Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i'd prefer this be wet and still called inside each switch. someone adding a switch in the future may accidentally wreck a db not knowing this auto runs
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
after thinking about it some more, i feel like this might be a non-issue or at least quite a rare occurrence. for it to be a problem, you'd have to:
runMigrations=trueI think it's probably easier to reason around having any command will run migrations if
runMigrations=truevs all the special casingThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
fair enough
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we actually want every command to run migrations though? It means when we deploy, every container in every replica tries to grab the lock to run the migrations, when we only need one of them to do it. Just seems like a lot more thrash for the benefit of only tests.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this is equivalent to what it was before, besides elasticsearch. It makes a lot of sense for the dev flow, but I agree is a bit overkill for deploys. We could pick a single command to champion migrations but I think it's alright for now