Skip to content

How to distinguish between sender spots and receiver spots? stlearn distance =200 #315

Description

@smk5g5

Hi,

I have some doubts about distinguishing sender spots from receiver spots?
I was also wondering how does one decide on a good distance (experimentally sensible) for visium data. I have used a distance of 200 (based on the distance argument in stlearn cci ). I was wondering if this is appropriate?

Also I have doubts about deciding which spots are receiver spots or sender spots.

I used the following code (in which I have 3 versions for deciding sender spots and receiver spots).

In the following code I have 3 versions (version 1 and 3 are similar) ,in those 2 versions I take the spot which is significant for a particular Ligand receptor pair and filter the neighbourhood spots (if it expresses receptor to some degree e.g. >1 or >2 etc) and further filter the Ligand based on expression of Ligand in the significant spot (i.e. if the ligand expression is not > 1 count I don't consider it). Although I have seen significant spots which don't show expression of that particular Ligand or receptor (and I was wondering why is that so)?

In the second version I just use the significant spots (assuming that the significant spots are the only ones which have spatially significant ligand and receptor expression (further filtering based on ligand and receptor expression in that spot being > 1 count).

So I was wondering what do you guys think about it? If this is the correct approach? If not what else would you recommend?

Thank you!

sigspots_senders_to_receiverspot_list <- function(sigspots_file, neighbourhood_spots_file, seurat_obj) {
# Load the neighbourhood spots data
neighbourhood_spots_df <- read.table(neighbourhood_spots_file, sep = " ", header = TRUE)
# Create list to store sender spots and their neighborhoods
sender_spot_neighborhood_list <- list()
for (i in 1:nrow(neighbourhood_spots_df)) {
sender_spot <- neighbourhood_spots_df$X[i]
sender_spot_neighborhood_list[[sender_spot]] <- str_split(neighbourhood_spots_df$neighbour_bcs[i], ',')[[1]]
}
# Load significant spots data
sigspots_df <- read.csv(sigspots_file, sep = ",", header = TRUE)
sigspots_df_list <- split(sigspots_df, sigspots_df$LR_interaction)
# Initialize list to store results
LR_sender_receiver_spot_list <- list()
# Iterate over each ligand-receptor interaction
for (LR in names(sigspots_df_list)) {
myligand <- str_split(LR, '_')[[1]][1]
myrec <- str_split(LR, '_')[[1]][2]
# Identify barcodes with expression for ligand and receptor
# For version 1 receptor_barcodes <- names(which(seurat_obj@assays$Spatial@counts[myrec, ] > 0)) #to further filter neighborhood barcodes to only include higher expression barcodes for receptors
#version 3 recepter expression > 2 and ligand expression > 2
receptor_barcodes <- names(which(seurat_obj@assays$Spatial@counts[myrec, ] > 2)) #to further filter neighborhood barcodes to only include higher expression barcodes for receptors
ligand_barcodes <- names(which(seurat_obj@assays$Spatial@counts[myligand, ] > 2))
# Filter significant sender spots based on ligand expression
mysig_sender_spots <- intersect(sigspots_df_list[[LR]]$Significant_barcodes, ligand_barcodes)
# Version 3 is only use spots for a particular LR if they are in Significant_barcodes consider those which are # Find receiver barcodes in the neighborhood of sender spots where receptor is expressed
#version 3 recepter expression > 2 and ligand expression > 2
# Version 2 is only use spots for a particular LR if they are in Significant_barcodes consider those which are # Find receiver barcodes in the neighborhood of sender spots where receptor is expressed
#Version 1 and version 3
receptor_barcodes_in_neighbourhood <- lapply(sender_spot_neighborhood_list[mysig_sender_spots], function(x) {
intersect(receptor_barcodes, x)
})
# Remove empty elements
# Version 2 use receptors spots only if they are in mysig_sender_spots
# receptor_barcodes_in_neighbourhood <- lapply(sender_spot_neighborhood_list[mysig_sender_spots], function(x) {
# abc = intersect(receptor_barcodes, x)
# return(intersect(abc,mysig_sender_spots))
# })
receptor_barcodes_in_neighbourhood <- Filter(function(x) length(x) > 0, receptor_barcodes_in_neighbourhood)
# Skip if no valid sender spots or all neighborhoods are empty
if (length(mysig_sender_spots) == 0 || length(receptor_barcodes_in_neighbourhood) == 0) {
next
}
# Create data frames for each sender-receiver pair
Sender_spot_receiver_spot_df_list <- lapply(names(receptor_barcodes_in_neighbourhood), function(x) { mydf <- data.frame(receiver_spot = receptor_barcodes_in_neighbourhood[[x]])
mydf$sender_spot <- x
mydf$LR <- LR
return(mydf[c('sender_spot', 'receiver_spot', 'LR')])
})
# Combine data frames into one for each LR interaction
Sender_spot_receiver_spot_df <- do.call(rbind, Sender_spot_receiver_spot_df_list)
LR_sender_receiver_spot_list[[LR]] <- Sender_spot_receiver_spot_df
}
# Combine all LR interaction data frames into a single data frame
LR_sender_receiver_spot_df <- do.call(rbind, LR_sender_receiver_spot_list)
# Add sample metadata to LR_sender_receiver_spot_df
mysample_seurat_meta <- seurat_obj@meta.data[c('integrated_snn_res.0.9')]
mysample_seurat_meta$barcode <- rownames(mysample_seurat_meta)
mysample_seurat_meta$integrated_snn_res.0.9 = droplevels(mysample_seurat_meta$integrated_snn_res.0.9)
LR_sender_receiver_spot_df$Sample <- unique(seurat_obj$Sample)
LR_sender_receiver_spot_df$Patient <- unique(seurat_obj$Patient)
# Join metadata and rename columns correctly
LR_sender_receiver_spot_df2 <- LR_sender_receiver_spot_df %>%
left_join(mysample_seurat_meta, by = c("sender_spot" = "barcode")) %>%
rename(sender_cluster = integrated_snn_res.0.9)
LR_sender_receiver_spot_df3 <- LR_sender_receiver_spot_df2 %>%
left_join(mysample_seurat_meta, by = c("receiver_spot" = "barcode")) %>%
rename(receiver_cluster = integrated_snn_res.0.9)
# Return the final data frame
return(LR_sender_receiver_spot_df3)
}

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
       blocks
      (function() {
      function addCopyButtons() {
      document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
      if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
      codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
      var btn = document.createElement('button');
      btn.textContent = 'Copy';
      btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
      btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
      btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
      btn.onclick = function() {
      navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
      btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
      setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
      });
      };
      codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
      codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
      });
      }
      addCopyButtons();
      // Re-run on dynamic content
      var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
      observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
      })();
      }
      } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
      })();
      (function(){
      try {
      var __m = "github.com";
      var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
      How to distinguish between sender spots and receiver spots? stlearn distance =200 · Issue #315 · BiomedicalMachineLearning/stLearn · GitHub
      Skip to content

      How to distinguish between sender spots and receiver spots? stlearn distance =200 #315

      Description

      @smk5g5

      Hi,

      I have some doubts about distinguishing sender spots from receiver spots?
      I was also wondering how does one decide on a good distance (experimentally sensible) for visium data. I have used a distance of 200 (based on the distance argument in stlearn cci ). I was wondering if this is appropriate?

      Also I have doubts about deciding which spots are receiver spots or sender spots.

      I used the following code (in which I have 3 versions for deciding sender spots and receiver spots).

      In the following code I have 3 versions (version 1 and 3 are similar) ,in those 2 versions I take the spot which is significant for a particular Ligand receptor pair and filter the neighbourhood spots (if it expresses receptor to some degree e.g. >1 or >2 etc) and further filter the Ligand based on expression of Ligand in the significant spot (i.e. if the ligand expression is not > 1 count I don't consider it). Although I have seen significant spots which don't show expression of that particular Ligand or receptor (and I was wondering why is that so)?

      In the second version I just use the significant spots (assuming that the significant spots are the only ones which have spatially significant ligand and receptor expression (further filtering based on ligand and receptor expression in that spot being > 1 count).

      So I was wondering what do you guys think about it? If this is the correct approach? If not what else would you recommend?

      Thank you!

      sigspots_senders_to_receiverspot_list <- function(sigspots_file, neighbourhood_spots_file, seurat_obj) {
      # Load the neighbourhood spots data
      neighbourhood_spots_df <- read.table(neighbourhood_spots_file, sep = " ", header = TRUE)
      # Create list to store sender spots and their neighborhoods
      sender_spot_neighborhood_list <- list()
      for (i in 1:nrow(neighbourhood_spots_df)) {
      sender_spot <- neighbourhood_spots_df$X[i]
      sender_spot_neighborhood_list[[sender_spot]] <- str_split(neighbourhood_spots_df$neighbour_bcs[i], ',')[[1]]
      }
      # Load significant spots data
      sigspots_df <- read.csv(sigspots_file, sep = ",", header = TRUE)
      sigspots_df_list <- split(sigspots_df, sigspots_df$LR_interaction)
      # Initialize list to store results
      LR_sender_receiver_spot_list <- list()
      # Iterate over each ligand-receptor interaction
      for (LR in names(sigspots_df_list)) {
      myligand <- str_split(LR, '_')[[1]][1]
      myrec <- str_split(LR, '_')[[1]][2]
      # Identify barcodes with expression for ligand and receptor
      # For version 1 receptor_barcodes <- names(which(seurat_obj@assays$Spatial@counts[myrec, ] > 0)) #to further filter neighborhood barcodes to only include higher expression barcodes for receptors
      #version 3 recepter expression > 2 and ligand expression > 2
      receptor_barcodes <- names(which(seurat_obj@assays$Spatial@counts[myrec, ] > 2)) #to further filter neighborhood barcodes to only include higher expression barcodes for receptors
      ligand_barcodes <- names(which(seurat_obj@assays$Spatial@counts[myligand, ] > 2))
      # Filter significant sender spots based on ligand expression
      mysig_sender_spots <- intersect(sigspots_df_list[[LR]]$Significant_barcodes, ligand_barcodes)
      # Version 3 is only use spots for a particular LR if they are in Significant_barcodes consider those which are # Find receiver barcodes in the neighborhood of sender spots where receptor is expressed
      #version 3 recepter expression > 2 and ligand expression > 2
      # Version 2 is only use spots for a particular LR if they are in Significant_barcodes consider those which are # Find receiver barcodes in the neighborhood of sender spots where receptor is expressed
      #Version 1 and version 3
      receptor_barcodes_in_neighbourhood <- lapply(sender_spot_neighborhood_list[mysig_sender_spots], function(x) {
      intersect(receptor_barcodes, x)
      })
      # Remove empty elements
      # Version 2 use receptors spots only if they are in mysig_sender_spots
      # receptor_barcodes_in_neighbourhood <- lapply(sender_spot_neighborhood_list[mysig_sender_spots], function(x) {
      # abc = intersect(receptor_barcodes, x)
      # return(intersect(abc,mysig_sender_spots))
      # })
      receptor_barcodes_in_neighbourhood <- Filter(function(x) length(x) > 0, receptor_barcodes_in_neighbourhood)
      # Skip if no valid sender spots or all neighborhoods are empty
      if (length(mysig_sender_spots) == 0 || length(receptor_barcodes_in_neighbourhood) == 0) {
      next
      }
      # Create data frames for each sender-receiver pair
      Sender_spot_receiver_spot_df_list <- lapply(names(receptor_barcodes_in_neighbourhood), function(x) { mydf <- data.frame(receiver_spot = receptor_barcodes_in_neighbourhood[[x]])
      mydf$sender_spot <- x
      mydf$LR <- LR
      return(mydf[c('sender_spot', 'receiver_spot', 'LR')])
      })
      # Combine data frames into one for each LR interaction
      Sender_spot_receiver_spot_df <- do.call(rbind, Sender_spot_receiver_spot_df_list)
      LR_sender_receiver_spot_list[[LR]] <- Sender_spot_receiver_spot_df
      }
      # Combine all LR interaction data frames into a single data frame
      LR_sender_receiver_spot_df <- do.call(rbind, LR_sender_receiver_spot_list)
      # Add sample metadata to LR_sender_receiver_spot_df
      mysample_seurat_meta <- seurat_obj@meta.data[c('integrated_snn_res.0.9')]
      mysample_seurat_meta$barcode <- rownames(mysample_seurat_meta)
      mysample_seurat_meta$integrated_snn_res.0.9 = droplevels(mysample_seurat_meta$integrated_snn_res.0.9)
      LR_sender_receiver_spot_df$Sample <- unique(seurat_obj$Sample)
      LR_sender_receiver_spot_df$Patient <- unique(seurat_obj$Patient)
      # Join metadata and rename columns correctly
      LR_sender_receiver_spot_df2 <- LR_sender_receiver_spot_df %>%
      left_join(mysample_seurat_meta, by = c("sender_spot" = "barcode")) %>%
      rename(sender_cluster = integrated_snn_res.0.9)
      LR_sender_receiver_spot_df3 <- LR_sender_receiver_spot_df2 %>%
      left_join(mysample_seurat_meta, by = c("receiver_spot" = "barcode")) %>%
      rename(receiver_cluster = integrated_snn_res.0.9)
      # Return the final data frame
      return(LR_sender_receiver_spot_df3)
      }
      

      Metadata

      Metadata

      Assignees

      No one assigned

        Labels

        No labels
        No labels

        Projects

        No projects

          Milestone

          No milestone

          Relationships

          None yet

          Development

          No branches or pull requests

          Issue actions

          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' How to distinguish between sender spots and receiver spots? stlearn distance =200 · Issue #315 · BiomedicalMachineLearning/stLearn · GitHub
          Skip to content

          How to distinguish between sender spots and receiver spots? stlearn distance =200 #315

          Description

          @smk5g5

          Hi,

          I have some doubts about distinguishing sender spots from receiver spots?
          I was also wondering how does one decide on a good distance (experimentally sensible) for visium data. I have used a distance of 200 (based on the distance argument in stlearn cci ). I was wondering if this is appropriate?

          Also I have doubts about deciding which spots are receiver spots or sender spots.

          I used the following code (in which I have 3 versions for deciding sender spots and receiver spots).

          In the following code I have 3 versions (version 1 and 3 are similar) ,in those 2 versions I take the spot which is significant for a particular Ligand receptor pair and filter the neighbourhood spots (if it expresses receptor to some degree e.g. >1 or >2 etc) and further filter the Ligand based on expression of Ligand in the significant spot (i.e. if the ligand expression is not > 1 count I don't consider it). Although I have seen significant spots which don't show expression of that particular Ligand or receptor (and I was wondering why is that so)?

          In the second version I just use the significant spots (assuming that the significant spots are the only ones which have spatially significant ligand and receptor expression (further filtering based on ligand and receptor expression in that spot being > 1 count).

          So I was wondering what do you guys think about it? If this is the correct approach? If not what else would you recommend?

          Thank you!

          sigspots_senders_to_receiverspot_list <- function(sigspots_file, neighbourhood_spots_file, seurat_obj) {
          # Load the neighbourhood spots data
          neighbourhood_spots_df <- read.table(neighbourhood_spots_file, sep = " ", header = TRUE)
          # Create list to store sender spots and their neighborhoods
          sender_spot_neighborhood_list <- list()
          for (i in 1:nrow(neighbourhood_spots_df)) {
          sender_spot <- neighbourhood_spots_df$X[i]
          sender_spot_neighborhood_list[[sender_spot]] <- str_split(neighbourhood_spots_df$neighbour_bcs[i], ',')[[1]]
          }
          # Load significant spots data
          sigspots_df <- read.csv(sigspots_file, sep = ",", header = TRUE)
          sigspots_df_list <- split(sigspots_df, sigspots_df$LR_interaction)
          # Initialize list to store results
          LR_sender_receiver_spot_list <- list()
          # Iterate over each ligand-receptor interaction
          for (LR in names(sigspots_df_list)) {
          myligand <- str_split(LR, '_')[[1]][1]
          myrec <- str_split(LR, '_')[[1]][2]
          # Identify barcodes with expression for ligand and receptor
          # For version 1 receptor_barcodes <- names(which(seurat_obj@assays$Spatial@counts[myrec, ] > 0)) #to further filter neighborhood barcodes to only include higher expression barcodes for receptors
          #version 3 recepter expression > 2 and ligand expression > 2
          receptor_barcodes <- names(which(seurat_obj@assays$Spatial@counts[myrec, ] > 2)) #to further filter neighborhood barcodes to only include higher expression barcodes for receptors
          ligand_barcodes <- names(which(seurat_obj@assays$Spatial@counts[myligand, ] > 2))
          # Filter significant sender spots based on ligand expression
          mysig_sender_spots <- intersect(sigspots_df_list[[LR]]$Significant_barcodes, ligand_barcodes)
          # Version 3 is only use spots for a particular LR if they are in Significant_barcodes consider those which are # Find receiver barcodes in the neighborhood of sender spots where receptor is expressed
          #version 3 recepter expression > 2 and ligand expression > 2
          # Version 2 is only use spots for a particular LR if they are in Significant_barcodes consider those which are # Find receiver barcodes in the neighborhood of sender spots where receptor is expressed
          #Version 1 and version 3
          receptor_barcodes_in_neighbourhood <- lapply(sender_spot_neighborhood_list[mysig_sender_spots], function(x) {
          intersect(receptor_barcodes, x)
          })
          # Remove empty elements
          # Version 2 use receptors spots only if they are in mysig_sender_spots
          # receptor_barcodes_in_neighbourhood <- lapply(sender_spot_neighborhood_list[mysig_sender_spots], function(x) {
          # abc = intersect(receptor_barcodes, x)
          # return(intersect(abc,mysig_sender_spots))
          # })
          receptor_barcodes_in_neighbourhood <- Filter(function(x) length(x) > 0, receptor_barcodes_in_neighbourhood)
          # Skip if no valid sender spots or all neighborhoods are empty
          if (length(mysig_sender_spots) == 0 || length(receptor_barcodes_in_neighbourhood) == 0) {
          next
          }
          # Create data frames for each sender-receiver pair
          Sender_spot_receiver_spot_df_list <- lapply(names(receptor_barcodes_in_neighbourhood), function(x) { mydf <- data.frame(receiver_spot = receptor_barcodes_in_neighbourhood[[x]])
          mydf$sender_spot <- x
          mydf$LR <- LR
          return(mydf[c('sender_spot', 'receiver_spot', 'LR')])
          })
          # Combine data frames into one for each LR interaction
          Sender_spot_receiver_spot_df <- do.call(rbind, Sender_spot_receiver_spot_df_list)
          LR_sender_receiver_spot_list[[LR]] <- Sender_spot_receiver_spot_df
          }
          # Combine all LR interaction data frames into a single data frame
          LR_sender_receiver_spot_df <- do.call(rbind, LR_sender_receiver_spot_list)
          # Add sample metadata to LR_sender_receiver_spot_df
          mysample_seurat_meta <- seurat_obj@meta.data[c('integrated_snn_res.0.9')]
          mysample_seurat_meta$barcode <- rownames(mysample_seurat_meta)
          mysample_seurat_meta$integrated_snn_res.0.9 = droplevels(mysample_seurat_meta$integrated_snn_res.0.9)
          LR_sender_receiver_spot_df$Sample <- unique(seurat_obj$Sample)
          LR_sender_receiver_spot_df$Patient <- unique(seurat_obj$Patient)
          # Join metadata and rename columns correctly
          LR_sender_receiver_spot_df2 <- LR_sender_receiver_spot_df %>%
          left_join(mysample_seurat_meta, by = c("sender_spot" = "barcode")) %>%
          rename(sender_cluster = integrated_snn_res.0.9)
          LR_sender_receiver_spot_df3 <- LR_sender_receiver_spot_df2 %>%
          left_join(mysample_seurat_meta, by = c("receiver_spot" = "barcode")) %>%
          rename(receiver_cluster = integrated_snn_res.0.9)
          # Return the final data frame
          return(LR_sender_receiver_spot_df3)
          }
          

          Metadata

          Metadata

          Assignees

          No one assigned

            Labels

            No labels
            No labels

            Projects

            No projects

              Milestone

              No milestone

              Relationships

              None yet

              Development

              No branches or pull requests

              Issue actions

              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' How to distinguish between sender spots and receiver spots? stlearn distance =200 · Issue #315 · BiomedicalMachineLearning/stLearn · GitHub
              Skip to content

              How to distinguish between sender spots and receiver spots? stlearn distance =200 #315

              Description

              @smk5g5

              Hi,

              I have some doubts about distinguishing sender spots from receiver spots?
              I was also wondering how does one decide on a good distance (experimentally sensible) for visium data. I have used a distance of 200 (based on the distance argument in stlearn cci ). I was wondering if this is appropriate?

              Also I have doubts about deciding which spots are receiver spots or sender spots.

              I used the following code (in which I have 3 versions for deciding sender spots and receiver spots).

              In the following code I have 3 versions (version 1 and 3 are similar) ,in those 2 versions I take the spot which is significant for a particular Ligand receptor pair and filter the neighbourhood spots (if it expresses receptor to some degree e.g. >1 or >2 etc) and further filter the Ligand based on expression of Ligand in the significant spot (i.e. if the ligand expression is not > 1 count I don't consider it). Although I have seen significant spots which don't show expression of that particular Ligand or receptor (and I was wondering why is that so)?

              In the second version I just use the significant spots (assuming that the significant spots are the only ones which have spatially significant ligand and receptor expression (further filtering based on ligand and receptor expression in that spot being > 1 count).

              So I was wondering what do you guys think about it? If this is the correct approach? If not what else would you recommend?

              Thank you!

              sigspots_senders_to_receiverspot_list <- function(sigspots_file, neighbourhood_spots_file, seurat_obj) {
              # Load the neighbourhood spots data
              neighbourhood_spots_df <- read.table(neighbourhood_spots_file, sep = " ", header = TRUE)
              # Create list to store sender spots and their neighborhoods
              sender_spot_neighborhood_list <- list()
              for (i in 1:nrow(neighbourhood_spots_df)) {
              sender_spot <- neighbourhood_spots_df$X[i]
              sender_spot_neighborhood_list[[sender_spot]] <- str_split(neighbourhood_spots_df$neighbour_bcs[i], ',')[[1]]
              }
              # Load significant spots data
              sigspots_df <- read.csv(sigspots_file, sep = ",", header = TRUE)
              sigspots_df_list <- split(sigspots_df, sigspots_df$LR_interaction)
              # Initialize list to store results
              LR_sender_receiver_spot_list <- list()
              # Iterate over each ligand-receptor interaction
              for (LR in names(sigspots_df_list)) {
              myligand <- str_split(LR, '_')[[1]][1]
              myrec <- str_split(LR, '_')[[1]][2]
              # Identify barcodes with expression for ligand and receptor
              # For version 1 receptor_barcodes <- names(which(seurat_obj@assays$Spatial@counts[myrec, ] > 0)) #to further filter neighborhood barcodes to only include higher expression barcodes for receptors
              #version 3 recepter expression > 2 and ligand expression > 2
              receptor_barcodes <- names(which(seurat_obj@assays$Spatial@counts[myrec, ] > 2)) #to further filter neighborhood barcodes to only include higher expression barcodes for receptors
              ligand_barcodes <- names(which(seurat_obj@assays$Spatial@counts[myligand, ] > 2))
              # Filter significant sender spots based on ligand expression
              mysig_sender_spots <- intersect(sigspots_df_list[[LR]]$Significant_barcodes, ligand_barcodes)
              # Version 3 is only use spots for a particular LR if they are in Significant_barcodes consider those which are # Find receiver barcodes in the neighborhood of sender spots where receptor is expressed
              #version 3 recepter expression > 2 and ligand expression > 2
              # Version 2 is only use spots for a particular LR if they are in Significant_barcodes consider those which are # Find receiver barcodes in the neighborhood of sender spots where receptor is expressed
              #Version 1 and version 3
              receptor_barcodes_in_neighbourhood <- lapply(sender_spot_neighborhood_list[mysig_sender_spots], function(x) {
              intersect(receptor_barcodes, x)
              })
              # Remove empty elements
              # Version 2 use receptors spots only if they are in mysig_sender_spots
              # receptor_barcodes_in_neighbourhood <- lapply(sender_spot_neighborhood_list[mysig_sender_spots], function(x) {
              # abc = intersect(receptor_barcodes, x)
              # return(intersect(abc,mysig_sender_spots))
              # })
              receptor_barcodes_in_neighbourhood <- Filter(function(x) length(x) > 0, receptor_barcodes_in_neighbourhood)
              # Skip if no valid sender spots or all neighborhoods are empty
              if (length(mysig_sender_spots) == 0 || length(receptor_barcodes_in_neighbourhood) == 0) {
              next
              }
              # Create data frames for each sender-receiver pair
              Sender_spot_receiver_spot_df_list <- lapply(names(receptor_barcodes_in_neighbourhood), function(x) { mydf <- data.frame(receiver_spot = receptor_barcodes_in_neighbourhood[[x]])
              mydf$sender_spot <- x
              mydf$LR <- LR
              return(mydf[c('sender_spot', 'receiver_spot', 'LR')])
              })
              # Combine data frames into one for each LR interaction
              Sender_spot_receiver_spot_df <- do.call(rbind, Sender_spot_receiver_spot_df_list)
              LR_sender_receiver_spot_list[[LR]] <- Sender_spot_receiver_spot_df
              }
              # Combine all LR interaction data frames into a single data frame
              LR_sender_receiver_spot_df <- do.call(rbind, LR_sender_receiver_spot_list)
              # Add sample metadata to LR_sender_receiver_spot_df
              mysample_seurat_meta <- seurat_obj@meta.data[c('integrated_snn_res.0.9')]
              mysample_seurat_meta$barcode <- rownames(mysample_seurat_meta)
              mysample_seurat_meta$integrated_snn_res.0.9 = droplevels(mysample_seurat_meta$integrated_snn_res.0.9)
              LR_sender_receiver_spot_df$Sample <- unique(seurat_obj$Sample)
              LR_sender_receiver_spot_df$Patient <- unique(seurat_obj$Patient)
              # Join metadata and rename columns correctly
              LR_sender_receiver_spot_df2 <- LR_sender_receiver_spot_df %>%
              left_join(mysample_seurat_meta, by = c("sender_spot" = "barcode")) %>%
              rename(sender_cluster = integrated_snn_res.0.9)
              LR_sender_receiver_spot_df3 <- LR_sender_receiver_spot_df2 %>%
              left_join(mysample_seurat_meta, by = c("receiver_spot" = "barcode")) %>%
              rename(receiver_cluster = integrated_snn_res.0.9)
              # Return the final data frame
              return(LR_sender_receiver_spot_df3)
              }
              

              Metadata

              Metadata

              Assignees

              No one assigned

                Labels

                No labels
                No labels

                Projects

                No projects

                  Milestone

                  No milestone

                  Relationships

                  None yet

                  Development

                  No branches or pull requests

                  Issue actions

                  , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' How to distinguish between sender spots and receiver spots? stlearn distance =200 · Issue #315 · BiomedicalMachineLearning/stLearn · GitHub
                  Skip to content

                  How to distinguish between sender spots and receiver spots? stlearn distance =200 #315

                  Description

                  @smk5g5

                  Hi,

                  I have some doubts about distinguishing sender spots from receiver spots?
                  I was also wondering how does one decide on a good distance (experimentally sensible) for visium data. I have used a distance of 200 (based on the distance argument in stlearn cci ). I was wondering if this is appropriate?

                  Also I have doubts about deciding which spots are receiver spots or sender spots.

                  I used the following code (in which I have 3 versions for deciding sender spots and receiver spots).

                  In the following code I have 3 versions (version 1 and 3 are similar) ,in those 2 versions I take the spot which is significant for a particular Ligand receptor pair and filter the neighbourhood spots (if it expresses receptor to some degree e.g. >1 or >2 etc) and further filter the Ligand based on expression of Ligand in the significant spot (i.e. if the ligand expression is not > 1 count I don't consider it). Although I have seen significant spots which don't show expression of that particular Ligand or receptor (and I was wondering why is that so)?

                  In the second version I just use the significant spots (assuming that the significant spots are the only ones which have spatially significant ligand and receptor expression (further filtering based on ligand and receptor expression in that spot being > 1 count).

                  So I was wondering what do you guys think about it? If this is the correct approach? If not what else would you recommend?

                  Thank you!

                  sigspots_senders_to_receiverspot_list <- function(sigspots_file, neighbourhood_spots_file, seurat_obj) {
                  # Load the neighbourhood spots data
                  neighbourhood_spots_df <- read.table(neighbourhood_spots_file, sep = " ", header = TRUE)
                  # Create list to store sender spots and their neighborhoods
                  sender_spot_neighborhood_list <- list()
                  for (i in 1:nrow(neighbourhood_spots_df)) {
                  sender_spot <- neighbourhood_spots_df$X[i]
                  sender_spot_neighborhood_list[[sender_spot]] <- str_split(neighbourhood_spots_df$neighbour_bcs[i], ',')[[1]]
                  }
                  # Load significant spots data
                  sigspots_df <- read.csv(sigspots_file, sep = ",", header = TRUE)
                  sigspots_df_list <- split(sigspots_df, sigspots_df$LR_interaction)
                  # Initialize list to store results
                  LR_sender_receiver_spot_list <- list()
                  # Iterate over each ligand-receptor interaction
                  for (LR in names(sigspots_df_list)) {
                  myligand <- str_split(LR, '_')[[1]][1]
                  myrec <- str_split(LR, '_')[[1]][2]
                  # Identify barcodes with expression for ligand and receptor
                  # For version 1 receptor_barcodes <- names(which(seurat_obj@assays$Spatial@counts[myrec, ] > 0)) #to further filter neighborhood barcodes to only include higher expression barcodes for receptors
                  #version 3 recepter expression > 2 and ligand expression > 2
                  receptor_barcodes <- names(which(seurat_obj@assays$Spatial@counts[myrec, ] > 2)) #to further filter neighborhood barcodes to only include higher expression barcodes for receptors
                  ligand_barcodes <- names(which(seurat_obj@assays$Spatial@counts[myligand, ] > 2))
                  # Filter significant sender spots based on ligand expression
                  mysig_sender_spots <- intersect(sigspots_df_list[[LR]]$Significant_barcodes, ligand_barcodes)
                  # Version 3 is only use spots for a particular LR if they are in Significant_barcodes consider those which are # Find receiver barcodes in the neighborhood of sender spots where receptor is expressed
                  #version 3 recepter expression > 2 and ligand expression > 2
                  # Version 2 is only use spots for a particular LR if they are in Significant_barcodes consider those which are # Find receiver barcodes in the neighborhood of sender spots where receptor is expressed
                  #Version 1 and version 3
                  receptor_barcodes_in_neighbourhood <- lapply(sender_spot_neighborhood_list[mysig_sender_spots], function(x) {
                  intersect(receptor_barcodes, x)
                  })
                  # Remove empty elements
                  # Version 2 use receptors spots only if they are in mysig_sender_spots
                  # receptor_barcodes_in_neighbourhood <- lapply(sender_spot_neighborhood_list[mysig_sender_spots], function(x) {
                  # abc = intersect(receptor_barcodes, x)
                  # return(intersect(abc,mysig_sender_spots))
                  # })
                  receptor_barcodes_in_neighbourhood <- Filter(function(x) length(x) > 0, receptor_barcodes_in_neighbourhood)
                  # Skip if no valid sender spots or all neighborhoods are empty
                  if (length(mysig_sender_spots) == 0 || length(receptor_barcodes_in_neighbourhood) == 0) {
                  next
                  }
                  # Create data frames for each sender-receiver pair
                  Sender_spot_receiver_spot_df_list <- lapply(names(receptor_barcodes_in_neighbourhood), function(x) { mydf <- data.frame(receiver_spot = receptor_barcodes_in_neighbourhood[[x]])
                  mydf$sender_spot <- x
                  mydf$LR <- LR
                  return(mydf[c('sender_spot', 'receiver_spot', 'LR')])
                  })
                  # Combine data frames into one for each LR interaction
                  Sender_spot_receiver_spot_df <- do.call(rbind, Sender_spot_receiver_spot_df_list)
                  LR_sender_receiver_spot_list[[LR]] <- Sender_spot_receiver_spot_df
                  }
                  # Combine all LR interaction data frames into a single data frame
                  LR_sender_receiver_spot_df <- do.call(rbind, LR_sender_receiver_spot_list)
                  # Add sample metadata to LR_sender_receiver_spot_df
                  mysample_seurat_meta <- seurat_obj@meta.data[c('integrated_snn_res.0.9')]
                  mysample_seurat_meta$barcode <- rownames(mysample_seurat_meta)
                  mysample_seurat_meta$integrated_snn_res.0.9 = droplevels(mysample_seurat_meta$integrated_snn_res.0.9)
                  LR_sender_receiver_spot_df$Sample <- unique(seurat_obj$Sample)
                  LR_sender_receiver_spot_df$Patient <- unique(seurat_obj$Patient)
                  # Join metadata and rename columns correctly
                  LR_sender_receiver_spot_df2 <- LR_sender_receiver_spot_df %>%
                  left_join(mysample_seurat_meta, by = c("sender_spot" = "barcode")) %>%
                  rename(sender_cluster = integrated_snn_res.0.9)
                  LR_sender_receiver_spot_df3 <- LR_sender_receiver_spot_df2 %>%
                  left_join(mysample_seurat_meta, by = c("receiver_spot" = "barcode")) %>%
                  rename(receiver_cluster = integrated_snn_res.0.9)
                  # Return the final data frame
                  return(LR_sender_receiver_spot_df3)
                  }
                  

                  Metadata

                  Metadata

                  Assignees

                  No one assigned

                    Labels

                    No labels
                    No labels

                    Projects

                    No projects

                      Milestone

                      No milestone

                      Relationships

                      None yet

                      Development

                      No branches or pull requests

                      Issue actions

                      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' How to distinguish between sender spots and receiver spots? stlearn distance =200 · Issue #315 · BiomedicalMachineLearning/stLearn · GitHub
                      Skip to content

                      How to distinguish between sender spots and receiver spots? stlearn distance =200 #315

                      Description

                      @smk5g5

                      Hi,

                      I have some doubts about distinguishing sender spots from receiver spots?
                      I was also wondering how does one decide on a good distance (experimentally sensible) for visium data. I have used a distance of 200 (based on the distance argument in stlearn cci ). I was wondering if this is appropriate?

                      Also I have doubts about deciding which spots are receiver spots or sender spots.

                      I used the following code (in which I have 3 versions for deciding sender spots and receiver spots).

                      In the following code I have 3 versions (version 1 and 3 are similar) ,in those 2 versions I take the spot which is significant for a particular Ligand receptor pair and filter the neighbourhood spots (if it expresses receptor to some degree e.g. >1 or >2 etc) and further filter the Ligand based on expression of Ligand in the significant spot (i.e. if the ligand expression is not > 1 count I don't consider it). Although I have seen significant spots which don't show expression of that particular Ligand or receptor (and I was wondering why is that so)?

                      In the second version I just use the significant spots (assuming that the significant spots are the only ones which have spatially significant ligand and receptor expression (further filtering based on ligand and receptor expression in that spot being > 1 count).

                      So I was wondering what do you guys think about it? If this is the correct approach? If not what else would you recommend?

                      Thank you!

                      sigspots_senders_to_receiverspot_list <- function(sigspots_file, neighbourhood_spots_file, seurat_obj) {
                      # Load the neighbourhood spots data
                      neighbourhood_spots_df <- read.table(neighbourhood_spots_file, sep = " ", header = TRUE)
                      # Create list to store sender spots and their neighborhoods
                      sender_spot_neighborhood_list <- list()
                      for (i in 1:nrow(neighbourhood_spots_df)) {
                      sender_spot <- neighbourhood_spots_df$X[i]
                      sender_spot_neighborhood_list[[sender_spot]] <- str_split(neighbourhood_spots_df$neighbour_bcs[i], ',')[[1]]
                      }
                      # Load significant spots data
                      sigspots_df <- read.csv(sigspots_file, sep = ",", header = TRUE)
                      sigspots_df_list <- split(sigspots_df, sigspots_df$LR_interaction)
                      # Initialize list to store results
                      LR_sender_receiver_spot_list <- list()
                      # Iterate over each ligand-receptor interaction
                      for (LR in names(sigspots_df_list)) {
                      myligand <- str_split(LR, '_')[[1]][1]
                      myrec <- str_split(LR, '_')[[1]][2]
                      # Identify barcodes with expression for ligand and receptor
                      # For version 1 receptor_barcodes <- names(which(seurat_obj@assays$Spatial@counts[myrec, ] > 0)) #to further filter neighborhood barcodes to only include higher expression barcodes for receptors
                      #version 3 recepter expression > 2 and ligand expression > 2
                      receptor_barcodes <- names(which(seurat_obj@assays$Spatial@counts[myrec, ] > 2)) #to further filter neighborhood barcodes to only include higher expression barcodes for receptors
                      ligand_barcodes <- names(which(seurat_obj@assays$Spatial@counts[myligand, ] > 2))
                      # Filter significant sender spots based on ligand expression
                      mysig_sender_spots <- intersect(sigspots_df_list[[LR]]$Significant_barcodes, ligand_barcodes)
                      # Version 3 is only use spots for a particular LR if they are in Significant_barcodes consider those which are # Find receiver barcodes in the neighborhood of sender spots where receptor is expressed
                      #version 3 recepter expression > 2 and ligand expression > 2
                      # Version 2 is only use spots for a particular LR if they are in Significant_barcodes consider those which are # Find receiver barcodes in the neighborhood of sender spots where receptor is expressed
                      #Version 1 and version 3
                      receptor_barcodes_in_neighbourhood <- lapply(sender_spot_neighborhood_list[mysig_sender_spots], function(x) {
                      intersect(receptor_barcodes, x)
                      })
                      # Remove empty elements
                      # Version 2 use receptors spots only if they are in mysig_sender_spots
                      # receptor_barcodes_in_neighbourhood <- lapply(sender_spot_neighborhood_list[mysig_sender_spots], function(x) {
                      # abc = intersect(receptor_barcodes, x)
                      # return(intersect(abc,mysig_sender_spots))
                      # })
                      receptor_barcodes_in_neighbourhood <- Filter(function(x) length(x) > 0, receptor_barcodes_in_neighbourhood)
                      # Skip if no valid sender spots or all neighborhoods are empty
                      if (length(mysig_sender_spots) == 0 || length(receptor_barcodes_in_neighbourhood) == 0) {
                      next
                      }
                      # Create data frames for each sender-receiver pair
                      Sender_spot_receiver_spot_df_list <- lapply(names(receptor_barcodes_in_neighbourhood), function(x) { mydf <- data.frame(receiver_spot = receptor_barcodes_in_neighbourhood[[x]])
                      mydf$sender_spot <- x
                      mydf$LR <- LR
                      return(mydf[c('sender_spot', 'receiver_spot', 'LR')])
                      })
                      # Combine data frames into one for each LR interaction
                      Sender_spot_receiver_spot_df <- do.call(rbind, Sender_spot_receiver_spot_df_list)
                      LR_sender_receiver_spot_list[[LR]] <- Sender_spot_receiver_spot_df
                      }
                      # Combine all LR interaction data frames into a single data frame
                      LR_sender_receiver_spot_df <- do.call(rbind, LR_sender_receiver_spot_list)
                      # Add sample metadata to LR_sender_receiver_spot_df
                      mysample_seurat_meta <- seurat_obj@meta.data[c('integrated_snn_res.0.9')]
                      mysample_seurat_meta$barcode <- rownames(mysample_seurat_meta)
                      mysample_seurat_meta$integrated_snn_res.0.9 = droplevels(mysample_seurat_meta$integrated_snn_res.0.9)
                      LR_sender_receiver_spot_df$Sample <- unique(seurat_obj$Sample)
                      LR_sender_receiver_spot_df$Patient <- unique(seurat_obj$Patient)
                      # Join metadata and rename columns correctly
                      LR_sender_receiver_spot_df2 <- LR_sender_receiver_spot_df %>%
                      left_join(mysample_seurat_meta, by = c("sender_spot" = "barcode")) %>%
                      rename(sender_cluster = integrated_snn_res.0.9)
                      LR_sender_receiver_spot_df3 <- LR_sender_receiver_spot_df2 %>%
                      left_join(mysample_seurat_meta, by = c("receiver_spot" = "barcode")) %>%
                      rename(receiver_cluster = integrated_snn_res.0.9)
                      # Return the final data frame
                      return(LR_sender_receiver_spot_df3)
                      }
                      

                      Metadata

                      Metadata

                      Assignees

                      No one assigned

                        Labels

                        No labels
                        No labels

                        Projects

                        No projects

                          Milestone

                          No milestone

                          Relationships

                          None yet

                          Development

                          No branches or pull requests

                          Issue actions

                          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' How to distinguish between sender spots and receiver spots? stlearn distance =200 · Issue #315 · BiomedicalMachineLearning/stLearn · GitHub
                          Skip to content

                          How to distinguish between sender spots and receiver spots? stlearn distance =200 #315

                          Description

                          @smk5g5

                          Hi,

                          I have some doubts about distinguishing sender spots from receiver spots?
                          I was also wondering how does one decide on a good distance (experimentally sensible) for visium data. I have used a distance of 200 (based on the distance argument in stlearn cci ). I was wondering if this is appropriate?

                          Also I have doubts about deciding which spots are receiver spots or sender spots.

                          I used the following code (in which I have 3 versions for deciding sender spots and receiver spots).

                          In the following code I have 3 versions (version 1 and 3 are similar) ,in those 2 versions I take the spot which is significant for a particular Ligand receptor pair and filter the neighbourhood spots (if it expresses receptor to some degree e.g. >1 or >2 etc) and further filter the Ligand based on expression of Ligand in the significant spot (i.e. if the ligand expression is not > 1 count I don't consider it). Although I have seen significant spots which don't show expression of that particular Ligand or receptor (and I was wondering why is that so)?

                          In the second version I just use the significant spots (assuming that the significant spots are the only ones which have spatially significant ligand and receptor expression (further filtering based on ligand and receptor expression in that spot being > 1 count).

                          So I was wondering what do you guys think about it? If this is the correct approach? If not what else would you recommend?

                          Thank you!

                          sigspots_senders_to_receiverspot_list <- function(sigspots_file, neighbourhood_spots_file, seurat_obj) {
                          # Load the neighbourhood spots data
                          neighbourhood_spots_df <- read.table(neighbourhood_spots_file, sep = " ", header = TRUE)
                          # Create list to store sender spots and their neighborhoods
                          sender_spot_neighborhood_list <- list()
                          for (i in 1:nrow(neighbourhood_spots_df)) {
                          sender_spot <- neighbourhood_spots_df$X[i]
                          sender_spot_neighborhood_list[[sender_spot]] <- str_split(neighbourhood_spots_df$neighbour_bcs[i], ',')[[1]]
                          }
                          # Load significant spots data
                          sigspots_df <- read.csv(sigspots_file, sep = ",", header = TRUE)
                          sigspots_df_list <- split(sigspots_df, sigspots_df$LR_interaction)
                          # Initialize list to store results
                          LR_sender_receiver_spot_list <- list()
                          # Iterate over each ligand-receptor interaction
                          for (LR in names(sigspots_df_list)) {
                          myligand <- str_split(LR, '_')[[1]][1]
                          myrec <- str_split(LR, '_')[[1]][2]
                          # Identify barcodes with expression for ligand and receptor
                          # For version 1 receptor_barcodes <- names(which(seurat_obj@assays$Spatial@counts[myrec, ] > 0)) #to further filter neighborhood barcodes to only include higher expression barcodes for receptors
                          #version 3 recepter expression > 2 and ligand expression > 2
                          receptor_barcodes <- names(which(seurat_obj@assays$Spatial@counts[myrec, ] > 2)) #to further filter neighborhood barcodes to only include higher expression barcodes for receptors
                          ligand_barcodes <- names(which(seurat_obj@assays$Spatial@counts[myligand, ] > 2))
                          # Filter significant sender spots based on ligand expression
                          mysig_sender_spots <- intersect(sigspots_df_list[[LR]]$Significant_barcodes, ligand_barcodes)
                          # Version 3 is only use spots for a particular LR if they are in Significant_barcodes consider those which are # Find receiver barcodes in the neighborhood of sender spots where receptor is expressed
                          #version 3 recepter expression > 2 and ligand expression > 2
                          # Version 2 is only use spots for a particular LR if they are in Significant_barcodes consider those which are # Find receiver barcodes in the neighborhood of sender spots where receptor is expressed
                          #Version 1 and version 3
                          receptor_barcodes_in_neighbourhood <- lapply(sender_spot_neighborhood_list[mysig_sender_spots], function(x) {
                          intersect(receptor_barcodes, x)
                          })
                          # Remove empty elements
                          # Version 2 use receptors spots only if they are in mysig_sender_spots
                          # receptor_barcodes_in_neighbourhood <- lapply(sender_spot_neighborhood_list[mysig_sender_spots], function(x) {
                          # abc = intersect(receptor_barcodes, x)
                          # return(intersect(abc,mysig_sender_spots))
                          # })
                          receptor_barcodes_in_neighbourhood <- Filter(function(x) length(x) > 0, receptor_barcodes_in_neighbourhood)
                          # Skip if no valid sender spots or all neighborhoods are empty
                          if (length(mysig_sender_spots) == 0 || length(receptor_barcodes_in_neighbourhood) == 0) {
                          next
                          }
                          # Create data frames for each sender-receiver pair
                          Sender_spot_receiver_spot_df_list <- lapply(names(receptor_barcodes_in_neighbourhood), function(x) { mydf <- data.frame(receiver_spot = receptor_barcodes_in_neighbourhood[[x]])
                          mydf$sender_spot <- x
                          mydf$LR <- LR
                          return(mydf[c('sender_spot', 'receiver_spot', 'LR')])
                          })
                          # Combine data frames into one for each LR interaction
                          Sender_spot_receiver_spot_df <- do.call(rbind, Sender_spot_receiver_spot_df_list)
                          LR_sender_receiver_spot_list[[LR]] <- Sender_spot_receiver_spot_df
                          }
                          # Combine all LR interaction data frames into a single data frame
                          LR_sender_receiver_spot_df <- do.call(rbind, LR_sender_receiver_spot_list)
                          # Add sample metadata to LR_sender_receiver_spot_df
                          mysample_seurat_meta <- seurat_obj@meta.data[c('integrated_snn_res.0.9')]
                          mysample_seurat_meta$barcode <- rownames(mysample_seurat_meta)
                          mysample_seurat_meta$integrated_snn_res.0.9 = droplevels(mysample_seurat_meta$integrated_snn_res.0.9)
                          LR_sender_receiver_spot_df$Sample <- unique(seurat_obj$Sample)
                          LR_sender_receiver_spot_df$Patient <- unique(seurat_obj$Patient)
                          # Join metadata and rename columns correctly
                          LR_sender_receiver_spot_df2 <- LR_sender_receiver_spot_df %>%
                          left_join(mysample_seurat_meta, by = c("sender_spot" = "barcode")) %>%
                          rename(sender_cluster = integrated_snn_res.0.9)
                          LR_sender_receiver_spot_df3 <- LR_sender_receiver_spot_df2 %>%
                          left_join(mysample_seurat_meta, by = c("receiver_spot" = "barcode")) %>%
                          rename(receiver_cluster = integrated_snn_res.0.9)
                          # Return the final data frame
                          return(LR_sender_receiver_spot_df3)
                          }
                          

                          Metadata

                          Metadata

                          Assignees

                          No one assigned

                            Labels

                            No labels
                            No labels

                            Projects

                            No projects

                              Milestone

                              No milestone

                              Relationships

                              None yet

                              Development

                              No branches or pull requests

                              Issue actions

                              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })(); How to distinguish between sender spots and receiver spots? stlearn distance =200 · Issue #315 · BiomedicalMachineLearning/stLearn · GitHub
                              Skip to content

                              How to distinguish between sender spots and receiver spots? stlearn distance =200 #315

                              Description

                              @smk5g5

                              Hi,

                              I have some doubts about distinguishing sender spots from receiver spots?
                              I was also wondering how does one decide on a good distance (experimentally sensible) for visium data. I have used a distance of 200 (based on the distance argument in stlearn cci ). I was wondering if this is appropriate?

                              Also I have doubts about deciding which spots are receiver spots or sender spots.

                              I used the following code (in which I have 3 versions for deciding sender spots and receiver spots).

                              In the following code I have 3 versions (version 1 and 3 are similar) ,in those 2 versions I take the spot which is significant for a particular Ligand receptor pair and filter the neighbourhood spots (if it expresses receptor to some degree e.g. >1 or >2 etc) and further filter the Ligand based on expression of Ligand in the significant spot (i.e. if the ligand expression is not > 1 count I don't consider it). Although I have seen significant spots which don't show expression of that particular Ligand or receptor (and I was wondering why is that so)?

                              In the second version I just use the significant spots (assuming that the significant spots are the only ones which have spatially significant ligand and receptor expression (further filtering based on ligand and receptor expression in that spot being > 1 count).

                              So I was wondering what do you guys think about it? If this is the correct approach? If not what else would you recommend?

                              Thank you!

                              sigspots_senders_to_receiverspot_list <- function(sigspots_file, neighbourhood_spots_file, seurat_obj) {
                              # Load the neighbourhood spots data
                              neighbourhood_spots_df <- read.table(neighbourhood_spots_file, sep = " ", header = TRUE)
                              # Create list to store sender spots and their neighborhoods
                              sender_spot_neighborhood_list <- list()
                              for (i in 1:nrow(neighbourhood_spots_df)) {
                              sender_spot <- neighbourhood_spots_df$X[i]
                              sender_spot_neighborhood_list[[sender_spot]] <- str_split(neighbourhood_spots_df$neighbour_bcs[i], ',')[[1]]
                              }
                              # Load significant spots data
                              sigspots_df <- read.csv(sigspots_file, sep = ",", header = TRUE)
                              sigspots_df_list <- split(sigspots_df, sigspots_df$LR_interaction)
                              # Initialize list to store results
                              LR_sender_receiver_spot_list <- list()
                              # Iterate over each ligand-receptor interaction
                              for (LR in names(sigspots_df_list)) {
                              myligand <- str_split(LR, '_')[[1]][1]
                              myrec <- str_split(LR, '_')[[1]][2]
                              # Identify barcodes with expression for ligand and receptor
                              # For version 1 receptor_barcodes <- names(which(seurat_obj@assays$Spatial@counts[myrec, ] > 0)) #to further filter neighborhood barcodes to only include higher expression barcodes for receptors
                              #version 3 recepter expression > 2 and ligand expression > 2
                              receptor_barcodes <- names(which(seurat_obj@assays$Spatial@counts[myrec, ] > 2)) #to further filter neighborhood barcodes to only include higher expression barcodes for receptors
                              ligand_barcodes <- names(which(seurat_obj@assays$Spatial@counts[myligand, ] > 2))
                              # Filter significant sender spots based on ligand expression
                              mysig_sender_spots <- intersect(sigspots_df_list[[LR]]$Significant_barcodes, ligand_barcodes)
                              # Version 3 is only use spots for a particular LR if they are in Significant_barcodes consider those which are # Find receiver barcodes in the neighborhood of sender spots where receptor is expressed
                              #version 3 recepter expression > 2 and ligand expression > 2
                              # Version 2 is only use spots for a particular LR if they are in Significant_barcodes consider those which are # Find receiver barcodes in the neighborhood of sender spots where receptor is expressed
                              #Version 1 and version 3
                              receptor_barcodes_in_neighbourhood <- lapply(sender_spot_neighborhood_list[mysig_sender_spots], function(x) {
                              intersect(receptor_barcodes, x)
                              })
                              # Remove empty elements
                              # Version 2 use receptors spots only if they are in mysig_sender_spots
                              # receptor_barcodes_in_neighbourhood <- lapply(sender_spot_neighborhood_list[mysig_sender_spots], function(x) {
                              # abc = intersect(receptor_barcodes, x)
                              # return(intersect(abc,mysig_sender_spots))
                              # })
                              receptor_barcodes_in_neighbourhood <- Filter(function(x) length(x) > 0, receptor_barcodes_in_neighbourhood)
                              # Skip if no valid sender spots or all neighborhoods are empty
                              if (length(mysig_sender_spots) == 0 || length(receptor_barcodes_in_neighbourhood) == 0) {
                              next
                              }
                              # Create data frames for each sender-receiver pair
                              Sender_spot_receiver_spot_df_list <- lapply(names(receptor_barcodes_in_neighbourhood), function(x) { mydf <- data.frame(receiver_spot = receptor_barcodes_in_neighbourhood[[x]])
                              mydf$sender_spot <- x
                              mydf$LR <- LR
                              return(mydf[c('sender_spot', 'receiver_spot', 'LR')])
                              })
                              # Combine data frames into one for each LR interaction
                              Sender_spot_receiver_spot_df <- do.call(rbind, Sender_spot_receiver_spot_df_list)
                              LR_sender_receiver_spot_list[[LR]] <- Sender_spot_receiver_spot_df
                              }
                              # Combine all LR interaction data frames into a single data frame
                              LR_sender_receiver_spot_df <- do.call(rbind, LR_sender_receiver_spot_list)
                              # Add sample metadata to LR_sender_receiver_spot_df
                              mysample_seurat_meta <- seurat_obj@meta.data[c('integrated_snn_res.0.9')]
                              mysample_seurat_meta$barcode <- rownames(mysample_seurat_meta)
                              mysample_seurat_meta$integrated_snn_res.0.9 = droplevels(mysample_seurat_meta$integrated_snn_res.0.9)
                              LR_sender_receiver_spot_df$Sample <- unique(seurat_obj$Sample)
                              LR_sender_receiver_spot_df$Patient <- unique(seurat_obj$Patient)
                              # Join metadata and rename columns correctly
                              LR_sender_receiver_spot_df2 <- LR_sender_receiver_spot_df %>%
                              left_join(mysample_seurat_meta, by = c("sender_spot" = "barcode")) %>%
                              rename(sender_cluster = integrated_snn_res.0.9)
                              LR_sender_receiver_spot_df3 <- LR_sender_receiver_spot_df2 %>%
                              left_join(mysample_seurat_meta, by = c("receiver_spot" = "barcode")) %>%
                              rename(receiver_cluster = integrated_snn_res.0.9)
                              # Return the final data frame
                              return(LR_sender_receiver_spot_df3)
                              }
                              

                              Metadata

                              Metadata

                              Assignees

                              No one assigned

                                Labels

                                No labels
                                No labels

                                Projects

                                No projects

                                  Milestone

                                  No milestone

                                  Relationships

                                  None yet

                                  Development

                                  No branches or pull requests

                                  Issue actions