Skip to content

chore: safe branch cleanup — delete empty remotes, close #108, review audit batch - #1426

Merged
BigSimmo merged 6 commits into
mainfrom
cursor/safe-branch-cleanup-78a8
Jul 30, 2026
Merged

chore: safe branch cleanup — delete empty remotes, close #108, review audit batch#1426
BigSimmo merged 6 commits into
mainfrom
cursor/safe-branch-cleanup-78a8

Conversation

@BigSimmo

@BigSimmoBigSimmo commented Jul 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

  • Deleted five superseded remote branches after content proof:
  • Archived #108 in docs/outstanding-issues.md
  • Reviewed a bounded batch of 10 audit/remediation remotes: 2 rejected+deleted, 8 retained with unique content still differing from main; recorded branch-cleanup ledger rows for each

Verification

  • npm run check:outstanding-issues — passed (120 rows, 57 open / 63 archived)
  • npm run check:branch-review-ledger — passed (1306 records)
  • npm run format before push
  • node scripts/reconciliation-preflight.mjs — 1 worktree, 0 dirty
  • npm run sweep:branch-ledger -- --no-fetch — 5 deleted refs gone; 0 automatic deletion candidates among remaining
  • npm run branch:cleanup — no merged local branches
  • Verification not run: npm run verify:pr-local — docs-only ledger/issues change; domain checks above cover the touched surfaces
  • UI verification not run: no UI/routing/styling changes

Risk and rollout

  • Risk: Low — documentation/ledger only; remote ref deletions already applied on GitHub for five empty/obsolete branches
  • Rollback: Restore deleted refs from recorded SHAs in #108 / ledger rows if needed; revert this PR for doc/ledger text
  • Provider or production effects: None (GitHub ref deletes only; no app/runtime change)

Notes

  • This cloud checkout had no dirty worktrees to clean (#079 multi-worktree farm is operator-local)
  • Open PR heads preserved (cursor/ledger-merge-dedupe-ad64, cursor/ci-hygiene-gates-1bf5, and others)
  • Stopped after one batch of 10 per the cleanup guide; remaining remotes with unique content were not mass-deleted
Open in WebOpen in Cursor

cursoragentand others added 3 commits July 30, 2026 07:27
@cursoragent@BigSimmo
chore:close#108after deleting empty remotes; record audit-branch c…
c6239b4
…leanup batch
Delete five superseded remote refs (#108 trio plus circleci-project-setup and
execute-audit-code-remediation). Archive #108 and append branch-cleanup ledger
rows for a ten-branch audit/remediation review batch (two rejected, eight retained).
Co-authored-by: BigSimmo <BigSimmo@users.noreply.github.com>
@cursoragent@BigSimmo
style: format outstanding-issues after main merge
5c5bcd7
Co-authored-by: BigSimmo <BigSimmo@users.noreply.github.com>
@cursoragent@BigSimmo
fix: resolve outstanding-issues merge without conflict markers
adca2ab
Rebuild from origin/main (archives #113/#114, adds #125) and re-apply the
#108 archive so the duplicate-id and conflict-marker breakage from the prior
merge commit is gone.
Co-authored-by: BigSimmo <BigSimmo@users.noreply.github.com>
@coderabbitai

coderabbitaiBot commented Jul 30, 2026•
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Warning

Review limit reached

You’ve reached a temporary PR review limit under our Fair Usage Limits Policy.

Your recent review volume is higher than typical usage, so adaptive limits are currently applied.

Next review available in:5 minutes

Your organization has reached its usage spending cap. Adjust your spending cap in the billing tab.

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: d81c52e7-e26a-4b11-9d6f-7d554f498a45

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0173afa and 92a78af.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • docs/branch-review-ledger.md
  • docs/outstanding-issues.md

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@supabase

supabaseBot commented Jul 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This pull request has been ignored for the connected project sjrfecxgysukkwxsowpy because there are no changes detected in supabase directory. You can change this behaviour in Project Integrations Settings ↗︎.

Preview Branches by Supabase.
Learn more about Supabase Branching ↗︎.

@BigSimmo
BigSimmo marked this pull request as ready for review July 30, 2026 08:44
chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]
chatgpt-codex-connectorBot reviewed Jul 30, 2026
View reviewed changes

@chatgpt-codex-connectorchatgpt-codex-connectorBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit:adca2ab55b

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment threaddocs/branch-review-ledger.md Outdated
Comment threaddocs/branch-review-ledger.md Outdated
@BigSimmo
BigSimmo merged commit d402aa1 into mainJul 30, 2026
23 checks passed
@BigSimmo
BigSimmo deleted the cursor/safe-branch-cleanup-78a8 branch July 30, 2026 09:56
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@chatgpt-codex-connectorchatgpt-codex-connector[bot]chatgpt-codex-connector[bot] left review comments

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@BigSimmo@cursoragent