Benchmarking with ASV - #456

Merged
jpn-- merged 163 commits into
ActivitySim:developfrom
jpn--:performance1
Apr 25, 2022
Merged

Benchmarking with ASV#456
jpn-- merged 163 commits into
ActivitySim:developfrom
jpn--:performance1

Conversation

@jpn--

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

work on #439

@jpn--
jpn-- marked this pull request as ready for review November 30, 2021 15:21
@jpn--

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

This work is ready for review, and passes tests in Travis. The benchmarking results website is online at https://activitysim.github.io/asim-benchmarks/

@dhensledhensle left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request in general looks really good. Code needs to be more consistent when it comes to chunking and multiprocessing (there are multiple spots that seem to contradict each other as to whether multiprocessing & chunking are enabled or not). More documentation would help developers and users understand the functionality and how to use it appropriately. I did get an error when trying to publish to GitHub pages that should be addressed.

Does a TravisCI test need to be created to test the benchmarking functionality?

Comment threaddocs/benchmarking.rst
Comment threaddocs/benchmarking.rst
Comment threaddocs/benchmarking.rst
Comment threaddocs/benchmarking.rst
Comment threaddocs/benchmarking.rst
Comment threadactivitysim/benchmarking/componentwise.py
Comment threadactivitysim/benchmarking/componentwise.py
Comment threadactivitysim/benchmarking/latest.py
Comment threadactivitysim/cli/benchmark.py Outdated
Comment threadactivitysim/benchmarking/componentwise.py
@jpn--
jpn-- requested a review from dhensleMarch 16, 2022 15:55
@jpn--

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@dhensle, I believe we have addressed all of the items you identified in your review, can you confirm? Thanks

@dhensledhensle left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All of my previous comments have been addressed. Looks good to me!

jpn--and others added 3 commits April 12, 2022 11:00
fix for dependency changes that result in small parameter estimation variance
@jpn--
jpn-- merged commit 91930b5 into ActivitySim:developApr 25, 2022
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Implement performance benchmarking via Airspeed Velocity

4 participants

@jpn--@coveralls@bstabler@dhensle
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Benchmarking with ASV - #456

Merged
jpn-- merged 163 commits into
ActivitySim:developfrom
jpn--:performance1
Apr 25, 2022
Merged

Benchmarking with ASV#456
jpn-- merged 163 commits into
ActivitySim:developfrom
jpn--:performance1

Conversation

@jpn--

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

work on #439

@jpn--
jpn-- marked this pull request as ready for review November 30, 2021 15:21
@jpn--

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

This work is ready for review, and passes tests in Travis. The benchmarking results website is online at https://activitysim.github.io/asim-benchmarks/

@dhensledhensle left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request in general looks really good. Code needs to be more consistent when it comes to chunking and multiprocessing (there are multiple spots that seem to contradict each other as to whether multiprocessing & chunking are enabled or not). More documentation would help developers and users understand the functionality and how to use it appropriately. I did get an error when trying to publish to GitHub pages that should be addressed.

Does a TravisCI test need to be created to test the benchmarking functionality?

Comment threaddocs/benchmarking.rst
Comment threaddocs/benchmarking.rst
Comment threaddocs/benchmarking.rst
Comment threaddocs/benchmarking.rst
Comment threaddocs/benchmarking.rst
Comment threadactivitysim/benchmarking/componentwise.py
Comment threadactivitysim/benchmarking/componentwise.py
Comment threadactivitysim/benchmarking/latest.py
Comment threadactivitysim/cli/benchmark.py Outdated
Comment threadactivitysim/benchmarking/componentwise.py
@jpn--
jpn-- requested a review from dhensleMarch 16, 2022 15:55
@jpn--

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@dhensle, I believe we have addressed all of the items you identified in your review, can you confirm? Thanks

@dhensledhensle left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All of my previous comments have been addressed. Looks good to me!

jpn--and others added 3 commits April 12, 2022 11:00
fix for dependency changes that result in small parameter estimation variance
@jpn--
jpn-- merged commit 91930b5 into ActivitySim:developApr 25, 2022
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Implement performance benchmarking via Airspeed Velocity

4 participants

@jpn--@coveralls@bstabler@dhensle
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Benchmarking with ASV - #456

Merged
jpn-- merged 163 commits into
ActivitySim:developfrom
jpn--:performance1
Apr 25, 2022
Merged

Benchmarking with ASV#456
jpn-- merged 163 commits into
ActivitySim:developfrom
jpn--:performance1

Conversation

@jpn--

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

work on #439

@jpn--
jpn-- marked this pull request as ready for review November 30, 2021 15:21
@jpn--

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

This work is ready for review, and passes tests in Travis. The benchmarking results website is online at https://activitysim.github.io/asim-benchmarks/

@dhensledhensle left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request in general looks really good. Code needs to be more consistent when it comes to chunking and multiprocessing (there are multiple spots that seem to contradict each other as to whether multiprocessing & chunking are enabled or not). More documentation would help developers and users understand the functionality and how to use it appropriately. I did get an error when trying to publish to GitHub pages that should be addressed.

Does a TravisCI test need to be created to test the benchmarking functionality?

Comment threaddocs/benchmarking.rst
Comment threaddocs/benchmarking.rst
Comment threaddocs/benchmarking.rst
Comment threaddocs/benchmarking.rst
Comment threaddocs/benchmarking.rst
Comment threadactivitysim/benchmarking/componentwise.py
Comment threadactivitysim/benchmarking/componentwise.py
Comment threadactivitysim/benchmarking/latest.py
Comment threadactivitysim/cli/benchmark.py Outdated
Comment threadactivitysim/benchmarking/componentwise.py
@jpn--
jpn-- requested a review from dhensleMarch 16, 2022 15:55
@jpn--

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@dhensle, I believe we have addressed all of the items you identified in your review, can you confirm? Thanks

@dhensledhensle left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All of my previous comments have been addressed. Looks good to me!

jpn--and others added 3 commits April 12, 2022 11:00
fix for dependency changes that result in small parameter estimation variance
@jpn--
jpn-- merged commit 91930b5 into ActivitySim:developApr 25, 2022
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Implement performance benchmarking via Airspeed Velocity

4 participants

@jpn--@coveralls@bstabler@dhensle
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Benchmarking with ASV - #456

Merged
jpn-- merged 163 commits into
ActivitySim:developfrom
jpn--:performance1
Apr 25, 2022
Merged

Benchmarking with ASV#456
jpn-- merged 163 commits into
ActivitySim:developfrom
jpn--:performance1

Conversation

@jpn--

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

work on #439

@jpn--
jpn-- marked this pull request as ready for review November 30, 2021 15:21
@jpn--

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

This work is ready for review, and passes tests in Travis. The benchmarking results website is online at https://activitysim.github.io/asim-benchmarks/

@dhensledhensle left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request in general looks really good. Code needs to be more consistent when it comes to chunking and multiprocessing (there are multiple spots that seem to contradict each other as to whether multiprocessing & chunking are enabled or not). More documentation would help developers and users understand the functionality and how to use it appropriately. I did get an error when trying to publish to GitHub pages that should be addressed.

Does a TravisCI test need to be created to test the benchmarking functionality?

Comment threaddocs/benchmarking.rst
Comment threaddocs/benchmarking.rst
Comment threaddocs/benchmarking.rst
Comment threaddocs/benchmarking.rst
Comment threaddocs/benchmarking.rst
Comment threadactivitysim/benchmarking/componentwise.py
Comment threadactivitysim/benchmarking/componentwise.py
Comment threadactivitysim/benchmarking/latest.py
Comment threadactivitysim/cli/benchmark.py Outdated
Comment threadactivitysim/benchmarking/componentwise.py
@jpn--
jpn-- requested a review from dhensleMarch 16, 2022 15:55
@jpn--

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@dhensle, I believe we have addressed all of the items you identified in your review, can you confirm? Thanks

@dhensledhensle left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All of my previous comments have been addressed. Looks good to me!

jpn--and others added 3 commits April 12, 2022 11:00
fix for dependency changes that result in small parameter estimation variance
@jpn--
jpn-- merged commit 91930b5 into ActivitySim:developApr 25, 2022
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Implement performance benchmarking via Airspeed Velocity

4 participants

@jpn--@coveralls@bstabler@dhensle
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Benchmarking with ASV - #456

Merged
jpn-- merged 163 commits into
ActivitySim:developfrom
jpn--:performance1
Apr 25, 2022
Merged

Benchmarking with ASV#456
jpn-- merged 163 commits into
ActivitySim:developfrom
jpn--:performance1

Conversation

@jpn--

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

work on #439

@jpn--
jpn-- marked this pull request as ready for review November 30, 2021 15:21
@jpn--

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

This work is ready for review, and passes tests in Travis. The benchmarking results website is online at https://activitysim.github.io/asim-benchmarks/

@dhensledhensle left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request in general looks really good. Code needs to be more consistent when it comes to chunking and multiprocessing (there are multiple spots that seem to contradict each other as to whether multiprocessing & chunking are enabled or not). More documentation would help developers and users understand the functionality and how to use it appropriately. I did get an error when trying to publish to GitHub pages that should be addressed.

Does a TravisCI test need to be created to test the benchmarking functionality?

Comment threaddocs/benchmarking.rst
Comment threaddocs/benchmarking.rst
Comment threaddocs/benchmarking.rst
Comment threaddocs/benchmarking.rst
Comment threaddocs/benchmarking.rst
Comment threadactivitysim/benchmarking/componentwise.py
Comment threadactivitysim/benchmarking/componentwise.py
Comment threadactivitysim/benchmarking/latest.py
Comment threadactivitysim/cli/benchmark.py Outdated
Comment threadactivitysim/benchmarking/componentwise.py
@jpn--
jpn-- requested a review from dhensleMarch 16, 2022 15:55
@jpn--

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@dhensle, I believe we have addressed all of the items you identified in your review, can you confirm? Thanks

@dhensledhensle left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All of my previous comments have been addressed. Looks good to me!

jpn--and others added 3 commits April 12, 2022 11:00
fix for dependency changes that result in small parameter estimation variance
@jpn--
jpn-- merged commit 91930b5 into ActivitySim:developApr 25, 2022
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Implement performance benchmarking via Airspeed Velocity

4 participants

@jpn--@coveralls@bstabler@dhensle
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Benchmarking with ASV - #456

Merged
jpn-- merged 163 commits into
ActivitySim:developfrom
jpn--:performance1
Apr 25, 2022
Merged

Benchmarking with ASV#456
jpn-- merged 163 commits into
ActivitySim:developfrom
jpn--:performance1

Conversation

@jpn--

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

work on #439

@jpn--
jpn-- marked this pull request as ready for review November 30, 2021 15:21
@jpn--

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

This work is ready for review, and passes tests in Travis. The benchmarking results website is online at https://activitysim.github.io/asim-benchmarks/

@dhensledhensle left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request in general looks really good. Code needs to be more consistent when it comes to chunking and multiprocessing (there are multiple spots that seem to contradict each other as to whether multiprocessing & chunking are enabled or not). More documentation would help developers and users understand the functionality and how to use it appropriately. I did get an error when trying to publish to GitHub pages that should be addressed.

Does a TravisCI test need to be created to test the benchmarking functionality?

Comment threaddocs/benchmarking.rst
Comment threaddocs/benchmarking.rst
Comment threaddocs/benchmarking.rst
Comment threaddocs/benchmarking.rst
Comment threaddocs/benchmarking.rst
Comment threadactivitysim/benchmarking/componentwise.py
Comment threadactivitysim/benchmarking/componentwise.py
Comment threadactivitysim/benchmarking/latest.py
Comment threadactivitysim/cli/benchmark.py Outdated
Comment threadactivitysim/benchmarking/componentwise.py
@jpn--
jpn-- requested a review from dhensleMarch 16, 2022 15:55
@jpn--

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@dhensle, I believe we have addressed all of the items you identified in your review, can you confirm? Thanks

@dhensledhensle left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All of my previous comments have been addressed. Looks good to me!

jpn--and others added 3 commits April 12, 2022 11:00
fix for dependency changes that result in small parameter estimation variance
@jpn--
jpn-- merged commit 91930b5 into ActivitySim:developApr 25, 2022
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Implement performance benchmarking via Airspeed Velocity

4 participants

@jpn--@coveralls@bstabler@dhensle
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Benchmarking with ASV - #456

Merged
jpn-- merged 163 commits into
ActivitySim:developfrom
jpn--:performance1
Apr 25, 2022
Merged

Benchmarking with ASV#456
jpn-- merged 163 commits into
ActivitySim:developfrom
jpn--:performance1

Conversation

@jpn--

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

work on #439

@jpn--
jpn-- marked this pull request as ready for review November 30, 2021 15:21
@jpn--

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

This work is ready for review, and passes tests in Travis. The benchmarking results website is online at https://activitysim.github.io/asim-benchmarks/

@dhensledhensle left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request in general looks really good. Code needs to be more consistent when it comes to chunking and multiprocessing (there are multiple spots that seem to contradict each other as to whether multiprocessing & chunking are enabled or not). More documentation would help developers and users understand the functionality and how to use it appropriately. I did get an error when trying to publish to GitHub pages that should be addressed.

Does a TravisCI test need to be created to test the benchmarking functionality?

Comment threaddocs/benchmarking.rst
Comment threaddocs/benchmarking.rst
Comment threaddocs/benchmarking.rst
Comment threaddocs/benchmarking.rst
Comment threaddocs/benchmarking.rst
Comment threadactivitysim/benchmarking/componentwise.py
Comment threadactivitysim/benchmarking/componentwise.py
Comment threadactivitysim/benchmarking/latest.py
Comment threadactivitysim/cli/benchmark.py Outdated
Comment threadactivitysim/benchmarking/componentwise.py
@jpn--
jpn-- requested a review from dhensleMarch 16, 2022 15:55
@jpn--

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@dhensle, I believe we have addressed all of the items you identified in your review, can you confirm? Thanks

@dhensledhensle left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All of my previous comments have been addressed. Looks good to me!

jpn--and others added 3 commits April 12, 2022 11:00
fix for dependency changes that result in small parameter estimation variance
@jpn--
jpn-- merged commit 91930b5 into ActivitySim:developApr 25, 2022
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Implement performance benchmarking via Airspeed Velocity

4 participants

@jpn--@coveralls@bstabler@dhensle
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Benchmarking with ASV - #456

Merged
jpn-- merged 163 commits into
ActivitySim:developfrom
jpn--:performance1
Apr 25, 2022
Merged

Benchmarking with ASV#456
jpn-- merged 163 commits into
ActivitySim:developfrom
jpn--:performance1

Conversation

@jpn--

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

work on #439

@jpn--
jpn-- marked this pull request as ready for review November 30, 2021 15:21
@jpn--

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

This work is ready for review, and passes tests in Travis. The benchmarking results website is online at https://activitysim.github.io/asim-benchmarks/

@dhensledhensle left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request in general looks really good. Code needs to be more consistent when it comes to chunking and multiprocessing (there are multiple spots that seem to contradict each other as to whether multiprocessing & chunking are enabled or not). More documentation would help developers and users understand the functionality and how to use it appropriately. I did get an error when trying to publish to GitHub pages that should be addressed.

Does a TravisCI test need to be created to test the benchmarking functionality?

Comment threaddocs/benchmarking.rst
Comment threaddocs/benchmarking.rst
Comment threaddocs/benchmarking.rst
Comment threaddocs/benchmarking.rst
Comment threaddocs/benchmarking.rst
Comment threadactivitysim/benchmarking/componentwise.py
Comment threadactivitysim/benchmarking/componentwise.py
Comment threadactivitysim/benchmarking/latest.py
Comment threadactivitysim/cli/benchmark.py Outdated
Comment threadactivitysim/benchmarking/componentwise.py
@jpn--
jpn-- requested a review from dhensleMarch 16, 2022 15:55
@jpn--

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@dhensle, I believe we have addressed all of the items you identified in your review, can you confirm? Thanks

@dhensledhensle left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All of my previous comments have been addressed. Looks good to me!

jpn--and others added 3 commits April 12, 2022 11:00
fix for dependency changes that result in small parameter estimation variance
@jpn--
jpn-- merged commit 91930b5 into ActivitySim:developApr 25, 2022
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Implement performance benchmarking via Airspeed Velocity

4 participants

@jpn--@coveralls@bstabler@dhensle