docs(forensics): §3.7 production window — five 20260818 migrations found already applied by the Supabase GitHub integration; db push not run - #2123
Conversation
…und already applied by the Supabase GitHub integration; db push not run Owner-authorised production window for 20260818090000/110000/111000/112000/113000 against sjrfecxgysukkwxsowpy. Pre-flight `supabase migration list` showed the pending set was empty, so per the authorisation condition `supabase db push` was not run and no mark-applied path was used. Read-only verification: all five history rows carry executed statements (3/11/12/5/4), schema_drift_snapshot() v2 probe ok with the expected 20 history rows (nothing allowlisted), ten work_mem rows at the D1 values, and live-drift run 32131517648 shows zero function mismatches / 20 missing_live / 2 unexpected_live / 15 migration_history findings. Timing across the push-triggered live-drift runs (applied 34 s after #2106 merged) plus `supabase branches list` (production bound to git branch main) shows the Supabase GitHub integration applies merged migrations to production on merge — recorded as an owner decision for the coordinator, not absorbed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
This pull request has been ignored for the connected project Preview Branches by Supabase. |
Warning Review limit reachedYou’ve reached a temporary PR review limit under our Fair Usage Limits Policy. Next review available in:7 minutes Limit details: You’ve used all 1 included review currently available under your plan. You completed 101 included PR reviews in the past 7 days; at that activity level, included reviews refill at 1 review per hour. Your organization has reached its usage spending cap. Adjust your spending cap in the billing tab. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
Comment |
Summary
docs/audit/live-drift-forensics-2026-08.md. The owner authorised one productionsupabase db pushwindow for exactly20260818090000,110000,111000,112000,113000againstClinical KB Database(sjrfecxgysukkwxsowpy), conditional onsupabase migration listshowing exactly those five pending. The pending set was empty — all five were already applied with executed statements (3/11/12/5/4, the CLI's per-statement shape, not the mark-applied shape) — sodb pushwas not run, nomigration repair/mark-applied path was used, no vault secret was read, staging was not touched, and production received zero writes.schema_drift_snapshot()v2 live (snapshot_version 2, probeok, the expected 20migration_historyrows — nothing allowlisted); tenwork_memrows at the D1 values; live-drift run32131517648with zero functiondef_hashmismatches, 20missing_live, 2unexpected_live, 15migration_historyfindings.supabase branches listshows the production project bound to git branchmain, and the push-triggered live-drift runs bracket the application to within 34 s of feat(db): codify live SET work_mem on the ten match_* RPCs, the eight schema-only objects, and three chain-stale columns (#316) #2106's squash-merge — the Supabase GitHub integration applies merged migrations to production automatically. Owner decision needed on keeping/disabling it; Phase 4 must not rely oncreate index concurrentlyinside an auto-db push.docs/branch-review-records/9f07fe8e….record.md).Verification
npm run verify:pr-local— docs route:completed: check:runtime, check:installed-lock-parity, format:changed, sitemap:check, docs:check-index, docs:check-inventory, docs:check-scripts, docs:check-links, check:branch-review-ledger, check:outstanding-issues, check:ledger-write-discipline·failed: (none)·not reached: (none).supabase migration list --linked, four read-onlysupabase db query --linkedSELECTs,supabase branches list, and GitHub reads of three live-drift run logs. No provider writes.Risk and rollout
db pushwas deliberately not executed because the pending set differed from the authorisation.Clinical Governance Preflight
Clinical KB Database(sjrfecxgysukkwxsowpy)Notes
#316was deliberately not updated (mid-reconcile in another chat); evidence lives in the forensics file only, per the authorisation.live-drift.ymldispatch was made: run32131517648on the post-feat(db): Phase 3 staging proof + forward-codify three hybrid RPC bodies the chain never received (#316) #2111 head already carries the exact expected summary and a re-run would repeat it.🤖 Generated with Claude Code