[feature] add non-exhausive URI validation

[nandgator]

• Succeeds:
  • feature request: validators.uri() #40,
  • Support for mailto: and tel: protocols ? #50,
  • Magnet validator #68 &
  • ipfs uri validation #195
  • URL Validation: Add support for other schemes apart from https, http, ftp #327

---

Suggestions are welcome:

validators/src/validators/uri.py

Lines 24 to 41 in cdc987d

	@validator
	defuri(value: str, /):
	"""Return whether or not given value is a valid URI.
	Examples:
	>>> uri('mailto:example@domain.com')
	# Output: True
	>>> uri('file:path.txt')
	# Output: ValidationError(func=uri, ...)
	Args:
	value:
	URI to validate.
	Returns:
	(Literal[True]): If `value` is a valid URI.
	(ValidationError): If `value` is an invalid URI.
	"""

[tofetpuzo]

are you taking any new suggestions?

[nandgator]

Constructive ones, please go ahead.

[tofetpuzo]

--- # Define a list of valid URI schemes => VALID_SCHEMES = ['http', 'https', 'ftp', 'mailto', 'file']

1. We could make the parameter-> value(str) flexible perhaps not restrict it to a type str, could be src/path/to/file; which could contain different urls
2. do a recursive search(regex expression perhaps) to match pattern

[tofetpuzo]

is it something we should do?

[nandgator]

Something similar yeah.

[tofetpuzo]

can I take up the challenge :)?

[nandgator]

Sure, go ahead.

[tofetpuzo]

Hey @yozachar ,can we use socket.inet_aton(ip) in python to validate ip addresses as a function then update the schema in uri.py?

 # URL-based schemes
if any(
value.startswith(item + "://") for item in {
"ftp", "ftps", "git", "http", "https",
"irc", "rtmp", "rtmps", "rtsp", "sftp",
"ssh", "telnet", "gopher", "ldap", "sip",
"nfs", "mqtt", "smb", "udp"
}
):

[nandgator]

IP addresses are already validated in ip_address.py. Why use socket.inet_aton?

[tofetpuzo]

Hi, that is cool I looked at the message thread, something about this error below , was why I thought this feature was asked for I guess, see code below.

import validators
streamurl = "rtmp://192.168.1.123:1935/live/test"
print(validators.url(streamurl))

Output:
ValidationError(func=url, args={'value': 'rtmp://192.168.1.123:1935/live/test'})

Or does it mean we just want to validate other schemas? like the ones few ones below, that I could not find in uri.py

proposed schemas

"Uri": {
"udp": udp://192.168.1.1:1234/path;param=value?,
"gopher": gopher://gopher.example.com/1/path;type=1?search#frag,\
"ldap": ldap://ldap.example.com/cn=John%20Doe,dc=example,dc=com;scope=one?sn#frag, \
"sip":sip://user:password@sip.example.com/path;transport=tcp?subject=Hello#frag, \
"smb": smb://fileserver.example.com/share/path;param=value?query=1#fragment\
}

Few Thoughts

1. Have a regex expression : that complies the schema above.
2. uri_regrex: re.compile()
   e.g

 # Validate using regex for URL-based schemes
if uri_regex.match(value):
return True

[e3krisztian]

No worries, I had another idea, and implemented it in

• feat: allow custom URL scheme validation #409

It can be optionally further enhanced with providing alternative validate_scheme implementations, like publicly exposing the default one, and maybe some of these:

defaccept_all_schemes(scheme):
returnTruedefaccept_iana_schemes(scheme):
# https://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes/uri-schemes.xhtml# I do not intend to, but someone might want to implement this as well
...
defaccept_schemes(*accepted_schemes):
defvalidate(scheme):
returnschemeinaccepted_schemesreturnvalidate

which could be used like

validators.url(value, validate_scheme=accept_all_schemes)
validators.url(value, validate_scheme=accept_schemes("http", "https"))

[tofetpuzo]

Apologies, I have been "mia". Has this feature been implemented?

[nandgator]

Apologies, I have been "mia". Has this feature been implemented?

Nope.

#409 (comment)

[tofetpuzo]

I will work on it I have been super busy, I have started already.

[tofetpuzo]

@nandgator
hny! I worked on telnet, just got time to impl. it.
cc PR cheers!