Skip to content

seo: per_chain_explainer on perp-fees + wallet-labels-coverage - #619

Merged
Flotapponnier merged 1 commit into
devfrom
feat/per-chain-explainer-perp-wallet
Jun 21, 2026
Merged

seo: per_chain_explainer on perp-fees + wallet-labels-coverage#619
Flotapponnier merged 1 commit into
devfrom
feat/per-chain-explainer-perp-wallet

Conversation

@Flotapponnier

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Adds dedicated per-chain landing pages by filling per_chain_explainer on two benches that already declare a dimensions.chain axis but render no /benchmarks/<slug>/<chain> route today.

Why

Audit on the 10 benches with existing per-chain explainers measured 27.9% body-text overlap between sibling pages (l1-finality/solana vs l1-finality/ethereum). The shared part is the template footer + comparison context block, the unique part is the explainer body + key-facts line. Two benches with a chain dimension were missing the explainer entirely, so they render no per-chain pages and capture no long-tail per-chain queries.

What this ships

  • perp-fees: 3 asset-scoped pages (ETH, BTC, SOL) targeting "cheapest perp DEX for ETH/BTC/SOL"
  • wallet-labels-coverage: 6 chain-scoped pages (solana, ton, stellar, bitcoin, ethereum, base) targeting chain-specialist labeling queries

Each block is 70-110 words, references provider-specific facts (Helius/Solana programs, TonAPI directory, StellarExpert directory, WalletExplorer Bitcoin clustering, OZ v5 ERC20 mechanics, GMX positionFeeFactor, Lighter zero-taker), and resolves to live numbers via {{p50:slug}} and {{best_p50:chain:X}} placeholders.

Body lengths verified under the 1000-char schema cap. pnpm validate passes (31 specs valid). No code changes.

@Flotapponnier
Flotapponnier merged commit 930afb7 into devJun 21, 2026
1 check passed
@Flotapponnier
Flotapponnier deleted the feat/per-chain-explainer-perp-wallet branch June 21, 2026 14:09
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@Flotapponnier