Skip to content

docs(issues): close stale #066/#067 after main landings - #1208

Merged
cursor[bot] merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
cursor/ledger-066-067-519b
Jul 25, 2026
Merged

docs(issues): close stale #066/#067 after main landings#1208
cursor[bot] merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
cursor/ledger-066-067-519b

Conversation

@BigSimmo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

Docs-only ledger sync after work already on main:

RAG impact: no retrieval behaviour change — docs/outstanding-issues ledger only.

Verification

Risk and rollout

  • Risk: Low — ledger hygiene only
  • Rollback: Revert the docs commits
  • Provider or production effects: None
Open in WebOpen in Cursor

cursoragentand others added 2 commits July 25, 2026 14:38
#66 is on origin/main via PR #1174; #67 was fixed in PR #1191 by
running the preflight JSON contract in-process. Also drop already-
resolved#30/#75 from the recommended queue and renumber.
Co-authored-by: BigSimmo <BigSimmo@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: BigSimmo <BigSimmo@users.noreply.github.com>
@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.
To continue using code reviews, you can upgrade your account or add credits to your account and enable them for code reviews in your settings.

@supabase

supabaseBot commented Jul 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This pull request has been ignored for the connected project sjrfecxgysukkwxsowpy because there are no changes detected in supabase directory. You can change this behaviour in Project Integrations Settings ↗︎.


Preview Branches by Supabase.
Learn more about Supabase Branching ↗︎.

@coderabbitai

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Warning

Review limit reached

@BigSimmo, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in:53 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: a2e53dc7-7e91-4d96-ba85-df3a16eba98c

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0b4dccc and cf94bf8.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • docs/branch-review-ledger.md
  • docs/outstanding-issues.md
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch cursor/ledger-066-067-519b

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@cursor
cursorBot merged commit 1aa64e9 into mainJul 25, 2026
18 checks passed
@cursor
cursorBot deleted the cursor/ledger-066-067-519b branch July 25, 2026 14:41
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@BigSimmo@cursoragent