Cut code review time & bugs in half, instantly.

Reviews for AI-powered teams who move
fast (but don’t break things)

Try it for free

2-click install

CodeRabbit review stack showing pull request layers, code changes, and review summaries

Open

Add teammate invitations with roles

acme/web-app #482·10 files

Submit review

Add the invitation data model

Introduce the `Invitation` record and `MemberRole` enum, and the migration that creates the invitations table. This is the foundation the API and UI build on.

prisma/schema.prisma

+26

29 unmodified lines

30 slug String@unique

31 createdAt DateTime@default(now())

32}

34modelInvitation {

35 id String@id@default(cuid())

36 email String

37 role MemberRole@default(MEMBER)

38 token String@unique

39 status InvitationStatus@default(PENDING)

40 orgId String

41 org Organization@relation(fields: [orgId], references: [id])

42 invitedBy String

43 expiresAt DateTime

44 createdAt DateTime@default(now())

46@@index([orgId, status])

47}

49enumMemberRole {

50ADMIN

51MEMBER

52VIEWER

53}

55enumInvitationStatus {

56PENDING

57ACCEPTED

58REVOKED

59}

prisma/migrations/20260624_add_invitations/migration.sql

+21

coderabbitaiBotleft a comment

Walkthrough

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 9 | ❌ 2

✨ Finishing Touches

Comment @coderabbitai help to get available commands.

coderabbitaiBotleft a comment

⚠ Potential issue|Major

... A 404 might be more suitable for not found errors.

-status_code=400,

+status_code=404,

Commitable suggestion

jbrooks215authorNow

Great catch! Just Fixed it.

coderabbitaiBotleft a comment

Recommended to use a wildcard imports

-7+1

Commitable suggestions

jbrooks215author2 minute ago

@coderabbitai No, we want to get rid of the star imports.

coderabbitaibot1 minute ago

@jbrooks215, I'll remember this preference.

✏️ New Learnings Added

Also Available in CLI & IDE

The leader in AI code reviews

Why teams prefer CodeRabbit

Most installed AI App

Repositories

75M

Defects found

Trusted by 15,000+ customers

Code reviews were hard before. Now, they feel impossible.

Your team moves fast with AI. But fast shouldn’t mean sloppy. We make sure every line still earns its merge.

Faster reviews + better code.

We do the heavy lifting & spot the hard-to-find issues. You do the final 10%.

See a sample review

Catch fast. Fix fast.

1-click commits for easy fixes and a “Fix with AI” button for harder ones.

TL;DR for your diff.

Quick context with a summary of changes, a walkthrough & an architectural diagram.

Find the bugs. Skip the noise.

We find bugs humans miss – & flag the time-consuming and tedious. Without the noise.

Chat with the CodeRabbit bot directly.

Give feedback on reviews to create Learnings. Or create issues, trigger docstrings & more.

Most customizable tool.

Customize everything from your coding guidelines to your workflow in a YAML file.

The reports you need.

Automate the creation of your daily standup reports, sprint reviews, and more.

CR_Flexibility

The only tool that reviews everywhere you work.

Review at the PR stage or directly in your IDE & CLI

CR_Quality

Industry-leading context.

Codebase-awareness is table stakes. We pull in dozens more points of context than other tools.

See a sample review

1. Codebase intelligence

Codegraph and custom guidelines help us understand complex dependencies across files to uncover the impact of changes.

2. External context

We bring the right context via MCP servers, Linked Issues (Jira & Linear) & Web Query (to fetch the latest info on the web).

3. Linters & Scanners

40+ linters and security scanners catch more bugs – while we filter out the noise from false positives.

CR_Intelligence

Code reviews that learn from you.

Set the baseline with your rules and style guides, then train the agent with feedback via replies. Reviews improve continuously.

CR_Finish

Ship faster with pre-merge checks & finishing touches.

Save hours of work and make sure your code’s ready to ship.

Custom checks

Create your own pre-merge code quality checks in natural language.

Unit test generation

Check test coverage and immediately generate any missing tests.

Docstring generation

Create docstrings to make it easier to understand the file in the future.

CR_Security

We take security seriously.

Architected for security

We protect your code and privacy with an architecture designed to ensure your code is private.

SSL-encrypted data

End-to-end encryption protects your code during reviews with zero data retention post-review.

SOC 2 Type II certified

Enterprise-grade security validated annually through independent SOC 2 Type II audits.

Why teams prefer CodeRabbit

Before CodeRabbit, quality depended on who reviewed your PR. Now, the bar is the same for everyone.

I love how deeply it analyzes code… It spots potential errors more often than other tools.

Since adopting CodeRabbit, our confidence is up and our bugs are down; it catches the edge cases humans skim past and helps us merge faster with more confidence.

CodeRabbit routinely catches off-by-ones, edge cases, and even spec/security slips before they hit production.

Writing code faster was never the issue; the bottleneck was always code review. I feel like CodeRabbit is solving that one problem and that was attractive. Why not solve that problem before we use a coding agent?

The feedback I get from developers is that they like that it shows them typo errors, null pointers, and static code. It's the edge scenarios that are usually difficult to catch. It's a good tool to get these edge scenarios.

The differentiator isn't generating code, it's governing it. AI accelerates teams, but without guardrails, you only ship bad code faster. CodeRabbit gave us a non-negotiable review layer across repositories that reduced risk while increasing speed.

Before CodeRabbit, quality depended on who reviewed your PR. Now, the bar is the same for everyone.

I love how deeply it analyzes code… It spots potential errors more often than other tools.

Since adopting CodeRabbit, our confidence is up and our bugs are down; it catches the edge cases humans skim past and helps us merge faster with more confidence.

CodeRabbit routinely catches off-by-ones, edge cases, and even spec/security slips before they hit production.

Writing code faster was never the issue; the bottleneck was always code review. I feel like CodeRabbit is solving that one problem and that was attractive. Why not solve that problem before we use a coding agent?

The feedback I get from developers is that they like that it shows them typo errors, null pointers, and static code. It's the edge scenarios that are usually difficult to catch. It's a good tool to get these edge scenarios.

The differentiator isn't generating code, it's governing it. AI accelerates teams, but without guardrails, you only ship bad code faster. CodeRabbit gave us a non-negotiable review layer across repositories that reduced risk while increasing speed.

Cut code review time & bugs in half, instantly.

Add the invitation data model

The leader in AI code reviews

Trusted by 15,000+ customers

Code reviews were hard before. Now, they feel impossible.

Faster reviews + better code.

Catch fast. Fix fast.

TL;DR for your diff.

Find the bugs. Skip the noise.

Chat with the CodeRabbit bot directly.

Most customizable tool.

The reports you need.

The only tool that reviews everywhere you work.

The only tool that reviews everywhere you work.

Industry-leading context.

1. Codebase intelligence

2. External context

3. Linters & Scanners

Code reviews that learn from you.

CodeRabbit learnings

Path & AST-based instructions

Coding agent guidelines

Ship faster with pre-merge checks & finishing touches.

Custom checks

Unit test generation

Docstring generation

We take security seriously.

Architected for security

SSL-encrypted data

SOC 2 Type II certified

Why teams prefer CodeRabbit