?#(\\d+)\\b`,
 'gi',
 );
 // Strip fenced blocks and inline code spans before matching.
 // GitHub's own closing-keyword parser ignores code formatting, and
 // this guard must not be stricter than the linker it protects:
 // this very PR's first run counted its own DISCUSSION of
 // `Fixes #4551` (in backticks, describing the incident) as a
 // declaration. Benign there — #4551 is closed — but a prose
 // mention of an issue some other open PR really fixes would have
 // been a spurious red.
 const declaredIssues = (body) => {
 const prose = (body || '')
 .replace(/```[\s\S]*?```/g, ' ')
 .replace(/`[^`\n]*`/g, ' ');
 const found = new Set();
 for (const [, owner, repo, number] of prose.matchAll(pattern)) {
 // A qualified reference to ANOTHER repo is not ours to judge.
 if (owner && `${owner}/${repo}`.toLowerCase() !== thisRepo.toLowerCase()) continue;
 found.add(Number(number));
 }
 return found;
 };
 const mine = declaredIssues(pr.body);
 if (mine.size === 0) {
 core.info('This PR declares no same-repo closing keywords — nothing to guard.');
 return;
 }
 core.info(`This PR declares: ${[...mine].map((n) => `#${n}`).join(', ')}`);
 // Branch-name convention (advisory, never red): a fix branch named
 // `claude/issue-<n>-<slug>` is discoverable by the next session
 // with one `git ls-remote | grep issue-<n>`. #4555 vs #4559
 // happened partly because the branches shared no token to grep.
 // Warning only — existing branches must not go red retroactively.
 const branch = pr.head.ref;
 if (![...mine].some((n) => branch.includes(`issue-${n}`))) {
 core.warning(
 `Branch \`${branch}\` does not name any declared issue. ` +
 `Convention: claude/issue-<n>-<slug> (e.g. claude/issue-${[...mine][0]}-short-slug) ` +
 `so parallel sessions can discover in-flight work with git ls-remote.`,
 );
 }
 // Drafts count: a draft PR is work in flight, which is exactly
 // what the second session needs to see.
 const openPrs = await github.paginate(github.rest.pulls.list, {
 owner: context.repo.owner,
 repo: context.repo.repo,
 state: 'open',
 per_page: 100,
 });
 const conflicts = [];
 for (const other of openPrs) {
 if (other.number === pr.number) continue;
 const theirs = declaredIssues(other.body);
 const shared = [...mine].filter((n) => theirs.has(n));
 if (shared.length > 0) conflicts.push({ other, shared });
 }
 if (conflicts.length === 0) {
 core.info('No other open PR declares these issues.');
 return;
 }
 // First come, first served: only the LATER PR goes red. Failing
 // both would leave the original author red through no action of
 // their own; failing the earlier one would reward racing.
 const older = conflicts.filter((c) => c.other.number < pr.number);
 const newer = conflicts.filter((c) => c.other.number > pr.number);
 for (const { other, shared } of newer) {
 core.info(
 `#${other.number} (newer) also declares ${shared.map((n) => `#${n}`).join(', ')} — ` +
 `it will fail its own run of this guard; this PR keeps its claim.`,
 );
 }
 if (older.length > 0) {
 const lines = older.map(({ other, shared }) =>
 ` - ${shared.map((n) => `#${n}`).join(', ')} is already claimed by #${other.number} ` +
 `(${other.html_url}, branch \`${other.head.ref}\`${other.draft ? ', draft' : ''})`,
 );
 core.setFailed(
 `Another open PR already declares a fix for the same issue(s):\n${lines.join('\n')}\n` +
 `If this PR is the duplicate, close it and add anything it uniquely covers to the ` +
 `earlier PR or a follow-up issue (that is what saved #4560 when #4559 was closed). ` +
 `If the EARLIER one is abandoned, close it first — this check re-runs on 'edited' ` +
 `and 'synchronize', and goes green once the conflict is gone.`,
 );
 }

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site
(function() {
var enabled = true;
function applyDarkMode() {
if (!enabled) return;
// Create style element if it doesn't exist
var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');
if (!style) {
style = document.createElement('style');
style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';
document.head.appendChild(style);
}
// Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video
style.textContent = '
/* Invert everything except media */
html {
filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;
background: #1a1a2e !important;
}
/* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */
img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] {
filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;
}
/* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */
.no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,
[data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"],
.ace_editor, .ace_editor *,
.CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,
.monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,
.markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,
.highlight, .highlight *,
pre code, pre code * {
filter: none !important;
}
/* Fix common UI elements */
.modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {
filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;
background: #2d2d44 !important;
border-color: #444 !important;
}
/* Scrollbars */
::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }
::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }
::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }
/* Selection */
::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }
::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }
';
}
function removeDarkMode() {
var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');
if (style) style.remove();
}
// Toggle with Alt+Shift+D
document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {
if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {
e.preventDefault();
enabled = !enabled;
if (enabled) {
applyDarkMode();
console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');
} else {
removeDarkMode();
console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');
}
}
});
// Apply on load
applyDarkMode();
// Re-apply on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {
if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {
applyDarkMode();
}
});
observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });
console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); }
})();
})();

Skip to content
 Duplicate Fix Guard

fix(plugin-auth): ensureDefaultOrganization resolves the L4 config-derived owner when no grant row exists (#13514 follow-through)
#8668
Sign in to view logs

fix(plugin-auth): ensureDefaultOrganization resolves the L4 config-derived owner when no grant row exists (#13514 follow-through)


fix(plugin-auth): ensureDefaultOrganization resolves the L4 config-derived owner when no grant row exists (#13514 follow-through) #8668
Workflow file for this run

.github/workflows/duplicate-fix-guard.yml
 at
d6af213
# GitHub happily lets any number of open PRs declare `Fixes #N` for the same
# issue. On 2026-08-02 that cost a full duplicate implementation: #4555 and
# #4559 both declared `Fixes #4551`, both ran the whole gate suite green, and
# the duplication sat machine-detectable from the moment the second PR opened
# (03:08) until a human noticed it (08:52). All agents here share one GitHub
# identity, so the issue's assignee could not warn the second author either —
# "assigned to os-zhuang" reads the same whether it is you or another session.
# Full post-mortem: #4588.
#
# This gate makes the second PR red at open time. First come, first served —
# the EARLIER open PR (lower number) keeps its claim and stays green; the
# later one fails with a pointer to it. That matches the pm-dispatch claim
# convention ("first claim comment wins") already in .claude/skills/.
#
# Scope: same-repo references only (bare `#N` and qualified `<this repo>#N`).
# Cross-repo references are the cross-repo-issue-closer's territory, and a
# duplicate across repos cannot be resolved by failing one side's CI anyway.
name: Duplicate Fix Guard
# `edited` matters as much as `opened`: a PR that adds `Fixes #N` to its body
# after the fact must re-run this check, and one that drops the line must be
# able to go green again.
on:
pull_request:
types: [opened, edited, reopened, synchronize]
permissions:
pull-requests: read
jobs:
duplicate-fix-guard:
name: No other open PR may claim the same issue
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
 - name: Check declared issues against other open PRs
uses: actions/github-script@v9
with:
script: |
 const pr = context.payload.pull_request;
 const thisRepo = `${context.repo.owner}/${context.repo.repo}`;
 // GitHub's own closing-keyword set. The optional colon is part of
 // GitHub's accepted syntax (`Fixes: #123`). Two same-repo forms:
 // bare `#N` and qualified `owner/repo#N` naming THIS repo.
 const KEYWORDS = 'close|closes|closed|fix|fixes|fixed|resolve|resolves|resolved';
 const pattern = new RegExp(
 `\\b(?:${KEYWORDS}):?\\s+(?:([\\w.-]+)\\/([\\w.-]+))?#(\\d+)\\b`,
 'gi',
 );
 // Strip fenced blocks and inline code spans before matching.
 // GitHub's own closing-keyword parser ignores code formatting, and
 // this guard must not be stricter than the linker it protects:
 // this very PR's first run counted its own DISCUSSION of
 // `Fixes #4551` (in backticks, describing the incident) as a
 // declaration. Benign there — #4551 is closed — but a prose
 // mention of an issue some other open PR really fixes would have
 // been a spurious red.
 const declaredIssues = (body) => {
 const prose = (body || '')
 .replace(/```[\s\S]*?```/g, ' ')
 .replace(/`[^`\n]*`/g, ' ');
 const found = new Set();
 for (const [, owner, repo, number] of prose.matchAll(pattern)) {
 // A qualified reference to ANOTHER repo is not ours to judge.
 if (owner && `${owner}/${repo}`.toLowerCase() !== thisRepo.toLowerCase()) continue;
 found.add(Number(number));
 }
 return found;
 };
 const mine = declaredIssues(pr.body);
 if (mine.size === 0) {
 core.info('This PR declares no same-repo closing keywords — nothing to guard.');
 return;
 }
 core.info(`This PR declares: ${[...mine].map((n) => `#${n}`).join(', ')}`);
 // Branch-name convention (advisory, never red): a fix branch named
 // `claude/issue-<n>-<slug>` is discoverable by the next session
 // with one `git ls-remote | grep issue-<n>`. #4555 vs #4559
 // happened partly because the branches shared no token to grep.
 // Warning only — existing branches must not go red retroactively.
 const branch = pr.head.ref;
 if (![...mine].some((n) => branch.includes(`issue-${n}`))) {
 core.warning(
 `Branch \`${branch}\` does not name any declared issue. ` +
 `Convention: claude/issue-<n>-<slug> (e.g. claude/issue-${[...mine][0]}-short-slug) ` +
 `so parallel sessions can discover in-flight work with git ls-remote.`,
 );
 }
 // Drafts count: a draft PR is work in flight, which is exactly
 // what the second session needs to see.
 const openPrs = await github.paginate(github.rest.pulls.list, {
 owner: context.repo.owner,
 repo: context.repo.repo,
 state: 'open',
 per_page: 100,
 });
 const conflicts = [];
 for (const other of openPrs) {
 if (other.number === pr.number) continue;
 const theirs = declaredIssues(other.body);
 const shared = [...mine].filter((n) => theirs.has(n));
 if (shared.length > 0) conflicts.push({ other, shared });
 }
 if (conflicts.length === 0) {
 core.info('No other open PR declares these issues.');
 return;
 }
 // First come, first served: only the LATER PR goes red. Failing
 // both would leave the original author red through no action of
 // their own; failing the earlier one would reward racing.
 const older = conflicts.filter((c) => c.other.number < pr.number);
 const newer = conflicts.filter((c) => c.other.number > pr.number);
 for (const { other, shared } of newer) {
 core.info(
 `#${other.number} (newer) also declares ${shared.map((n) => `#${n}`).join(', ')} — ` +
 `it will fail its own run of this guard; this PR keeps its claim.`,
 );
 }
 if (older.length > 0) {
 const lines = older.map(({ other, shared }) =>
 ` - ${shared.map((n) => `#${n}`).join(', ')} is already claimed by #${other.number} ` +
 `(${other.html_url}, branch \`${other.head.ref}\`${other.draft ? ', draft' : ''})`,
 );
 core.setFailed(
 `Another open PR already declares a fix for the same issue(s):\n${lines.join('\n')}\n` +
 `If this PR is the duplicate, close it and add anything it uniquely covers to the ` +
 `earlier PR or a follow-up issue (that is what saved #4560 when #4559 was closed). ` +
 `If the EARLIER one is abandoned, close it first — this check re-runs on 'edited' ` +
 `and 'synchronize', and goes green once the conflict is gone.`,
 );
 }