Record the PR #2137 prlanded verification in the ledger

[BigSimmo]

Summary

• One immutable review record (docs/branch-review-records/f9c5621….record.md) capturing the prlanded post-merge verification of PR Give the Guide Centre footer search the shared edge-to-edge phone dock #2137, written by npm run ledger:append against the squash SHA 7b2aee6aeaee99c8ab56112af1f3d5dda34d3cb8.
• It had no home: PR Give the Guide Centre footer search the shared edge-to-edge phone dock #2137 was already merged, and a merged PR cannot track follow-up work, so the branch was restarted from latest main rather than reusing merged history. (GitHub had already auto-deleted the old head branch after the squash, so this is a fresh branch, not a rewrite.)
• Ledger-only PRs are normally discouraged by AGENTS.md "PR bundling", and this one exists only because the record documents a merge that has already happened and cannot ride its owning PR. It is append-only, one file, and independently revertible.

What the record pins:

• The squash content diff (git diff --stat 7b2aee6 ea132c1) was empty, so the auto-merge race orphaned nothing. Worth recording: three pushes went to that branch, two while auto-merge was armed, which is exactly the race the prlanded check exists for.
• CI run 32181431013 was the first of eight to survive without being cancelled by a main-sync, and it went green across Production UI (1)/(2)/(3), Production UI critical, Unit coverage, Lighthouse budget and the PR required aggregate.
• The browser contract added in tests/guide-centre-chrome.spec.ts executed for the first time in that run and passed, so the Guide dock's glass and its addon pill are now proven by rendered effect rather than by class presence.

Verification

Documentation/ledger scope only — one generated, append-only record file. Per the repository's verification principle, the smallest gate that can detect a plausible regression here is the ledger contract pair plus formatting; there is no executable surface in this diff.

• npm run check:branch-review-ledger

branch-review-ledger self-test passed.
Branch review ledger guard passed: 880 live table records + 1206 archived + 396 immutable
(880 under the 2026-07-29 machine-readable contract), immutable review writes, six cells each,
no conflict markers, mojibake, heading records, or duplicates.

• npm run check:ledger-write-discipline

ledger write discipline self-test passed.
Ledger write discipline passed for 9b1e7248450c..HEAD.

• npm run format — clean; prettier --check on the record file reports All matched files use Prettier code style!
• npm run verify:pr-local — not run. It selects lint, typecheck, the full unit suite and a production build, none of which can be affected by adding one Markdown record. Running it would be the "stacking gates that catch no distinct plausible regression" the process-hardening tiers rule out.
• npm run verify:ui / verify:release — not run; no UI, routing, styling or release-confidence change in this diff.

Risk and rollout

• Risk: None to product behaviour. The diff adds a single append-only Markdown record under docs/branch-review-records/; no source, schema, config, or generated runtime data is touched.
• Rollback: revert the single commit.
• Provider or production effects: None.

Notes

• classifyPullRequestFiles returns clinicalRisk: false, operationalRisk: false, ragRanking: false for this path, so no RAG impact: line and no Clinical Governance Preflight are required.
• The legacy docs/branch-review-ledger.md table is untouched — this is an immutable record file, which is the contract check:ledger-write-discipline enforces.

---

Generated by Claude Code

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.
To continue using code reviews, add credits to your account and enable them for code reviews in your settings.

[supabase]

This pull request has been ignored for the connected project sjrfecxgysukkwxsowpy because there are no changes detected in supabase directory. You can change this behaviour in Project Integrations Settings ↗︎.

---

Preview Branches by Supabase.
Learn more about Supabase Branching ↗︎.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Review limit reached

You’ve reached a temporary PR review limit under our Fair Usage Limits Policy.

Your current included review allowance is based on your included PR review attempts over the past 7 days.

Next review available in:41 minutes

Limit details: You’ve used the included review currently available. Your 102 included PR review attempts over the past 7 days set your current allowance at 1 review per hour.

Your organization has reached its usage spending cap. Adjust your spending cap in the billing tab.

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits within each organization.

For paid Pro and Pro+ reviews, CodeRabbit uses a developer's included PR review attempts over the past 7 days to set the current hourly allowance. At typical activity levels, the full plan allowance applies. Higher sustained activity can lower the allowance until earlier attempts leave the 7-day window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 68970927-d1dc-4428-a980-5cbf6201cab0

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 622f1fb and 2916daa.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• docs/branch-review-records/f9c56210f7787f6efa1ea378c67a893c9d06a38b91f0dd7c9050fd751028846e.record.md

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}