Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
[PWGHF] Omegac0/Xi pT cut - #8962
Conversation
[PWGHF] Please consider the following formatting changes to AliceO2Group#8962
fgrosa
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hi @FDUEnrich thanks! The PR looks ok to me in general, I just have a few minor comments (see below)
| // a tolerance has been added to be more conservative ptMinOmegaczeroToOmegaKaLfCasc ptMinXicZeroOmegacZeroToXiPiLfCasc | ||
| Configurable<float> ptMinOmegacZeroToOmegaPiLfCasc{"ptMinOmegacZeroToOmegaPiLfCasc", 2.0, "min. pT for Omegaczero in Omega + Pi decays"}; | ||
| Configurable<float> ptMinOmegaczeroToOmegaKaLfCasc{"ptMinOmegaczeroToOmegaKaLfCasc", 2.0, "min. pT for Omegaczero in Omega + Ka decays"}; | ||
| Configurable<float> ptMinXicZeroOmegacZeroToXiPiLfCasc{"ptMinXicZeroOmegacZeroToXiPiLfCasc", 2.0, "min. pT for XicZeroOmegacZero in Xi + Pi decays"}; | ||
| Configurable<float> ptMinXicplusLfCasc{"ptMinXicplusLfCasc", 2.0, "min. pT for Xicplus in Xi + Pi + Pi decays"}; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I would put 0 as default not to change the behaviour of pp wagons
| // a tolerance has been added to be more conservative ptMinOmegaczeroToOmegaKaLfCasc ptMinXicZeroOmegacZeroToXiPiLfCasc | |
| Configurable<float> ptMinOmegacZeroToOmegaPiLfCasc{"ptMinOmegacZeroToOmegaPiLfCasc", 2.0, "min. pT for Omegaczero in Omega + Pi decays"}; | |
| Configurable<float> ptMinOmegaczeroToOmegaKaLfCasc{"ptMinOmegaczeroToOmegaKaLfCasc", 2.0, "min. pT for Omegaczero in Omega + Ka decays"}; | |
| Configurable<float> ptMinXicZeroOmegacZeroToXiPiLfCasc{"ptMinXicZeroOmegacZeroToXiPiLfCasc", 2.0, "min. pT for XicZeroOmegacZero in Xi + Pi decays"}; | |
| Configurable<float> ptMinXicplusLfCasc{"ptMinXicplusLfCasc", 2.0, "min. pT for Xicplus in Xi + Pi + Pi decays"}; | |
| // a tolerance has been added to be more conservative ptMinOmegaczeroToOmegaKaLfCasc ptMinXicZeroOmegacZeroToXiPiLfCasc | |
| Configurable<float> ptMinOmegacZeroToOmegaPiLfCasc{"ptMinOmegacZeroToOmegaPiLfCasc", 0.f, "min. pT for Omegaczero in Omega + Pi decays"}; | |
| Configurable<float> ptMinOmegaczeroToOmegaKaLfCasc{"ptMinOmegaczeroToOmegaKaLfCasc", 0.f, "min. pT for Omegaczero in Omega + Ka decays"}; | |
| Configurable<float> ptMinXicZeroOmegacZeroToXiPiLfCasc{"ptMinXicZeroOmegacZeroToXiPiLfCasc", 0.f, "min. pT for XicZeroOmegacZero in Xi + Pi decays"}; | |
| Configurable<float> ptMinXicplusLfCasc{"ptMinXicplusLfCasc", 0.f, "min. pT for Xicplus in Xi + Pi + Pi decays"}; |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
[PWGHF] Please consider the following formatting changes to AliceO2Group#8975
| // selections have been set to run2 lambda dedicated cuts | ||
| // selections for cascade have been set to the loosest value between xi and omega | ||
| // a tolerance has been added to be more conservative | ||
| // a tolerance has been added to be more conservative ptMinOmegaczeroToOmegaKaLfCasc ptMinXicZeroOmegacZeroToXiPiLfCasc |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Why did you add ptMinOmegaczeroToOmegaKaLfCasc ptMinXicZeroOmegacZeroToXiPiLfCasc here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Dear expert, thank you for comment! I added these four configurable because Fabrizio suggested doing this. We think it's better to cut pT for OmegaczeroToOmegaKa, XicZeroOmegacZeroToXiPi, OmegacZeroToOmegaPi and XicplusToXiPiPi respectively.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@vkucera this is for the production of derived data in Pb-Pb, for which it is unlikely that we can perform measurements to pT=0 and the size is drastically reduced if we skip the low pT
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@FDUEnrich@fgrosa I was referring to that very line with the comment.
[PWGHF] Please consider the following formatting changes to AliceO2Group#8962
Co-authored-by: ALICE Action Bot <alibuild@cern.ch>
Co-authored-by: ALICE Action Bot <alibuild@cern.ch>
Co-authored-by: ALICE Action Bot <alibuild@cern.ch>
Calculating pT of Omegac0/Xi and cut pT< setting value. Fill after pTcut distribution histos and pTcut status.