Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
[PWGHF] Add centrality information to Xic0 - #9128
Conversation
The FT0M, FT0A, FT0C and numContrib has been added to Xic0 event lever
Please consider the following formatting changes to #9128
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
fgrosa
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@Tao-Fang ok for me if removed from the "lite" table, even though I am still convinced that this will give you the error about unbound indices if you select the "full" table. I think that for the Lc nobody uses the "full" version, but I believe that it also produces the error about unbound indices.
In any case we can merge it as soon as you implement the two remaining comments (if you consume the table with the centrality in the process functions without centrality, they anyway require the centrality task as dependency)
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Co-authored-by: Fabrizio <fabrizio.grosa@cern.ch>
Co-authored-by: Fabrizio <fabrizio.grosa@cern.ch>
Co-authored-by: Fabrizio <fabrizio.grosa@cern.ch>
alibuild
commented
Jan 21, 2025
Error while checking build/O2Physics/o2 for 0fe7dbc at 2025-01-21 20:02: Full log here. |
ktf
commented
Jan 21, 2025
Looks like a genuine error. Please check. |
ktf
commented
Jan 22, 2025
Please check the build. |
Head branch was pushed to by a user without write access
Tao-Fang
commented
Jan 23, 2025
|
Co-authored-by: ALICE Action Bot <alibuild@cern.ch> Co-authored-by: Fabrizio <fabrizio.grosa@cern.ch>
The FT0M, FT0A, FT0C and numContrib has been added to Xic0 event lever