Explicit chunk for non fractional values produce errors #1002

Description

@bwentl

Describe the bug
A clear and concise description of what the bug is.

TransLink would like to be able to set explicit_chunk values that are whole numbers to make it easier for us to control memory usage of our model. Currently, we have a working implementation of our model using fractional values of explicit_chunk, but when we increase the size of our synthetic population, we can encountered out of memory issues. Therefore, we wish to limit the memory use of high-memory-use sub models such as workplace location, mandatory tour scheduling model, etc, by using whole number explicit_chunk values.

When we tried to use whole numbers (>1) for explicit_chunk, we encountered the following error in workplace location (but this can happen in any module with chunking on where the chunk size is larger than number of chooser rows):

16/10/2025 19:43:18 - NOTIFY - activitysim.core.workflow.runner - time to execute run.workplace_location UNTIL ERROR : 13.842 seconds
16/10/2025 19:43:18 - WARNING - activitysim.core.mp_tasks - AssertionError exception running workplace_location model: 16/10/2025 19:43:18 - ERROR - activitysim.core.mp_tasks - mp_tasks - mp_households_16 - AssertionError exception caught in mp_run_simulation: 16/10/2025 19:43:18 - ERROR - activitysim.core.mp_tasks - ---
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/mp_tasks.py", line 1098, in mp_run_simulation
run_simulation(state, queue, step_info, resume_after, shared_data_buffer)
File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/mp_tasks.py", line 1048, in run_simulation
raise e
File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/mp_tasks.py", line 1043, in run_simulation
state.run.by_name(model)
File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/workflow/runner.py", line 347, in by_name
self._obj._context = run_named_step(
File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/workflow/steps.py", line 83, in run_named_step
step_func(context, **kwargs)
File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/workflow/steps.py", line 367, in run_step
outcome = error_logging(wrapped_func)(state, *args, **kwargs)
File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/workflow/steps.py", line 46, in wrapper
return func(*args, **kwargs)
File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/abm/models/location_choice.py", line 1223, in workplace_location
iterate_location_choice(
File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/abm/models/location_choice.py", line 1066, in iterate_location_choice
choices_df_, save_sample_df = run_location_choice(
File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/abm/models/location_choice.py", line 860, in run_location_choice
choices_df = run_location_simulate(
File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/abm/models/location_choice.py", line 727, in run_location_simulate
choices = interaction_sample_simulate(
File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/interaction_sample_simulate.py", line 482, in interaction_sample_simulate
for (
File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/chunk.py", line 1392, in adaptive_chunked_choosers_and_alts
assert (rows_per_chunk > 0) and (rows_per_chunk <= num_choosers)
AssertionError
---

To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:

  1. use a number for explicit chunk that is larger than chooser size
  2. turn multiprocessing on
  3. calculation for rows_per_chunk will be wrong and throws an error.

Expected behavior
A clear and concise description of what you expected to happen.

If chunk_size specified is larger than number of rows, the model should run without error on chunkless. If multiprocessing is used and chunk size is larger than the row being processed within a specific process, the model should run without error on chunkless.

Screenshots
If applicable, add screenshots to help explain your problem.

NA

Additional context
Add any other context about the problem here.

I suspect the calculation for chunk size is wrong in chunk.py, but need help in further diagnosis:

 def initial_rows_per_chunk(self):
if self.chunk_training_mode == MODE_EXPLICIT:
if self.rows_per_chunk:
number_of_chunks = self.num_choosers // self.rows_per_chunk + (
1 if self.num_choosers % self.rows_per_chunk else 0
)
else:
number_of_chunks = 1
return self.rows_per_chunk, number_of_chunks

If self.num_choosers > self.rows_per_chunk, number_of_chunks would produce 0, which is not valid.

I suspect there could be more issues affecting chunking calculations, but not sure what the best places to look are.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    BugSomething isn't working/bug f

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
       blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
      }
      } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
      })();
      (function(){
      try {
      var __m = "github.com";
      var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
      
      Skip to content

      Explicit chunk for non fractional values produce errors #1002

      Description

      @bwentl

      Describe the bug
      A clear and concise description of what the bug is.

      TransLink would like to be able to set explicit_chunk values that are whole numbers to make it easier for us to control memory usage of our model. Currently, we have a working implementation of our model using fractional values of explicit_chunk, but when we increase the size of our synthetic population, we can encountered out of memory issues. Therefore, we wish to limit the memory use of high-memory-use sub models such as workplace location, mandatory tour scheduling model, etc, by using whole number explicit_chunk values.

      When we tried to use whole numbers (>1) for explicit_chunk, we encountered the following error in workplace location (but this can happen in any module with chunking on where the chunk size is larger than number of chooser rows):

      16/10/2025 19:43:18 - NOTIFY - activitysim.core.workflow.runner - time to execute run.workplace_location UNTIL ERROR : 13.842 seconds
      16/10/2025 19:43:18 - WARNING - activitysim.core.mp_tasks - AssertionError exception running workplace_location model: 16/10/2025 19:43:18 - ERROR - activitysim.core.mp_tasks - mp_tasks - mp_households_16 - AssertionError exception caught in mp_run_simulation: 16/10/2025 19:43:18 - ERROR - activitysim.core.mp_tasks - ---
      Traceback (most recent call last):
      File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/mp_tasks.py", line 1098, in mp_run_simulation
      run_simulation(state, queue, step_info, resume_after, shared_data_buffer)
      File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/mp_tasks.py", line 1048, in run_simulation
      raise e
      File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/mp_tasks.py", line 1043, in run_simulation
      state.run.by_name(model)
      File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/workflow/runner.py", line 347, in by_name
      self._obj._context = run_named_step(
      File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/workflow/steps.py", line 83, in run_named_step
      step_func(context, **kwargs)
      File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/workflow/steps.py", line 367, in run_step
      outcome = error_logging(wrapped_func)(state, *args, **kwargs)
      File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/workflow/steps.py", line 46, in wrapper
      return func(*args, **kwargs)
      File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/abm/models/location_choice.py", line 1223, in workplace_location
      iterate_location_choice(
      File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/abm/models/location_choice.py", line 1066, in iterate_location_choice
      choices_df_, save_sample_df = run_location_choice(
      File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/abm/models/location_choice.py", line 860, in run_location_choice
      choices_df = run_location_simulate(
      File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/abm/models/location_choice.py", line 727, in run_location_simulate
      choices = interaction_sample_simulate(
      File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/interaction_sample_simulate.py", line 482, in interaction_sample_simulate
      for (
      File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/chunk.py", line 1392, in adaptive_chunked_choosers_and_alts
      assert (rows_per_chunk > 0) and (rows_per_chunk <= num_choosers)
      AssertionError
      ---
      

      To Reproduce
      Steps to reproduce the behavior:

      1. use a number for explicit chunk that is larger than chooser size
      2. turn multiprocessing on
      3. calculation for rows_per_chunk will be wrong and throws an error.

      Expected behavior
      A clear and concise description of what you expected to happen.

      If chunk_size specified is larger than number of rows, the model should run without error on chunkless. If multiprocessing is used and chunk size is larger than the row being processed within a specific process, the model should run without error on chunkless.

      Screenshots
      If applicable, add screenshots to help explain your problem.

      NA

      Additional context
      Add any other context about the problem here.

      I suspect the calculation for chunk size is wrong in chunk.py, but need help in further diagnosis:

       def initial_rows_per_chunk(self):
      if self.chunk_training_mode == MODE_EXPLICIT:
      if self.rows_per_chunk:
      number_of_chunks = self.num_choosers // self.rows_per_chunk + (
      1 if self.num_choosers % self.rows_per_chunk else 0
      )
      else:
      number_of_chunks = 1
      return self.rows_per_chunk, number_of_chunks
      

      If self.num_choosers > self.rows_per_chunk, number_of_chunks would produce 0, which is not valid.

      I suspect there could be more issues affecting chunking calculations, but not sure what the best places to look are.

      Metadata

      Metadata

      Assignees

      No one assigned

        Labels

        BugSomething isn't working/bug f

        Type

        No type

        Projects

        No projects

          Milestone

          No milestone

          Relationships

          None yet

          Development

          No branches or pull requests

          Issue actions

          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
          Skip to content

          Explicit chunk for non fractional values produce errors #1002

          Description

          @bwentl

          Describe the bug
          A clear and concise description of what the bug is.

          TransLink would like to be able to set explicit_chunk values that are whole numbers to make it easier for us to control memory usage of our model. Currently, we have a working implementation of our model using fractional values of explicit_chunk, but when we increase the size of our synthetic population, we can encountered out of memory issues. Therefore, we wish to limit the memory use of high-memory-use sub models such as workplace location, mandatory tour scheduling model, etc, by using whole number explicit_chunk values.

          When we tried to use whole numbers (>1) for explicit_chunk, we encountered the following error in workplace location (but this can happen in any module with chunking on where the chunk size is larger than number of chooser rows):

          16/10/2025 19:43:18 - NOTIFY - activitysim.core.workflow.runner - time to execute run.workplace_location UNTIL ERROR : 13.842 seconds
          16/10/2025 19:43:18 - WARNING - activitysim.core.mp_tasks - AssertionError exception running workplace_location model: 16/10/2025 19:43:18 - ERROR - activitysim.core.mp_tasks - mp_tasks - mp_households_16 - AssertionError exception caught in mp_run_simulation: 16/10/2025 19:43:18 - ERROR - activitysim.core.mp_tasks - ---
          Traceback (most recent call last):
          File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/mp_tasks.py", line 1098, in mp_run_simulation
          run_simulation(state, queue, step_info, resume_after, shared_data_buffer)
          File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/mp_tasks.py", line 1048, in run_simulation
          raise e
          File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/mp_tasks.py", line 1043, in run_simulation
          state.run.by_name(model)
          File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/workflow/runner.py", line 347, in by_name
          self._obj._context = run_named_step(
          File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/workflow/steps.py", line 83, in run_named_step
          step_func(context, **kwargs)
          File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/workflow/steps.py", line 367, in run_step
          outcome = error_logging(wrapped_func)(state, *args, **kwargs)
          File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/workflow/steps.py", line 46, in wrapper
          return func(*args, **kwargs)
          File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/abm/models/location_choice.py", line 1223, in workplace_location
          iterate_location_choice(
          File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/abm/models/location_choice.py", line 1066, in iterate_location_choice
          choices_df_, save_sample_df = run_location_choice(
          File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/abm/models/location_choice.py", line 860, in run_location_choice
          choices_df = run_location_simulate(
          File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/abm/models/location_choice.py", line 727, in run_location_simulate
          choices = interaction_sample_simulate(
          File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/interaction_sample_simulate.py", line 482, in interaction_sample_simulate
          for (
          File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/chunk.py", line 1392, in adaptive_chunked_choosers_and_alts
          assert (rows_per_chunk > 0) and (rows_per_chunk <= num_choosers)
          AssertionError
          ---
          

          To Reproduce
          Steps to reproduce the behavior:

          1. use a number for explicit chunk that is larger than chooser size
          2. turn multiprocessing on
          3. calculation for rows_per_chunk will be wrong and throws an error.

          Expected behavior
          A clear and concise description of what you expected to happen.

          If chunk_size specified is larger than number of rows, the model should run without error on chunkless. If multiprocessing is used and chunk size is larger than the row being processed within a specific process, the model should run without error on chunkless.

          Screenshots
          If applicable, add screenshots to help explain your problem.

          NA

          Additional context
          Add any other context about the problem here.

          I suspect the calculation for chunk size is wrong in chunk.py, but need help in further diagnosis:

           def initial_rows_per_chunk(self):
          if self.chunk_training_mode == MODE_EXPLICIT:
          if self.rows_per_chunk:
          number_of_chunks = self.num_choosers // self.rows_per_chunk + (
          1 if self.num_choosers % self.rows_per_chunk else 0
          )
          else:
          number_of_chunks = 1
          return self.rows_per_chunk, number_of_chunks
          

          If self.num_choosers > self.rows_per_chunk, number_of_chunks would produce 0, which is not valid.

          I suspect there could be more issues affecting chunking calculations, but not sure what the best places to look are.

          Metadata

          Metadata

          Assignees

          No one assigned

            Labels

            BugSomething isn't working/bug f

            Type

            No type

            Projects

            No projects

              Milestone

              No milestone

              Relationships

              None yet

              Development

              No branches or pull requests

              Issue actions

              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
              Skip to content

              Explicit chunk for non fractional values produce errors #1002

              Description

              @bwentl

              Describe the bug
              A clear and concise description of what the bug is.

              TransLink would like to be able to set explicit_chunk values that are whole numbers to make it easier for us to control memory usage of our model. Currently, we have a working implementation of our model using fractional values of explicit_chunk, but when we increase the size of our synthetic population, we can encountered out of memory issues. Therefore, we wish to limit the memory use of high-memory-use sub models such as workplace location, mandatory tour scheduling model, etc, by using whole number explicit_chunk values.

              When we tried to use whole numbers (>1) for explicit_chunk, we encountered the following error in workplace location (but this can happen in any module with chunking on where the chunk size is larger than number of chooser rows):

              16/10/2025 19:43:18 - NOTIFY - activitysim.core.workflow.runner - time to execute run.workplace_location UNTIL ERROR : 13.842 seconds
              16/10/2025 19:43:18 - WARNING - activitysim.core.mp_tasks - AssertionError exception running workplace_location model: 16/10/2025 19:43:18 - ERROR - activitysim.core.mp_tasks - mp_tasks - mp_households_16 - AssertionError exception caught in mp_run_simulation: 16/10/2025 19:43:18 - ERROR - activitysim.core.mp_tasks - ---
              Traceback (most recent call last):
              File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/mp_tasks.py", line 1098, in mp_run_simulation
              run_simulation(state, queue, step_info, resume_after, shared_data_buffer)
              File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/mp_tasks.py", line 1048, in run_simulation
              raise e
              File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/mp_tasks.py", line 1043, in run_simulation
              state.run.by_name(model)
              File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/workflow/runner.py", line 347, in by_name
              self._obj._context = run_named_step(
              File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/workflow/steps.py", line 83, in run_named_step
              step_func(context, **kwargs)
              File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/workflow/steps.py", line 367, in run_step
              outcome = error_logging(wrapped_func)(state, *args, **kwargs)
              File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/workflow/steps.py", line 46, in wrapper
              return func(*args, **kwargs)
              File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/abm/models/location_choice.py", line 1223, in workplace_location
              iterate_location_choice(
              File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/abm/models/location_choice.py", line 1066, in iterate_location_choice
              choices_df_, save_sample_df = run_location_choice(
              File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/abm/models/location_choice.py", line 860, in run_location_choice
              choices_df = run_location_simulate(
              File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/abm/models/location_choice.py", line 727, in run_location_simulate
              choices = interaction_sample_simulate(
              File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/interaction_sample_simulate.py", line 482, in interaction_sample_simulate
              for (
              File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/chunk.py", line 1392, in adaptive_chunked_choosers_and_alts
              assert (rows_per_chunk > 0) and (rows_per_chunk <= num_choosers)
              AssertionError
              ---
              

              To Reproduce
              Steps to reproduce the behavior:

              1. use a number for explicit chunk that is larger than chooser size
              2. turn multiprocessing on
              3. calculation for rows_per_chunk will be wrong and throws an error.

              Expected behavior
              A clear and concise description of what you expected to happen.

              If chunk_size specified is larger than number of rows, the model should run without error on chunkless. If multiprocessing is used and chunk size is larger than the row being processed within a specific process, the model should run without error on chunkless.

              Screenshots
              If applicable, add screenshots to help explain your problem.

              NA

              Additional context
              Add any other context about the problem here.

              I suspect the calculation for chunk size is wrong in chunk.py, but need help in further diagnosis:

               def initial_rows_per_chunk(self):
              if self.chunk_training_mode == MODE_EXPLICIT:
              if self.rows_per_chunk:
              number_of_chunks = self.num_choosers // self.rows_per_chunk + (
              1 if self.num_choosers % self.rows_per_chunk else 0
              )
              else:
              number_of_chunks = 1
              return self.rows_per_chunk, number_of_chunks
              

              If self.num_choosers > self.rows_per_chunk, number_of_chunks would produce 0, which is not valid.

              I suspect there could be more issues affecting chunking calculations, but not sure what the best places to look are.

              Metadata

              Metadata

              Assignees

              No one assigned

                Labels

                BugSomething isn't working/bug f

                Type

                No type

                Projects

                No projects

                  Milestone

                  No milestone

                  Relationships

                  None yet

                  Development

                  No branches or pull requests

                  Issue actions

                  , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
                  Skip to content

                  Explicit chunk for non fractional values produce errors #1002

                  Description

                  @bwentl

                  Describe the bug
                  A clear and concise description of what the bug is.

                  TransLink would like to be able to set explicit_chunk values that are whole numbers to make it easier for us to control memory usage of our model. Currently, we have a working implementation of our model using fractional values of explicit_chunk, but when we increase the size of our synthetic population, we can encountered out of memory issues. Therefore, we wish to limit the memory use of high-memory-use sub models such as workplace location, mandatory tour scheduling model, etc, by using whole number explicit_chunk values.

                  When we tried to use whole numbers (>1) for explicit_chunk, we encountered the following error in workplace location (but this can happen in any module with chunking on where the chunk size is larger than number of chooser rows):

                  16/10/2025 19:43:18 - NOTIFY - activitysim.core.workflow.runner - time to execute run.workplace_location UNTIL ERROR : 13.842 seconds
                  16/10/2025 19:43:18 - WARNING - activitysim.core.mp_tasks - AssertionError exception running workplace_location model: 16/10/2025 19:43:18 - ERROR - activitysim.core.mp_tasks - mp_tasks - mp_households_16 - AssertionError exception caught in mp_run_simulation: 16/10/2025 19:43:18 - ERROR - activitysim.core.mp_tasks - ---
                  Traceback (most recent call last):
                  File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/mp_tasks.py", line 1098, in mp_run_simulation
                  run_simulation(state, queue, step_info, resume_after, shared_data_buffer)
                  File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/mp_tasks.py", line 1048, in run_simulation
                  raise e
                  File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/mp_tasks.py", line 1043, in run_simulation
                  state.run.by_name(model)
                  File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/workflow/runner.py", line 347, in by_name
                  self._obj._context = run_named_step(
                  File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/workflow/steps.py", line 83, in run_named_step
                  step_func(context, **kwargs)
                  File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/workflow/steps.py", line 367, in run_step
                  outcome = error_logging(wrapped_func)(state, *args, **kwargs)
                  File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/workflow/steps.py", line 46, in wrapper
                  return func(*args, **kwargs)
                  File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/abm/models/location_choice.py", line 1223, in workplace_location
                  iterate_location_choice(
                  File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/abm/models/location_choice.py", line 1066, in iterate_location_choice
                  choices_df_, save_sample_df = run_location_choice(
                  File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/abm/models/location_choice.py", line 860, in run_location_choice
                  choices_df = run_location_simulate(
                  File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/abm/models/location_choice.py", line 727, in run_location_simulate
                  choices = interaction_sample_simulate(
                  File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/interaction_sample_simulate.py", line 482, in interaction_sample_simulate
                  for (
                  File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/chunk.py", line 1392, in adaptive_chunked_choosers_and_alts
                  assert (rows_per_chunk > 0) and (rows_per_chunk <= num_choosers)
                  AssertionError
                  ---
                  

                  To Reproduce
                  Steps to reproduce the behavior:

                  1. use a number for explicit chunk that is larger than chooser size
                  2. turn multiprocessing on
                  3. calculation for rows_per_chunk will be wrong and throws an error.

                  Expected behavior
                  A clear and concise description of what you expected to happen.

                  If chunk_size specified is larger than number of rows, the model should run without error on chunkless. If multiprocessing is used and chunk size is larger than the row being processed within a specific process, the model should run without error on chunkless.

                  Screenshots
                  If applicable, add screenshots to help explain your problem.

                  NA

                  Additional context
                  Add any other context about the problem here.

                  I suspect the calculation for chunk size is wrong in chunk.py, but need help in further diagnosis:

                   def initial_rows_per_chunk(self):
                  if self.chunk_training_mode == MODE_EXPLICIT:
                  if self.rows_per_chunk:
                  number_of_chunks = self.num_choosers // self.rows_per_chunk + (
                  1 if self.num_choosers % self.rows_per_chunk else 0
                  )
                  else:
                  number_of_chunks = 1
                  return self.rows_per_chunk, number_of_chunks
                  

                  If self.num_choosers > self.rows_per_chunk, number_of_chunks would produce 0, which is not valid.

                  I suspect there could be more issues affecting chunking calculations, but not sure what the best places to look are.

                  Metadata

                  Metadata

                  Assignees

                  No one assigned

                    Labels

                    BugSomething isn't working/bug f

                    Type

                    No type

                    Projects

                    No projects

                      Milestone

                      No milestone

                      Relationships

                      None yet

                      Development

                      No branches or pull requests

                      Issue actions

                      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
                      Skip to content

                      Explicit chunk for non fractional values produce errors #1002

                      Description

                      @bwentl

                      Describe the bug
                      A clear and concise description of what the bug is.

                      TransLink would like to be able to set explicit_chunk values that are whole numbers to make it easier for us to control memory usage of our model. Currently, we have a working implementation of our model using fractional values of explicit_chunk, but when we increase the size of our synthetic population, we can encountered out of memory issues. Therefore, we wish to limit the memory use of high-memory-use sub models such as workplace location, mandatory tour scheduling model, etc, by using whole number explicit_chunk values.

                      When we tried to use whole numbers (>1) for explicit_chunk, we encountered the following error in workplace location (but this can happen in any module with chunking on where the chunk size is larger than number of chooser rows):

                      16/10/2025 19:43:18 - NOTIFY - activitysim.core.workflow.runner - time to execute run.workplace_location UNTIL ERROR : 13.842 seconds
                      16/10/2025 19:43:18 - WARNING - activitysim.core.mp_tasks - AssertionError exception running workplace_location model: 16/10/2025 19:43:18 - ERROR - activitysim.core.mp_tasks - mp_tasks - mp_households_16 - AssertionError exception caught in mp_run_simulation: 16/10/2025 19:43:18 - ERROR - activitysim.core.mp_tasks - ---
                      Traceback (most recent call last):
                      File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/mp_tasks.py", line 1098, in mp_run_simulation
                      run_simulation(state, queue, step_info, resume_after, shared_data_buffer)
                      File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/mp_tasks.py", line 1048, in run_simulation
                      raise e
                      File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/mp_tasks.py", line 1043, in run_simulation
                      state.run.by_name(model)
                      File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/workflow/runner.py", line 347, in by_name
                      self._obj._context = run_named_step(
                      File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/workflow/steps.py", line 83, in run_named_step
                      step_func(context, **kwargs)
                      File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/workflow/steps.py", line 367, in run_step
                      outcome = error_logging(wrapped_func)(state, *args, **kwargs)
                      File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/workflow/steps.py", line 46, in wrapper
                      return func(*args, **kwargs)
                      File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/abm/models/location_choice.py", line 1223, in workplace_location
                      iterate_location_choice(
                      File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/abm/models/location_choice.py", line 1066, in iterate_location_choice
                      choices_df_, save_sample_df = run_location_choice(
                      File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/abm/models/location_choice.py", line 860, in run_location_choice
                      choices_df = run_location_simulate(
                      File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/abm/models/location_choice.py", line 727, in run_location_simulate
                      choices = interaction_sample_simulate(
                      File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/interaction_sample_simulate.py", line 482, in interaction_sample_simulate
                      for (
                      File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/chunk.py", line 1392, in adaptive_chunked_choosers_and_alts
                      assert (rows_per_chunk > 0) and (rows_per_chunk <= num_choosers)
                      AssertionError
                      ---
                      

                      To Reproduce
                      Steps to reproduce the behavior:

                      1. use a number for explicit chunk that is larger than chooser size
                      2. turn multiprocessing on
                      3. calculation for rows_per_chunk will be wrong and throws an error.

                      Expected behavior
                      A clear and concise description of what you expected to happen.

                      If chunk_size specified is larger than number of rows, the model should run without error on chunkless. If multiprocessing is used and chunk size is larger than the row being processed within a specific process, the model should run without error on chunkless.

                      Screenshots
                      If applicable, add screenshots to help explain your problem.

                      NA

                      Additional context
                      Add any other context about the problem here.

                      I suspect the calculation for chunk size is wrong in chunk.py, but need help in further diagnosis:

                       def initial_rows_per_chunk(self):
                      if self.chunk_training_mode == MODE_EXPLICIT:
                      if self.rows_per_chunk:
                      number_of_chunks = self.num_choosers // self.rows_per_chunk + (
                      1 if self.num_choosers % self.rows_per_chunk else 0
                      )
                      else:
                      number_of_chunks = 1
                      return self.rows_per_chunk, number_of_chunks
                      

                      If self.num_choosers > self.rows_per_chunk, number_of_chunks would produce 0, which is not valid.

                      I suspect there could be more issues affecting chunking calculations, but not sure what the best places to look are.

                      Metadata

                      Metadata

                      Assignees

                      No one assigned

                        Labels

                        BugSomething isn't working/bug f

                        Type

                        No type

                        Projects

                        No projects

                          Milestone

                          No milestone

                          Relationships

                          None yet

                          Development

                          No branches or pull requests

                          Issue actions

                          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
                          Skip to content

                          Explicit chunk for non fractional values produce errors #1002

                          Description

                          @bwentl

                          Describe the bug
                          A clear and concise description of what the bug is.

                          TransLink would like to be able to set explicit_chunk values that are whole numbers to make it easier for us to control memory usage of our model. Currently, we have a working implementation of our model using fractional values of explicit_chunk, but when we increase the size of our synthetic population, we can encountered out of memory issues. Therefore, we wish to limit the memory use of high-memory-use sub models such as workplace location, mandatory tour scheduling model, etc, by using whole number explicit_chunk values.

                          When we tried to use whole numbers (>1) for explicit_chunk, we encountered the following error in workplace location (but this can happen in any module with chunking on where the chunk size is larger than number of chooser rows):

                          16/10/2025 19:43:18 - NOTIFY - activitysim.core.workflow.runner - time to execute run.workplace_location UNTIL ERROR : 13.842 seconds
                          16/10/2025 19:43:18 - WARNING - activitysim.core.mp_tasks - AssertionError exception running workplace_location model: 16/10/2025 19:43:18 - ERROR - activitysim.core.mp_tasks - mp_tasks - mp_households_16 - AssertionError exception caught in mp_run_simulation: 16/10/2025 19:43:18 - ERROR - activitysim.core.mp_tasks - ---
                          Traceback (most recent call last):
                          File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/mp_tasks.py", line 1098, in mp_run_simulation
                          run_simulation(state, queue, step_info, resume_after, shared_data_buffer)
                          File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/mp_tasks.py", line 1048, in run_simulation
                          raise e
                          File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/mp_tasks.py", line 1043, in run_simulation
                          state.run.by_name(model)
                          File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/workflow/runner.py", line 347, in by_name
                          self._obj._context = run_named_step(
                          File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/workflow/steps.py", line 83, in run_named_step
                          step_func(context, **kwargs)
                          File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/workflow/steps.py", line 367, in run_step
                          outcome = error_logging(wrapped_func)(state, *args, **kwargs)
                          File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/workflow/steps.py", line 46, in wrapper
                          return func(*args, **kwargs)
                          File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/abm/models/location_choice.py", line 1223, in workplace_location
                          iterate_location_choice(
                          File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/abm/models/location_choice.py", line 1066, in iterate_location_choice
                          choices_df_, save_sample_df = run_location_choice(
                          File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/abm/models/location_choice.py", line 860, in run_location_choice
                          choices_df = run_location_simulate(
                          File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/abm/models/location_choice.py", line 727, in run_location_simulate
                          choices = interaction_sample_simulate(
                          File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/interaction_sample_simulate.py", line 482, in interaction_sample_simulate
                          for (
                          File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/chunk.py", line 1392, in adaptive_chunked_choosers_and_alts
                          assert (rows_per_chunk > 0) and (rows_per_chunk <= num_choosers)
                          AssertionError
                          ---
                          

                          To Reproduce
                          Steps to reproduce the behavior:

                          1. use a number for explicit chunk that is larger than chooser size
                          2. turn multiprocessing on
                          3. calculation for rows_per_chunk will be wrong and throws an error.

                          Expected behavior
                          A clear and concise description of what you expected to happen.

                          If chunk_size specified is larger than number of rows, the model should run without error on chunkless. If multiprocessing is used and chunk size is larger than the row being processed within a specific process, the model should run without error on chunkless.

                          Screenshots
                          If applicable, add screenshots to help explain your problem.

                          NA

                          Additional context
                          Add any other context about the problem here.

                          I suspect the calculation for chunk size is wrong in chunk.py, but need help in further diagnosis:

                           def initial_rows_per_chunk(self):
                          if self.chunk_training_mode == MODE_EXPLICIT:
                          if self.rows_per_chunk:
                          number_of_chunks = self.num_choosers // self.rows_per_chunk + (
                          1 if self.num_choosers % self.rows_per_chunk else 0
                          )
                          else:
                          number_of_chunks = 1
                          return self.rows_per_chunk, number_of_chunks
                          

                          If self.num_choosers > self.rows_per_chunk, number_of_chunks would produce 0, which is not valid.

                          I suspect there could be more issues affecting chunking calculations, but not sure what the best places to look are.

                          Metadata

                          Metadata

                          Assignees

                          No one assigned

                            Labels

                            BugSomething isn't working/bug f

                            Type

                            No type

                            Projects

                            No projects

                              Milestone

                              No milestone

                              Relationships

                              None yet

                              Development

                              No branches or pull requests

                              Issue actions

                              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
                              Skip to content

                              Explicit chunk for non fractional values produce errors #1002

                              Description

                              @bwentl

                              Describe the bug
                              A clear and concise description of what the bug is.

                              TransLink would like to be able to set explicit_chunk values that are whole numbers to make it easier for us to control memory usage of our model. Currently, we have a working implementation of our model using fractional values of explicit_chunk, but when we increase the size of our synthetic population, we can encountered out of memory issues. Therefore, we wish to limit the memory use of high-memory-use sub models such as workplace location, mandatory tour scheduling model, etc, by using whole number explicit_chunk values.

                              When we tried to use whole numbers (>1) for explicit_chunk, we encountered the following error in workplace location (but this can happen in any module with chunking on where the chunk size is larger than number of chooser rows):

                              16/10/2025 19:43:18 - NOTIFY - activitysim.core.workflow.runner - time to execute run.workplace_location UNTIL ERROR : 13.842 seconds
                              16/10/2025 19:43:18 - WARNING - activitysim.core.mp_tasks - AssertionError exception running workplace_location model: 16/10/2025 19:43:18 - ERROR - activitysim.core.mp_tasks - mp_tasks - mp_households_16 - AssertionError exception caught in mp_run_simulation: 16/10/2025 19:43:18 - ERROR - activitysim.core.mp_tasks - ---
                              Traceback (most recent call last):
                              File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/mp_tasks.py", line 1098, in mp_run_simulation
                              run_simulation(state, queue, step_info, resume_after, shared_data_buffer)
                              File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/mp_tasks.py", line 1048, in run_simulation
                              raise e
                              File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/mp_tasks.py", line 1043, in run_simulation
                              state.run.by_name(model)
                              File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/workflow/runner.py", line 347, in by_name
                              self._obj._context = run_named_step(
                              File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/workflow/steps.py", line 83, in run_named_step
                              step_func(context, **kwargs)
                              File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/workflow/steps.py", line 367, in run_step
                              outcome = error_logging(wrapped_func)(state, *args, **kwargs)
                              File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/workflow/steps.py", line 46, in wrapper
                              return func(*args, **kwargs)
                              File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/abm/models/location_choice.py", line 1223, in workplace_location
                              iterate_location_choice(
                              File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/abm/models/location_choice.py", line 1066, in iterate_location_choice
                              choices_df_, save_sample_df = run_location_choice(
                              File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/abm/models/location_choice.py", line 860, in run_location_choice
                              choices_df = run_location_simulate(
                              File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/abm/models/location_choice.py", line 727, in run_location_simulate
                              choices = interaction_sample_simulate(
                              File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/interaction_sample_simulate.py", line 482, in interaction_sample_simulate
                              for (
                              File "/home/ubuntu/.uv/activitysim/tlpytools/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/activitysim/core/chunk.py", line 1392, in adaptive_chunked_choosers_and_alts
                              assert (rows_per_chunk > 0) and (rows_per_chunk <= num_choosers)
                              AssertionError
                              ---
                              

                              To Reproduce
                              Steps to reproduce the behavior:

                              1. use a number for explicit chunk that is larger than chooser size
                              2. turn multiprocessing on
                              3. calculation for rows_per_chunk will be wrong and throws an error.

                              Expected behavior
                              A clear and concise description of what you expected to happen.

                              If chunk_size specified is larger than number of rows, the model should run without error on chunkless. If multiprocessing is used and chunk size is larger than the row being processed within a specific process, the model should run without error on chunkless.

                              Screenshots
                              If applicable, add screenshots to help explain your problem.

                              NA

                              Additional context
                              Add any other context about the problem here.

                              I suspect the calculation for chunk size is wrong in chunk.py, but need help in further diagnosis:

                               def initial_rows_per_chunk(self):
                              if self.chunk_training_mode == MODE_EXPLICIT:
                              if self.rows_per_chunk:
                              number_of_chunks = self.num_choosers // self.rows_per_chunk + (
                              1 if self.num_choosers % self.rows_per_chunk else 0
                              )
                              else:
                              number_of_chunks = 1
                              return self.rows_per_chunk, number_of_chunks
                              

                              If self.num_choosers > self.rows_per_chunk, number_of_chunks would produce 0, which is not valid.

                              I suspect there could be more issues affecting chunking calculations, but not sure what the best places to look are.

                              Metadata

                              Metadata

                              Assignees

                              No one assigned

                                Labels

                                BugSomething isn't working/bug f

                                Type

                                No type

                                Projects

                                No projects

                                  Milestone

                                  No milestone

                                  Relationships

                                  None yet

                                  Development

                                  No branches or pull requests

                                  Issue actions