Foo<T> != Foo<U> under layout randomization

previously field ordering was using the same seed for all instances of Foo,
now we pass seed values through the layout tree so that not only
the struct itself affects layout but also its fields

Author: the8472

compiler/rustc_abi/src/layout.rs

@@ -119,6 +119,8 @@ impl<Cx: HasDataLayout> LayoutCalculator<Cx> {
 .chain(Niche::from_scalar(dl,Size::ZERO, a))
 .max_by_key(|niche| niche.available(dl));
 
+let combined_seed = a.size(&self.cx).bytes().wrapping_add(b.size(&self.cx).bytes());
+
 LayoutData{
 variants:Variants::Single{index:VariantIdx::new(0)},
 fields:FieldsShape::Arbitrary{
@@ -131,6 +133,7 @@ impl<Cx: HasDataLayout> LayoutCalculator<Cx> {
  size,
 max_repr_align:None,
 unadjusted_abi_align: align.abi,
+randomization_seed: combined_seed,
 }
 }
 
@@ -223,6 +226,7 @@ impl<Cx: HasDataLayout> LayoutCalculator<Cx> {
 size:Size::ZERO,
 max_repr_align:None,
 unadjusted_abi_align: dl.i8_align.abi,
+randomization_seed:0,
 }
 }
 
@@ -385,6 +389,11 @@ impl<Cx: HasDataLayout> LayoutCalculator<Cx> {
 returnErr(LayoutCalculatorError::EmptyUnion);
 };
 
+let combined_seed = only_variant
+.iter()
+.map(|v| v.randomization_seed)
+.fold(repr.field_shuffle_seed, |acc, seed| acc.wrapping_add(seed));
+
 Ok(LayoutData{
 variants:Variants::Single{index: only_variant_idx },
 fields:FieldsShape::Union(union_field_count),
@@ -394,6 +403,7 @@ impl<Cx: HasDataLayout> LayoutCalculator<Cx> {
 size: size.align_to(align.abi),
  max_repr_align,
  unadjusted_abi_align,
+randomization_seed: combined_seed,
 })
 }
 
@@ -650,6 +660,11 @@ impl<Cx: HasDataLayout> LayoutCalculator<Cx> {
 BackendRepr::Memory{sized:true}
 };
 
+let combined_seed = variant_layouts
+.iter()
+.map(|v| v.randomization_seed)
+.fold(repr.field_shuffle_seed, |acc, seed| acc.wrapping_add(seed));
+
 let layout = LayoutData{
 variants:Variants::Multiple{
 tag: niche_scalar,
@@ -671,6 +686,7 @@ impl<Cx: HasDataLayout> LayoutCalculator<Cx> {
  align,
  max_repr_align,
  unadjusted_abi_align,
+randomization_seed: combined_seed,
 };
 
 Some(TmpLayout{ layout,variants: variant_layouts })
@@ -961,6 +977,11 @@ impl<Cx: HasDataLayout> LayoutCalculator<Cx> {
 
 let largest_niche = Niche::from_scalar(dl,Size::ZERO, tag);
 
+let combined_seed = layout_variants
+.iter()
+.map(|v| v.randomization_seed)
+.fold(repr.field_shuffle_seed, |acc, seed| acc.wrapping_add(seed));
+
 let tagged_layout = LayoutData{
 variants:Variants::Multiple{
  tag,
@@ -978,6 +999,7 @@ impl<Cx: HasDataLayout> LayoutCalculator<Cx> {
  size,
  max_repr_align,
  unadjusted_abi_align,
+randomization_seed: combined_seed,
 };
 
 let tagged_layout = TmpLayout{layout: tagged_layout,variants: layout_variants };
@@ -1029,6 +1051,8 @@ impl<Cx: HasDataLayout> LayoutCalculator<Cx> {
 letmut align = if pack.is_some(){ dl.i8_align}else{ dl.aggregate_align};
 letmut max_repr_align = repr.align;
 letmut inverse_memory_index:IndexVec<u32,FieldIdx> = fields.indices().collect();
+let field_seed =
+ fields.raw.iter().fold(0u64, |acc, f| acc.wrapping_add(f.randomization_seed));
 let optimize_field_order = !repr.inhibit_struct_field_reordering();
 if optimize_field_order && fields.len() > 1{
 let end =
@@ -1046,8 +1070,9 @@ impl<Cx: HasDataLayout> LayoutCalculator<Cx> {
 use rand::seq::SliceRandom;
 // `ReprOptions.field_shuffle_seed` is a deterministic seed we can use to randomize field
 // ordering.
-letmut rng =
- rand_xoshiro::Xoshiro128StarStar::seed_from_u64(repr.field_shuffle_seed);
+letmut rng = rand_xoshiro::Xoshiro128StarStar::seed_from_u64(
+ field_seed.wrapping_add(repr.field_shuffle_seed),
+);
 
 // Shuffle the ordering of the fields.
  optimizing.shuffle(&mut rng);
@@ -1344,6 +1369,13 @@ impl<Cx: HasDataLayout> LayoutCalculator<Cx> {
  unadjusted_abi_align
 };
 
+// a transparent struct only has a single field, so its seed should be the same as the one we pass forward
+let seed = if repr.transparent(){
+ field_seed
+}else{
+ field_seed.wrapping_add(repr.field_shuffle_seed)
+};
+
 Ok(LayoutData{
 variants:Variants::Single{index:VariantIdx::new(0)},
 fields:FieldsShape::Arbitrary{ offsets, memory_index },
@@ -1353,6 +1385,7 @@ impl<Cx: HasDataLayout> LayoutCalculator<Cx> {
  size,
  max_repr_align,
  unadjusted_abi_align,
+randomization_seed: seed,
 })
 }
 

compiler/rustc_abi/src/lib.rs

@@ -1719,6 +1719,18 @@ pub struct LayoutData<FieldIdx: Idx, VariantIdx: Idx> {
 /// Only used on aarch64-linux, where the argument passing ABI ignores the requested alignment
 /// in some cases.
 pubunadjusted_abi_align:Align,
+
+/// The randomization seed based on this type's own repr and its fields.
+///
+/// Since randomization is toggled on a per-crate basis even crates that do not have randomization
+/// enabled should still calculate a seed so that downstream uses can use it to distinguish different
+/// types.
+///
+/// For every T and U for which we do not guarantee that a repr(Rust) `Foo<T>` can be coerced or
+/// transmuted to `Foo<U>` we aim to create probalistically distinct seeds so that Foo can choose
+/// to reorder its fields based on that information. The current implementation is a conservative
+/// approximation of this goal.
+pubrandomization_seed:u64,
 }
 
 impl<FieldIdx:Idx,VariantIdx:Idx>LayoutData<FieldIdx,VariantIdx>{
@@ -1739,6 +1751,30 @@ impl<FieldIdx: Idx, VariantIdx: Idx> LayoutData<FieldIdx, VariantIdx> {
 let largest_niche = Niche::from_scalar(cx,Size::ZERO, scalar);
 let size = scalar.size(cx);
 let align = scalar.align(cx);
+
+let range = scalar.valid_range(cx);
+
+// All primitive types for which we don't have subtype coercions should get a distinct seed,
+// so that types wrapping them can use randomization to arrive at distinct layouts.
+//
+// Some type information is already lost at this point, so as an approximation we derive
+// the seed from what remains. For example on 64-bit targets usize and u64 can no longer
+// be distinguished.
+let randomization_seed = size
+.bytes()
+.wrapping_add(
+match scalar.primitive(){
+Primitive::Int(_,true) => 1,
+Primitive::Int(_,false) => 2,
+Primitive::Float(_) => 3,
+Primitive::Pointer(_) => 4,
+} << 32,
+)
+// distinguishes references from pointers
+.wrapping_add((range.startasu64).rotate_right(16))
+// distinguishes char from u32 and bool from u8
+.wrapping_add((range.endasu64).rotate_right(16));
+
 LayoutData{
 variants:Variants::Single{index:VariantIdx::new(0)},
 fields:FieldsShape::Primitive,
@@ -1748,6 +1784,7 @@ impl<FieldIdx: Idx, VariantIdx: Idx> LayoutData<FieldIdx, VariantIdx> {
  align,
 max_repr_align:None,
 unadjusted_abi_align: align.abi,
+ randomization_seed,
 }
 }
 }
@@ -1770,6 +1807,7 @@ where
  variants,
  max_repr_align,
  unadjusted_abi_align,
+ref randomization_seed,
 } = self;
  f.debug_struct("Layout")
 .field("size", size)
@@ -1780,6 +1818,7 @@ where
 .field("variants", variants)
 .field("max_repr_align", max_repr_align)
 .field("unadjusted_abi_align", unadjusted_abi_align)
+.field("randomization_seed", randomization_seed)
 .finish()
 }
 }

compiler/rustc_middle/src/ty/layout.rs

@@ -770,6 +770,7 @@ where
 size:Size::ZERO,
 max_repr_align:None,
 unadjusted_abi_align: tcx.data_layout.i8_align.abi,
+randomization_seed:0,
 })
 }
 

compiler/rustc_ty_utils/src/layout.rs

@@ -347,6 +347,7 @@ fn layout_of_uncached<'tcx>(
  size,
 max_repr_align:None,
 unadjusted_abi_align: element.align.abi,
+randomization_seed: element.randomization_seed.wrapping_add(count),
 })
 }
  ty::Slice(element) => {
@@ -360,6 +361,8 @@ fn layout_of_uncached<'tcx>(
 size:Size::ZERO,
 max_repr_align:None,
 unadjusted_abi_align: element.align.abi,
+// adding a randomly chosen value to distinguish slices
+randomization_seed: element.randomization_seed.wrapping_add(0x2dcba99c39784102),
 })
 }
  ty::Str => tcx.mk_layout(LayoutData{
@@ -371,6 +374,8 @@ fn layout_of_uncached<'tcx>(
 size:Size::ZERO,
 max_repr_align:None,
 unadjusted_abi_align: dl.i8_align.abi,
+// another random value
+randomization_seed:0xc1325f37d127be22,
 }),
 
 // Odd unit types.
@@ -542,6 +547,7 @@ fn layout_of_uncached<'tcx>(
  align,
 max_repr_align:None,
 unadjusted_abi_align: align.abi,
+randomization_seed: e_ly.randomization_seed.wrapping_add(e_len),
 })
 }
 
@@ -999,6 +1005,9 @@ fn coroutine_layout<'tcx>(
 BackendRepr::Memory{sized:true}
 };
 
+// this is similar to how ReprOptions populates its field_shuffle_seed
+let def_hash = tcx.def_path_hash(def_id).0.to_smaller_hash().as_u64();
+
 let layout = tcx.mk_layout(LayoutData{
 variants:Variants::Multiple{
  tag,
@@ -1019,6 +1028,7 @@ fn coroutine_layout<'tcx>(
  align,
 max_repr_align:None,
 unadjusted_abi_align: align.abi,
+randomization_seed: def_hash,
 });
 debug!("coroutine layout ({:?}): {:#?}", ty, layout);
 Ok(layout)

tests/ui/layout/randomize.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+//@ build-pass
+//@ revisions: normal randomize-layout
+//@ [randomize-layout]compile-flags: -Zrandomize-layout
+
+#![crate_type = "lib"]
+
+structFoo<T>(u32,T,u8);
+
+structWrapper<T>(T);
+
+#[repr(transparent)]
+structTransparentWrapper(u16);
+
+const _:() = {
+// behavior of the current implementation, not guaranteed
+#[cfg(not(randomize_layout))]
+assert!(std::mem::offset_of!(Foo::<u16>,1) == std::mem::offset_of!(Foo::<Wrapper<u16>>,1));
+
+// under randomization Foo<T> != Foo<U>
+#[cfg(randomize_layout)]
+assert!(std::mem::offset_of!(Foo::<u16>,1) != std::mem::offset_of!(Foo::<Wrapper<u16>>,1));
+
+// but repr(transparent) should make them the same again.
+// maybe not strictly guaranteed? but UCG has been leaning in that direction at least
+#[cfg(randomize_layout)]
+assert!(
+ std::mem::offset_of!(Foo::<u16>,1) == std::mem::offset_of!(Foo::<TransparentWrapper>,1)
+);
+};