Skip to content

fix: add passthrough init to abstract provider - #450

Merged
beeme1mr merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
provider-init
Feb 18, 2025
Merged

fix: add passthrough init to abstract provider#450
beeme1mr merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
provider-init

Conversation

@gruebel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Related Issues

Fixes#429

Signed-off-by: gruebel <anton.gruebel@gmail.com>
@codecov

codecovBot commented Feb 13, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.72%. Comparing base (1198728) to head (baeab17).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #450 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 97.72% 97.72% =======================================
Files 32 32 Lines 1627 1629 +2 =======================================
+ Hits 1590 1592 +2 
Misses 37 37 
FlagCoverage Δ
unittests97.72% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@beeme1mr
beeme1mr merged commit 088409e into mainFeb 18, 2025
@beeme1mr
beeme1mr deleted the provider-init branch February 18, 2025 13:45
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Use mixins with AbstractProvider path to race conditioning for youre provider

2 participants

@gruebel@beeme1mr