Add logging and remove validation with developer profile querying - #488

Merged
shruti0085 merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
shruti0085/devProfileLogs
Jul 29, 2025
Merged

Add logging and remove validation with developer profile querying#488
shruti0085 merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
shruti0085/devProfileLogs

Conversation

@shruti0085

@shruti0085shruti0085 commented Jul 28, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description of changes:
There is not sufficient logging around the developer profile fetching logic in the login flow. This change adds more logging. In addition, unnecessary restrictive validation checks on the stored and returned Q developer profiles has been removed as we want to rely on the backend to give us valid results. Only validation to check the shape of the stored value is now used, if it is incorrect, we expect further calls to the backend to fail with an appropriate message.
Related issue: #485
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

@bryceitoc9bryceitoc9 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Minor nit in removing some of the validity checking.

Comment on lines 170 to 180
private boolean isValidAccountId(final String accountId) {
return accountId != null && accountId.matches("^\\d{12}$");
return StringUtils.isNotBlank(accountId);
}

private boolean isValidArn(final String arn) {
return arn != null && arn.matches("^arn:aws:codewhisperer:[a-z]{2}-[a-z]+-\\d:\\d{12}:profile/[A-Z0-9]+$");
return StringUtils.isNotBlank(arn);
}

private boolean isValidRegion(final String region) {
return region != null && region
.matches("^[a-z]{2}-(central|north|south|east|west|northeast|southeast|northwest|southwest)-(\\d)$");
return StringUtils.isNotBlank(region);
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why drop these validations?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

None of the other IDEs do it and clients are not expected to. We expect validation to happen on the backend side where an incorrect value should fail with an appropriate message. Also the validity checking was too regex heavy which was leading to invalid states happening on the Eclipse side.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

IMO it's fine to not have these check, in most scenarios, users won't touch / modify the cached file (also that's what we expect). We just need to ensure serialize/de-serialize work fine then it should be good enough.

@JsonIgnore
public final String getRegion() {
return identityDetails.region();
return identityDetails != null ? identityDetails.region() : null;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@shruti0085
shruti0085 merged commit a8b39ac into mainJul 29, 2025
1 check passed
@shruti0085
shruti0085 deleted the shruti0085/devProfileLogs branch July 29, 2025 21:45
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@shruti0085@bryceitoc9@Will-ShaoHua
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Add logging and remove validation with developer profile querying - #488

Merged
shruti0085 merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
shruti0085/devProfileLogs
Jul 29, 2025
Merged

Add logging and remove validation with developer profile querying#488
shruti0085 merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
shruti0085/devProfileLogs

Conversation

@shruti0085

@shruti0085shruti0085 commented Jul 28, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description of changes:
There is not sufficient logging around the developer profile fetching logic in the login flow. This change adds more logging. In addition, unnecessary restrictive validation checks on the stored and returned Q developer profiles has been removed as we want to rely on the backend to give us valid results. Only validation to check the shape of the stored value is now used, if it is incorrect, we expect further calls to the backend to fail with an appropriate message.
Related issue: #485
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

@bryceitoc9bryceitoc9 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Minor nit in removing some of the validity checking.

Comment on lines 170 to 180
private boolean isValidAccountId(final String accountId) {
return accountId != null && accountId.matches("^\\d{12}$");
return StringUtils.isNotBlank(accountId);
}

private boolean isValidArn(final String arn) {
return arn != null && arn.matches("^arn:aws:codewhisperer:[a-z]{2}-[a-z]+-\\d:\\d{12}:profile/[A-Z0-9]+$");
return StringUtils.isNotBlank(arn);
}

private boolean isValidRegion(final String region) {
return region != null && region
.matches("^[a-z]{2}-(central|north|south|east|west|northeast|southeast|northwest|southwest)-(\\d)$");
return StringUtils.isNotBlank(region);
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why drop these validations?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

None of the other IDEs do it and clients are not expected to. We expect validation to happen on the backend side where an incorrect value should fail with an appropriate message. Also the validity checking was too regex heavy which was leading to invalid states happening on the Eclipse side.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

IMO it's fine to not have these check, in most scenarios, users won't touch / modify the cached file (also that's what we expect). We just need to ensure serialize/de-serialize work fine then it should be good enough.

@JsonIgnore
public final String getRegion() {
return identityDetails.region();
return identityDetails != null ? identityDetails.region() : null;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@shruti0085
shruti0085 merged commit a8b39ac into mainJul 29, 2025
1 check passed
@shruti0085
shruti0085 deleted the shruti0085/devProfileLogs branch July 29, 2025 21:45
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@shruti0085@bryceitoc9@Will-ShaoHua
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Add logging and remove validation with developer profile querying - #488

Merged
shruti0085 merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
shruti0085/devProfileLogs
Jul 29, 2025
Merged

Add logging and remove validation with developer profile querying#488
shruti0085 merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
shruti0085/devProfileLogs

Conversation

@shruti0085

@shruti0085shruti0085 commented Jul 28, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description of changes:
There is not sufficient logging around the developer profile fetching logic in the login flow. This change adds more logging. In addition, unnecessary restrictive validation checks on the stored and returned Q developer profiles has been removed as we want to rely on the backend to give us valid results. Only validation to check the shape of the stored value is now used, if it is incorrect, we expect further calls to the backend to fail with an appropriate message.
Related issue: #485
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

@bryceitoc9bryceitoc9 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Minor nit in removing some of the validity checking.

Comment on lines 170 to 180
private boolean isValidAccountId(final String accountId) {
return accountId != null && accountId.matches("^\\d{12}$");
return StringUtils.isNotBlank(accountId);
}

private boolean isValidArn(final String arn) {
return arn != null && arn.matches("^arn:aws:codewhisperer:[a-z]{2}-[a-z]+-\\d:\\d{12}:profile/[A-Z0-9]+$");
return StringUtils.isNotBlank(arn);
}

private boolean isValidRegion(final String region) {
return region != null && region
.matches("^[a-z]{2}-(central|north|south|east|west|northeast|southeast|northwest|southwest)-(\\d)$");
return StringUtils.isNotBlank(region);
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why drop these validations?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

None of the other IDEs do it and clients are not expected to. We expect validation to happen on the backend side where an incorrect value should fail with an appropriate message. Also the validity checking was too regex heavy which was leading to invalid states happening on the Eclipse side.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

IMO it's fine to not have these check, in most scenarios, users won't touch / modify the cached file (also that's what we expect). We just need to ensure serialize/de-serialize work fine then it should be good enough.

@JsonIgnore
public final String getRegion() {
return identityDetails.region();
return identityDetails != null ? identityDetails.region() : null;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@shruti0085
shruti0085 merged commit a8b39ac into mainJul 29, 2025
1 check passed
@shruti0085
shruti0085 deleted the shruti0085/devProfileLogs branch July 29, 2025 21:45
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@shruti0085@bryceitoc9@Will-ShaoHua
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Add logging and remove validation with developer profile querying - #488

Merged
shruti0085 merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
shruti0085/devProfileLogs
Jul 29, 2025
Merged

Add logging and remove validation with developer profile querying#488
shruti0085 merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
shruti0085/devProfileLogs

Conversation

@shruti0085

@shruti0085shruti0085 commented Jul 28, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description of changes:
There is not sufficient logging around the developer profile fetching logic in the login flow. This change adds more logging. In addition, unnecessary restrictive validation checks on the stored and returned Q developer profiles has been removed as we want to rely on the backend to give us valid results. Only validation to check the shape of the stored value is now used, if it is incorrect, we expect further calls to the backend to fail with an appropriate message.
Related issue: #485
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

@bryceitoc9bryceitoc9 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Minor nit in removing some of the validity checking.

Comment on lines 170 to 180
private boolean isValidAccountId(final String accountId) {
return accountId != null && accountId.matches("^\\d{12}$");
return StringUtils.isNotBlank(accountId);
}

private boolean isValidArn(final String arn) {
return arn != null && arn.matches("^arn:aws:codewhisperer:[a-z]{2}-[a-z]+-\\d:\\d{12}:profile/[A-Z0-9]+$");
return StringUtils.isNotBlank(arn);
}

private boolean isValidRegion(final String region) {
return region != null && region
.matches("^[a-z]{2}-(central|north|south|east|west|northeast|southeast|northwest|southwest)-(\\d)$");
return StringUtils.isNotBlank(region);
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why drop these validations?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

None of the other IDEs do it and clients are not expected to. We expect validation to happen on the backend side where an incorrect value should fail with an appropriate message. Also the validity checking was too regex heavy which was leading to invalid states happening on the Eclipse side.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

IMO it's fine to not have these check, in most scenarios, users won't touch / modify the cached file (also that's what we expect). We just need to ensure serialize/de-serialize work fine then it should be good enough.

@JsonIgnore
public final String getRegion() {
return identityDetails.region();
return identityDetails != null ? identityDetails.region() : null;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@shruti0085
shruti0085 merged commit a8b39ac into mainJul 29, 2025
1 check passed
@shruti0085
shruti0085 deleted the shruti0085/devProfileLogs branch July 29, 2025 21:45
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@shruti0085@bryceitoc9@Will-ShaoHua
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Add logging and remove validation with developer profile querying - #488

Merged
shruti0085 merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
shruti0085/devProfileLogs
Jul 29, 2025
Merged

Add logging and remove validation with developer profile querying#488
shruti0085 merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
shruti0085/devProfileLogs

Conversation

@shruti0085

@shruti0085shruti0085 commented Jul 28, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description of changes:
There is not sufficient logging around the developer profile fetching logic in the login flow. This change adds more logging. In addition, unnecessary restrictive validation checks on the stored and returned Q developer profiles has been removed as we want to rely on the backend to give us valid results. Only validation to check the shape of the stored value is now used, if it is incorrect, we expect further calls to the backend to fail with an appropriate message.
Related issue: #485
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

@bryceitoc9bryceitoc9 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Minor nit in removing some of the validity checking.

Comment on lines 170 to 180
private boolean isValidAccountId(final String accountId) {
return accountId != null && accountId.matches("^\\d{12}$");
return StringUtils.isNotBlank(accountId);
}

private boolean isValidArn(final String arn) {
return arn != null && arn.matches("^arn:aws:codewhisperer:[a-z]{2}-[a-z]+-\\d:\\d{12}:profile/[A-Z0-9]+$");
return StringUtils.isNotBlank(arn);
}

private boolean isValidRegion(final String region) {
return region != null && region
.matches("^[a-z]{2}-(central|north|south|east|west|northeast|southeast|northwest|southwest)-(\\d)$");
return StringUtils.isNotBlank(region);
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why drop these validations?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

None of the other IDEs do it and clients are not expected to. We expect validation to happen on the backend side where an incorrect value should fail with an appropriate message. Also the validity checking was too regex heavy which was leading to invalid states happening on the Eclipse side.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

IMO it's fine to not have these check, in most scenarios, users won't touch / modify the cached file (also that's what we expect). We just need to ensure serialize/de-serialize work fine then it should be good enough.

@JsonIgnore
public final String getRegion() {
return identityDetails.region();
return identityDetails != null ? identityDetails.region() : null;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@shruti0085
shruti0085 merged commit a8b39ac into mainJul 29, 2025
1 check passed
@shruti0085
shruti0085 deleted the shruti0085/devProfileLogs branch July 29, 2025 21:45
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@shruti0085@bryceitoc9@Will-ShaoHua
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Add logging and remove validation with developer profile querying - #488

Merged
shruti0085 merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
shruti0085/devProfileLogs
Jul 29, 2025
Merged

Add logging and remove validation with developer profile querying#488
shruti0085 merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
shruti0085/devProfileLogs

Conversation

@shruti0085

@shruti0085shruti0085 commented Jul 28, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description of changes:
There is not sufficient logging around the developer profile fetching logic in the login flow. This change adds more logging. In addition, unnecessary restrictive validation checks on the stored and returned Q developer profiles has been removed as we want to rely on the backend to give us valid results. Only validation to check the shape of the stored value is now used, if it is incorrect, we expect further calls to the backend to fail with an appropriate message.
Related issue: #485
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

@bryceitoc9bryceitoc9 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Minor nit in removing some of the validity checking.

Comment on lines 170 to 180
private boolean isValidAccountId(final String accountId) {
return accountId != null && accountId.matches("^\\d{12}$");
return StringUtils.isNotBlank(accountId);
}

private boolean isValidArn(final String arn) {
return arn != null && arn.matches("^arn:aws:codewhisperer:[a-z]{2}-[a-z]+-\\d:\\d{12}:profile/[A-Z0-9]+$");
return StringUtils.isNotBlank(arn);
}

private boolean isValidRegion(final String region) {
return region != null && region
.matches("^[a-z]{2}-(central|north|south|east|west|northeast|southeast|northwest|southwest)-(\\d)$");
return StringUtils.isNotBlank(region);
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why drop these validations?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

None of the other IDEs do it and clients are not expected to. We expect validation to happen on the backend side where an incorrect value should fail with an appropriate message. Also the validity checking was too regex heavy which was leading to invalid states happening on the Eclipse side.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

IMO it's fine to not have these check, in most scenarios, users won't touch / modify the cached file (also that's what we expect). We just need to ensure serialize/de-serialize work fine then it should be good enough.

@JsonIgnore
public final String getRegion() {
return identityDetails.region();
return identityDetails != null ? identityDetails.region() : null;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@shruti0085
shruti0085 merged commit a8b39ac into mainJul 29, 2025
1 check passed
@shruti0085
shruti0085 deleted the shruti0085/devProfileLogs branch July 29, 2025 21:45
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@shruti0085@bryceitoc9@Will-ShaoHua
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Add logging and remove validation with developer profile querying - #488

Merged
shruti0085 merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
shruti0085/devProfileLogs
Jul 29, 2025
Merged

Add logging and remove validation with developer profile querying#488
shruti0085 merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
shruti0085/devProfileLogs

Conversation

@shruti0085

@shruti0085shruti0085 commented Jul 28, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description of changes:
There is not sufficient logging around the developer profile fetching logic in the login flow. This change adds more logging. In addition, unnecessary restrictive validation checks on the stored and returned Q developer profiles has been removed as we want to rely on the backend to give us valid results. Only validation to check the shape of the stored value is now used, if it is incorrect, we expect further calls to the backend to fail with an appropriate message.
Related issue: #485
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

@bryceitoc9bryceitoc9 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Minor nit in removing some of the validity checking.

Comment on lines 170 to 180
private boolean isValidAccountId(final String accountId) {
return accountId != null && accountId.matches("^\\d{12}$");
return StringUtils.isNotBlank(accountId);
}

private boolean isValidArn(final String arn) {
return arn != null && arn.matches("^arn:aws:codewhisperer:[a-z]{2}-[a-z]+-\\d:\\d{12}:profile/[A-Z0-9]+$");
return StringUtils.isNotBlank(arn);
}

private boolean isValidRegion(final String region) {
return region != null && region
.matches("^[a-z]{2}-(central|north|south|east|west|northeast|southeast|northwest|southwest)-(\\d)$");
return StringUtils.isNotBlank(region);
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why drop these validations?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

None of the other IDEs do it and clients are not expected to. We expect validation to happen on the backend side where an incorrect value should fail with an appropriate message. Also the validity checking was too regex heavy which was leading to invalid states happening on the Eclipse side.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

IMO it's fine to not have these check, in most scenarios, users won't touch / modify the cached file (also that's what we expect). We just need to ensure serialize/de-serialize work fine then it should be good enough.

@JsonIgnore
public final String getRegion() {
return identityDetails.region();
return identityDetails != null ? identityDetails.region() : null;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@shruti0085
shruti0085 merged commit a8b39ac into mainJul 29, 2025
1 check passed
@shruti0085
shruti0085 deleted the shruti0085/devProfileLogs branch July 29, 2025 21:45
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@shruti0085@bryceitoc9@Will-ShaoHua
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Add logging and remove validation with developer profile querying - #488

Merged
shruti0085 merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
shruti0085/devProfileLogs
Jul 29, 2025
Merged

Add logging and remove validation with developer profile querying#488
shruti0085 merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
shruti0085/devProfileLogs

Conversation

@shruti0085

@shruti0085shruti0085 commented Jul 28, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description of changes:
There is not sufficient logging around the developer profile fetching logic in the login flow. This change adds more logging. In addition, unnecessary restrictive validation checks on the stored and returned Q developer profiles has been removed as we want to rely on the backend to give us valid results. Only validation to check the shape of the stored value is now used, if it is incorrect, we expect further calls to the backend to fail with an appropriate message.
Related issue: #485
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

@bryceitoc9bryceitoc9 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Minor nit in removing some of the validity checking.

Comment on lines 170 to 180
private boolean isValidAccountId(final String accountId) {
return accountId != null && accountId.matches("^\\d{12}$");
return StringUtils.isNotBlank(accountId);
}

private boolean isValidArn(final String arn) {
return arn != null && arn.matches("^arn:aws:codewhisperer:[a-z]{2}-[a-z]+-\\d:\\d{12}:profile/[A-Z0-9]+$");
return StringUtils.isNotBlank(arn);
}

private boolean isValidRegion(final String region) {
return region != null && region
.matches("^[a-z]{2}-(central|north|south|east|west|northeast|southeast|northwest|southwest)-(\\d)$");
return StringUtils.isNotBlank(region);
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why drop these validations?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

None of the other IDEs do it and clients are not expected to. We expect validation to happen on the backend side where an incorrect value should fail with an appropriate message. Also the validity checking was too regex heavy which was leading to invalid states happening on the Eclipse side.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

IMO it's fine to not have these check, in most scenarios, users won't touch / modify the cached file (also that's what we expect). We just need to ensure serialize/de-serialize work fine then it should be good enough.

@JsonIgnore
public final String getRegion() {
return identityDetails.region();
return identityDetails != null ? identityDetails.region() : null;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@shruti0085
shruti0085 merged commit a8b39ac into mainJul 29, 2025
1 check passed
@shruti0085
shruti0085 deleted the shruti0085/devProfileLogs branch July 29, 2025 21:45
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@shruti0085@bryceitoc9@Will-ShaoHua