feat(api): embed pending collaborator invites on the owner's own tracks - #947

Merged
raymondjacobson merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/collab-pending-collaborators
Jun 10, 2026
Merged

feat(api): embed pending collaborator invites on the owner's own tracks#947
raymondjacobson merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/collab-pending-collaborators

Conversation

@raymondjacobson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Backend for the apps edit-form fix: an owner editing a track was dropping still-pending collaborator invites, because the edit form seeds its collaborators field from the track response — which only carried accepted collaborators. On save, the ETL reconciles the metadata set and removes any invite not present, so pending ones vanished.

Change

  • GetTrackCollaborators now returns accepted and pending rows (with status). The embed splits them:
    • collaborators — accepted, on every track response (unchanged behavior).
    • pending_collaboratorsnew, populated only on the requester's own tracks.
  • Owner-scoped: pending user IDs are resolved and embedded only where owner == my_id, so pending invites never surface to other viewers. (They're public on-chain regardless, but there's no reason to hand them to everyone.)
  • swagger: pending_collaborators declared on the track schemas.

Follow-up (apps)

The edit form will initialize from collaborators + pending_collaborators so saving preserves pending invites. Needs an SDK regen once this deploys (the field reproduces cleanly, same as collaborators).

Tests

TestPendingCollaboratorsVisibleToOwnerOnly: owner sees the pending invite; a non-owner sees only the accepted collaborator. Existing collaborator/embed/profile suites still pass.

Perf

Same bounded, index-served embed query as before (PK leads on track_id, ANY(@ids)); it now also returns pending rows, post-filtered by the same index. No new round-trips.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

The edit form initializes its collaborators field from the track response, which
only carried accepted collaborators — so re-saving a track dropped any
still-pending invites (the ETL reconciles the metadata set and removes rows not
present). Expose the owner's pending invites so the client can preserve them.
- GetTrackCollaborators now returns accepted + pending (with status); the embed
splits them: `collaborators` (accepted) on every response as before, plus a
new `pending_collaborators` populated only on the requester's own tracks.
- Owner-scoped: pending user IDs are resolved and embedded only for tracks where
owner == my_id, so pending invites never surface to other viewers.
- swagger: declare `pending_collaborators` on the track schemas.
Test: owner sees the pending invite, non-owner sees only accepted.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
raymondjacobson added a commit to AudiusProject/apps that referenced this pull request Jun 10, 2026
The edit form seeded its collaborators field from the track's accepted-only
`collaborators`, so saving dropped any still-pending invites (the ETL reconciles
the metadata set). Initialize the field from accepted + pending instead.
- SDK Track/SearchTrack: add `pendingCollaborators` (hand-edit stopgap; the API
swagger now declares `pending_collaborators` in AudiusProject/api#947, so the
next regen reproduces this).
- Track model + adapter: expose `pending_collaborators` (owner-only).
- Web + mobile edit screens: seed the collaborators field with
`[...collaborators, ...pending_collaborators]` so pending invites survive a
save. Display still uses accepted-only `collaborators` (no regression).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@raymondjacobson
raymondjacobson merged commit 1ad2042 into mainJun 10, 2026
5 checks passed
@raymondjacobson
raymondjacobson deleted the claude/collab-pending-collaborators branch June 10, 2026 00:37
raymondjacobson added a commit to AudiusProject/apps that referenced this pull request Jun 16, 2026
The edit form seeded its collaborators field from the track's accepted-only
`collaborators`, so saving dropped any still-pending invites (the ETL reconciles
the metadata set). Initialize the field from accepted + pending instead.
- SDK Track/SearchTrack: add `pendingCollaborators` (hand-edit stopgap; the API
swagger now declares `pending_collaborators` in AudiusProject/api#947, so the
next regen reproduces this).
- Track model + adapter: expose `pending_collaborators` (owner-only).
- Web + mobile edit screens: seed the collaborators field with
`[...collaborators, ...pending_collaborators]` so pending invites survive a
save. Display still uses accepted-only `collaborators` (no regression).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@raymondjacobson
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

feat(api): embed pending collaborator invites on the owner's own tracks - #947

Merged
raymondjacobson merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/collab-pending-collaborators
Jun 10, 2026
Merged

feat(api): embed pending collaborator invites on the owner's own tracks#947
raymondjacobson merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/collab-pending-collaborators

Conversation

@raymondjacobson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Backend for the apps edit-form fix: an owner editing a track was dropping still-pending collaborator invites, because the edit form seeds its collaborators field from the track response — which only carried accepted collaborators. On save, the ETL reconciles the metadata set and removes any invite not present, so pending ones vanished.

Change

  • GetTrackCollaborators now returns accepted and pending rows (with status). The embed splits them:
    • collaborators — accepted, on every track response (unchanged behavior).
    • pending_collaboratorsnew, populated only on the requester's own tracks.
  • Owner-scoped: pending user IDs are resolved and embedded only where owner == my_id, so pending invites never surface to other viewers. (They're public on-chain regardless, but there's no reason to hand them to everyone.)
  • swagger: pending_collaborators declared on the track schemas.

Follow-up (apps)

The edit form will initialize from collaborators + pending_collaborators so saving preserves pending invites. Needs an SDK regen once this deploys (the field reproduces cleanly, same as collaborators).

Tests

TestPendingCollaboratorsVisibleToOwnerOnly: owner sees the pending invite; a non-owner sees only the accepted collaborator. Existing collaborator/embed/profile suites still pass.

Perf

Same bounded, index-served embed query as before (PK leads on track_id, ANY(@ids)); it now also returns pending rows, post-filtered by the same index. No new round-trips.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

The edit form initializes its collaborators field from the track response, which
only carried accepted collaborators — so re-saving a track dropped any
still-pending invites (the ETL reconciles the metadata set and removes rows not
present). Expose the owner's pending invites so the client can preserve them.
- GetTrackCollaborators now returns accepted + pending (with status); the embed
splits them: `collaborators` (accepted) on every response as before, plus a
new `pending_collaborators` populated only on the requester's own tracks.
- Owner-scoped: pending user IDs are resolved and embedded only for tracks where
owner == my_id, so pending invites never surface to other viewers.
- swagger: declare `pending_collaborators` on the track schemas.
Test: owner sees the pending invite, non-owner sees only accepted.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
raymondjacobson added a commit to AudiusProject/apps that referenced this pull request Jun 10, 2026
The edit form seeded its collaborators field from the track's accepted-only
`collaborators`, so saving dropped any still-pending invites (the ETL reconciles
the metadata set). Initialize the field from accepted + pending instead.
- SDK Track/SearchTrack: add `pendingCollaborators` (hand-edit stopgap; the API
swagger now declares `pending_collaborators` in AudiusProject/api#947, so the
next regen reproduces this).
- Track model + adapter: expose `pending_collaborators` (owner-only).
- Web + mobile edit screens: seed the collaborators field with
`[...collaborators, ...pending_collaborators]` so pending invites survive a
save. Display still uses accepted-only `collaborators` (no regression).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@raymondjacobson
raymondjacobson merged commit 1ad2042 into mainJun 10, 2026
5 checks passed
@raymondjacobson
raymondjacobson deleted the claude/collab-pending-collaborators branch June 10, 2026 00:37
raymondjacobson added a commit to AudiusProject/apps that referenced this pull request Jun 16, 2026
The edit form seeded its collaborators field from the track's accepted-only
`collaborators`, so saving dropped any still-pending invites (the ETL reconciles
the metadata set). Initialize the field from accepted + pending instead.
- SDK Track/SearchTrack: add `pendingCollaborators` (hand-edit stopgap; the API
swagger now declares `pending_collaborators` in AudiusProject/api#947, so the
next regen reproduces this).
- Track model + adapter: expose `pending_collaborators` (owner-only).
- Web + mobile edit screens: seed the collaborators field with
`[...collaborators, ...pending_collaborators]` so pending invites survive a
save. Display still uses accepted-only `collaborators` (no regression).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@raymondjacobson
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

feat(api): embed pending collaborator invites on the owner's own tracks - #947

Merged
raymondjacobson merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/collab-pending-collaborators
Jun 10, 2026
Merged

feat(api): embed pending collaborator invites on the owner's own tracks#947
raymondjacobson merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/collab-pending-collaborators

Conversation

@raymondjacobson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Backend for the apps edit-form fix: an owner editing a track was dropping still-pending collaborator invites, because the edit form seeds its collaborators field from the track response — which only carried accepted collaborators. On save, the ETL reconciles the metadata set and removes any invite not present, so pending ones vanished.

Change

  • GetTrackCollaborators now returns accepted and pending rows (with status). The embed splits them:
    • collaborators — accepted, on every track response (unchanged behavior).
    • pending_collaboratorsnew, populated only on the requester's own tracks.
  • Owner-scoped: pending user IDs are resolved and embedded only where owner == my_id, so pending invites never surface to other viewers. (They're public on-chain regardless, but there's no reason to hand them to everyone.)
  • swagger: pending_collaborators declared on the track schemas.

Follow-up (apps)

The edit form will initialize from collaborators + pending_collaborators so saving preserves pending invites. Needs an SDK regen once this deploys (the field reproduces cleanly, same as collaborators).

Tests

TestPendingCollaboratorsVisibleToOwnerOnly: owner sees the pending invite; a non-owner sees only the accepted collaborator. Existing collaborator/embed/profile suites still pass.

Perf

Same bounded, index-served embed query as before (PK leads on track_id, ANY(@ids)); it now also returns pending rows, post-filtered by the same index. No new round-trips.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

The edit form initializes its collaborators field from the track response, which
only carried accepted collaborators — so re-saving a track dropped any
still-pending invites (the ETL reconciles the metadata set and removes rows not
present). Expose the owner's pending invites so the client can preserve them.
- GetTrackCollaborators now returns accepted + pending (with status); the embed
splits them: `collaborators` (accepted) on every response as before, plus a
new `pending_collaborators` populated only on the requester's own tracks.
- Owner-scoped: pending user IDs are resolved and embedded only for tracks where
owner == my_id, so pending invites never surface to other viewers.
- swagger: declare `pending_collaborators` on the track schemas.
Test: owner sees the pending invite, non-owner sees only accepted.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
raymondjacobson added a commit to AudiusProject/apps that referenced this pull request Jun 10, 2026
The edit form seeded its collaborators field from the track's accepted-only
`collaborators`, so saving dropped any still-pending invites (the ETL reconciles
the metadata set). Initialize the field from accepted + pending instead.
- SDK Track/SearchTrack: add `pendingCollaborators` (hand-edit stopgap; the API
swagger now declares `pending_collaborators` in AudiusProject/api#947, so the
next regen reproduces this).
- Track model + adapter: expose `pending_collaborators` (owner-only).
- Web + mobile edit screens: seed the collaborators field with
`[...collaborators, ...pending_collaborators]` so pending invites survive a
save. Display still uses accepted-only `collaborators` (no regression).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@raymondjacobson
raymondjacobson merged commit 1ad2042 into mainJun 10, 2026
5 checks passed
@raymondjacobson
raymondjacobson deleted the claude/collab-pending-collaborators branch June 10, 2026 00:37
raymondjacobson added a commit to AudiusProject/apps that referenced this pull request Jun 16, 2026
The edit form seeded its collaborators field from the track's accepted-only
`collaborators`, so saving dropped any still-pending invites (the ETL reconciles
the metadata set). Initialize the field from accepted + pending instead.
- SDK Track/SearchTrack: add `pendingCollaborators` (hand-edit stopgap; the API
swagger now declares `pending_collaborators` in AudiusProject/api#947, so the
next regen reproduces this).
- Track model + adapter: expose `pending_collaborators` (owner-only).
- Web + mobile edit screens: seed the collaborators field with
`[...collaborators, ...pending_collaborators]` so pending invites survive a
save. Display still uses accepted-only `collaborators` (no regression).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@raymondjacobson
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

feat(api): embed pending collaborator invites on the owner's own tracks - #947

Merged
raymondjacobson merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/collab-pending-collaborators
Jun 10, 2026
Merged

feat(api): embed pending collaborator invites on the owner's own tracks#947
raymondjacobson merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/collab-pending-collaborators

Conversation

@raymondjacobson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Backend for the apps edit-form fix: an owner editing a track was dropping still-pending collaborator invites, because the edit form seeds its collaborators field from the track response — which only carried accepted collaborators. On save, the ETL reconciles the metadata set and removes any invite not present, so pending ones vanished.

Change

  • GetTrackCollaborators now returns accepted and pending rows (with status). The embed splits them:
    • collaborators — accepted, on every track response (unchanged behavior).
    • pending_collaboratorsnew, populated only on the requester's own tracks.
  • Owner-scoped: pending user IDs are resolved and embedded only where owner == my_id, so pending invites never surface to other viewers. (They're public on-chain regardless, but there's no reason to hand them to everyone.)
  • swagger: pending_collaborators declared on the track schemas.

Follow-up (apps)

The edit form will initialize from collaborators + pending_collaborators so saving preserves pending invites. Needs an SDK regen once this deploys (the field reproduces cleanly, same as collaborators).

Tests

TestPendingCollaboratorsVisibleToOwnerOnly: owner sees the pending invite; a non-owner sees only the accepted collaborator. Existing collaborator/embed/profile suites still pass.

Perf

Same bounded, index-served embed query as before (PK leads on track_id, ANY(@ids)); it now also returns pending rows, post-filtered by the same index. No new round-trips.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

The edit form initializes its collaborators field from the track response, which
only carried accepted collaborators — so re-saving a track dropped any
still-pending invites (the ETL reconciles the metadata set and removes rows not
present). Expose the owner's pending invites so the client can preserve them.
- GetTrackCollaborators now returns accepted + pending (with status); the embed
splits them: `collaborators` (accepted) on every response as before, plus a
new `pending_collaborators` populated only on the requester's own tracks.
- Owner-scoped: pending user IDs are resolved and embedded only for tracks where
owner == my_id, so pending invites never surface to other viewers.
- swagger: declare `pending_collaborators` on the track schemas.
Test: owner sees the pending invite, non-owner sees only accepted.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
raymondjacobson added a commit to AudiusProject/apps that referenced this pull request Jun 10, 2026
The edit form seeded its collaborators field from the track's accepted-only
`collaborators`, so saving dropped any still-pending invites (the ETL reconciles
the metadata set). Initialize the field from accepted + pending instead.
- SDK Track/SearchTrack: add `pendingCollaborators` (hand-edit stopgap; the API
swagger now declares `pending_collaborators` in AudiusProject/api#947, so the
next regen reproduces this).
- Track model + adapter: expose `pending_collaborators` (owner-only).
- Web + mobile edit screens: seed the collaborators field with
`[...collaborators, ...pending_collaborators]` so pending invites survive a
save. Display still uses accepted-only `collaborators` (no regression).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@raymondjacobson
raymondjacobson merged commit 1ad2042 into mainJun 10, 2026
5 checks passed
@raymondjacobson
raymondjacobson deleted the claude/collab-pending-collaborators branch June 10, 2026 00:37
raymondjacobson added a commit to AudiusProject/apps that referenced this pull request Jun 16, 2026
The edit form seeded its collaborators field from the track's accepted-only
`collaborators`, so saving dropped any still-pending invites (the ETL reconciles
the metadata set). Initialize the field from accepted + pending instead.
- SDK Track/SearchTrack: add `pendingCollaborators` (hand-edit stopgap; the API
swagger now declares `pending_collaborators` in AudiusProject/api#947, so the
next regen reproduces this).
- Track model + adapter: expose `pending_collaborators` (owner-only).
- Web + mobile edit screens: seed the collaborators field with
`[...collaborators, ...pending_collaborators]` so pending invites survive a
save. Display still uses accepted-only `collaborators` (no regression).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@raymondjacobson
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

feat(api): embed pending collaborator invites on the owner's own tracks - #947

Merged
raymondjacobson merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/collab-pending-collaborators
Jun 10, 2026
Merged

feat(api): embed pending collaborator invites on the owner's own tracks#947
raymondjacobson merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/collab-pending-collaborators

Conversation

@raymondjacobson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Backend for the apps edit-form fix: an owner editing a track was dropping still-pending collaborator invites, because the edit form seeds its collaborators field from the track response — which only carried accepted collaborators. On save, the ETL reconciles the metadata set and removes any invite not present, so pending ones vanished.

Change

  • GetTrackCollaborators now returns accepted and pending rows (with status). The embed splits them:
    • collaborators — accepted, on every track response (unchanged behavior).
    • pending_collaboratorsnew, populated only on the requester's own tracks.
  • Owner-scoped: pending user IDs are resolved and embedded only where owner == my_id, so pending invites never surface to other viewers. (They're public on-chain regardless, but there's no reason to hand them to everyone.)
  • swagger: pending_collaborators declared on the track schemas.

Follow-up (apps)

The edit form will initialize from collaborators + pending_collaborators so saving preserves pending invites. Needs an SDK regen once this deploys (the field reproduces cleanly, same as collaborators).

Tests

TestPendingCollaboratorsVisibleToOwnerOnly: owner sees the pending invite; a non-owner sees only the accepted collaborator. Existing collaborator/embed/profile suites still pass.

Perf

Same bounded, index-served embed query as before (PK leads on track_id, ANY(@ids)); it now also returns pending rows, post-filtered by the same index. No new round-trips.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

The edit form initializes its collaborators field from the track response, which
only carried accepted collaborators — so re-saving a track dropped any
still-pending invites (the ETL reconciles the metadata set and removes rows not
present). Expose the owner's pending invites so the client can preserve them.
- GetTrackCollaborators now returns accepted + pending (with status); the embed
splits them: `collaborators` (accepted) on every response as before, plus a
new `pending_collaborators` populated only on the requester's own tracks.
- Owner-scoped: pending user IDs are resolved and embedded only for tracks where
owner == my_id, so pending invites never surface to other viewers.
- swagger: declare `pending_collaborators` on the track schemas.
Test: owner sees the pending invite, non-owner sees only accepted.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
raymondjacobson added a commit to AudiusProject/apps that referenced this pull request Jun 10, 2026
The edit form seeded its collaborators field from the track's accepted-only
`collaborators`, so saving dropped any still-pending invites (the ETL reconciles
the metadata set). Initialize the field from accepted + pending instead.
- SDK Track/SearchTrack: add `pendingCollaborators` (hand-edit stopgap; the API
swagger now declares `pending_collaborators` in AudiusProject/api#947, so the
next regen reproduces this).
- Track model + adapter: expose `pending_collaborators` (owner-only).
- Web + mobile edit screens: seed the collaborators field with
`[...collaborators, ...pending_collaborators]` so pending invites survive a
save. Display still uses accepted-only `collaborators` (no regression).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@raymondjacobson
raymondjacobson merged commit 1ad2042 into mainJun 10, 2026
5 checks passed
@raymondjacobson
raymondjacobson deleted the claude/collab-pending-collaborators branch June 10, 2026 00:37
raymondjacobson added a commit to AudiusProject/apps that referenced this pull request Jun 16, 2026
The edit form seeded its collaborators field from the track's accepted-only
`collaborators`, so saving dropped any still-pending invites (the ETL reconciles
the metadata set). Initialize the field from accepted + pending instead.
- SDK Track/SearchTrack: add `pendingCollaborators` (hand-edit stopgap; the API
swagger now declares `pending_collaborators` in AudiusProject/api#947, so the
next regen reproduces this).
- Track model + adapter: expose `pending_collaborators` (owner-only).
- Web + mobile edit screens: seed the collaborators field with
`[...collaborators, ...pending_collaborators]` so pending invites survive a
save. Display still uses accepted-only `collaborators` (no regression).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@raymondjacobson
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

feat(api): embed pending collaborator invites on the owner's own tracks - #947

Merged
raymondjacobson merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/collab-pending-collaborators
Jun 10, 2026
Merged

feat(api): embed pending collaborator invites on the owner's own tracks#947
raymondjacobson merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/collab-pending-collaborators

Conversation

@raymondjacobson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Backend for the apps edit-form fix: an owner editing a track was dropping still-pending collaborator invites, because the edit form seeds its collaborators field from the track response — which only carried accepted collaborators. On save, the ETL reconciles the metadata set and removes any invite not present, so pending ones vanished.

Change

  • GetTrackCollaborators now returns accepted and pending rows (with status). The embed splits them:
    • collaborators — accepted, on every track response (unchanged behavior).
    • pending_collaboratorsnew, populated only on the requester's own tracks.
  • Owner-scoped: pending user IDs are resolved and embedded only where owner == my_id, so pending invites never surface to other viewers. (They're public on-chain regardless, but there's no reason to hand them to everyone.)
  • swagger: pending_collaborators declared on the track schemas.

Follow-up (apps)

The edit form will initialize from collaborators + pending_collaborators so saving preserves pending invites. Needs an SDK regen once this deploys (the field reproduces cleanly, same as collaborators).

Tests

TestPendingCollaboratorsVisibleToOwnerOnly: owner sees the pending invite; a non-owner sees only the accepted collaborator. Existing collaborator/embed/profile suites still pass.

Perf

Same bounded, index-served embed query as before (PK leads on track_id, ANY(@ids)); it now also returns pending rows, post-filtered by the same index. No new round-trips.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

The edit form initializes its collaborators field from the track response, which
only carried accepted collaborators — so re-saving a track dropped any
still-pending invites (the ETL reconciles the metadata set and removes rows not
present). Expose the owner's pending invites so the client can preserve them.
- GetTrackCollaborators now returns accepted + pending (with status); the embed
splits them: `collaborators` (accepted) on every response as before, plus a
new `pending_collaborators` populated only on the requester's own tracks.
- Owner-scoped: pending user IDs are resolved and embedded only for tracks where
owner == my_id, so pending invites never surface to other viewers.
- swagger: declare `pending_collaborators` on the track schemas.
Test: owner sees the pending invite, non-owner sees only accepted.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
raymondjacobson added a commit to AudiusProject/apps that referenced this pull request Jun 10, 2026
The edit form seeded its collaborators field from the track's accepted-only
`collaborators`, so saving dropped any still-pending invites (the ETL reconciles
the metadata set). Initialize the field from accepted + pending instead.
- SDK Track/SearchTrack: add `pendingCollaborators` (hand-edit stopgap; the API
swagger now declares `pending_collaborators` in AudiusProject/api#947, so the
next regen reproduces this).
- Track model + adapter: expose `pending_collaborators` (owner-only).
- Web + mobile edit screens: seed the collaborators field with
`[...collaborators, ...pending_collaborators]` so pending invites survive a
save. Display still uses accepted-only `collaborators` (no regression).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@raymondjacobson
raymondjacobson merged commit 1ad2042 into mainJun 10, 2026
5 checks passed
@raymondjacobson
raymondjacobson deleted the claude/collab-pending-collaborators branch June 10, 2026 00:37
raymondjacobson added a commit to AudiusProject/apps that referenced this pull request Jun 16, 2026
The edit form seeded its collaborators field from the track's accepted-only
`collaborators`, so saving dropped any still-pending invites (the ETL reconciles
the metadata set). Initialize the field from accepted + pending instead.
- SDK Track/SearchTrack: add `pendingCollaborators` (hand-edit stopgap; the API
swagger now declares `pending_collaborators` in AudiusProject/api#947, so the
next regen reproduces this).
- Track model + adapter: expose `pending_collaborators` (owner-only).
- Web + mobile edit screens: seed the collaborators field with
`[...collaborators, ...pending_collaborators]` so pending invites survive a
save. Display still uses accepted-only `collaborators` (no regression).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@raymondjacobson
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

feat(api): embed pending collaborator invites on the owner's own tracks - #947

Merged
raymondjacobson merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/collab-pending-collaborators
Jun 10, 2026
Merged

feat(api): embed pending collaborator invites on the owner's own tracks#947
raymondjacobson merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/collab-pending-collaborators

Conversation

@raymondjacobson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Backend for the apps edit-form fix: an owner editing a track was dropping still-pending collaborator invites, because the edit form seeds its collaborators field from the track response — which only carried accepted collaborators. On save, the ETL reconciles the metadata set and removes any invite not present, so pending ones vanished.

Change

  • GetTrackCollaborators now returns accepted and pending rows (with status). The embed splits them:
    • collaborators — accepted, on every track response (unchanged behavior).
    • pending_collaboratorsnew, populated only on the requester's own tracks.
  • Owner-scoped: pending user IDs are resolved and embedded only where owner == my_id, so pending invites never surface to other viewers. (They're public on-chain regardless, but there's no reason to hand them to everyone.)
  • swagger: pending_collaborators declared on the track schemas.

Follow-up (apps)

The edit form will initialize from collaborators + pending_collaborators so saving preserves pending invites. Needs an SDK regen once this deploys (the field reproduces cleanly, same as collaborators).

Tests

TestPendingCollaboratorsVisibleToOwnerOnly: owner sees the pending invite; a non-owner sees only the accepted collaborator. Existing collaborator/embed/profile suites still pass.

Perf

Same bounded, index-served embed query as before (PK leads on track_id, ANY(@ids)); it now also returns pending rows, post-filtered by the same index. No new round-trips.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

The edit form initializes its collaborators field from the track response, which
only carried accepted collaborators — so re-saving a track dropped any
still-pending invites (the ETL reconciles the metadata set and removes rows not
present). Expose the owner's pending invites so the client can preserve them.
- GetTrackCollaborators now returns accepted + pending (with status); the embed
splits them: `collaborators` (accepted) on every response as before, plus a
new `pending_collaborators` populated only on the requester's own tracks.
- Owner-scoped: pending user IDs are resolved and embedded only for tracks where
owner == my_id, so pending invites never surface to other viewers.
- swagger: declare `pending_collaborators` on the track schemas.
Test: owner sees the pending invite, non-owner sees only accepted.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
raymondjacobson added a commit to AudiusProject/apps that referenced this pull request Jun 10, 2026
The edit form seeded its collaborators field from the track's accepted-only
`collaborators`, so saving dropped any still-pending invites (the ETL reconciles
the metadata set). Initialize the field from accepted + pending instead.
- SDK Track/SearchTrack: add `pendingCollaborators` (hand-edit stopgap; the API
swagger now declares `pending_collaborators` in AudiusProject/api#947, so the
next regen reproduces this).
- Track model + adapter: expose `pending_collaborators` (owner-only).
- Web + mobile edit screens: seed the collaborators field with
`[...collaborators, ...pending_collaborators]` so pending invites survive a
save. Display still uses accepted-only `collaborators` (no regression).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@raymondjacobson
raymondjacobson merged commit 1ad2042 into mainJun 10, 2026
5 checks passed
@raymondjacobson
raymondjacobson deleted the claude/collab-pending-collaborators branch June 10, 2026 00:37
raymondjacobson added a commit to AudiusProject/apps that referenced this pull request Jun 16, 2026
The edit form seeded its collaborators field from the track's accepted-only
`collaborators`, so saving dropped any still-pending invites (the ETL reconciles
the metadata set). Initialize the field from accepted + pending instead.
- SDK Track/SearchTrack: add `pendingCollaborators` (hand-edit stopgap; the API
swagger now declares `pending_collaborators` in AudiusProject/api#947, so the
next regen reproduces this).
- Track model + adapter: expose `pending_collaborators` (owner-only).
- Web + mobile edit screens: seed the collaborators field with
`[...collaborators, ...pending_collaborators]` so pending invites survive a
save. Display still uses accepted-only `collaborators` (no regression).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@raymondjacobson
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

feat(api): embed pending collaborator invites on the owner's own tracks - #947

Merged
raymondjacobson merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/collab-pending-collaborators
Jun 10, 2026
Merged

feat(api): embed pending collaborator invites on the owner's own tracks#947
raymondjacobson merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/collab-pending-collaborators

Conversation

@raymondjacobson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Backend for the apps edit-form fix: an owner editing a track was dropping still-pending collaborator invites, because the edit form seeds its collaborators field from the track response — which only carried accepted collaborators. On save, the ETL reconciles the metadata set and removes any invite not present, so pending ones vanished.

Change

  • GetTrackCollaborators now returns accepted and pending rows (with status). The embed splits them:
    • collaborators — accepted, on every track response (unchanged behavior).
    • pending_collaboratorsnew, populated only on the requester's own tracks.
  • Owner-scoped: pending user IDs are resolved and embedded only where owner == my_id, so pending invites never surface to other viewers. (They're public on-chain regardless, but there's no reason to hand them to everyone.)
  • swagger: pending_collaborators declared on the track schemas.

Follow-up (apps)

The edit form will initialize from collaborators + pending_collaborators so saving preserves pending invites. Needs an SDK regen once this deploys (the field reproduces cleanly, same as collaborators).

Tests

TestPendingCollaboratorsVisibleToOwnerOnly: owner sees the pending invite; a non-owner sees only the accepted collaborator. Existing collaborator/embed/profile suites still pass.

Perf

Same bounded, index-served embed query as before (PK leads on track_id, ANY(@ids)); it now also returns pending rows, post-filtered by the same index. No new round-trips.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

The edit form initializes its collaborators field from the track response, which
only carried accepted collaborators — so re-saving a track dropped any
still-pending invites (the ETL reconciles the metadata set and removes rows not
present). Expose the owner's pending invites so the client can preserve them.
- GetTrackCollaborators now returns accepted + pending (with status); the embed
splits them: `collaborators` (accepted) on every response as before, plus a
new `pending_collaborators` populated only on the requester's own tracks.
- Owner-scoped: pending user IDs are resolved and embedded only for tracks where
owner == my_id, so pending invites never surface to other viewers.
- swagger: declare `pending_collaborators` on the track schemas.
Test: owner sees the pending invite, non-owner sees only accepted.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
raymondjacobson added a commit to AudiusProject/apps that referenced this pull request Jun 10, 2026
The edit form seeded its collaborators field from the track's accepted-only
`collaborators`, so saving dropped any still-pending invites (the ETL reconciles
the metadata set). Initialize the field from accepted + pending instead.
- SDK Track/SearchTrack: add `pendingCollaborators` (hand-edit stopgap; the API
swagger now declares `pending_collaborators` in AudiusProject/api#947, so the
next regen reproduces this).
- Track model + adapter: expose `pending_collaborators` (owner-only).
- Web + mobile edit screens: seed the collaborators field with
`[...collaborators, ...pending_collaborators]` so pending invites survive a
save. Display still uses accepted-only `collaborators` (no regression).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@raymondjacobson
raymondjacobson merged commit 1ad2042 into mainJun 10, 2026
5 checks passed
@raymondjacobson
raymondjacobson deleted the claude/collab-pending-collaborators branch June 10, 2026 00:37
raymondjacobson added a commit to AudiusProject/apps that referenced this pull request Jun 16, 2026
The edit form seeded its collaborators field from the track's accepted-only
`collaborators`, so saving dropped any still-pending invites (the ETL reconciles
the metadata set). Initialize the field from accepted + pending instead.
- SDK Track/SearchTrack: add `pendingCollaborators` (hand-edit stopgap; the API
swagger now declares `pending_collaborators` in AudiusProject/api#947, so the
next regen reproduces this).
- Track model + adapter: expose `pending_collaborators` (owner-only).
- Web + mobile edit screens: seed the collaborators field with
`[...collaborators, ...pending_collaborators]` so pending invites survive a
save. Display still uses accepted-only `collaborators` (no regression).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@raymondjacobson