Revert: Warning Quality Check Build Task - #3172

Merged
Alex Holub (alexholub113) merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
alexholub/revert-warning-quality-check-build-task
Jan 2, 2025
Merged

Revert: Warning Quality Check Build Task#3172
Alex Holub (alexholub113) merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
alexholub/revert-warning-quality-check-build-task

Conversation

@alexholub113

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

since these changes cause errors in the pipeline it was decided to roll them back temporarily

@keegan-caruso

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Alex Holub (@alexholub113) Can you link to the pipeline that is now passing with this reverted?

@TimHannMSFT

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Alex Holub (@alexholub113) I suspect you'll have to edit the pipeline for now to target your branch and ensure this fixes as expected I've shared more details in our internal channel. Once there's a passing pipeline run there I'll approve.

In the fullness of time we should have that pipeline take a parameter for branch and then have IDWeb PRs run that pipeline as a merge gate

@alexholub113

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

To test this revert I created OneBranch PR.
The OneBranch-PullRequest pipeline was successfully passed.

@TimHannMSFTTim Hannifin (TimHannMSFT) left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks Alex Holub (@alexholub113) !

Please create a PBI and assign to @kellyyangsong to re-add this check once it no longer breaks the onebranch PR build

@alexholub113

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Task was created

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@alexholub113
Alex Holub (alexholub113) deleted the alexholub/revert-warning-quality-check-build-task branch January 2, 2025 22:48
This was referenced Aug 1, 2025
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@alexholub113@keegan-caruso@TimHannMSFT@FuPingFranco
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Revert: Warning Quality Check Build Task - #3172

Merged
Alex Holub (alexholub113) merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
alexholub/revert-warning-quality-check-build-task
Jan 2, 2025
Merged

Revert: Warning Quality Check Build Task#3172
Alex Holub (alexholub113) merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
alexholub/revert-warning-quality-check-build-task

Conversation

@alexholub113

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

since these changes cause errors in the pipeline it was decided to roll them back temporarily

@keegan-caruso

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Alex Holub (@alexholub113) Can you link to the pipeline that is now passing with this reverted?

@TimHannMSFT

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Alex Holub (@alexholub113) I suspect you'll have to edit the pipeline for now to target your branch and ensure this fixes as expected I've shared more details in our internal channel. Once there's a passing pipeline run there I'll approve.

In the fullness of time we should have that pipeline take a parameter for branch and then have IDWeb PRs run that pipeline as a merge gate

@alexholub113

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

To test this revert I created OneBranch PR.
The OneBranch-PullRequest pipeline was successfully passed.

@TimHannMSFTTim Hannifin (TimHannMSFT) left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks Alex Holub (@alexholub113) !

Please create a PBI and assign to @kellyyangsong to re-add this check once it no longer breaks the onebranch PR build

@alexholub113

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Task was created

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@alexholub113
Alex Holub (alexholub113) deleted the alexholub/revert-warning-quality-check-build-task branch January 2, 2025 22:48
This was referenced Aug 1, 2025
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@alexholub113@keegan-caruso@TimHannMSFT@FuPingFranco
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Revert: Warning Quality Check Build Task - #3172

Merged
Alex Holub (alexholub113) merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
alexholub/revert-warning-quality-check-build-task
Jan 2, 2025
Merged

Revert: Warning Quality Check Build Task#3172
Alex Holub (alexholub113) merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
alexholub/revert-warning-quality-check-build-task

Conversation

@alexholub113

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

since these changes cause errors in the pipeline it was decided to roll them back temporarily

@keegan-caruso

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Alex Holub (@alexholub113) Can you link to the pipeline that is now passing with this reverted?

@TimHannMSFT

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Alex Holub (@alexholub113) I suspect you'll have to edit the pipeline for now to target your branch and ensure this fixes as expected I've shared more details in our internal channel. Once there's a passing pipeline run there I'll approve.

In the fullness of time we should have that pipeline take a parameter for branch and then have IDWeb PRs run that pipeline as a merge gate

@alexholub113

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

To test this revert I created OneBranch PR.
The OneBranch-PullRequest pipeline was successfully passed.

@TimHannMSFTTim Hannifin (TimHannMSFT) left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks Alex Holub (@alexholub113) !

Please create a PBI and assign to @kellyyangsong to re-add this check once it no longer breaks the onebranch PR build

@alexholub113

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Task was created

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@alexholub113
Alex Holub (alexholub113) deleted the alexholub/revert-warning-quality-check-build-task branch January 2, 2025 22:48
This was referenced Aug 1, 2025
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@alexholub113@keegan-caruso@TimHannMSFT@FuPingFranco
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Revert: Warning Quality Check Build Task - #3172

Merged
Alex Holub (alexholub113) merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
alexholub/revert-warning-quality-check-build-task
Jan 2, 2025
Merged

Revert: Warning Quality Check Build Task#3172
Alex Holub (alexholub113) merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
alexholub/revert-warning-quality-check-build-task

Conversation

@alexholub113

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

since these changes cause errors in the pipeline it was decided to roll them back temporarily

@keegan-caruso

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Alex Holub (@alexholub113) Can you link to the pipeline that is now passing with this reverted?

@TimHannMSFT

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Alex Holub (@alexholub113) I suspect you'll have to edit the pipeline for now to target your branch and ensure this fixes as expected I've shared more details in our internal channel. Once there's a passing pipeline run there I'll approve.

In the fullness of time we should have that pipeline take a parameter for branch and then have IDWeb PRs run that pipeline as a merge gate

@alexholub113

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

To test this revert I created OneBranch PR.
The OneBranch-PullRequest pipeline was successfully passed.

@TimHannMSFTTim Hannifin (TimHannMSFT) left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks Alex Holub (@alexholub113) !

Please create a PBI and assign to @kellyyangsong to re-add this check once it no longer breaks the onebranch PR build

@alexholub113

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Task was created

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@alexholub113
Alex Holub (alexholub113) deleted the alexholub/revert-warning-quality-check-build-task branch January 2, 2025 22:48
This was referenced Aug 1, 2025
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@alexholub113@keegan-caruso@TimHannMSFT@FuPingFranco
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Revert: Warning Quality Check Build Task - #3172

Merged
Alex Holub (alexholub113) merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
alexholub/revert-warning-quality-check-build-task
Jan 2, 2025
Merged

Revert: Warning Quality Check Build Task#3172
Alex Holub (alexholub113) merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
alexholub/revert-warning-quality-check-build-task

Conversation

@alexholub113

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

since these changes cause errors in the pipeline it was decided to roll them back temporarily

@keegan-caruso

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Alex Holub (@alexholub113) Can you link to the pipeline that is now passing with this reverted?

@TimHannMSFT

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Alex Holub (@alexholub113) I suspect you'll have to edit the pipeline for now to target your branch and ensure this fixes as expected I've shared more details in our internal channel. Once there's a passing pipeline run there I'll approve.

In the fullness of time we should have that pipeline take a parameter for branch and then have IDWeb PRs run that pipeline as a merge gate

@alexholub113

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

To test this revert I created OneBranch PR.
The OneBranch-PullRequest pipeline was successfully passed.

@TimHannMSFTTim Hannifin (TimHannMSFT) left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks Alex Holub (@alexholub113) !

Please create a PBI and assign to @kellyyangsong to re-add this check once it no longer breaks the onebranch PR build

@alexholub113

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Task was created

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@alexholub113
Alex Holub (alexholub113) deleted the alexholub/revert-warning-quality-check-build-task branch January 2, 2025 22:48
This was referenced Aug 1, 2025
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@alexholub113@keegan-caruso@TimHannMSFT@FuPingFranco
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Revert: Warning Quality Check Build Task - #3172

Merged
Alex Holub (alexholub113) merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
alexholub/revert-warning-quality-check-build-task
Jan 2, 2025
Merged

Revert: Warning Quality Check Build Task#3172
Alex Holub (alexholub113) merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
alexholub/revert-warning-quality-check-build-task

Conversation

@alexholub113

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

since these changes cause errors in the pipeline it was decided to roll them back temporarily

@keegan-caruso

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Alex Holub (@alexholub113) Can you link to the pipeline that is now passing with this reverted?

@TimHannMSFT

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Alex Holub (@alexholub113) I suspect you'll have to edit the pipeline for now to target your branch and ensure this fixes as expected I've shared more details in our internal channel. Once there's a passing pipeline run there I'll approve.

In the fullness of time we should have that pipeline take a parameter for branch and then have IDWeb PRs run that pipeline as a merge gate

@alexholub113

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

To test this revert I created OneBranch PR.
The OneBranch-PullRequest pipeline was successfully passed.

@TimHannMSFTTim Hannifin (TimHannMSFT) left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks Alex Holub (@alexholub113) !

Please create a PBI and assign to @kellyyangsong to re-add this check once it no longer breaks the onebranch PR build

@alexholub113

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Task was created

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@alexholub113
Alex Holub (alexholub113) deleted the alexholub/revert-warning-quality-check-build-task branch January 2, 2025 22:48
This was referenced Aug 1, 2025
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@alexholub113@keegan-caruso@TimHannMSFT@FuPingFranco
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Revert: Warning Quality Check Build Task - #3172

Merged
Alex Holub (alexholub113) merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
alexholub/revert-warning-quality-check-build-task
Jan 2, 2025
Merged

Revert: Warning Quality Check Build Task#3172
Alex Holub (alexholub113) merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
alexholub/revert-warning-quality-check-build-task

Conversation

@alexholub113

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

since these changes cause errors in the pipeline it was decided to roll them back temporarily

@keegan-caruso

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Alex Holub (@alexholub113) Can you link to the pipeline that is now passing with this reverted?

@TimHannMSFT

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Alex Holub (@alexholub113) I suspect you'll have to edit the pipeline for now to target your branch and ensure this fixes as expected I've shared more details in our internal channel. Once there's a passing pipeline run there I'll approve.

In the fullness of time we should have that pipeline take a parameter for branch and then have IDWeb PRs run that pipeline as a merge gate

@alexholub113

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

To test this revert I created OneBranch PR.
The OneBranch-PullRequest pipeline was successfully passed.

@TimHannMSFTTim Hannifin (TimHannMSFT) left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks Alex Holub (@alexholub113) !

Please create a PBI and assign to @kellyyangsong to re-add this check once it no longer breaks the onebranch PR build

@alexholub113

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Task was created

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@alexholub113
Alex Holub (alexholub113) deleted the alexholub/revert-warning-quality-check-build-task branch January 2, 2025 22:48
This was referenced Aug 1, 2025
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@alexholub113@keegan-caruso@TimHannMSFT@FuPingFranco
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Revert: Warning Quality Check Build Task - #3172

Merged
Alex Holub (alexholub113) merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
alexholub/revert-warning-quality-check-build-task
Jan 2, 2025
Merged

Revert: Warning Quality Check Build Task#3172
Alex Holub (alexholub113) merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
alexholub/revert-warning-quality-check-build-task

Conversation

@alexholub113

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

since these changes cause errors in the pipeline it was decided to roll them back temporarily

@keegan-caruso

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Alex Holub (@alexholub113) Can you link to the pipeline that is now passing with this reverted?

@TimHannMSFT

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Alex Holub (@alexholub113) I suspect you'll have to edit the pipeline for now to target your branch and ensure this fixes as expected I've shared more details in our internal channel. Once there's a passing pipeline run there I'll approve.

In the fullness of time we should have that pipeline take a parameter for branch and then have IDWeb PRs run that pipeline as a merge gate

@alexholub113

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

To test this revert I created OneBranch PR.
The OneBranch-PullRequest pipeline was successfully passed.

@TimHannMSFTTim Hannifin (TimHannMSFT) left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks Alex Holub (@alexholub113) !

Please create a PBI and assign to @kellyyangsong to re-add this check once it no longer breaks the onebranch PR build

@alexholub113

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Task was created

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@alexholub113
Alex Holub (alexholub113) deleted the alexholub/revert-warning-quality-check-build-task branch January 2, 2025 22:48
This was referenced Aug 1, 2025
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@alexholub113@keegan-caruso@TimHannMSFT@FuPingFranco