Expose ValidationLevel so what-if can run under a least-privilege identity #954

Description

Summary

New-AzOpsDeployment never passes -ValidationLevel to the what-if cmdlets, so ARM always applies the default Provider. Provider runs preflight as a real deployment and checks write permission on every resource in the template. The practical result is that Invoke-AzOpsPush -WhatIf cannot run under a least-privilege identity — the Validate pipeline must use the same principal as Push.

ARM already supports the fix. ValidationLevel: ProviderNoRbac performs full template and provider validation but checks only read permission per resource. AzOps just has no way to ask for it.

Current behaviour

In src/internal/functions/New-AzOpsDeployment.ps1 the what-if call is:

$results=&$whatIfCommand@parameters-ErrorAction Continue-ErrorVariable resultsError

$parameters is built up through the function and never contains a ValidationLevel entry. There is no PSFConfig setting for it either — the only what-if related key is Core.WhatifExcludedChangeTypes.

Repro

  1. Give the Validate pipeline identity a role with */read, Microsoft.Resources/deployments/whatIf/action and Microsoft.Resources/deployments/validate/action, and no write on any resource type.
  2. Open a pull request that adds a resource — in our case Microsoft.AlertsManagement/actionRules and microsoft.insights/actionGroups.
  3. Validate fails:
Get-AzResourceGroupDeploymentWhatIfResult: InvalidTemplateDeployment - Long running operation
failed with status 'Failed'. Additional Info:'The template deployment failed with error:
'Authorization failed for template resource '<name>' of type
'Microsoft.AlertsManagement/actionRules'. The client '***' with object id '<redacted>' does not
have permission to perform action 'Microsoft.AlertsManagement/actionRules/write' at scope
'/subscriptions/<redacted>/resourceGroups/<redacted>/providers/Microsoft.AlertsManagement/actionRules/<name>'.'.'

Granting Microsoft.Resources/deployments/whatIf/action alone is not enough — that clears the first error, and then preflight fails on the per-resource write check.

Why this matters

The usual CI pattern is a low-privilege identity for PR preview and a separate writer for deploy, so that a pull request from anyone cannot run under a principal able to change production. With AzOps, Validate has to hold deploy rights, because what-if demands them.

AzOps-Accelerator ships a single credentials variable group shared by pull.yml, validate.yml and push.yml, so this is consistent with the reference design today — but it means the split isn't available to anyone who wants it.

Proposal

Expose the ARM parameter as a setting, defaulting to Provider so existing behaviour is unchanged:

"Core.WhatIfValidationLevel": "Provider"

and add it to the splat in New-AzOpsDeployment when a what-if is being performed, e.g.

$validationLevel=Get-PSFConfigValue-FullName 'AzOps.Core.WhatIfValidationLevel'if ($validationLevel) {
$parameters.ValidationLevel=$validationLevel
}

Operators who want a read-only preview identity could then set ProviderNoRbac and pair it with a custom role of */read plus the two preview actions. AzOps-Accelerator could subsequently offer a separate validate identity, which is not possible while the module cannot pass the parameter.

Workaround considered and rejected

Injecting the parameter from the pipeline:

$global:PSDefaultParameterValues['Get-AzResourceGroupDeploymentWhatIfResult:ValidationLevel'] ='ProviderNoRbac'

This is unsupported, relies on the global scope reaching into module scope, does not reach the ForEach-Object -Parallel runspaces used when AllowMultipleTemplateParameterFiles and ParallelDeployMultipleTemplateParameterFiles are enabled, and fails silently by reverting to Provider rather than reporting that the setting was ignored.

Versions

  • AzOps 2.8.5, and confirmed unchanged on main at time of writing
  • Azure DevOps pipelines from AzOps-Accelerator
  • ValidationLevel requires Az PowerShell 13.4.0+ / Azure CLI 2.76.0+

References

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
       blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
      }
      } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
      })();
      (function(){
      try {
      var __m = "github.com";
      var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
      
      Skip to content

      Expose ValidationLevel so what-if can run under a least-privilege identity #954

      Description

      Summary

      New-AzOpsDeployment never passes -ValidationLevel to the what-if cmdlets, so ARM always applies the default Provider. Provider runs preflight as a real deployment and checks write permission on every resource in the template. The practical result is that Invoke-AzOpsPush -WhatIf cannot run under a least-privilege identity — the Validate pipeline must use the same principal as Push.

      ARM already supports the fix. ValidationLevel: ProviderNoRbac performs full template and provider validation but checks only read permission per resource. AzOps just has no way to ask for it.

      Current behaviour

      In src/internal/functions/New-AzOpsDeployment.ps1 the what-if call is:

      $results=&$whatIfCommand@parameters-ErrorAction Continue-ErrorVariable resultsError

      $parameters is built up through the function and never contains a ValidationLevel entry. There is no PSFConfig setting for it either — the only what-if related key is Core.WhatifExcludedChangeTypes.

      Repro

      1. Give the Validate pipeline identity a role with */read, Microsoft.Resources/deployments/whatIf/action and Microsoft.Resources/deployments/validate/action, and no write on any resource type.
      2. Open a pull request that adds a resource — in our case Microsoft.AlertsManagement/actionRules and microsoft.insights/actionGroups.
      3. Validate fails:
      Get-AzResourceGroupDeploymentWhatIfResult: InvalidTemplateDeployment - Long running operation
      failed with status 'Failed'. Additional Info:'The template deployment failed with error:
      'Authorization failed for template resource '<name>' of type
      'Microsoft.AlertsManagement/actionRules'. The client '***' with object id '<redacted>' does not
      have permission to perform action 'Microsoft.AlertsManagement/actionRules/write' at scope
      '/subscriptions/<redacted>/resourceGroups/<redacted>/providers/Microsoft.AlertsManagement/actionRules/<name>'.'.'
      

      Granting Microsoft.Resources/deployments/whatIf/action alone is not enough — that clears the first error, and then preflight fails on the per-resource write check.

      Why this matters

      The usual CI pattern is a low-privilege identity for PR preview and a separate writer for deploy, so that a pull request from anyone cannot run under a principal able to change production. With AzOps, Validate has to hold deploy rights, because what-if demands them.

      AzOps-Accelerator ships a single credentials variable group shared by pull.yml, validate.yml and push.yml, so this is consistent with the reference design today — but it means the split isn't available to anyone who wants it.

      Proposal

      Expose the ARM parameter as a setting, defaulting to Provider so existing behaviour is unchanged:

      "Core.WhatIfValidationLevel": "Provider"
      

      and add it to the splat in New-AzOpsDeployment when a what-if is being performed, e.g.

      $validationLevel=Get-PSFConfigValue-FullName 'AzOps.Core.WhatIfValidationLevel'if ($validationLevel) {
      $parameters.ValidationLevel=$validationLevel
      }

      Operators who want a read-only preview identity could then set ProviderNoRbac and pair it with a custom role of */read plus the two preview actions. AzOps-Accelerator could subsequently offer a separate validate identity, which is not possible while the module cannot pass the parameter.

      Workaround considered and rejected

      Injecting the parameter from the pipeline:

      $global:PSDefaultParameterValues['Get-AzResourceGroupDeploymentWhatIfResult:ValidationLevel'] ='ProviderNoRbac'

      This is unsupported, relies on the global scope reaching into module scope, does not reach the ForEach-Object -Parallel runspaces used when AllowMultipleTemplateParameterFiles and ParallelDeployMultipleTemplateParameterFiles are enabled, and fails silently by reverting to Provider rather than reporting that the setting was ignored.

      Versions

      • AzOps 2.8.5, and confirmed unchanged on main at time of writing
      • Azure DevOps pipelines from AzOps-Accelerator
      • ValidationLevel requires Az PowerShell 13.4.0+ / Azure CLI 2.76.0+

      References

      Activity

      Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

      Metadata

      Metadata

      Assignees

      No one assigned

        Labels

        No labels
        No labels

        Type

        No type

        Projects

        No projects

          Milestone

          No milestone

          Relationships

          None yet

          Development

          No branches or pull requests

          Issue actions

          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
          Skip to content

          Expose ValidationLevel so what-if can run under a least-privilege identity #954

          Description

          Summary

          New-AzOpsDeployment never passes -ValidationLevel to the what-if cmdlets, so ARM always applies the default Provider. Provider runs preflight as a real deployment and checks write permission on every resource in the template. The practical result is that Invoke-AzOpsPush -WhatIf cannot run under a least-privilege identity — the Validate pipeline must use the same principal as Push.

          ARM already supports the fix. ValidationLevel: ProviderNoRbac performs full template and provider validation but checks only read permission per resource. AzOps just has no way to ask for it.

          Current behaviour

          In src/internal/functions/New-AzOpsDeployment.ps1 the what-if call is:

          $results=&$whatIfCommand@parameters-ErrorAction Continue-ErrorVariable resultsError

          $parameters is built up through the function and never contains a ValidationLevel entry. There is no PSFConfig setting for it either — the only what-if related key is Core.WhatifExcludedChangeTypes.

          Repro

          1. Give the Validate pipeline identity a role with */read, Microsoft.Resources/deployments/whatIf/action and Microsoft.Resources/deployments/validate/action, and no write on any resource type.
          2. Open a pull request that adds a resource — in our case Microsoft.AlertsManagement/actionRules and microsoft.insights/actionGroups.
          3. Validate fails:
          Get-AzResourceGroupDeploymentWhatIfResult: InvalidTemplateDeployment - Long running operation
          failed with status 'Failed'. Additional Info:'The template deployment failed with error:
          'Authorization failed for template resource '<name>' of type
          'Microsoft.AlertsManagement/actionRules'. The client '***' with object id '<redacted>' does not
          have permission to perform action 'Microsoft.AlertsManagement/actionRules/write' at scope
          '/subscriptions/<redacted>/resourceGroups/<redacted>/providers/Microsoft.AlertsManagement/actionRules/<name>'.'.'
          

          Granting Microsoft.Resources/deployments/whatIf/action alone is not enough — that clears the first error, and then preflight fails on the per-resource write check.

          Why this matters

          The usual CI pattern is a low-privilege identity for PR preview and a separate writer for deploy, so that a pull request from anyone cannot run under a principal able to change production. With AzOps, Validate has to hold deploy rights, because what-if demands them.

          AzOps-Accelerator ships a single credentials variable group shared by pull.yml, validate.yml and push.yml, so this is consistent with the reference design today — but it means the split isn't available to anyone who wants it.

          Proposal

          Expose the ARM parameter as a setting, defaulting to Provider so existing behaviour is unchanged:

          "Core.WhatIfValidationLevel": "Provider"
          

          and add it to the splat in New-AzOpsDeployment when a what-if is being performed, e.g.

          $validationLevel=Get-PSFConfigValue-FullName 'AzOps.Core.WhatIfValidationLevel'if ($validationLevel) {
          $parameters.ValidationLevel=$validationLevel
          }

          Operators who want a read-only preview identity could then set ProviderNoRbac and pair it with a custom role of */read plus the two preview actions. AzOps-Accelerator could subsequently offer a separate validate identity, which is not possible while the module cannot pass the parameter.

          Workaround considered and rejected

          Injecting the parameter from the pipeline:

          $global:PSDefaultParameterValues['Get-AzResourceGroupDeploymentWhatIfResult:ValidationLevel'] ='ProviderNoRbac'

          This is unsupported, relies on the global scope reaching into module scope, does not reach the ForEach-Object -Parallel runspaces used when AllowMultipleTemplateParameterFiles and ParallelDeployMultipleTemplateParameterFiles are enabled, and fails silently by reverting to Provider rather than reporting that the setting was ignored.

          Versions

          • AzOps 2.8.5, and confirmed unchanged on main at time of writing
          • Azure DevOps pipelines from AzOps-Accelerator
          • ValidationLevel requires Az PowerShell 13.4.0+ / Azure CLI 2.76.0+

          References

          Activity

          Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

          Metadata

          Metadata

          Assignees

          No one assigned

            Labels

            No labels
            No labels

            Type

            No type

            Projects

            No projects

              Milestone

              No milestone

              Relationships

              None yet

              Development

              No branches or pull requests

              Issue actions

              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
              Skip to content

              Expose ValidationLevel so what-if can run under a least-privilege identity #954

              Description

              Summary

              New-AzOpsDeployment never passes -ValidationLevel to the what-if cmdlets, so ARM always applies the default Provider. Provider runs preflight as a real deployment and checks write permission on every resource in the template. The practical result is that Invoke-AzOpsPush -WhatIf cannot run under a least-privilege identity — the Validate pipeline must use the same principal as Push.

              ARM already supports the fix. ValidationLevel: ProviderNoRbac performs full template and provider validation but checks only read permission per resource. AzOps just has no way to ask for it.

              Current behaviour

              In src/internal/functions/New-AzOpsDeployment.ps1 the what-if call is:

              $results=&$whatIfCommand@parameters-ErrorAction Continue-ErrorVariable resultsError

              $parameters is built up through the function and never contains a ValidationLevel entry. There is no PSFConfig setting for it either — the only what-if related key is Core.WhatifExcludedChangeTypes.

              Repro

              1. Give the Validate pipeline identity a role with */read, Microsoft.Resources/deployments/whatIf/action and Microsoft.Resources/deployments/validate/action, and no write on any resource type.
              2. Open a pull request that adds a resource — in our case Microsoft.AlertsManagement/actionRules and microsoft.insights/actionGroups.
              3. Validate fails:
              Get-AzResourceGroupDeploymentWhatIfResult: InvalidTemplateDeployment - Long running operation
              failed with status 'Failed'. Additional Info:'The template deployment failed with error:
              'Authorization failed for template resource '<name>' of type
              'Microsoft.AlertsManagement/actionRules'. The client '***' with object id '<redacted>' does not
              have permission to perform action 'Microsoft.AlertsManagement/actionRules/write' at scope
              '/subscriptions/<redacted>/resourceGroups/<redacted>/providers/Microsoft.AlertsManagement/actionRules/<name>'.'.'
              

              Granting Microsoft.Resources/deployments/whatIf/action alone is not enough — that clears the first error, and then preflight fails on the per-resource write check.

              Why this matters

              The usual CI pattern is a low-privilege identity for PR preview and a separate writer for deploy, so that a pull request from anyone cannot run under a principal able to change production. With AzOps, Validate has to hold deploy rights, because what-if demands them.

              AzOps-Accelerator ships a single credentials variable group shared by pull.yml, validate.yml and push.yml, so this is consistent with the reference design today — but it means the split isn't available to anyone who wants it.

              Proposal

              Expose the ARM parameter as a setting, defaulting to Provider so existing behaviour is unchanged:

              "Core.WhatIfValidationLevel": "Provider"
              

              and add it to the splat in New-AzOpsDeployment when a what-if is being performed, e.g.

              $validationLevel=Get-PSFConfigValue-FullName 'AzOps.Core.WhatIfValidationLevel'if ($validationLevel) {
              $parameters.ValidationLevel=$validationLevel
              }

              Operators who want a read-only preview identity could then set ProviderNoRbac and pair it with a custom role of */read plus the two preview actions. AzOps-Accelerator could subsequently offer a separate validate identity, which is not possible while the module cannot pass the parameter.

              Workaround considered and rejected

              Injecting the parameter from the pipeline:

              $global:PSDefaultParameterValues['Get-AzResourceGroupDeploymentWhatIfResult:ValidationLevel'] ='ProviderNoRbac'

              This is unsupported, relies on the global scope reaching into module scope, does not reach the ForEach-Object -Parallel runspaces used when AllowMultipleTemplateParameterFiles and ParallelDeployMultipleTemplateParameterFiles are enabled, and fails silently by reverting to Provider rather than reporting that the setting was ignored.

              Versions

              • AzOps 2.8.5, and confirmed unchanged on main at time of writing
              • Azure DevOps pipelines from AzOps-Accelerator
              • ValidationLevel requires Az PowerShell 13.4.0+ / Azure CLI 2.76.0+

              References

              Activity

              Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

              Metadata

              Metadata

              Assignees

              No one assigned

                Labels

                No labels
                No labels

                Type

                No type

                Projects

                No projects

                  Milestone

                  No milestone

                  Relationships

                  None yet

                  Development

                  No branches or pull requests

                  Issue actions

                  , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
                  Skip to content

                  Expose ValidationLevel so what-if can run under a least-privilege identity #954

                  Description

                  Summary

                  New-AzOpsDeployment never passes -ValidationLevel to the what-if cmdlets, so ARM always applies the default Provider. Provider runs preflight as a real deployment and checks write permission on every resource in the template. The practical result is that Invoke-AzOpsPush -WhatIf cannot run under a least-privilege identity — the Validate pipeline must use the same principal as Push.

                  ARM already supports the fix. ValidationLevel: ProviderNoRbac performs full template and provider validation but checks only read permission per resource. AzOps just has no way to ask for it.

                  Current behaviour

                  In src/internal/functions/New-AzOpsDeployment.ps1 the what-if call is:

                  $results=&$whatIfCommand@parameters-ErrorAction Continue-ErrorVariable resultsError

                  $parameters is built up through the function and never contains a ValidationLevel entry. There is no PSFConfig setting for it either — the only what-if related key is Core.WhatifExcludedChangeTypes.

                  Repro

                  1. Give the Validate pipeline identity a role with */read, Microsoft.Resources/deployments/whatIf/action and Microsoft.Resources/deployments/validate/action, and no write on any resource type.
                  2. Open a pull request that adds a resource — in our case Microsoft.AlertsManagement/actionRules and microsoft.insights/actionGroups.
                  3. Validate fails:
                  Get-AzResourceGroupDeploymentWhatIfResult: InvalidTemplateDeployment - Long running operation
                  failed with status 'Failed'. Additional Info:'The template deployment failed with error:
                  'Authorization failed for template resource '<name>' of type
                  'Microsoft.AlertsManagement/actionRules'. The client '***' with object id '<redacted>' does not
                  have permission to perform action 'Microsoft.AlertsManagement/actionRules/write' at scope
                  '/subscriptions/<redacted>/resourceGroups/<redacted>/providers/Microsoft.AlertsManagement/actionRules/<name>'.'.'
                  

                  Granting Microsoft.Resources/deployments/whatIf/action alone is not enough — that clears the first error, and then preflight fails on the per-resource write check.

                  Why this matters

                  The usual CI pattern is a low-privilege identity for PR preview and a separate writer for deploy, so that a pull request from anyone cannot run under a principal able to change production. With AzOps, Validate has to hold deploy rights, because what-if demands them.

                  AzOps-Accelerator ships a single credentials variable group shared by pull.yml, validate.yml and push.yml, so this is consistent with the reference design today — but it means the split isn't available to anyone who wants it.

                  Proposal

                  Expose the ARM parameter as a setting, defaulting to Provider so existing behaviour is unchanged:

                  "Core.WhatIfValidationLevel": "Provider"
                  

                  and add it to the splat in New-AzOpsDeployment when a what-if is being performed, e.g.

                  $validationLevel=Get-PSFConfigValue-FullName 'AzOps.Core.WhatIfValidationLevel'if ($validationLevel) {
                  $parameters.ValidationLevel=$validationLevel
                  }

                  Operators who want a read-only preview identity could then set ProviderNoRbac and pair it with a custom role of */read plus the two preview actions. AzOps-Accelerator could subsequently offer a separate validate identity, which is not possible while the module cannot pass the parameter.

                  Workaround considered and rejected

                  Injecting the parameter from the pipeline:

                  $global:PSDefaultParameterValues['Get-AzResourceGroupDeploymentWhatIfResult:ValidationLevel'] ='ProviderNoRbac'

                  This is unsupported, relies on the global scope reaching into module scope, does not reach the ForEach-Object -Parallel runspaces used when AllowMultipleTemplateParameterFiles and ParallelDeployMultipleTemplateParameterFiles are enabled, and fails silently by reverting to Provider rather than reporting that the setting was ignored.

                  Versions

                  • AzOps 2.8.5, and confirmed unchanged on main at time of writing
                  • Azure DevOps pipelines from AzOps-Accelerator
                  • ValidationLevel requires Az PowerShell 13.4.0+ / Azure CLI 2.76.0+

                  References

                  Activity

                  Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

                  Metadata

                  Metadata

                  Assignees

                  No one assigned

                    Labels

                    No labels
                    No labels

                    Type

                    No type

                    Projects

                    No projects

                      Milestone

                      No milestone

                      Relationships

                      None yet

                      Development

                      No branches or pull requests

                      Issue actions

                      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
                      Skip to content

                      Expose ValidationLevel so what-if can run under a least-privilege identity #954

                      Description

                      Summary

                      New-AzOpsDeployment never passes -ValidationLevel to the what-if cmdlets, so ARM always applies the default Provider. Provider runs preflight as a real deployment and checks write permission on every resource in the template. The practical result is that Invoke-AzOpsPush -WhatIf cannot run under a least-privilege identity — the Validate pipeline must use the same principal as Push.

                      ARM already supports the fix. ValidationLevel: ProviderNoRbac performs full template and provider validation but checks only read permission per resource. AzOps just has no way to ask for it.

                      Current behaviour

                      In src/internal/functions/New-AzOpsDeployment.ps1 the what-if call is:

                      $results=&$whatIfCommand@parameters-ErrorAction Continue-ErrorVariable resultsError

                      $parameters is built up through the function and never contains a ValidationLevel entry. There is no PSFConfig setting for it either — the only what-if related key is Core.WhatifExcludedChangeTypes.

                      Repro

                      1. Give the Validate pipeline identity a role with */read, Microsoft.Resources/deployments/whatIf/action and Microsoft.Resources/deployments/validate/action, and no write on any resource type.
                      2. Open a pull request that adds a resource — in our case Microsoft.AlertsManagement/actionRules and microsoft.insights/actionGroups.
                      3. Validate fails:
                      Get-AzResourceGroupDeploymentWhatIfResult: InvalidTemplateDeployment - Long running operation
                      failed with status 'Failed'. Additional Info:'The template deployment failed with error:
                      'Authorization failed for template resource '<name>' of type
                      'Microsoft.AlertsManagement/actionRules'. The client '***' with object id '<redacted>' does not
                      have permission to perform action 'Microsoft.AlertsManagement/actionRules/write' at scope
                      '/subscriptions/<redacted>/resourceGroups/<redacted>/providers/Microsoft.AlertsManagement/actionRules/<name>'.'.'
                      

                      Granting Microsoft.Resources/deployments/whatIf/action alone is not enough — that clears the first error, and then preflight fails on the per-resource write check.

                      Why this matters

                      The usual CI pattern is a low-privilege identity for PR preview and a separate writer for deploy, so that a pull request from anyone cannot run under a principal able to change production. With AzOps, Validate has to hold deploy rights, because what-if demands them.

                      AzOps-Accelerator ships a single credentials variable group shared by pull.yml, validate.yml and push.yml, so this is consistent with the reference design today — but it means the split isn't available to anyone who wants it.

                      Proposal

                      Expose the ARM parameter as a setting, defaulting to Provider so existing behaviour is unchanged:

                      "Core.WhatIfValidationLevel": "Provider"
                      

                      and add it to the splat in New-AzOpsDeployment when a what-if is being performed, e.g.

                      $validationLevel=Get-PSFConfigValue-FullName 'AzOps.Core.WhatIfValidationLevel'if ($validationLevel) {
                      $parameters.ValidationLevel=$validationLevel
                      }

                      Operators who want a read-only preview identity could then set ProviderNoRbac and pair it with a custom role of */read plus the two preview actions. AzOps-Accelerator could subsequently offer a separate validate identity, which is not possible while the module cannot pass the parameter.

                      Workaround considered and rejected

                      Injecting the parameter from the pipeline:

                      $global:PSDefaultParameterValues['Get-AzResourceGroupDeploymentWhatIfResult:ValidationLevel'] ='ProviderNoRbac'

                      This is unsupported, relies on the global scope reaching into module scope, does not reach the ForEach-Object -Parallel runspaces used when AllowMultipleTemplateParameterFiles and ParallelDeployMultipleTemplateParameterFiles are enabled, and fails silently by reverting to Provider rather than reporting that the setting was ignored.

                      Versions

                      • AzOps 2.8.5, and confirmed unchanged on main at time of writing
                      • Azure DevOps pipelines from AzOps-Accelerator
                      • ValidationLevel requires Az PowerShell 13.4.0+ / Azure CLI 2.76.0+

                      References

                      Activity

                      Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

                      Metadata

                      Metadata

                      Assignees

                      No one assigned

                        Labels

                        No labels
                        No labels

                        Type

                        No type

                        Projects

                        No projects

                          Milestone

                          No milestone

                          Relationships

                          None yet

                          Development

                          No branches or pull requests

                          Issue actions

                          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
                          Skip to content

                          Expose ValidationLevel so what-if can run under a least-privilege identity #954

                          Description

                          Summary

                          New-AzOpsDeployment never passes -ValidationLevel to the what-if cmdlets, so ARM always applies the default Provider. Provider runs preflight as a real deployment and checks write permission on every resource in the template. The practical result is that Invoke-AzOpsPush -WhatIf cannot run under a least-privilege identity — the Validate pipeline must use the same principal as Push.

                          ARM already supports the fix. ValidationLevel: ProviderNoRbac performs full template and provider validation but checks only read permission per resource. AzOps just has no way to ask for it.

                          Current behaviour

                          In src/internal/functions/New-AzOpsDeployment.ps1 the what-if call is:

                          $results=&$whatIfCommand@parameters-ErrorAction Continue-ErrorVariable resultsError

                          $parameters is built up through the function and never contains a ValidationLevel entry. There is no PSFConfig setting for it either — the only what-if related key is Core.WhatifExcludedChangeTypes.

                          Repro

                          1. Give the Validate pipeline identity a role with */read, Microsoft.Resources/deployments/whatIf/action and Microsoft.Resources/deployments/validate/action, and no write on any resource type.
                          2. Open a pull request that adds a resource — in our case Microsoft.AlertsManagement/actionRules and microsoft.insights/actionGroups.
                          3. Validate fails:
                          Get-AzResourceGroupDeploymentWhatIfResult: InvalidTemplateDeployment - Long running operation
                          failed with status 'Failed'. Additional Info:'The template deployment failed with error:
                          'Authorization failed for template resource '<name>' of type
                          'Microsoft.AlertsManagement/actionRules'. The client '***' with object id '<redacted>' does not
                          have permission to perform action 'Microsoft.AlertsManagement/actionRules/write' at scope
                          '/subscriptions/<redacted>/resourceGroups/<redacted>/providers/Microsoft.AlertsManagement/actionRules/<name>'.'.'
                          

                          Granting Microsoft.Resources/deployments/whatIf/action alone is not enough — that clears the first error, and then preflight fails on the per-resource write check.

                          Why this matters

                          The usual CI pattern is a low-privilege identity for PR preview and a separate writer for deploy, so that a pull request from anyone cannot run under a principal able to change production. With AzOps, Validate has to hold deploy rights, because what-if demands them.

                          AzOps-Accelerator ships a single credentials variable group shared by pull.yml, validate.yml and push.yml, so this is consistent with the reference design today — but it means the split isn't available to anyone who wants it.

                          Proposal

                          Expose the ARM parameter as a setting, defaulting to Provider so existing behaviour is unchanged:

                          "Core.WhatIfValidationLevel": "Provider"
                          

                          and add it to the splat in New-AzOpsDeployment when a what-if is being performed, e.g.

                          $validationLevel=Get-PSFConfigValue-FullName 'AzOps.Core.WhatIfValidationLevel'if ($validationLevel) {
                          $parameters.ValidationLevel=$validationLevel
                          }

                          Operators who want a read-only preview identity could then set ProviderNoRbac and pair it with a custom role of */read plus the two preview actions. AzOps-Accelerator could subsequently offer a separate validate identity, which is not possible while the module cannot pass the parameter.

                          Workaround considered and rejected

                          Injecting the parameter from the pipeline:

                          $global:PSDefaultParameterValues['Get-AzResourceGroupDeploymentWhatIfResult:ValidationLevel'] ='ProviderNoRbac'

                          This is unsupported, relies on the global scope reaching into module scope, does not reach the ForEach-Object -Parallel runspaces used when AllowMultipleTemplateParameterFiles and ParallelDeployMultipleTemplateParameterFiles are enabled, and fails silently by reverting to Provider rather than reporting that the setting was ignored.

                          Versions

                          • AzOps 2.8.5, and confirmed unchanged on main at time of writing
                          • Azure DevOps pipelines from AzOps-Accelerator
                          • ValidationLevel requires Az PowerShell 13.4.0+ / Azure CLI 2.76.0+

                          References

                          Activity

                          Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

                          Metadata

                          Metadata

                          Assignees

                          No one assigned

                            Labels

                            No labels
                            No labels

                            Type

                            No type

                            Projects

                            No projects

                              Milestone

                              No milestone

                              Relationships

                              None yet

                              Development

                              No branches or pull requests

                              Issue actions

                              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
                              Skip to content

                              Expose ValidationLevel so what-if can run under a least-privilege identity #954

                              Description

                              Summary

                              New-AzOpsDeployment never passes -ValidationLevel to the what-if cmdlets, so ARM always applies the default Provider. Provider runs preflight as a real deployment and checks write permission on every resource in the template. The practical result is that Invoke-AzOpsPush -WhatIf cannot run under a least-privilege identity — the Validate pipeline must use the same principal as Push.

                              ARM already supports the fix. ValidationLevel: ProviderNoRbac performs full template and provider validation but checks only read permission per resource. AzOps just has no way to ask for it.

                              Current behaviour

                              In src/internal/functions/New-AzOpsDeployment.ps1 the what-if call is:

                              $results=&$whatIfCommand@parameters-ErrorAction Continue-ErrorVariable resultsError

                              $parameters is built up through the function and never contains a ValidationLevel entry. There is no PSFConfig setting for it either — the only what-if related key is Core.WhatifExcludedChangeTypes.

                              Repro

                              1. Give the Validate pipeline identity a role with */read, Microsoft.Resources/deployments/whatIf/action and Microsoft.Resources/deployments/validate/action, and no write on any resource type.
                              2. Open a pull request that adds a resource — in our case Microsoft.AlertsManagement/actionRules and microsoft.insights/actionGroups.
                              3. Validate fails:
                              Get-AzResourceGroupDeploymentWhatIfResult: InvalidTemplateDeployment - Long running operation
                              failed with status 'Failed'. Additional Info:'The template deployment failed with error:
                              'Authorization failed for template resource '<name>' of type
                              'Microsoft.AlertsManagement/actionRules'. The client '***' with object id '<redacted>' does not
                              have permission to perform action 'Microsoft.AlertsManagement/actionRules/write' at scope
                              '/subscriptions/<redacted>/resourceGroups/<redacted>/providers/Microsoft.AlertsManagement/actionRules/<name>'.'.'
                              

                              Granting Microsoft.Resources/deployments/whatIf/action alone is not enough — that clears the first error, and then preflight fails on the per-resource write check.

                              Why this matters

                              The usual CI pattern is a low-privilege identity for PR preview and a separate writer for deploy, so that a pull request from anyone cannot run under a principal able to change production. With AzOps, Validate has to hold deploy rights, because what-if demands them.

                              AzOps-Accelerator ships a single credentials variable group shared by pull.yml, validate.yml and push.yml, so this is consistent with the reference design today — but it means the split isn't available to anyone who wants it.

                              Proposal

                              Expose the ARM parameter as a setting, defaulting to Provider so existing behaviour is unchanged:

                              "Core.WhatIfValidationLevel": "Provider"
                              

                              and add it to the splat in New-AzOpsDeployment when a what-if is being performed, e.g.

                              $validationLevel=Get-PSFConfigValue-FullName 'AzOps.Core.WhatIfValidationLevel'if ($validationLevel) {
                              $parameters.ValidationLevel=$validationLevel
                              }

                              Operators who want a read-only preview identity could then set ProviderNoRbac and pair it with a custom role of */read plus the two preview actions. AzOps-Accelerator could subsequently offer a separate validate identity, which is not possible while the module cannot pass the parameter.

                              Workaround considered and rejected

                              Injecting the parameter from the pipeline:

                              $global:PSDefaultParameterValues['Get-AzResourceGroupDeploymentWhatIfResult:ValidationLevel'] ='ProviderNoRbac'

                              This is unsupported, relies on the global scope reaching into module scope, does not reach the ForEach-Object -Parallel runspaces used when AllowMultipleTemplateParameterFiles and ParallelDeployMultipleTemplateParameterFiles are enabled, and fails silently by reverting to Provider rather than reporting that the setting was ignored.

                              Versions

                              • AzOps 2.8.5, and confirmed unchanged on main at time of writing
                              • Azure DevOps pipelines from AzOps-Accelerator
                              • ValidationLevel requires Az PowerShell 13.4.0+ / Azure CLI 2.76.0+

                              References

                              Activity

                              Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

                              Metadata

                              Metadata

                              Assignees

                              No one assigned

                                Labels

                                No labels
                                No labels

                                Type

                                No type

                                Projects

                                No projects

                                  Milestone

                                  No milestone

                                  Relationships

                                  None yet

                                  Development

                                  No branches or pull requests

                                  Issue actions