[O2B-1602] Add widget for runs-overview to filter by pdpBeamType

[graduta]

I have a JIRA ticket

• branch and/or PR name(s) include(s) JIRA ID
• issue has "Fix version" assigned
• issue "Status" is set to "In review"
• PR labels are selected

Notable changes for users:

• runs-overview page now gives option to the user to filter by pdp beam type from a set of pre-selected options
• the beamtype filter model expects now a provider (being beam types or PDP beam types)
• the beamtype filter model now extends the observable pattern as it loads remote data to fill in the filter

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 9 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 46.23%. Comparing base (19ab138) to head (ceac6d3).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
.../public/services/beamTypes/pdpBeamTypesProvider.js	0.00%	4 Missing ⚠️
...ents/Filters/LhcFillsFilter/BeamTypeFilterModel.js	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
...blic/views/Runs/ActiveColumns/runsActiveColumns.js	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
...ws/LhcFills/ActiveColumns/lhcFillsActiveColumns.js	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #2205 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 46.22% 46.23% =======================================
Files 1039 1039 Lines 17143 17142 -1 Branches 3124 3124 =======================================
Hits 7925 7925 + Misses 9218 9217 -1 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[isaachilly]

It is out-of-scope for this ticket, but the beamType selection could be applied to the RCT lhc-period-overview page also in the future. Do you agree?

[graduta]

It is out-of-scope for this ticket, but the beamType selection could be applied to the RCT lhc-period-overview page also in the future. Do you agree?

I agree but I have the remark that it is not beamType that RCT users are seeking. For them we display and they use pdpBeamType

[isaachilly]

It is out-of-scope for this ticket, but the beamType selection could be applied to the RCT lhc-period-overview page also in the future. Do you agree?

I agree but I have the remark that it is not beamType that RCT users are seeking. For them we display and they use pdpBeamType

Yes, I'm saying beamType here as in general category, like beamTypeFilterModel.