Skip to content

Rewrite of the AppGW module - #1026

Merged
Rainer Halanek (rahalan) merged 36 commits into
mainfrom
users/rahalan/UpdateAppGW
Feb 22, 2022
Merged

Rainer Halanek (rahalan) merged 36 commits into
mainfrom
users/rahalan/UpdateAppGW

Conversation

@rahalan

@rahalan Rainer Halanek (rahalan) commented Feb 21, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Change

New approach for the AppGW module. As it is very versatile, many properties are just arrays

Network: ApplicationGateways

Type of Change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • This change requires a documentation update (Wiki)

Checklist

  • I'm sure there are no other open Pull Requests for the same update/change
  • My corresponding pipelines / checks run clean and green without any errors or warnings
  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation (readme)
  • I did format my code

@eriqua Erika Gressi (eriqua) left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

General question to the group: should we start updating the version.json for breaking changes or not yet?

Comment thread arm/Microsoft.Network/applicationGateways/.parameters/parameters.json Outdated
…rs.json

Co-authored-by: Erika Gressi <56914614+eriqua@users.noreply.github.com>
Comment thread arm/Microsoft.Network/applicationGateways/.parameters/parameters.json Outdated
…rs.json

Co-authored-by: Erika Gressi <56914614+eriqua@users.noreply.github.com>
Comment thread arm/Microsoft.Network/applicationGateways/.parameters/parameters.json Outdated
Comment thread arm/Microsoft.Network/applicationGateways/deploy.bicep Outdated
Comment thread arm/Microsoft.Network/applicationGateways/.parameters/parameters.json Outdated
Comment thread arm/Microsoft.Network/applicationGateways/deploy.bicep Outdated
Comment thread arm/Microsoft.Network/applicationGateways/deploy.bicep Outdated

@eriqua Erika Gressi (eriqua) left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd suggest attaching the status badge to the PR

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Feb 22, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Unit Test Results

  1 files  ±    0  1 suites  ±0   22s ⏱️ -27s
  4 tests  -   10  4 ✔️  - 10    0 💤 ±  0  0 ±0 
36 runs   - 104  4 ✔️  - 10  32 💤  - 94  0 ±0 

Results for commit ebb02e0. ± Comparison against base commit 42ea3fb.

This pull request removes 14 and adds 4 tests. Note that renamed tests count towards both.
/home/runner/work/ResourceModules/ResourceModules/arm/.global/global.module.tests.ps1 ‑ API version tests [All apiVersions in the template should be 'recent'].In [Microsoft.KeyVault/vaults/accessPolicies] used resource type [vaults/accessPolicies] should use on of the recent API version(s). Currently using [2021-06-01-preview]
/home/runner/work/ResourceModules/ResourceModules/arm/.global/global.module.tests.ps1 ‑ API version tests [All apiVersions in the template should be 'recent'].In [Microsoft.KeyVault/vaults/keys] used resource type [roleassignments] should use on of the recent API version(s). Currently using [2021-04-01-preview]
/home/runner/work/ResourceModules/ResourceModules/arm/.global/global.module.tests.ps1 ‑ API version tests [All apiVersions in the template should be 'recent'].In [Microsoft.KeyVault/vaults/keys] used resource type [vaults/keys] should use on of the recent API version(s). Currently using [2019-09-01]
/home/runner/work/ResourceModules/ResourceModules/arm/.global/global.module.tests.ps1 ‑ API version tests [All apiVersions in the template should be 'recent'].In [Microsoft.KeyVault/vaults/secrets] used resource type [roleassignments] should use on of the recent API version(s). Currently using [2021-04-01-preview]
/home/runner/work/ResourceModules/ResourceModules/arm/.global/global.module.tests.ps1 ‑ API version tests [All apiVersions in the template should be 'recent'].In [Microsoft.KeyVault/vaults/secrets] used resource type [vaults/secrets] should use on of the recent API version(s). Currently using [2019-09-01]
/home/runner/work/ResourceModules/ResourceModules/arm/.global/global.module.tests.ps1 ‑ API version tests [All apiVersions in the template should be 'recent'].In [Microsoft.KeyVault/vaults] used resource type [diagnosticsettings] should use on of the recent API version(s). Currently using [2021-05-01-preview]
/home/runner/work/ResourceModules/ResourceModules/arm/.global/global.module.tests.ps1 ‑ API version tests [All apiVersions in the template should be 'recent'].In [Microsoft.KeyVault/vaults] used resource type [locks] should use on of the recent API version(s). Currently using [2017-04-01]
/home/runner/work/ResourceModules/ResourceModules/arm/.global/global.module.tests.ps1 ‑ API version tests [All apiVersions in the template should be 'recent'].In [Microsoft.KeyVault/vaults] used resource type [privateEndpoints/privateDnsZoneGroups] should use on of the recent API version(s). Currently using [2021-02-01]
/home/runner/work/ResourceModules/ResourceModules/arm/.global/global.module.tests.ps1 ‑ API version tests [All apiVersions in the template should be 'recent'].In [Microsoft.KeyVault/vaults] used resource type [privateEndpoints] should use on of the recent API version(s). Currently using [2021-05-01]
/home/runner/work/ResourceModules/ResourceModules/arm/.global/global.module.tests.ps1 ‑ API version tests [All apiVersions in the template should be 'recent'].In [Microsoft.KeyVault/vaults] used resource type [roleassignments] should use on of the recent API version(s). Currently using [2021-04-01-preview]
…
/home/runner/work/ResourceModules/ResourceModules/arm/.global/global.module.tests.ps1 ‑ API version tests [All apiVersions in the template should be 'recent'].In [Microsoft.Network/applicationGateways] used resource type [applicationGateways] should use on of the recent API version(s). Currently using [2021-05-01]
/home/runner/work/ResourceModules/ResourceModules/arm/.global/global.module.tests.ps1 ‑ API version tests [All apiVersions in the template should be 'recent'].In [Microsoft.Network/applicationGateways] used resource type [diagnosticsettings] should use on of the recent API version(s). Currently using [2021-05-01-preview]
/home/runner/work/ResourceModules/ResourceModules/arm/.global/global.module.tests.ps1 ‑ API version tests [All apiVersions in the template should be 'recent'].In [Microsoft.Network/applicationGateways] used resource type [locks] should use on of the recent API version(s). Currently using [2017-04-01]
/home/runner/work/ResourceModules/ResourceModules/arm/.global/global.module.tests.ps1 ‑ API version tests [All apiVersions in the template should be 'recent'].In [Microsoft.Network/applicationGateways] used resource type [roleassignments] should use on of the recent API version(s). Currently using [2021-04-01-preview]

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@rahalan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

General question to the group: should we start updating the version.json for breaking changes or not yet?

Updated to new version

@rahalan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I'd suggest attaching the status badge to the PR

Network: ApplicationGateways

@eriqua Erika Gressi (eriqua) left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🆗

@rahalan
Rainer Halanek (rahalan) deleted the users/rahalan/UpdateAppGW branch February 22, 2022 23:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

[cat] modules category: modules

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants