Claude/rag d6 reconcile b4

[BigSimmo]

Summary

Verification

• npm run verify:pr-local

During development, use npm run verify:cheap as the faster iteration gate before the final PR-local preflight.

• npm run verify:ui when UI, routing, styling, browser behavior, reduced-motion, or forced-colors behavior changed
• npm run verify:release before release or handoff confidence claims

For retrieval, ranking, selection, chunking, source/citation rendering, or answer-contract changes, verify:pr-local runs eval:rag:offline automatically. Run the offline command directly during iteration before spending a live eval.

• npm run eval:retrieval:quality (must stay 36/36) when retrieval, ranking, selection, chunking, or scoring behavior changed — CI cannot run it (needs live keys), so run it locally and paste the summary. A metadata/governance-weighting change once buried correct docs (recall 1.0→0.76) and only this eval caught it.
• npm run eval:rag -- --limit 15 + npm run eval:quality -- --rag-only when answer generation, the synthesis prompt, or answer post-processing changed (grounded-supported must not drop; citation-failure 0)
• npm run check:production-readiness when clinical workflow, privacy, environment, Supabase, source governance, or deployment behavior changed
• npm run check:deployment-readiness when deployment startup, hosting, or rollout behavior changed

Risk and rollout

Complete this section for clinical, data, API, auth/privacy, workflow, dependency, build, or deployment changes.

• Risk:
• Rollback:
• Provider or production effects: None / describe the explicitly authorized effect
• RAG impact: Required if touching RAG ranking surfaces (src/lib/rag/, retrieval RPCs, golden fixtures, ranking tests; see docs/rag-behaviour/safeguards.md). Must use one of:
  • RAG impact: no retrieval behaviour change — <reason>
  • RAG impact: behaviour change — canary pair <baseline run> -> <post run>
  • (Use RAG impact: none or omit for non-RAG PRs)

Clinical Governance Preflight

Complete this section when the change touches ingestion, answer generation, search/ranking, source rendering, document access, privacy, production env, or clinical output.

• Source-backed claims still require linked source verification before clinical use
• No patient-identifiable document workflow was introduced or expanded without explicit governance approval
• Supabase target remains Clinical KB Database (sjrfecxgysukkwxsowpy)
• Service-role keys and private document access remain server-only
• Demo/synthetic content remains clearly separated from real clinical sources
• Source metadata, review status, and outdated/unknown-source behavior remain conservative
• Deployment classification/TGA SaMD impact was checked when clinical decision-support behavior changed

Notes

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.
To continue using code reviews, add credits to your account and enable them for code reviews in your settings.

[supabase]

This pull request has been ignored for the connected project sjrfecxgysukkwxsowpy because there are no changes detected in supabase directory. You can change this behaviour in Project Integrations Settings ↗︎.

---

Preview Branches by Supabase.
Learn more about Supabase Branching ↗︎.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Review limit reached

You’ve reached a temporary PR review limit under our Fair Usage Limits Policy.

Your current included review allowance is based on your included PR review attempts over the past 7 days.

Next review available in:16 minutes

Limit details: You’ve used the included review currently available. Your 101 included PR review attempts over the past 7 days set your current allowance at 1 review per hour.

Your organization has reached its usage spending cap. Adjust your spending cap in the billing tab.

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits within each organization.

For paid Pro and Pro+ reviews, CodeRabbit uses a developer's included PR review attempts over the past 7 days to set the current hourly allowance. At typical activity levels, the full plan allowance applies. Higher sustained activity can lower the allowance until earlier attempts leave the 7-day window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 28b8eb84-5de9-4b72-9253-7a9a3010f974

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5437c30 and 3afb295.

📒 Files selected for processing (6)

• docs/branch-review-records/69f8dc5e98bd8461fc83a8937ab127c3010024c0d01e04ab940b47f74b230fa6.record.md
• docs/outstanding-issues-inbox/a20fc4ce-0608-4939-97c1-f2fb7f8a1285.json
• docs/outstanding-issues-inbox/applied/11e6ac01-c68c-4b5a-ba69-c1380aaabff6.json
• docs/outstanding-issues-inbox/applied/dc18b947-7869-4756-9470-d70469749bbd.json
• docs/outstanding-issues.md
• docs/rag-improvement/HANDOVER.md

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}