using skims with find_nearest_accessibility_zone is a bottleneck when working with large number of MAZs #1030

Description

@bricegnichols

Describe the bug
The annotate_households step takes a very long time to complete (~25 minutes without sharrow in our implementation). The slowdown occurs after household data has been processed and disaggregate accessibilities are being calculated. More specifically, the nearest_skim function in find_nearest_accessibility_zone in disaggregate_accessibility.py is the bottleneck.

To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:

  1. Copy input data from here and configs from here. (Note: if you want to truly benchmark the runtime slowness I will upload the full data instead of the test data linked here.)
  2. Clone Activitysim
  3. Open a command prompt, cd to Activitysim, then enter uv sync --locked to create the uv .venv.
  4. Enter .venv\Scripts\activate to activate the uv environment.
  5. Enter activitysim run -c path_to_configs -d path_to_data_test -o path_to_output

Expected behavior
This step takes about 2 minutes running with sharrow and I would expect it to run maybe a little slower (but way faster than 25 minutes) without sharrow.

Additional context
David Hensle worked with us to diagnose the problem and proposed a new method that works much faster. We also tested the centroids alternative method but did not yet get it working. However, the skims approach seems preferable to using MAZ centroids. Our implementation has 66k MAZs so this may not have surfaced as an obvious issue for implementations with fewer MAZs.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    BugSomething isn't working/bug f

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
       blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
      }
      } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
      })();
      (function(){
      try {
      var __m = "github.com";
      var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
      
      Skip to content

      using skims with find_nearest_accessibility_zone is a bottleneck when working with large number of MAZs #1030

      Description

      @bricegnichols

      Describe the bug
      The annotate_households step takes a very long time to complete (~25 minutes without sharrow in our implementation). The slowdown occurs after household data has been processed and disaggregate accessibilities are being calculated. More specifically, the nearest_skim function in find_nearest_accessibility_zone in disaggregate_accessibility.py is the bottleneck.

      To Reproduce
      Steps to reproduce the behavior:

      1. Copy input data from here and configs from here. (Note: if you want to truly benchmark the runtime slowness I will upload the full data instead of the test data linked here.)
      2. Clone Activitysim
      3. Open a command prompt, cd to Activitysim, then enter uv sync --locked to create the uv .venv.
      4. Enter .venv\Scripts\activate to activate the uv environment.
      5. Enter activitysim run -c path_to_configs -d path_to_data_test -o path_to_output

      Expected behavior
      This step takes about 2 minutes running with sharrow and I would expect it to run maybe a little slower (but way faster than 25 minutes) without sharrow.

      Additional context
      David Hensle worked with us to diagnose the problem and proposed a new method that works much faster. We also tested the centroids alternative method but did not yet get it working. However, the skims approach seems preferable to using MAZ centroids. Our implementation has 66k MAZs so this may not have surfaced as an obvious issue for implementations with fewer MAZs.

      Activity

      Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

      Metadata

      Metadata

      Assignees

      No one assigned

        Labels

        BugSomething isn't working/bug f

        Type

        No type

        Projects

        No projects

          Milestone

          No milestone

          Relationships

          None yet

          Development

          No branches or pull requests

          Issue actions

          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
          Skip to content

          using skims with find_nearest_accessibility_zone is a bottleneck when working with large number of MAZs #1030

          Description

          @bricegnichols

          Describe the bug
          The annotate_households step takes a very long time to complete (~25 minutes without sharrow in our implementation). The slowdown occurs after household data has been processed and disaggregate accessibilities are being calculated. More specifically, the nearest_skim function in find_nearest_accessibility_zone in disaggregate_accessibility.py is the bottleneck.

          To Reproduce
          Steps to reproduce the behavior:

          1. Copy input data from here and configs from here. (Note: if you want to truly benchmark the runtime slowness I will upload the full data instead of the test data linked here.)
          2. Clone Activitysim
          3. Open a command prompt, cd to Activitysim, then enter uv sync --locked to create the uv .venv.
          4. Enter .venv\Scripts\activate to activate the uv environment.
          5. Enter activitysim run -c path_to_configs -d path_to_data_test -o path_to_output

          Expected behavior
          This step takes about 2 minutes running with sharrow and I would expect it to run maybe a little slower (but way faster than 25 minutes) without sharrow.

          Additional context
          David Hensle worked with us to diagnose the problem and proposed a new method that works much faster. We also tested the centroids alternative method but did not yet get it working. However, the skims approach seems preferable to using MAZ centroids. Our implementation has 66k MAZs so this may not have surfaced as an obvious issue for implementations with fewer MAZs.

          Activity

          Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

          Metadata

          Metadata

          Assignees

          No one assigned

            Labels

            BugSomething isn't working/bug f

            Type

            No type

            Projects

            No projects

              Milestone

              No milestone

              Relationships

              None yet

              Development

              No branches or pull requests

              Issue actions

              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
              Skip to content

              using skims with find_nearest_accessibility_zone is a bottleneck when working with large number of MAZs #1030

              Description

              @bricegnichols

              Describe the bug
              The annotate_households step takes a very long time to complete (~25 minutes without sharrow in our implementation). The slowdown occurs after household data has been processed and disaggregate accessibilities are being calculated. More specifically, the nearest_skim function in find_nearest_accessibility_zone in disaggregate_accessibility.py is the bottleneck.

              To Reproduce
              Steps to reproduce the behavior:

              1. Copy input data from here and configs from here. (Note: if you want to truly benchmark the runtime slowness I will upload the full data instead of the test data linked here.)
              2. Clone Activitysim
              3. Open a command prompt, cd to Activitysim, then enter uv sync --locked to create the uv .venv.
              4. Enter .venv\Scripts\activate to activate the uv environment.
              5. Enter activitysim run -c path_to_configs -d path_to_data_test -o path_to_output

              Expected behavior
              This step takes about 2 minutes running with sharrow and I would expect it to run maybe a little slower (but way faster than 25 minutes) without sharrow.

              Additional context
              David Hensle worked with us to diagnose the problem and proposed a new method that works much faster. We also tested the centroids alternative method but did not yet get it working. However, the skims approach seems preferable to using MAZ centroids. Our implementation has 66k MAZs so this may not have surfaced as an obvious issue for implementations with fewer MAZs.

              Activity

              Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

              Metadata

              Metadata

              Assignees

              No one assigned

                Labels

                BugSomething isn't working/bug f

                Type

                No type

                Projects

                No projects

                  Milestone

                  No milestone

                  Relationships

                  None yet

                  Development

                  No branches or pull requests

                  Issue actions

                  , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
                  Skip to content

                  using skims with find_nearest_accessibility_zone is a bottleneck when working with large number of MAZs #1030

                  Description

                  @bricegnichols

                  Describe the bug
                  The annotate_households step takes a very long time to complete (~25 minutes without sharrow in our implementation). The slowdown occurs after household data has been processed and disaggregate accessibilities are being calculated. More specifically, the nearest_skim function in find_nearest_accessibility_zone in disaggregate_accessibility.py is the bottleneck.

                  To Reproduce
                  Steps to reproduce the behavior:

                  1. Copy input data from here and configs from here. (Note: if you want to truly benchmark the runtime slowness I will upload the full data instead of the test data linked here.)
                  2. Clone Activitysim
                  3. Open a command prompt, cd to Activitysim, then enter uv sync --locked to create the uv .venv.
                  4. Enter .venv\Scripts\activate to activate the uv environment.
                  5. Enter activitysim run -c path_to_configs -d path_to_data_test -o path_to_output

                  Expected behavior
                  This step takes about 2 minutes running with sharrow and I would expect it to run maybe a little slower (but way faster than 25 minutes) without sharrow.

                  Additional context
                  David Hensle worked with us to diagnose the problem and proposed a new method that works much faster. We also tested the centroids alternative method but did not yet get it working. However, the skims approach seems preferable to using MAZ centroids. Our implementation has 66k MAZs so this may not have surfaced as an obvious issue for implementations with fewer MAZs.

                  Activity

                  Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

                  Metadata

                  Metadata

                  Assignees

                  No one assigned

                    Labels

                    BugSomething isn't working/bug f

                    Type

                    No type

                    Projects

                    No projects

                      Milestone

                      No milestone

                      Relationships

                      None yet

                      Development

                      No branches or pull requests

                      Issue actions

                      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
                      Skip to content

                      using skims with find_nearest_accessibility_zone is a bottleneck when working with large number of MAZs #1030

                      Description

                      @bricegnichols

                      Describe the bug
                      The annotate_households step takes a very long time to complete (~25 minutes without sharrow in our implementation). The slowdown occurs after household data has been processed and disaggregate accessibilities are being calculated. More specifically, the nearest_skim function in find_nearest_accessibility_zone in disaggregate_accessibility.py is the bottleneck.

                      To Reproduce
                      Steps to reproduce the behavior:

                      1. Copy input data from here and configs from here. (Note: if you want to truly benchmark the runtime slowness I will upload the full data instead of the test data linked here.)
                      2. Clone Activitysim
                      3. Open a command prompt, cd to Activitysim, then enter uv sync --locked to create the uv .venv.
                      4. Enter .venv\Scripts\activate to activate the uv environment.
                      5. Enter activitysim run -c path_to_configs -d path_to_data_test -o path_to_output

                      Expected behavior
                      This step takes about 2 minutes running with sharrow and I would expect it to run maybe a little slower (but way faster than 25 minutes) without sharrow.

                      Additional context
                      David Hensle worked with us to diagnose the problem and proposed a new method that works much faster. We also tested the centroids alternative method but did not yet get it working. However, the skims approach seems preferable to using MAZ centroids. Our implementation has 66k MAZs so this may not have surfaced as an obvious issue for implementations with fewer MAZs.

                      Activity

                      Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

                      Metadata

                      Metadata

                      Assignees

                      No one assigned

                        Labels

                        BugSomething isn't working/bug f

                        Type

                        No type

                        Projects

                        No projects

                          Milestone

                          No milestone

                          Relationships

                          None yet

                          Development

                          No branches or pull requests

                          Issue actions

                          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
                          Skip to content

                          using skims with find_nearest_accessibility_zone is a bottleneck when working with large number of MAZs #1030

                          Description

                          @bricegnichols

                          Describe the bug
                          The annotate_households step takes a very long time to complete (~25 minutes without sharrow in our implementation). The slowdown occurs after household data has been processed and disaggregate accessibilities are being calculated. More specifically, the nearest_skim function in find_nearest_accessibility_zone in disaggregate_accessibility.py is the bottleneck.

                          To Reproduce
                          Steps to reproduce the behavior:

                          1. Copy input data from here and configs from here. (Note: if you want to truly benchmark the runtime slowness I will upload the full data instead of the test data linked here.)
                          2. Clone Activitysim
                          3. Open a command prompt, cd to Activitysim, then enter uv sync --locked to create the uv .venv.
                          4. Enter .venv\Scripts\activate to activate the uv environment.
                          5. Enter activitysim run -c path_to_configs -d path_to_data_test -o path_to_output

                          Expected behavior
                          This step takes about 2 minutes running with sharrow and I would expect it to run maybe a little slower (but way faster than 25 minutes) without sharrow.

                          Additional context
                          David Hensle worked with us to diagnose the problem and proposed a new method that works much faster. We also tested the centroids alternative method but did not yet get it working. However, the skims approach seems preferable to using MAZ centroids. Our implementation has 66k MAZs so this may not have surfaced as an obvious issue for implementations with fewer MAZs.

                          Activity

                          Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

                          Metadata

                          Metadata

                          Assignees

                          No one assigned

                            Labels

                            BugSomething isn't working/bug f

                            Type

                            No type

                            Projects

                            No projects

                              Milestone

                              No milestone

                              Relationships

                              None yet

                              Development

                              No branches or pull requests

                              Issue actions

                              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
                              Skip to content

                              using skims with find_nearest_accessibility_zone is a bottleneck when working with large number of MAZs #1030

                              Description

                              @bricegnichols

                              Describe the bug
                              The annotate_households step takes a very long time to complete (~25 minutes without sharrow in our implementation). The slowdown occurs after household data has been processed and disaggregate accessibilities are being calculated. More specifically, the nearest_skim function in find_nearest_accessibility_zone in disaggregate_accessibility.py is the bottleneck.

                              To Reproduce
                              Steps to reproduce the behavior:

                              1. Copy input data from here and configs from here. (Note: if you want to truly benchmark the runtime slowness I will upload the full data instead of the test data linked here.)
                              2. Clone Activitysim
                              3. Open a command prompt, cd to Activitysim, then enter uv sync --locked to create the uv .venv.
                              4. Enter .venv\Scripts\activate to activate the uv environment.
                              5. Enter activitysim run -c path_to_configs -d path_to_data_test -o path_to_output

                              Expected behavior
                              This step takes about 2 minutes running with sharrow and I would expect it to run maybe a little slower (but way faster than 25 minutes) without sharrow.

                              Additional context
                              David Hensle worked with us to diagnose the problem and proposed a new method that works much faster. We also tested the centroids alternative method but did not yet get it working. However, the skims approach seems preferable to using MAZ centroids. Our implementation has 66k MAZs so this may not have surfaced as an obvious issue for implementations with fewer MAZs.

                              Activity

                              Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

                              Metadata

                              Metadata

                              Assignees

                              No one assigned

                                Labels

                                BugSomething isn't working/bug f

                                Type

                                No type

                                Projects

                                No projects

                                  Milestone

                                  No milestone

                                  Relationships

                                  None yet

                                  Development

                                  No branches or pull requests

                                  Issue actions