Make command handling in Q chat webview async - #35

Merged
breedloj merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
breedloj/asyncChatCommands
Sep 25, 2024
Merged

Make command handling in Q chat webview async#35
breedloj merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
breedloj/asyncChatCommands

Conversation

@breedloj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description of changes:
I ran into an issue where the call to get the Q LSP was creating a deadlock in the IDE's ability to fetch and start the language server. Any LSP dependencies should be async/handled in a separate thread. This change makes communication with the chat LSP async.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.


public ChatMessageProvider() {
try {
amazonQLspServer = LspProvider.getAmazonQServer().get();

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Was this the root cause of the deadlock between the LSP and Client startup?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, this blocking call was preventing download and startup from happening.

}
public static CompletableFuture<ChatMessageProvider> createAsync() {
return LspProvider.getAmazonQServer()
.thenApply(ChatMessageProvider::new);

@dingfelidingfeliSep 25, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks to be the root of the change. Not entirely familiar with how JVM handles async but is thenApply thread safe somehow? How does it prevent deadlock in this case.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thenApply runs once the future is resolved. Primary thing here is to avoid a blocking call in the constructor run on the main thread. This pattern gives consumers a way to safely construct an instance in an async flow by making the resolution explicit.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ahh I see. That makes sense.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@breedloj@angjordn@dingfeli
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Make command handling in Q chat webview async - #35

Merged
breedloj merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
breedloj/asyncChatCommands
Sep 25, 2024
Merged

Make command handling in Q chat webview async#35
breedloj merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
breedloj/asyncChatCommands

Conversation

@breedloj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description of changes:
I ran into an issue where the call to get the Q LSP was creating a deadlock in the IDE's ability to fetch and start the language server. Any LSP dependencies should be async/handled in a separate thread. This change makes communication with the chat LSP async.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.


public ChatMessageProvider() {
try {
amazonQLspServer = LspProvider.getAmazonQServer().get();

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Was this the root cause of the deadlock between the LSP and Client startup?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, this blocking call was preventing download and startup from happening.

}
public static CompletableFuture<ChatMessageProvider> createAsync() {
return LspProvider.getAmazonQServer()
.thenApply(ChatMessageProvider::new);

@dingfelidingfeliSep 25, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks to be the root of the change. Not entirely familiar with how JVM handles async but is thenApply thread safe somehow? How does it prevent deadlock in this case.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thenApply runs once the future is resolved. Primary thing here is to avoid a blocking call in the constructor run on the main thread. This pattern gives consumers a way to safely construct an instance in an async flow by making the resolution explicit.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ahh I see. That makes sense.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@breedloj@angjordn@dingfeli
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Make command handling in Q chat webview async - #35

Merged
breedloj merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
breedloj/asyncChatCommands
Sep 25, 2024
Merged

Make command handling in Q chat webview async#35
breedloj merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
breedloj/asyncChatCommands

Conversation

@breedloj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description of changes:
I ran into an issue where the call to get the Q LSP was creating a deadlock in the IDE's ability to fetch and start the language server. Any LSP dependencies should be async/handled in a separate thread. This change makes communication with the chat LSP async.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.


public ChatMessageProvider() {
try {
amazonQLspServer = LspProvider.getAmazonQServer().get();

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Was this the root cause of the deadlock between the LSP and Client startup?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, this blocking call was preventing download and startup from happening.

}
public static CompletableFuture<ChatMessageProvider> createAsync() {
return LspProvider.getAmazonQServer()
.thenApply(ChatMessageProvider::new);

@dingfelidingfeliSep 25, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks to be the root of the change. Not entirely familiar with how JVM handles async but is thenApply thread safe somehow? How does it prevent deadlock in this case.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thenApply runs once the future is resolved. Primary thing here is to avoid a blocking call in the constructor run on the main thread. This pattern gives consumers a way to safely construct an instance in an async flow by making the resolution explicit.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ahh I see. That makes sense.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@breedloj@angjordn@dingfeli
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Make command handling in Q chat webview async - #35

Merged
breedloj merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
breedloj/asyncChatCommands
Sep 25, 2024
Merged

Make command handling in Q chat webview async#35
breedloj merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
breedloj/asyncChatCommands

Conversation

@breedloj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description of changes:
I ran into an issue where the call to get the Q LSP was creating a deadlock in the IDE's ability to fetch and start the language server. Any LSP dependencies should be async/handled in a separate thread. This change makes communication with the chat LSP async.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.


public ChatMessageProvider() {
try {
amazonQLspServer = LspProvider.getAmazonQServer().get();

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Was this the root cause of the deadlock between the LSP and Client startup?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, this blocking call was preventing download and startup from happening.

}
public static CompletableFuture<ChatMessageProvider> createAsync() {
return LspProvider.getAmazonQServer()
.thenApply(ChatMessageProvider::new);

@dingfelidingfeliSep 25, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks to be the root of the change. Not entirely familiar with how JVM handles async but is thenApply thread safe somehow? How does it prevent deadlock in this case.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thenApply runs once the future is resolved. Primary thing here is to avoid a blocking call in the constructor run on the main thread. This pattern gives consumers a way to safely construct an instance in an async flow by making the resolution explicit.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ahh I see. That makes sense.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@breedloj@angjordn@dingfeli
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Make command handling in Q chat webview async - #35

Merged
breedloj merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
breedloj/asyncChatCommands
Sep 25, 2024
Merged

Make command handling in Q chat webview async#35
breedloj merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
breedloj/asyncChatCommands

Conversation

@breedloj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description of changes:
I ran into an issue where the call to get the Q LSP was creating a deadlock in the IDE's ability to fetch and start the language server. Any LSP dependencies should be async/handled in a separate thread. This change makes communication with the chat LSP async.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.


public ChatMessageProvider() {
try {
amazonQLspServer = LspProvider.getAmazonQServer().get();

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Was this the root cause of the deadlock between the LSP and Client startup?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, this blocking call was preventing download and startup from happening.

}
public static CompletableFuture<ChatMessageProvider> createAsync() {
return LspProvider.getAmazonQServer()
.thenApply(ChatMessageProvider::new);

@dingfelidingfeliSep 25, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks to be the root of the change. Not entirely familiar with how JVM handles async but is thenApply thread safe somehow? How does it prevent deadlock in this case.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thenApply runs once the future is resolved. Primary thing here is to avoid a blocking call in the constructor run on the main thread. This pattern gives consumers a way to safely construct an instance in an async flow by making the resolution explicit.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ahh I see. That makes sense.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@breedloj@angjordn@dingfeli
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Make command handling in Q chat webview async - #35

Merged
breedloj merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
breedloj/asyncChatCommands
Sep 25, 2024
Merged

Make command handling in Q chat webview async#35
breedloj merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
breedloj/asyncChatCommands

Conversation

@breedloj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description of changes:
I ran into an issue where the call to get the Q LSP was creating a deadlock in the IDE's ability to fetch and start the language server. Any LSP dependencies should be async/handled in a separate thread. This change makes communication with the chat LSP async.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.


public ChatMessageProvider() {
try {
amazonQLspServer = LspProvider.getAmazonQServer().get();

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Was this the root cause of the deadlock between the LSP and Client startup?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, this blocking call was preventing download and startup from happening.

}
public static CompletableFuture<ChatMessageProvider> createAsync() {
return LspProvider.getAmazonQServer()
.thenApply(ChatMessageProvider::new);

@dingfelidingfeliSep 25, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks to be the root of the change. Not entirely familiar with how JVM handles async but is thenApply thread safe somehow? How does it prevent deadlock in this case.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thenApply runs once the future is resolved. Primary thing here is to avoid a blocking call in the constructor run on the main thread. This pattern gives consumers a way to safely construct an instance in an async flow by making the resolution explicit.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ahh I see. That makes sense.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@breedloj@angjordn@dingfeli
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Make command handling in Q chat webview async - #35

Merged
breedloj merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
breedloj/asyncChatCommands
Sep 25, 2024
Merged

Make command handling in Q chat webview async#35
breedloj merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
breedloj/asyncChatCommands

Conversation

@breedloj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description of changes:
I ran into an issue where the call to get the Q LSP was creating a deadlock in the IDE's ability to fetch and start the language server. Any LSP dependencies should be async/handled in a separate thread. This change makes communication with the chat LSP async.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.


public ChatMessageProvider() {
try {
amazonQLspServer = LspProvider.getAmazonQServer().get();

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Was this the root cause of the deadlock between the LSP and Client startup?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, this blocking call was preventing download and startup from happening.

}
public static CompletableFuture<ChatMessageProvider> createAsync() {
return LspProvider.getAmazonQServer()
.thenApply(ChatMessageProvider::new);

@dingfelidingfeliSep 25, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks to be the root of the change. Not entirely familiar with how JVM handles async but is thenApply thread safe somehow? How does it prevent deadlock in this case.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thenApply runs once the future is resolved. Primary thing here is to avoid a blocking call in the constructor run on the main thread. This pattern gives consumers a way to safely construct an instance in an async flow by making the resolution explicit.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ahh I see. That makes sense.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@breedloj@angjordn@dingfeli
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Make command handling in Q chat webview async - #35

Merged
breedloj merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
breedloj/asyncChatCommands
Sep 25, 2024
Merged

Make command handling in Q chat webview async#35
breedloj merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
breedloj/asyncChatCommands

Conversation

@breedloj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description of changes:
I ran into an issue where the call to get the Q LSP was creating a deadlock in the IDE's ability to fetch and start the language server. Any LSP dependencies should be async/handled in a separate thread. This change makes communication with the chat LSP async.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.


public ChatMessageProvider() {
try {
amazonQLspServer = LspProvider.getAmazonQServer().get();

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Was this the root cause of the deadlock between the LSP and Client startup?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, this blocking call was preventing download and startup from happening.

}
public static CompletableFuture<ChatMessageProvider> createAsync() {
return LspProvider.getAmazonQServer()
.thenApply(ChatMessageProvider::new);

@dingfelidingfeliSep 25, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks to be the root of the change. Not entirely familiar with how JVM handles async but is thenApply thread safe somehow? How does it prevent deadlock in this case.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thenApply runs once the future is resolved. Primary thing here is to avoid a blocking call in the constructor run on the main thread. This pattern gives consumers a way to safely construct an instance in an async flow by making the resolution explicit.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ahh I see. That makes sense.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@breedloj@angjordn@dingfeli