test(ward-flow): pin demo countdown clock

[BigSimmo]

Summary

• stabilize the Ward Flow demo countdown browser test by pinning its browser clock before navigation
• record the post-merge review of PR Ward Flow Phase 5 documents, and three sidebar fixes the squash left behind #2384 and refresh the required repository-awareness snapshot
• leave the coupled 64rem Ward sidebar breakpoint unchanged because tokenizing only this selector would let it diverge from the sidebar selectors it must match

Verification

• npm run test:e2e:mockups -- tests/ui-ward-roles.spec.ts --grep "the demo clock control advances" (1 passed; isolated production build and TypeScript passed)
• npm run check:branch-review-ledger
• npm run check:repo-awareness-snapshot
• npm run format

npm run verify:pr-local was not run: this is a three-line test stabilization with its generated review metadata, and the exact affected browser owner passed through the repository wrapper.

UI verification not run: the full npm run verify:ui would duplicate the exact Ward Flow browser owner already run; product UI/runtime behavior is unchanged.

Risk and rollout

• Risk: Low; test-only clock control plus generated review metadata. Product runtime behavior is unchanged.
• Rollback: Revert this commit.
• Provider or production effects: None.
• RAG impact: none

Clinical Governance Preflight

• Source-backed claims still require linked source verification before clinical use
• No patient-identifiable document workflow was introduced or expanded without explicit governance approval
• Supabase target remains Clinical KB Database (sjrfecxgysukkwxsowpy)
• Service-role keys and private document access remain server-only
• Demo/synthetic content remains clearly separated from real clinical sources
• Source metadata, review status, and outdated/unknown-source behavior remain conservative
• Deployment classification/TGA SaMD impact was checked when clinical decision-support behavior changed

This PR changes only test time control and review metadata; clinical decision-support behavior is unchanged.

Notes

• Follow-up to the nonblocking Advisory UI failure on merged PR Ward Flow Phase 5 documents, and three sidebar fixes the squash left behind #2384.
• Original PR head 37313af8b59c1a673fc1157c8a0ac738e92ffdb2 has the same tree as squash merge 351c1502c36d90931d27c40206ea3e7ff892497a.

[supabase]

This pull request has been ignored for the connected project sjrfecxgysukkwxsowpy because there are no changes detected in supabase directory. You can change this behaviour in Project Integrations Settings ↗︎.

---

Preview Branches by Supabase.
Learn more about Supabase Branching ↗︎.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 7a2ba3a3-ef69-42e1-aafc-097ed6473bff

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e15b250 and 1941b7f.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)

• docs/branch-review-records/05dba5d5d54fbe6733f15470a3d69957522452e434e543af81b8189c5d4a04db.record.md is excluded by !docs/**, !**/*.md

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• data/repo-awareness-snapshot.json
• tests/ui-ward-roles.spec.ts

Included review availability: 0 reviews are currently available. Your included PR review attempts over the past 7 days set your current allowance at 1 review per hour.

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The repository snapshot now includes updated revision metadata, a new PR #2384 review record, and incremented totals. The ward-role expiry test now uses a fixed browser time before checking bed-hold countdown behavior.

Changes

Repository snapshot metadata

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Update snapshot revision and review record data/repo-awareness-snapshot.json	The snapshot records the new revision, PR #2384 review data, and updated record and reference totals.

Ward expiry test timing

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Pin expiry test time tests/ui-ward-roles.spec.ts	The held-bed expiry test sets a fixed browser timestamp before navigation and assertions.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes

Merge Risk:⚪ Minimal · up to 1941b

This PR only stabilizes a browser test and updates review metadata; product runtime behavior is unchanged, and no actionable merge-blocking risk remains beyond normal checks.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 1…
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly identifies the main change: pinning the demo countdown clock in the Ward Flow test.
Description check	✅ Passed	The description follows the repository template. It documents the changes, verification results, skipped checks with reasons, risk, rollback, production effects, RAG impact, governance status, and not…

Full details: Docstring Coverage

Explanation

No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 1 files. (1 skipped: 1 unsupported.)

Full details: Description check

Explanation

The description follows the repository template. It documents the changes, verification results, skipped checks with reasons, risk, rollback, production effects, RAG impact, governance status, and notes.

✨ Finishing Touches

📝 Generate docstrings

• Create stacked PR
• Commit on current branch

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch codex/pr-2384-followup

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[cursor]

Approved. Cursor Bugbot completed successfully with no findings requiring human review, and no approval policy required additional review. Reviewers were not assigned.

_{Sent by Cursor Approval Agent: Pull Request Router and Approver}