docs(api): declare collaborators on the track schema in the OpenAPI spec - #946

Merged
raymondjacobson merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/collab-swagger-collaborators
Jun 9, 2026
Merged

docs(api): declare collaborators on the track schema in the OpenAPI spec#946
raymondjacobson merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/collab-swagger-collaborators

Conversation

@raymondjacobson

@raymondjacobsonraymondjacobson commented Jun 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Makes the SDK-generated collaborators field durable.

Why

The track response already returns collaborators (an array of accepted collaborator users, added in #932). But the embedded swagger spec (api/swagger/swagger-v1.yaml, served at /v1/swagger.yaml) never declared it. The apps SDK is generated from this spec via openapi-generator, and the generated models' FromJSONTyped only copy fields present in the spec — so collaborators was silently dropped during deserialization, and the field never reached the client even though the API returned it.

(The apps PR currently hand-edits the generated Track.ts/SearchTrack.ts to add the field. That works, but the next npm run gen would overwrite it. This PR fixes the root: declare the field in the spec so codegen reproduces it.)

Change

Add collaborators (array of user) to the track and search_track schemas — the two schemas that produce the SDK Track and SearchTrack models the apps adapter consumes. The generated output (collaborators?: Array<User> + the standard array-map in FromJSONTyped/ToJSON) exactly matches the apps hand-edit, so a regen is a no-op for those files.

Not included (deliberately)

  • Notification types (track_collaborator_invite/_accept): the apps SDK notification models are hand-authored as one shared TrackCollaboratorNotification, but generating two swagger schemas would emit two differently-named models — making this a rename + rewire that needs a verified generator run, not a clean spec addition. Tracked separately.
  • /collaboration_invites: no SDK consumer exists yet, so there's nothing for codegen to protect.

Spec validates (YAML OK) and the binary builds (the spec is //go:embed-ed).

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

@raymondjacobson@claude
docs(api): document collaborators on the track schema in the OpenAP…
7b436a2
…I spec
The track response already returns `collaborators` (added in #932), but the
embedded swagger spec didn't declare it — so SDK codegen (which generates from
this spec) silently omits the field and clients that deserialize via the
generated models drop it. Add `collaborators` (array of users) to the `track`
and `search_track` schemas so the generated SDK Track/SearchTrack models include
it, matching the API's actual response.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@raymondjacobson
raymondjacobson merged commit ad11aed into mainJun 9, 2026
5 checks passed
@raymondjacobson
raymondjacobson deleted the claude/collab-swagger-collaborators branch June 9, 2026 23:26
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@raymondjacobson
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all 
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '

Skip to content
docs(api): declare collaborators on the track schema in the OpenAPI spec - #946
Merged
raymondjacobson merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
claude/collab-swagger-collaborators
Jun 9, 2026
Merged
docs(api): declare collaborators on the track schema in the OpenAPI spec#946
raymondjacobson merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
claude/collab-swagger-collaborators
Conversation
@raymondjacobson
@raymondjacobsonraymondjacobson
commented
Jun 9, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Makes the SDK-generated collaborators field durable.
Why
The track response already returns collaborators (an array of accepted collaborator users, added in #932). But the embedded swagger spec (api/swagger/swagger-v1.yaml, served at /v1/swagger.yaml) never declared it. The apps SDK is generated from this spec via openapi-generator, and the generated models' FromJSONTyped only copy fields present in the spec — so collaborators was silently dropped during deserialization, and the field never reached the client even though the API returned it.
(The apps PR currently hand-edits the generated Track.ts/SearchTrack.ts to add the field. That works, but the next npm run gen would overwrite it. This PR fixes the root: declare the field in the spec so codegen reproduces it.)
Change
Add collaborators (array of user) to the track and search_track schemas — the two schemas that produce the SDK Track and SearchTrack models the apps adapter consumes. The generated output (collaborators?: Array<User> + the standard array-map in FromJSONTyped/ToJSON) exactly matches the apps hand-edit, so a regen is a no-op for those files.
Not included (deliberately)
  • Notification types (track_collaborator_invite/_accept): the apps SDK notification models are hand-authored as one shared TrackCollaboratorNotification, but generating two swagger schemas would emit two differently-named models — making this a rename + rewire that needs a verified generator run, not a clean spec addition. Tracked separately.
  • /collaboration_invites: no SDK consumer exists yet, so there's nothing for codegen to protect.
Spec validates (YAML OK) and the binary builds (the spec is //go:embed-ed).
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
@raymondjacobson@claude
docs(api): document collaborators on the track schema in the OpenAP…
7b436a2
…I spec
The track response already returns `collaborators` (added in #932), but the
embedded swagger spec didn't declare it — so SDK codegen (which generates from
this spec) silently omits the field and clients that deserialize via the
generated models drop it. Add `collaborators` (array of users) to the `track`
and `search_track` schemas so the generated SDK Track/SearchTrack models include
it, matching the API's actual response.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@raymondjacobson
raymondjacobson
merged commit ad11aed
into
mainJun 9, 2026

5 checks passed

@raymondjacobson
raymondjacobson
deleted the

claude/collab-swagger-collaborators

branch
June 9, 2026 23:26
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@raymondjacobson

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
docs(api): declare collaborators on the track schema in the OpenAPI spec - #946
Merged
raymondjacobson merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
claude/collab-swagger-collaborators
Jun 9, 2026
Merged
docs(api): declare collaborators on the track schema in the OpenAPI spec#946
raymondjacobson merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
claude/collab-swagger-collaborators
Conversation
@raymondjacobson
@raymondjacobsonraymondjacobson
commented
Jun 9, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Makes the SDK-generated collaborators field durable.
Why
The track response already returns collaborators (an array of accepted collaborator users, added in #932). But the embedded swagger spec (api/swagger/swagger-v1.yaml, served at /v1/swagger.yaml) never declared it. The apps SDK is generated from this spec via openapi-generator, and the generated models' FromJSONTyped only copy fields present in the spec — so collaborators was silently dropped during deserialization, and the field never reached the client even though the API returned it.
(The apps PR currently hand-edits the generated Track.ts/SearchTrack.ts to add the field. That works, but the next npm run gen would overwrite it. This PR fixes the root: declare the field in the spec so codegen reproduces it.)
Change
Add collaborators (array of user) to the track and search_track schemas — the two schemas that produce the SDK Track and SearchTrack models the apps adapter consumes. The generated output (collaborators?: Array<User> + the standard array-map in FromJSONTyped/ToJSON) exactly matches the apps hand-edit, so a regen is a no-op for those files.
Not included (deliberately)
  • Notification types (track_collaborator_invite/_accept): the apps SDK notification models are hand-authored as one shared TrackCollaboratorNotification, but generating two swagger schemas would emit two differently-named models — making this a rename + rewire that needs a verified generator run, not a clean spec addition. Tracked separately.
  • /collaboration_invites: no SDK consumer exists yet, so there's nothing for codegen to protect.
Spec validates (YAML OK) and the binary builds (the spec is //go:embed-ed).
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
@raymondjacobson@claude
docs(api): document collaborators on the track schema in the OpenAP…
7b436a2
…I spec
The track response already returns `collaborators` (added in #932), but the
embedded swagger spec didn't declare it — so SDK codegen (which generates from
this spec) silently omits the field and clients that deserialize via the
generated models drop it. Add `collaborators` (array of users) to the `track`
and `search_track` schemas so the generated SDK Track/SearchTrack models include
it, matching the API's actual response.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@raymondjacobson
raymondjacobson
merged commit ad11aed
into
mainJun 9, 2026

5 checks passed

@raymondjacobson
raymondjacobson
deleted the

claude/collab-swagger-collaborators

branch
June 9, 2026 23:26
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@raymondjacobson

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
docs(api): declare collaborators on the track schema in the OpenAPI spec - #946
Merged
raymondjacobson merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
claude/collab-swagger-collaborators
Jun 9, 2026
Merged
docs(api): declare collaborators on the track schema in the OpenAPI spec#946
raymondjacobson merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
claude/collab-swagger-collaborators
Conversation
@raymondjacobson
@raymondjacobsonraymondjacobson
commented
Jun 9, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Makes the SDK-generated collaborators field durable.
Why
The track response already returns collaborators (an array of accepted collaborator users, added in #932). But the embedded swagger spec (api/swagger/swagger-v1.yaml, served at /v1/swagger.yaml) never declared it. The apps SDK is generated from this spec via openapi-generator, and the generated models' FromJSONTyped only copy fields present in the spec — so collaborators was silently dropped during deserialization, and the field never reached the client even though the API returned it.
(The apps PR currently hand-edits the generated Track.ts/SearchTrack.ts to add the field. That works, but the next npm run gen would overwrite it. This PR fixes the root: declare the field in the spec so codegen reproduces it.)
Change
Add collaborators (array of user) to the track and search_track schemas — the two schemas that produce the SDK Track and SearchTrack models the apps adapter consumes. The generated output (collaborators?: Array<User> + the standard array-map in FromJSONTyped/ToJSON) exactly matches the apps hand-edit, so a regen is a no-op for those files.
Not included (deliberately)
  • Notification types (track_collaborator_invite/_accept): the apps SDK notification models are hand-authored as one shared TrackCollaboratorNotification, but generating two swagger schemas would emit two differently-named models — making this a rename + rewire that needs a verified generator run, not a clean spec addition. Tracked separately.
  • /collaboration_invites: no SDK consumer exists yet, so there's nothing for codegen to protect.
Spec validates (YAML OK) and the binary builds (the spec is //go:embed-ed).
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
@raymondjacobson@claude
docs(api): document collaborators on the track schema in the OpenAP…
7b436a2
…I spec
The track response already returns `collaborators` (added in #932), but the
embedded swagger spec didn't declare it — so SDK codegen (which generates from
this spec) silently omits the field and clients that deserialize via the
generated models drop it. Add `collaborators` (array of users) to the `track`
and `search_track` schemas so the generated SDK Track/SearchTrack models include
it, matching the API's actual response.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@raymondjacobson
raymondjacobson
merged commit ad11aed
into
mainJun 9, 2026

5 checks passed

@raymondjacobson
raymondjacobson
deleted the

claude/collab-swagger-collaborators

branch
June 9, 2026 23:26
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@raymondjacobson

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "youtube.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '

Skip to content
docs(api): declare collaborators on the track schema in the OpenAPI spec - #946
Merged
raymondjacobson merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
claude/collab-swagger-collaborators
Jun 9, 2026
Merged
docs(api): declare collaborators on the track schema in the OpenAPI spec#946
raymondjacobson merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
claude/collab-swagger-collaborators
Conversation
@raymondjacobson
@raymondjacobsonraymondjacobson
commented
Jun 9, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Makes the SDK-generated collaborators field durable.
Why
The track response already returns collaborators (an array of accepted collaborator users, added in #932). But the embedded swagger spec (api/swagger/swagger-v1.yaml, served at /v1/swagger.yaml) never declared it. The apps SDK is generated from this spec via openapi-generator, and the generated models' FromJSONTyped only copy fields present in the spec — so collaborators was silently dropped during deserialization, and the field never reached the client even though the API returned it.
(The apps PR currently hand-edits the generated Track.ts/SearchTrack.ts to add the field. That works, but the next npm run gen would overwrite it. This PR fixes the root: declare the field in the spec so codegen reproduces it.)
Change
Add collaborators (array of user) to the track and search_track schemas — the two schemas that produce the SDK Track and SearchTrack models the apps adapter consumes. The generated output (collaborators?: Array<User> + the standard array-map in FromJSONTyped/ToJSON) exactly matches the apps hand-edit, so a regen is a no-op for those files.
Not included (deliberately)
  • Notification types (track_collaborator_invite/_accept): the apps SDK notification models are hand-authored as one shared TrackCollaboratorNotification, but generating two swagger schemas would emit two differently-named models — making this a rename + rewire that needs a verified generator run, not a clean spec addition. Tracked separately.
  • /collaboration_invites: no SDK consumer exists yet, so there's nothing for codegen to protect.
Spec validates (YAML OK) and the binary builds (the spec is //go:embed-ed).
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
@raymondjacobson@claude
docs(api): document collaborators on the track schema in the OpenAP…
7b436a2
…I spec
The track response already returns `collaborators` (added in #932), but the
embedded swagger spec didn't declare it — so SDK codegen (which generates from
this spec) silently omits the field and clients that deserialize via the
generated models drop it. Add `collaborators` (array of users) to the `track`
and `search_track` schemas so the generated SDK Track/SearchTrack models include
it, matching the API's actual response.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@raymondjacobson
raymondjacobson
merged commit ad11aed
into
mainJun 9, 2026

5 checks passed

@raymondjacobson
raymondjacobson
deleted the

claude/collab-swagger-collaborators

branch
June 9, 2026 23:26
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@raymondjacobson

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
docs(api): declare collaborators on the track schema in the OpenAPI spec - #946
Merged
raymondjacobson merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
claude/collab-swagger-collaborators
Jun 9, 2026
Merged
docs(api): declare collaborators on the track schema in the OpenAPI spec#946
raymondjacobson merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
claude/collab-swagger-collaborators
Conversation
@raymondjacobson
@raymondjacobsonraymondjacobson
commented
Jun 9, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Makes the SDK-generated collaborators field durable.
Why
The track response already returns collaborators (an array of accepted collaborator users, added in #932). But the embedded swagger spec (api/swagger/swagger-v1.yaml, served at /v1/swagger.yaml) never declared it. The apps SDK is generated from this spec via openapi-generator, and the generated models' FromJSONTyped only copy fields present in the spec — so collaborators was silently dropped during deserialization, and the field never reached the client even though the API returned it.
(The apps PR currently hand-edits the generated Track.ts/SearchTrack.ts to add the field. That works, but the next npm run gen would overwrite it. This PR fixes the root: declare the field in the spec so codegen reproduces it.)
Change
Add collaborators (array of user) to the track and search_track schemas — the two schemas that produce the SDK Track and SearchTrack models the apps adapter consumes. The generated output (collaborators?: Array<User> + the standard array-map in FromJSONTyped/ToJSON) exactly matches the apps hand-edit, so a regen is a no-op for those files.
Not included (deliberately)
  • Notification types (track_collaborator_invite/_accept): the apps SDK notification models are hand-authored as one shared TrackCollaboratorNotification, but generating two swagger schemas would emit two differently-named models — making this a rename + rewire that needs a verified generator run, not a clean spec addition. Tracked separately.
  • /collaboration_invites: no SDK consumer exists yet, so there's nothing for codegen to protect.
Spec validates (YAML OK) and the binary builds (the spec is //go:embed-ed).
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
@raymondjacobson@claude
docs(api): document collaborators on the track schema in the OpenAP…
7b436a2
…I spec
The track response already returns `collaborators` (added in #932), but the
embedded swagger spec didn't declare it — so SDK codegen (which generates from
this spec) silently omits the field and clients that deserialize via the
generated models drop it. Add `collaborators` (array of users) to the `track`
and `search_track` schemas so the generated SDK Track/SearchTrack models include
it, matching the API's actual response.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@raymondjacobson
raymondjacobson
merged commit ad11aed
into
mainJun 9, 2026

5 checks passed

@raymondjacobson
raymondjacobson
deleted the

claude/collab-swagger-collaborators

branch
June 9, 2026 23:26
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@raymondjacobson

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
docs(api): declare collaborators on the track schema in the OpenAPI spec - #946
Merged
raymondjacobson merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
claude/collab-swagger-collaborators
Jun 9, 2026
Merged
docs(api): declare collaborators on the track schema in the OpenAPI spec#946
raymondjacobson merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
claude/collab-swagger-collaborators
Conversation
@raymondjacobson
@raymondjacobsonraymondjacobson
commented
Jun 9, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Makes the SDK-generated collaborators field durable.
Why
The track response already returns collaborators (an array of accepted collaborator users, added in #932). But the embedded swagger spec (api/swagger/swagger-v1.yaml, served at /v1/swagger.yaml) never declared it. The apps SDK is generated from this spec via openapi-generator, and the generated models' FromJSONTyped only copy fields present in the spec — so collaborators was silently dropped during deserialization, and the field never reached the client even though the API returned it.
(The apps PR currently hand-edits the generated Track.ts/SearchTrack.ts to add the field. That works, but the next npm run gen would overwrite it. This PR fixes the root: declare the field in the spec so codegen reproduces it.)
Change
Add collaborators (array of user) to the track and search_track schemas — the two schemas that produce the SDK Track and SearchTrack models the apps adapter consumes. The generated output (collaborators?: Array<User> + the standard array-map in FromJSONTyped/ToJSON) exactly matches the apps hand-edit, so a regen is a no-op for those files.
Not included (deliberately)
  • Notification types (track_collaborator_invite/_accept): the apps SDK notification models are hand-authored as one shared TrackCollaboratorNotification, but generating two swagger schemas would emit two differently-named models — making this a rename + rewire that needs a verified generator run, not a clean spec addition. Tracked separately.
  • /collaboration_invites: no SDK consumer exists yet, so there's nothing for codegen to protect.
Spec validates (YAML OK) and the binary builds (the spec is //go:embed-ed).
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
@raymondjacobson@claude
docs(api): document collaborators on the track schema in the OpenAP…
7b436a2
…I spec
The track response already returns `collaborators` (added in #932), but the
embedded swagger spec didn't declare it — so SDK codegen (which generates from
this spec) silently omits the field and clients that deserialize via the
generated models drop it. Add `collaborators` (array of users) to the `track`
and `search_track` schemas so the generated SDK Track/SearchTrack models include
it, matching the API's actual response.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@raymondjacobson
raymondjacobson
merged commit ad11aed
into
mainJun 9, 2026

5 checks passed

@raymondjacobson
raymondjacobson
deleted the

claude/collab-swagger-collaborators

branch
June 9, 2026 23:26
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@raymondjacobson

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); }
})();
})();

Skip to content
docs(api): declare collaborators on the track schema in the OpenAPI spec - #946
Merged
raymondjacobson merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
claude/collab-swagger-collaborators
Jun 9, 2026
Merged
docs(api): declare collaborators on the track schema in the OpenAPI spec#946
raymondjacobson merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
claude/collab-swagger-collaborators
Conversation
@raymondjacobson
@raymondjacobsonraymondjacobson
commented
Jun 9, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Makes the SDK-generated collaborators field durable.
Why
The track response already returns collaborators (an array of accepted collaborator users, added in #932). But the embedded swagger spec (api/swagger/swagger-v1.yaml, served at /v1/swagger.yaml) never declared it. The apps SDK is generated from this spec via openapi-generator, and the generated models' FromJSONTyped only copy fields present in the spec — so collaborators was silently dropped during deserialization, and the field never reached the client even though the API returned it.
(The apps PR currently hand-edits the generated Track.ts/SearchTrack.ts to add the field. That works, but the next npm run gen would overwrite it. This PR fixes the root: declare the field in the spec so codegen reproduces it.)
Change
Add collaborators (array of user) to the track and search_track schemas — the two schemas that produce the SDK Track and SearchTrack models the apps adapter consumes. The generated output (collaborators?: Array<User> + the standard array-map in FromJSONTyped/ToJSON) exactly matches the apps hand-edit, so a regen is a no-op for those files.
Not included (deliberately)
  • Notification types (track_collaborator_invite/_accept): the apps SDK notification models are hand-authored as one shared TrackCollaboratorNotification, but generating two swagger schemas would emit two differently-named models — making this a rename + rewire that needs a verified generator run, not a clean spec addition. Tracked separately.
  • /collaboration_invites: no SDK consumer exists yet, so there's nothing for codegen to protect.
Spec validates (YAML OK) and the binary builds (the spec is //go:embed-ed).
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
@raymondjacobson@claude
docs(api): document collaborators on the track schema in the OpenAP…
7b436a2
…I spec
The track response already returns `collaborators` (added in #932), but the
embedded swagger spec didn't declare it — so SDK codegen (which generates from
this spec) silently omits the field and clients that deserialize via the
generated models drop it. Add `collaborators` (array of users) to the `track`
and `search_track` schemas so the generated SDK Track/SearchTrack models include
it, matching the API's actual response.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@raymondjacobson
raymondjacobson
merged commit ad11aed
into
mainJun 9, 2026

5 checks passed

@raymondjacobson
raymondjacobson
deleted the

claude/collab-swagger-collaborators

branch
June 9, 2026 23:26
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@raymondjacobson