fix(dashboard): refresh post-dependabot build artifacts - #390

Merged
michaelmwu merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/followup-review-20260715
Jul 15, 2026
Merged

fix(dashboard): refresh post-dependabot build artifacts#390
michaelmwu merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/followup-review-20260715

Conversation

@michaelmwu

@michaelmwumichaelmwu commented Jul 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Follow-up to #389.

This PR addresses the dashboard review findings:

  • Align react and react-dom versions.
  • Regenerate the admin dashboard Bun lockfile.
  • Silence TypeScript 6's baseUrl deprecation diagnostic.
  • Rebuild and commit the generated dashboard bundle served by the API.

Validation:

  • cd apps/admin_dashboard && bun install --frozen-lockfile
  • cd apps/admin_dashboard && bun run typecheck
  • cd apps/admin_dashboard && bun run build

Note

Low Risk
Dependency alignment and regenerated static files only; no application logic changes beyond what the new React patch and bundle imply.

Overview
Follow-up to post-dependabot cleanup for admin_dashboard: bumps react to 19.2.7 so it matches react-dom, refreshes bun.lock (including @types/react 19.2.15 and removal of @types/bun / related lock entries), and adds ignoreDeprecations": "6.0" in tsconfig.app.json to quiet TypeScript 6 baseUrl deprecation noise while keeping existing path aliases.

Rebuilt static assets are committed under apps/api/.../static/dashboard, with the Vite manifest entry JS hash updated (index-CB3HLLMv.jsindex-CjyViga_.js) so the API serves the new bundle.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 5b7bfc1. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

@cursor

cursorBot commented Jul 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Bugbot couldn't run - usage limit reached

Bugbot is counted against Cursor usage for this user or team, and this run hit a usage or spend limit.

A user or team admin can review and increase usage limits in the Cursor dashboard.

(requestId: serverGenReqId_3c495bd2-0a21-41f4-a3a2-68d3772ba768)

@coderabbitai

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@michaelmwu, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in:24 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 7f06929f-895d-402c-b6a6-d6af45bb6fbc

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between af08247 and 5b7bfc1.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • apps/admin_dashboard/bun.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • apps/admin_dashboard/package.json
  • apps/admin_dashboard/tsconfig.app.json
  • apps/api/src/five08/backend/static/dashboard/.vite/manifest.json
  • apps/api/src/five08/backend/static/dashboard/assets/index-CjyViga_.js
  • apps/api/src/five08/backend/static/dashboard/index.html
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch codex/followup-review-20260715

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@michaelmwu
michaelmwu added this pull request to the merge queueJul 15, 2026
Merged via the queue into main with commit 43aea7fJul 15, 2026
12 checks passed
@michaelmwu
michaelmwu deleted the codex/followup-review-20260715 branch July 15, 2026 16:24
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@michaelmwu
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

fix(dashboard): refresh post-dependabot build artifacts - #390

Merged
michaelmwu merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/followup-review-20260715
Jul 15, 2026
Merged

fix(dashboard): refresh post-dependabot build artifacts#390
michaelmwu merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/followup-review-20260715

Conversation

@michaelmwu

@michaelmwumichaelmwu commented Jul 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Follow-up to #389.

This PR addresses the dashboard review findings:

  • Align react and react-dom versions.
  • Regenerate the admin dashboard Bun lockfile.
  • Silence TypeScript 6's baseUrl deprecation diagnostic.
  • Rebuild and commit the generated dashboard bundle served by the API.

Validation:

  • cd apps/admin_dashboard && bun install --frozen-lockfile
  • cd apps/admin_dashboard && bun run typecheck
  • cd apps/admin_dashboard && bun run build

Note

Low Risk
Dependency alignment and regenerated static files only; no application logic changes beyond what the new React patch and bundle imply.

Overview
Follow-up to post-dependabot cleanup for admin_dashboard: bumps react to 19.2.7 so it matches react-dom, refreshes bun.lock (including @types/react 19.2.15 and removal of @types/bun / related lock entries), and adds ignoreDeprecations": "6.0" in tsconfig.app.json to quiet TypeScript 6 baseUrl deprecation noise while keeping existing path aliases.

Rebuilt static assets are committed under apps/api/.../static/dashboard, with the Vite manifest entry JS hash updated (index-CB3HLLMv.jsindex-CjyViga_.js) so the API serves the new bundle.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 5b7bfc1. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

@cursor

cursorBot commented Jul 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Bugbot couldn't run - usage limit reached

Bugbot is counted against Cursor usage for this user or team, and this run hit a usage or spend limit.

A user or team admin can review and increase usage limits in the Cursor dashboard.

(requestId: serverGenReqId_3c495bd2-0a21-41f4-a3a2-68d3772ba768)

@coderabbitai

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@michaelmwu, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in:24 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 7f06929f-895d-402c-b6a6-d6af45bb6fbc

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between af08247 and 5b7bfc1.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • apps/admin_dashboard/bun.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • apps/admin_dashboard/package.json
  • apps/admin_dashboard/tsconfig.app.json
  • apps/api/src/five08/backend/static/dashboard/.vite/manifest.json
  • apps/api/src/five08/backend/static/dashboard/assets/index-CjyViga_.js
  • apps/api/src/five08/backend/static/dashboard/index.html
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch codex/followup-review-20260715

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@michaelmwu
michaelmwu added this pull request to the merge queueJul 15, 2026
Merged via the queue into main with commit 43aea7fJul 15, 2026
12 checks passed
@michaelmwu
michaelmwu deleted the codex/followup-review-20260715 branch July 15, 2026 16:24
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@michaelmwu
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

fix(dashboard): refresh post-dependabot build artifacts - #390

Merged
michaelmwu merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/followup-review-20260715
Jul 15, 2026
Merged

fix(dashboard): refresh post-dependabot build artifacts#390
michaelmwu merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/followup-review-20260715

Conversation

@michaelmwu

@michaelmwumichaelmwu commented Jul 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Follow-up to #389.

This PR addresses the dashboard review findings:

  • Align react and react-dom versions.
  • Regenerate the admin dashboard Bun lockfile.
  • Silence TypeScript 6's baseUrl deprecation diagnostic.
  • Rebuild and commit the generated dashboard bundle served by the API.

Validation:

  • cd apps/admin_dashboard && bun install --frozen-lockfile
  • cd apps/admin_dashboard && bun run typecheck
  • cd apps/admin_dashboard && bun run build

Note

Low Risk
Dependency alignment and regenerated static files only; no application logic changes beyond what the new React patch and bundle imply.

Overview
Follow-up to post-dependabot cleanup for admin_dashboard: bumps react to 19.2.7 so it matches react-dom, refreshes bun.lock (including @types/react 19.2.15 and removal of @types/bun / related lock entries), and adds ignoreDeprecations": "6.0" in tsconfig.app.json to quiet TypeScript 6 baseUrl deprecation noise while keeping existing path aliases.

Rebuilt static assets are committed under apps/api/.../static/dashboard, with the Vite manifest entry JS hash updated (index-CB3HLLMv.jsindex-CjyViga_.js) so the API serves the new bundle.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 5b7bfc1. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

@cursor

cursorBot commented Jul 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Bugbot couldn't run - usage limit reached

Bugbot is counted against Cursor usage for this user or team, and this run hit a usage or spend limit.

A user or team admin can review and increase usage limits in the Cursor dashboard.

(requestId: serverGenReqId_3c495bd2-0a21-41f4-a3a2-68d3772ba768)

@coderabbitai

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@michaelmwu, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in:24 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 7f06929f-895d-402c-b6a6-d6af45bb6fbc

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between af08247 and 5b7bfc1.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • apps/admin_dashboard/bun.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • apps/admin_dashboard/package.json
  • apps/admin_dashboard/tsconfig.app.json
  • apps/api/src/five08/backend/static/dashboard/.vite/manifest.json
  • apps/api/src/five08/backend/static/dashboard/assets/index-CjyViga_.js
  • apps/api/src/five08/backend/static/dashboard/index.html
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch codex/followup-review-20260715

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@michaelmwu
michaelmwu added this pull request to the merge queueJul 15, 2026
Merged via the queue into main with commit 43aea7fJul 15, 2026
12 checks passed
@michaelmwu
michaelmwu deleted the codex/followup-review-20260715 branch July 15, 2026 16:24
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@michaelmwu
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

fix(dashboard): refresh post-dependabot build artifacts - #390

Merged
michaelmwu merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/followup-review-20260715
Jul 15, 2026
Merged

fix(dashboard): refresh post-dependabot build artifacts#390
michaelmwu merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/followup-review-20260715

Conversation

@michaelmwu

@michaelmwumichaelmwu commented Jul 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Follow-up to #389.

This PR addresses the dashboard review findings:

  • Align react and react-dom versions.
  • Regenerate the admin dashboard Bun lockfile.
  • Silence TypeScript 6's baseUrl deprecation diagnostic.
  • Rebuild and commit the generated dashboard bundle served by the API.

Validation:

  • cd apps/admin_dashboard && bun install --frozen-lockfile
  • cd apps/admin_dashboard && bun run typecheck
  • cd apps/admin_dashboard && bun run build

Note

Low Risk
Dependency alignment and regenerated static files only; no application logic changes beyond what the new React patch and bundle imply.

Overview
Follow-up to post-dependabot cleanup for admin_dashboard: bumps react to 19.2.7 so it matches react-dom, refreshes bun.lock (including @types/react 19.2.15 and removal of @types/bun / related lock entries), and adds ignoreDeprecations": "6.0" in tsconfig.app.json to quiet TypeScript 6 baseUrl deprecation noise while keeping existing path aliases.

Rebuilt static assets are committed under apps/api/.../static/dashboard, with the Vite manifest entry JS hash updated (index-CB3HLLMv.jsindex-CjyViga_.js) so the API serves the new bundle.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 5b7bfc1. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

@cursor

cursorBot commented Jul 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Bugbot couldn't run - usage limit reached

Bugbot is counted against Cursor usage for this user or team, and this run hit a usage or spend limit.

A user or team admin can review and increase usage limits in the Cursor dashboard.

(requestId: serverGenReqId_3c495bd2-0a21-41f4-a3a2-68d3772ba768)

@coderabbitai

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@michaelmwu, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in:24 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 7f06929f-895d-402c-b6a6-d6af45bb6fbc

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between af08247 and 5b7bfc1.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • apps/admin_dashboard/bun.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • apps/admin_dashboard/package.json
  • apps/admin_dashboard/tsconfig.app.json
  • apps/api/src/five08/backend/static/dashboard/.vite/manifest.json
  • apps/api/src/five08/backend/static/dashboard/assets/index-CjyViga_.js
  • apps/api/src/five08/backend/static/dashboard/index.html
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch codex/followup-review-20260715

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@michaelmwu
michaelmwu added this pull request to the merge queueJul 15, 2026
Merged via the queue into main with commit 43aea7fJul 15, 2026
12 checks passed
@michaelmwu
michaelmwu deleted the codex/followup-review-20260715 branch July 15, 2026 16:24
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@michaelmwu
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

fix(dashboard): refresh post-dependabot build artifacts - #390

Merged
michaelmwu merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/followup-review-20260715
Jul 15, 2026
Merged

fix(dashboard): refresh post-dependabot build artifacts#390
michaelmwu merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/followup-review-20260715

Conversation

@michaelmwu

@michaelmwumichaelmwu commented Jul 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Follow-up to #389.

This PR addresses the dashboard review findings:

  • Align react and react-dom versions.
  • Regenerate the admin dashboard Bun lockfile.
  • Silence TypeScript 6's baseUrl deprecation diagnostic.
  • Rebuild and commit the generated dashboard bundle served by the API.

Validation:

  • cd apps/admin_dashboard && bun install --frozen-lockfile
  • cd apps/admin_dashboard && bun run typecheck
  • cd apps/admin_dashboard && bun run build

Note

Low Risk
Dependency alignment and regenerated static files only; no application logic changes beyond what the new React patch and bundle imply.

Overview
Follow-up to post-dependabot cleanup for admin_dashboard: bumps react to 19.2.7 so it matches react-dom, refreshes bun.lock (including @types/react 19.2.15 and removal of @types/bun / related lock entries), and adds ignoreDeprecations": "6.0" in tsconfig.app.json to quiet TypeScript 6 baseUrl deprecation noise while keeping existing path aliases.

Rebuilt static assets are committed under apps/api/.../static/dashboard, with the Vite manifest entry JS hash updated (index-CB3HLLMv.jsindex-CjyViga_.js) so the API serves the new bundle.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 5b7bfc1. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

@cursor

cursorBot commented Jul 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Bugbot couldn't run - usage limit reached

Bugbot is counted against Cursor usage for this user or team, and this run hit a usage or spend limit.

A user or team admin can review and increase usage limits in the Cursor dashboard.

(requestId: serverGenReqId_3c495bd2-0a21-41f4-a3a2-68d3772ba768)

@coderabbitai

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@michaelmwu, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in:24 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 7f06929f-895d-402c-b6a6-d6af45bb6fbc

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between af08247 and 5b7bfc1.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • apps/admin_dashboard/bun.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • apps/admin_dashboard/package.json
  • apps/admin_dashboard/tsconfig.app.json
  • apps/api/src/five08/backend/static/dashboard/.vite/manifest.json
  • apps/api/src/five08/backend/static/dashboard/assets/index-CjyViga_.js
  • apps/api/src/five08/backend/static/dashboard/index.html
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch codex/followup-review-20260715

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@michaelmwu
michaelmwu added this pull request to the merge queueJul 15, 2026
Merged via the queue into main with commit 43aea7fJul 15, 2026
12 checks passed
@michaelmwu
michaelmwu deleted the codex/followup-review-20260715 branch July 15, 2026 16:24
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@michaelmwu
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

fix(dashboard): refresh post-dependabot build artifacts - #390

Merged
michaelmwu merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/followup-review-20260715
Jul 15, 2026
Merged

fix(dashboard): refresh post-dependabot build artifacts#390
michaelmwu merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/followup-review-20260715

Conversation

@michaelmwu

@michaelmwumichaelmwu commented Jul 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Follow-up to #389.

This PR addresses the dashboard review findings:

  • Align react and react-dom versions.
  • Regenerate the admin dashboard Bun lockfile.
  • Silence TypeScript 6's baseUrl deprecation diagnostic.
  • Rebuild and commit the generated dashboard bundle served by the API.

Validation:

  • cd apps/admin_dashboard && bun install --frozen-lockfile
  • cd apps/admin_dashboard && bun run typecheck
  • cd apps/admin_dashboard && bun run build

Note

Low Risk
Dependency alignment and regenerated static files only; no application logic changes beyond what the new React patch and bundle imply.

Overview
Follow-up to post-dependabot cleanup for admin_dashboard: bumps react to 19.2.7 so it matches react-dom, refreshes bun.lock (including @types/react 19.2.15 and removal of @types/bun / related lock entries), and adds ignoreDeprecations": "6.0" in tsconfig.app.json to quiet TypeScript 6 baseUrl deprecation noise while keeping existing path aliases.

Rebuilt static assets are committed under apps/api/.../static/dashboard, with the Vite manifest entry JS hash updated (index-CB3HLLMv.jsindex-CjyViga_.js) so the API serves the new bundle.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 5b7bfc1. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

@cursor

cursorBot commented Jul 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Bugbot couldn't run - usage limit reached

Bugbot is counted against Cursor usage for this user or team, and this run hit a usage or spend limit.

A user or team admin can review and increase usage limits in the Cursor dashboard.

(requestId: serverGenReqId_3c495bd2-0a21-41f4-a3a2-68d3772ba768)

@coderabbitai

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@michaelmwu, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in:24 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 7f06929f-895d-402c-b6a6-d6af45bb6fbc

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between af08247 and 5b7bfc1.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • apps/admin_dashboard/bun.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • apps/admin_dashboard/package.json
  • apps/admin_dashboard/tsconfig.app.json
  • apps/api/src/five08/backend/static/dashboard/.vite/manifest.json
  • apps/api/src/five08/backend/static/dashboard/assets/index-CjyViga_.js
  • apps/api/src/five08/backend/static/dashboard/index.html
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch codex/followup-review-20260715

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@michaelmwu
michaelmwu added this pull request to the merge queueJul 15, 2026
Merged via the queue into main with commit 43aea7fJul 15, 2026
12 checks passed
@michaelmwu
michaelmwu deleted the codex/followup-review-20260715 branch July 15, 2026 16:24
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@michaelmwu
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

fix(dashboard): refresh post-dependabot build artifacts - #390

Merged
michaelmwu merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/followup-review-20260715
Jul 15, 2026
Merged

fix(dashboard): refresh post-dependabot build artifacts#390
michaelmwu merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/followup-review-20260715

Conversation

@michaelmwu

@michaelmwumichaelmwu commented Jul 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Follow-up to #389.

This PR addresses the dashboard review findings:

  • Align react and react-dom versions.
  • Regenerate the admin dashboard Bun lockfile.
  • Silence TypeScript 6's baseUrl deprecation diagnostic.
  • Rebuild and commit the generated dashboard bundle served by the API.

Validation:

  • cd apps/admin_dashboard && bun install --frozen-lockfile
  • cd apps/admin_dashboard && bun run typecheck
  • cd apps/admin_dashboard && bun run build

Note

Low Risk
Dependency alignment and regenerated static files only; no application logic changes beyond what the new React patch and bundle imply.

Overview
Follow-up to post-dependabot cleanup for admin_dashboard: bumps react to 19.2.7 so it matches react-dom, refreshes bun.lock (including @types/react 19.2.15 and removal of @types/bun / related lock entries), and adds ignoreDeprecations": "6.0" in tsconfig.app.json to quiet TypeScript 6 baseUrl deprecation noise while keeping existing path aliases.

Rebuilt static assets are committed under apps/api/.../static/dashboard, with the Vite manifest entry JS hash updated (index-CB3HLLMv.jsindex-CjyViga_.js) so the API serves the new bundle.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 5b7bfc1. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

@cursor

cursorBot commented Jul 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Bugbot couldn't run - usage limit reached

Bugbot is counted against Cursor usage for this user or team, and this run hit a usage or spend limit.

A user or team admin can review and increase usage limits in the Cursor dashboard.

(requestId: serverGenReqId_3c495bd2-0a21-41f4-a3a2-68d3772ba768)

@coderabbitai

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@michaelmwu, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in:24 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 7f06929f-895d-402c-b6a6-d6af45bb6fbc

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between af08247 and 5b7bfc1.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • apps/admin_dashboard/bun.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • apps/admin_dashboard/package.json
  • apps/admin_dashboard/tsconfig.app.json
  • apps/api/src/five08/backend/static/dashboard/.vite/manifest.json
  • apps/api/src/five08/backend/static/dashboard/assets/index-CjyViga_.js
  • apps/api/src/five08/backend/static/dashboard/index.html
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch codex/followup-review-20260715

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@michaelmwu
michaelmwu added this pull request to the merge queueJul 15, 2026
Merged via the queue into main with commit 43aea7fJul 15, 2026
12 checks passed
@michaelmwu
michaelmwu deleted the codex/followup-review-20260715 branch July 15, 2026 16:24
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@michaelmwu
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

fix(dashboard): refresh post-dependabot build artifacts - #390

Merged
michaelmwu merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/followup-review-20260715
Jul 15, 2026
Merged

fix(dashboard): refresh post-dependabot build artifacts#390
michaelmwu merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/followup-review-20260715

Conversation

@michaelmwu

@michaelmwumichaelmwu commented Jul 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Follow-up to #389.

This PR addresses the dashboard review findings:

  • Align react and react-dom versions.
  • Regenerate the admin dashboard Bun lockfile.
  • Silence TypeScript 6's baseUrl deprecation diagnostic.
  • Rebuild and commit the generated dashboard bundle served by the API.

Validation:

  • cd apps/admin_dashboard && bun install --frozen-lockfile
  • cd apps/admin_dashboard && bun run typecheck
  • cd apps/admin_dashboard && bun run build

Note

Low Risk
Dependency alignment and regenerated static files only; no application logic changes beyond what the new React patch and bundle imply.

Overview
Follow-up to post-dependabot cleanup for admin_dashboard: bumps react to 19.2.7 so it matches react-dom, refreshes bun.lock (including @types/react 19.2.15 and removal of @types/bun / related lock entries), and adds ignoreDeprecations": "6.0" in tsconfig.app.json to quiet TypeScript 6 baseUrl deprecation noise while keeping existing path aliases.

Rebuilt static assets are committed under apps/api/.../static/dashboard, with the Vite manifest entry JS hash updated (index-CB3HLLMv.jsindex-CjyViga_.js) so the API serves the new bundle.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 5b7bfc1. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

@cursor

cursorBot commented Jul 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Bugbot couldn't run - usage limit reached

Bugbot is counted against Cursor usage for this user or team, and this run hit a usage or spend limit.

A user or team admin can review and increase usage limits in the Cursor dashboard.

(requestId: serverGenReqId_3c495bd2-0a21-41f4-a3a2-68d3772ba768)

@coderabbitai

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@michaelmwu, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in:24 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 7f06929f-895d-402c-b6a6-d6af45bb6fbc

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between af08247 and 5b7bfc1.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • apps/admin_dashboard/bun.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • apps/admin_dashboard/package.json
  • apps/admin_dashboard/tsconfig.app.json
  • apps/api/src/five08/backend/static/dashboard/.vite/manifest.json
  • apps/api/src/five08/backend/static/dashboard/assets/index-CjyViga_.js
  • apps/api/src/five08/backend/static/dashboard/index.html
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch codex/followup-review-20260715

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@michaelmwu
michaelmwu added this pull request to the merge queueJul 15, 2026
Merged via the queue into main with commit 43aea7fJul 15, 2026
12 checks passed
@michaelmwu
michaelmwu deleted the codex/followup-review-20260715 branch July 15, 2026 16:24
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@michaelmwu