[Feature]: Support Bisected Blocks #1

Open
Open
[Feature]: Support Bisected Blocks#1
Assignees
BitByLogics
Labels
enhancementNew feature or requesthelp wantedExtra attention is needed

Description

@BitByLogics
BitByLogics
opened on Dec 5, 2025

Summary

Add support for bisected packet blocks

Problem This Solves

Currently, if you create a packet block that is bisected only the bottom portion of the block will appear.

Proposed Solution

Implement some way of supporting bisected blocks, whether the block holds a child instance of its other half, or an entirely new packet block is created.

Alternatives Considered

Currently, users can manually create two separate bisected blocks at the appropriate location. This works visually, but isn't ideal.

Additional Context

Originally suggested by p0larr_ on Discord

Priority

Medium – helpful improvement

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

enhancementNew feature or requesthelp wantedExtra attention is needed

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions

    , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all 
     blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '

    Skip to content
    [Feature]: Support Bisected Blocks #1
    Open
    Open
    [Feature]: Support Bisected Blocks#1
    Assignees
    BitByLogics
    Labels
    enhancementNew feature or requesthelp wantedExtra attention is needed
    Description
    @BitByLogics
    BitByLogics
    opened on Dec 5, 2025
    Summary
    Add support for bisected packet blocks
    Problem This Solves
    Currently, if you create a packet block that is bisected only the bottom portion of the block will appear.
    Proposed Solution
    Implement some way of supporting bisected blocks, whether the block holds a child instance of its other half, or an entirely new packet block is created.
    Alternatives Considered
    Currently, users can manually create two separate bisected blocks at the appropriate location. This works visually, but isn't ideal.
    Additional Context
    Originally suggested by p0larr_ on Discord
    Priority
    Medium – helpful improvement
    Metadata
    Metadata
    Assignees
    Labels
    enhancementNew feature or requesthelp wantedExtra attention is needed
    Projects
    No projects
      Milestone
      No milestone
      Relationships
      None yet
      Development
      No branches or pull requests
      Issue actions
      
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

      Skip to content
      [Feature]: Support Bisected Blocks #1
      Open
      Open
      [Feature]: Support Bisected Blocks#1
      Assignees
      BitByLogics
      Labels
      enhancementNew feature or requesthelp wantedExtra attention is needed
      Description
      @BitByLogics
      BitByLogics
      opened on Dec 5, 2025
      Summary
      Add support for bisected packet blocks
      Problem This Solves
      Currently, if you create a packet block that is bisected only the bottom portion of the block will appear.
      Proposed Solution
      Implement some way of supporting bisected blocks, whether the block holds a child instance of its other half, or an entirely new packet block is created.
      Alternatives Considered
      Currently, users can manually create two separate bisected blocks at the appropriate location. This works visually, but isn't ideal.
      Additional Context
      Originally suggested by p0larr_ on Discord
      Priority
      Medium – helpful improvement
      Metadata
      Metadata
      Assignees
      Labels
      enhancementNew feature or requesthelp wantedExtra attention is needed
      Projects
      No projects
        Milestone
        No milestone
        Relationships
        None yet
        Development
        No branches or pull requests
        Issue actions
        
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

        Skip to content
        [Feature]: Support Bisected Blocks #1
        Open
        Open
        [Feature]: Support Bisected Blocks#1
        Assignees
        BitByLogics
        Labels
        enhancementNew feature or requesthelp wantedExtra attention is needed
        Description
        @BitByLogics
        BitByLogics
        opened on Dec 5, 2025
        Summary
        Add support for bisected packet blocks
        Problem This Solves
        Currently, if you create a packet block that is bisected only the bottom portion of the block will appear.
        Proposed Solution
        Implement some way of supporting bisected blocks, whether the block holds a child instance of its other half, or an entirely new packet block is created.
        Alternatives Considered
        Currently, users can manually create two separate bisected blocks at the appropriate location. This works visually, but isn't ideal.
        Additional Context
        Originally suggested by p0larr_ on Discord
        Priority
        Medium – helpful improvement
        Metadata
        Metadata
        Assignees
        Labels
        enhancementNew feature or requesthelp wantedExtra attention is needed
        Projects
        No projects
          Milestone
          No milestone
          Relationships
          None yet
          Development
          No branches or pull requests
          Issue actions
          
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "youtube.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '

          Skip to content
          [Feature]: Support Bisected Blocks #1
          Open
          Open
          [Feature]: Support Bisected Blocks#1
          Assignees
          BitByLogics
          Labels
          enhancementNew feature or requesthelp wantedExtra attention is needed
          Description
          @BitByLogics
          BitByLogics
          opened on Dec 5, 2025
          Summary
          Add support for bisected packet blocks
          Problem This Solves
          Currently, if you create a packet block that is bisected only the bottom portion of the block will appear.
          Proposed Solution
          Implement some way of supporting bisected blocks, whether the block holds a child instance of its other half, or an entirely new packet block is created.
          Alternatives Considered
          Currently, users can manually create two separate bisected blocks at the appropriate location. This works visually, but isn't ideal.
          Additional Context
          Originally suggested by p0larr_ on Discord
          Priority
          Medium – helpful improvement
          Metadata
          Metadata
          Assignees
          Labels
          enhancementNew feature or requesthelp wantedExtra attention is needed
          Projects
          No projects
            Milestone
            No milestone
            Relationships
            None yet
            Development
            No branches or pull requests
            Issue actions
            
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

            Skip to content
            [Feature]: Support Bisected Blocks #1
            Open
            Open
            [Feature]: Support Bisected Blocks#1
            Assignees
            BitByLogics
            Labels
            enhancementNew feature or requesthelp wantedExtra attention is needed
            Description
            @BitByLogics
            BitByLogics
            opened on Dec 5, 2025
            Summary
            Add support for bisected packet blocks
            Problem This Solves
            Currently, if you create a packet block that is bisected only the bottom portion of the block will appear.
            Proposed Solution
            Implement some way of supporting bisected blocks, whether the block holds a child instance of its other half, or an entirely new packet block is created.
            Alternatives Considered
            Currently, users can manually create two separate bisected blocks at the appropriate location. This works visually, but isn't ideal.
            Additional Context
            Originally suggested by p0larr_ on Discord
            Priority
            Medium – helpful improvement
            Metadata
            Metadata
            Assignees
            Labels
            enhancementNew feature or requesthelp wantedExtra attention is needed
            Projects
            No projects
              Milestone
              No milestone
              Relationships
              None yet
              Development
              No branches or pull requests
              Issue actions
              
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

              Skip to content
              [Feature]: Support Bisected Blocks #1
              Open
              Open
              [Feature]: Support Bisected Blocks#1
              Assignees
              BitByLogics
              Labels
              enhancementNew feature or requesthelp wantedExtra attention is needed
              Description
              @BitByLogics
              BitByLogics
              opened on Dec 5, 2025
              Summary
              Add support for bisected packet blocks
              Problem This Solves
              Currently, if you create a packet block that is bisected only the bottom portion of the block will appear.
              Proposed Solution
              Implement some way of supporting bisected blocks, whether the block holds a child instance of its other half, or an entirely new packet block is created.
              Alternatives Considered
              Currently, users can manually create two separate bisected blocks at the appropriate location. This works visually, but isn't ideal.
              Additional Context
              Originally suggested by p0larr_ on Discord
              Priority
              Medium – helpful improvement
              Metadata
              Metadata
              Assignees
              Labels
              enhancementNew feature or requesthelp wantedExtra attention is needed
              Projects
              No projects
                Milestone
                No milestone
                Relationships
                None yet
                Development
                No branches or pull requests
                Issue actions
                
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); }
})();
})();

                Skip to content
                [Feature]: Support Bisected Blocks #1
                Open
                Open
                [Feature]: Support Bisected Blocks#1
                Assignees
                BitByLogics
                Labels
                enhancementNew feature or requesthelp wantedExtra attention is needed
                Description
                @BitByLogics
                BitByLogics
                opened on Dec 5, 2025
                Summary
                Add support for bisected packet blocks
                Problem This Solves
                Currently, if you create a packet block that is bisected only the bottom portion of the block will appear.
                Proposed Solution
                Implement some way of supporting bisected blocks, whether the block holds a child instance of its other half, or an entirely new packet block is created.
                Alternatives Considered
                Currently, users can manually create two separate bisected blocks at the appropriate location. This works visually, but isn't ideal.
                Additional Context
                Originally suggested by p0larr_ on Discord
                Priority
                Medium – helpful improvement
                Metadata
                Metadata
                Assignees
                Labels
                enhancementNew feature or requesthelp wantedExtra attention is needed
                Projects
                No projects
                  Milestone
                  No milestone
                  Relationships
                  None yet
                  Development
                  No branches or pull requests
                  Issue actions