docs: close rejected Playwright cache proposal (archive #136) - #1467
Conversation
This pull request has been ignored for the connected project Preview Branches by Supabase. |
Warning Review limit reachedYou’ve reached a temporary PR review limit under our Fair Usage Limits Policy. Next review available in:32 minutes Your organization has reached its usage spending cap. Adjust your spending cap in the billing tab. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
Comment |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Third docs/outstanding-issues.md conflict, this time against #1462, #1467 and #1482. That file carries no merge driver by design (#133), so any overlapping edit conflicts; main is landing issue-ledger commits continuously. Resolved by the same prescribed recipe: rebuilt from origin/main and re-applied only this branch's own #86 "Hydration SHIPPED (#101)" edit. Verified identical row count (146) and identical id set to origin/main, so the archived rows from all three of those PRs are preserved and nothing was dropped. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GGEBHp4Seoh1jK1vGTNtYS
Motivation
Description
docs/outstanding-issues.mdto move Harden RAG telemetry and production guardrails #136 into the resolved/archive section and document the measured outcome and rationale for rejecting the cache (warm build saved ~34s for an ~804MB cache; persisting it per-commit would risk evicting Playwright browser caches).Testing
npm run check:outstanding-issues,npm run format,npm run format:check, andgit diff --check, all of which passed locally and the outstanding-issues self-check passed.Codex Task