Skip to content

fix: update pump.fun FAQ — blended fee vs bonding curve fee - #1903

Closed
Flotapponnier wants to merge 6 commits into
devfrom
fix/memecoin-platforms-faq-graduated
Closed

fix: update pump.fun FAQ — blended fee vs bonding curve fee#1903
Flotapponnier wants to merge 6 commits into
devfrom
fix/memecoin-platforms-faq-graduated

Conversation

@Flotapponnier

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

The FAQ said "pump.fun near zero" with the old explanation (before Section 1bis added fee wallet tracking). Now that we capture native SOL transfers to the 9 pump.fun fee recipient pubkeys, the benchmark shows ~0.15% blended — correct, but lower than the advertised 0.95% curve fee.

The per-token Prometheus data explains exactly why: Fartcoin, Pnut, ZEREBRO, jellyjelly, arc, Ban, MOODENG are all graduated tokens (PumpSwap/Raydium). They dominate the trade count weighting and pull the weighted average well below the bonding curve rate. Curve tokens (UwU 0.53%, BAYC 0.48%, USWR 0.50%) show expected values in their per-token breakdown.

Updated the FAQ to reflect this accurately.

@Flotapponnier

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

FAQ already updated in dev via #1910

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@Flotapponnier