Skip to content

[wasm] Bump chrome for testing - linux: 116.0.5845.110, windows: 116.0.5845.111 - #3

Open
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
update-chrome-version-5988050343
Open

[wasm] Bump chrome for testing - linux: 116.0.5845.110, windows: 116.0.5845.111#3
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
update-chrome-version-5988050343

Conversation

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

No description provided.

BruceForstall pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 31, 2024
…#102133)
This generalizes the indir reordering optimization (that currently only
triggers for loads) to kick in for GT_STOREIND nodes.
The main complication with doing this is the fact that the data node of
the second indirection needs its own reordering with the previous
indirection. The existing logic works by reordering all nodes between
the first and second indirection that are unrelated to the second
indirection's computation to happen after it. Once that is done we know
that there are no uses of the first indirection's result between it and
the second indirection, so after doing the necessary interference checks
we can safely move the previous indirection to happen after the data
node of the second indirection.
Example:
```csharp
class Body { public double x, y, z, vx, vy, vz, mass; }
static void Advance(double dt, Body[] bodies)
{
foreach (Body b in bodies)
{
b.x += dt * b.vx;
b.y += dt * b.vy;
b.z += dt * b.vz;
}
}
```
Diff:
```diff
@@ -1,18 +1,17 @@
-G_M55007_IG04: ;; offset=0x001C
+G_M55007_IG04: ;; offset=0x0020
ldr x3, [x0, w1, UXTW #3]
ldp d16, d17, [x3, #0x08]
ldp d18, d19, [x3, #0x20]
fmul d18, d0, d18
fadd d16, d16, d18
- str d16, [x3, #0x08]
- fmul d16, d0, d19
- fadd d16, d17, d16
- str d16, [x3, #0x10]
+ fmul d18, d0, d19
+ fadd d17, d17, d18
+ stp d16, d17, [x3, #0x08]
ldr d16, [x3, #0x18]
ldr d17, [x3, #0x30]
fmul d17, d0, d17
fadd d16, d16, d17
str d16, [x3, #0x18]
add w1, w1, #1
cmp w2, w1
bgt G_M55007_IG04
```
BruceForstall pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 9, 2024
* bug #1: don't allow for values out of the SerializationRecordType enum range
* bug #2: throw SerializationException rather than KeyNotFoundException when the referenced record is missing or it points to a record of different type
* bug #3: throw SerializationException rather than FormatException when it's being thrown by BinaryReader (or sth else that we use)
* bug #4: document the fact that IOException can be thrown
* bug #5: throw SerializationException rather than OverflowException when parsing the decimal fails
* bug #6: 0 and 17 are illegal values for PrimitiveType enum
* bug #7: throw SerializationException when a surrogate character is read (so far an ArgumentException was thrown)
BruceForstall pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 17, 2025
Currently, offsets are incorrectly treated as indices which is
leading to incorrect code being emitted.
e.g., `ScatterWithByteOffsets<long>` emits
`ST1D Zdata.D, Pg, [Xbase, Zoffsets.D, lsl #3]`
instead of,
`ST1D Zdata.D, Pg, [Xbase, Zoffsets.D]`
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants