Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
[PWGCF] framework for FemtoVsFlow - #12690
Conversation
O2 linter results: ❌ 2 errors, |
Please consider the following formatting changes to AliceO2Group#12690
wenyaCern
commented
Aug 22, 2025
fix formatting |
victor-gonzalez
commented
Aug 22, 2025
Please, keep it as draft until it gets reviewed/approved Also, for the new files, follow The fact that But new files had to adhere to them. It is in the benefice of everyone Thanks!! |
victor-gonzalez
commented
Aug 25, 2025
@wenyaCern, thanks for moving forward this functionality! |
wenyaCern
commented
Aug 25, 2025
Dear Victor, For this analysis, using the current femto-derived data format is impossible, as the analysis procedure in Task only reserves the filtered tracks by the table producer, while the calculation for flow requires inclusive hadrons. Events will be separated by the information of flow and that flow information will be transferred to analysis tasks. Considering the above reasons, I prefer to create a new data format by adding flow information in the data-driven, which will be isolated and not affect the current femto analysis. I'm fixing the O2 linter and MegaLinter issues now. Hope you can consider my update and thanks a lot for that! Best regards, |
victor-gonzalez
commented
Aug 25, 2025
Dear Wenya, |
wenyaCern
commented
Aug 25, 2025
Dear Victor, |
[PWGCF] Please consider the following formatting changes to AliceO2Group#12690
[PWGCF] Please consider the following formatting changes to AliceO2Group#12690
[PWGCF] Please consider the following formatting changes to AliceO2Group#12690
[PWGCF] Please consider the following formatting changes to AliceO2Group#12690
The O2 linter errors have been fixed. The derived data contains the qn bin information, which is the only thing changed from the femtoUniverse framework. |
Pull request was converted to draft
victor-gonzalez
commented
Aug 28, 2025
@wenyaCern@shouqiye This is still not ready for being merged |
victor-gonzalez
commented
Aug 28, 2025
Please, keep it as draft for the time being |
Overview
I've created a simple framework for calculating femtocorrelation functions with divided qₙ-vectors for Event-shape engineering of flow measurements, building on
femtoUniverse(and incorporating small parts offemtodream). The analysis wants to estimate the relation between femtoRadii vs v2.Why a New Framework
Key updates to the data model necessitated this:
FemtoDerived.hinDatamodelnow includes q-vector information.