diff --git a/docs/adr/0066-unified-authorization-model.md b/docs/adr/0066-unified-authorization-model.md
index d9a9ccb2f5..2fe7229d3e 100644
--- a/docs/adr/0066-unified-authorization-model.md
+++ b/docs/adr/0066-unified-authorization-model.md
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ The design rule that resolves the recurring confusion: **a resource declares the
 ### D1 — Capability registry [new]
 Promote capabilities from bare strings to **first-class records** (`sys_permission` / capability definition) with `name`, `label`, `description`, `scope` (platform | org), and a `managedBy` (platform | package | admin). `systemPermissions[]` on permission sets and `requiredPermissions[]` on resources become **references** to these records. Packages declare their capabilities; admins add new ones in Setup. Back-compat: existing string capabilities are seeded as records with the same `name`, so all current references keep resolving.
 
-**Landed (2026-07):** the curated platform set is `@objectstack/spec` `PLATFORM_CAPABILITIES` (`security/capabilities.ts`), seeded `managed_by:'platform'` by `bootstrap-system-capabilities.ts`. "**Packages declare their capabilities**" is now an EXPLICIT API — `defineCapability` + a stack's `capabilities` array (`{ name, label?, description?, scope, packageId? }`) — materialized into `sys_capability` with `managed_by:'package'` + `package_id` provenance by `bootstrap-declared-capabilities.ts` (idempotent, upgrade-aware; refuses to hijack curated/foreign capabilities, never clobbers admin rows, and *claims* a pre-existing derived placeholder). This retires the implicit back-door where a capability existed only as an untitled placeholder derived from a permission set's `systemPermissions[]`; that derivation still runs for back-compat but skips any explicitly-declared name. A capability is **not** a contract and carries no `inputs`: DEFINE (`defineCapability`) / GRANT (`systemPermissions`) / REQUIRE (`requiredPermissions`) stay decoupled. Aligns with ADR-0094 D5 (retire implicit `managed_by`-guessing).
+**Landed (2026-07):** the curated platform set is `@objectstack/spec` `PLATFORM_CAPABILITIES` (`security/capabilities.ts`), seeded `managed_by:'platform'` by `bootstrap-system-capabilities.ts`. "**Packages declare their capabilities**" is now an EXPLICIT API — `defineCapability` + a stack's `capabilities` array (`{ name, label?, description?, scope, packageId? }`) — materialized into `sys_capability` with `managed_by:'package'` + `package_id` provenance by `bootstrap-declared-capabilities.ts` (idempotent, upgrade-aware; refuses to hijack curated/foreign capabilities, never clobbers admin rows, and *claims* a pre-existing derived placeholder). This retires the implicit back-door where a capability existed only as an untitled placeholder derived from a permission set's `systemPermissions[]`; that derivation still runs for back-compat but skips any explicitly-declared name. A capability is **not** a contract and carries no `inputs`: DEFINE (`defineCapability`) / GRANT (`systemPermissions`) / REQUIRE (`requiredPermissions`) stay decoupled. Aligns with ADR-0066 D1 (retire implicit `managed_by`-guessing).
 
 ### D2 — Secure-by-default object/field posture [new] (data-model posture, NOT a permission)
 Add an object (and field) flag that opts it **out of blanket wildcard grants** — e.g. `access: { default: 'private' }` (vs the implicit `'public'`). A `private` object is **not** covered by `'*': {allowRead:true}`; access requires an **explicit** permission-set grant. Mirrors Salesforce "new object = no access until granted." This is a posture like `tenancy`, declared on the object — it is **not** an assignment and names no principal. `admin_full_access` (the superuser `'*'` grant) still covers private objects unless it too is excluded (rare).