fix alphabet translation using hash function and prefix

[avivcarmis]

No description provided.

[avivcarmis]

[avivcarmis]

hash function taken from here

[dorilahav]

Would suggest to also use a dictionary because the hash is not very long.
There is a good chance that a whole project including some libraries would have more than 10000 functions and variables so it could actually have 2 functions with the same name.

[dorilahav]

A nice and clean solution might be to just create a counter and use it's value to name variables and functions.

[elisherer]

@dorilahav , it's important to stay deterministic,
I think it would be a good idea to use both hash and transliteration for readability sake.

function$chava_46165799_lbrch($chava_1432970484_mbvrch){console.log('היוש, '+$chava_1432970484_mbvrch);}$chava_46165799_lbrch('עולם');

WDYT?

[avivcarmis]

@dorilahav , it's important to stay deterministic,
I think it would be a good idea to use both hash and transliteration for readability sake.

function$chava_46165799_lbrch($chava_1432970484_mbvrch){console.log('היוש, '+$chava_1432970484_mbvrch);}$chava_46165799_lbrch('עולם');

WDYT?

I agree

[avivcarmis]

@dorilahav I do agree with @elisherer that we want determinism. I also agree that we want to avoid collisions of hash result. I think that a combination of the two should be safe enough for the purposes of חווה סקריפט.
closing in favour of #36

[avivcarmis]

No description provided.

[avivcarmis]

[avivcarmis]

hash function taken from here

[dorilahav]

Would suggest to also use a dictionary because the hash is not very long.
There is a good chance that a whole project including some libraries would have more than 10000 functions and variables so it could actually have 2 functions with the same name.

[dorilahav]

A nice and clean solution might be to just create a counter and use it's value to name variables and functions.

[elisherer]

@dorilahav , it's important to stay deterministic,
I think it would be a good idea to use both hash and transliteration for readability sake.

function$chava_46165799_lbrch($chava_1432970484_mbvrch){console.log('היוש, '+$chava_1432970484_mbvrch);}$chava_46165799_lbrch('עולם');

WDYT?

[avivcarmis]

@dorilahav , it's important to stay deterministic,
I think it would be a good idea to use both hash and transliteration for readability sake.

function$chava_46165799_lbrch($chava_1432970484_mbvrch){console.log('היוש, '+$chava_1432970484_mbvrch);}$chava_46165799_lbrch('עולם');

WDYT?

I agree

[avivcarmis]

@dorilahav I do agree with @elisherer that we want determinism. I also agree that we want to avoid collisions of hash result. I think that a combination of the two should be safe enough for the purposes of חווה סקריפט.
closing in favour of #36

[avivcarmis]

No description provided.

[avivcarmis]

[avivcarmis]

hash function taken from here

[dorilahav]

Would suggest to also use a dictionary because the hash is not very long.
There is a good chance that a whole project including some libraries would have more than 10000 functions and variables so it could actually have 2 functions with the same name.

[dorilahav]

A nice and clean solution might be to just create a counter and use it's value to name variables and functions.

[elisherer]

@dorilahav , it's important to stay deterministic,
I think it would be a good idea to use both hash and transliteration for readability sake.

function$chava_46165799_lbrch($chava_1432970484_mbvrch){console.log('היוש, '+$chava_1432970484_mbvrch);}$chava_46165799_lbrch('עולם');

WDYT?

[avivcarmis]

@dorilahav , it's important to stay deterministic,
I think it would be a good idea to use both hash and transliteration for readability sake.

function$chava_46165799_lbrch($chava_1432970484_mbvrch){console.log('היוש, '+$chava_1432970484_mbvrch);}$chava_46165799_lbrch('עולם');

WDYT?

I agree

[avivcarmis]

@dorilahav I do agree with @elisherer that we want determinism. I also agree that we want to avoid collisions of hash result. I think that a combination of the two should be safe enough for the purposes of חווה סקריפט.
closing in favour of #36

[avivcarmis]

No description provided.

[avivcarmis]

[avivcarmis]

hash function taken from here

[dorilahav]

Would suggest to also use a dictionary because the hash is not very long.
There is a good chance that a whole project including some libraries would have more than 10000 functions and variables so it could actually have 2 functions with the same name.

[dorilahav]

A nice and clean solution might be to just create a counter and use it's value to name variables and functions.

[elisherer]

@dorilahav , it's important to stay deterministic,
I think it would be a good idea to use both hash and transliteration for readability sake.

function$chava_46165799_lbrch($chava_1432970484_mbvrch){console.log('היוש, '+$chava_1432970484_mbvrch);}$chava_46165799_lbrch('עולם');

WDYT?

[avivcarmis]

@dorilahav , it's important to stay deterministic,
I think it would be a good idea to use both hash and transliteration for readability sake.

function$chava_46165799_lbrch($chava_1432970484_mbvrch){console.log('היוש, '+$chava_1432970484_mbvrch);}$chava_46165799_lbrch('עולם');

WDYT?

I agree

[avivcarmis]

@dorilahav I do agree with @elisherer that we want determinism. I also agree that we want to avoid collisions of hash result. I think that a combination of the two should be safe enough for the purposes of חווה סקריפט.
closing in favour of #36

[avivcarmis]

No description provided.

[avivcarmis]

[avivcarmis]

hash function taken from here

[dorilahav]

Would suggest to also use a dictionary because the hash is not very long.
There is a good chance that a whole project including some libraries would have more than 10000 functions and variables so it could actually have 2 functions with the same name.

[dorilahav]

A nice and clean solution might be to just create a counter and use it's value to name variables and functions.

[elisherer]

@dorilahav , it's important to stay deterministic,
I think it would be a good idea to use both hash and transliteration for readability sake.

function$chava_46165799_lbrch($chava_1432970484_mbvrch){console.log('היוש, '+$chava_1432970484_mbvrch);}$chava_46165799_lbrch('עולם');

WDYT?

[avivcarmis]

@dorilahav , it's important to stay deterministic,
I think it would be a good idea to use both hash and transliteration for readability sake.

function$chava_46165799_lbrch($chava_1432970484_mbvrch){console.log('היוש, '+$chava_1432970484_mbvrch);}$chava_46165799_lbrch('עולם');

WDYT?

I agree

[avivcarmis]

@dorilahav I do agree with @elisherer that we want determinism. I also agree that we want to avoid collisions of hash result. I think that a combination of the two should be safe enough for the purposes of חווה סקריפט.
closing in favour of #36

[avivcarmis]

No description provided.

[avivcarmis]

[avivcarmis]

hash function taken from here

[dorilahav]

Would suggest to also use a dictionary because the hash is not very long.
There is a good chance that a whole project including some libraries would have more than 10000 functions and variables so it could actually have 2 functions with the same name.

[dorilahav]

A nice and clean solution might be to just create a counter and use it's value to name variables and functions.

[elisherer]

@dorilahav , it's important to stay deterministic,
I think it would be a good idea to use both hash and transliteration for readability sake.

function$chava_46165799_lbrch($chava_1432970484_mbvrch){console.log('היוש, '+$chava_1432970484_mbvrch);}$chava_46165799_lbrch('עולם');

WDYT?

[avivcarmis]

@dorilahav , it's important to stay deterministic,
I think it would be a good idea to use both hash and transliteration for readability sake.

function$chava_46165799_lbrch($chava_1432970484_mbvrch){console.log('היוש, '+$chava_1432970484_mbvrch);}$chava_46165799_lbrch('עולם');

WDYT?

I agree

[avivcarmis]

@dorilahav I do agree with @elisherer that we want determinism. I also agree that we want to avoid collisions of hash result. I think that a combination of the two should be safe enough for the purposes of חווה סקריפט.
closing in favour of #36

[avivcarmis]

No description provided.

[avivcarmis]

[avivcarmis]

hash function taken from here

[dorilahav]

Would suggest to also use a dictionary because the hash is not very long.
There is a good chance that a whole project including some libraries would have more than 10000 functions and variables so it could actually have 2 functions with the same name.

[dorilahav]

A nice and clean solution might be to just create a counter and use it's value to name variables and functions.

[elisherer]

@dorilahav , it's important to stay deterministic,
I think it would be a good idea to use both hash and transliteration for readability sake.

function$chava_46165799_lbrch($chava_1432970484_mbvrch){console.log('היוש, '+$chava_1432970484_mbvrch);}$chava_46165799_lbrch('עולם');

WDYT?

[avivcarmis]

@dorilahav , it's important to stay deterministic,
I think it would be a good idea to use both hash and transliteration for readability sake.

function$chava_46165799_lbrch($chava_1432970484_mbvrch){console.log('היוש, '+$chava_1432970484_mbvrch);}$chava_46165799_lbrch('עולם');

WDYT?

I agree

[avivcarmis]

@dorilahav I do agree with @elisherer that we want determinism. I also agree that we want to avoid collisions of hash result. I think that a combination of the two should be safe enough for the purposes of חווה סקריפט.
closing in favour of #36

[avivcarmis]

No description provided.

[avivcarmis]

[avivcarmis]

hash function taken from here

[dorilahav]

Would suggest to also use a dictionary because the hash is not very long.
There is a good chance that a whole project including some libraries would have more than 10000 functions and variables so it could actually have 2 functions with the same name.

[dorilahav]

A nice and clean solution might be to just create a counter and use it's value to name variables and functions.

[elisherer]

@dorilahav , it's important to stay deterministic,
I think it would be a good idea to use both hash and transliteration for readability sake.

function$chava_46165799_lbrch($chava_1432970484_mbvrch){console.log('היוש, '+$chava_1432970484_mbvrch);}$chava_46165799_lbrch('עולם');

WDYT?

[avivcarmis]

@dorilahav , it's important to stay deterministic,
I think it would be a good idea to use both hash and transliteration for readability sake.

function$chava_46165799_lbrch($chava_1432970484_mbvrch){console.log('היוש, '+$chava_1432970484_mbvrch);}$chava_46165799_lbrch('עולם');

WDYT?

I agree

[avivcarmis]

@dorilahav I do agree with @elisherer that we want determinism. I also agree that we want to avoid collisions of hash result. I think that a combination of the two should be safe enough for the purposes of חווה סקריפט.
closing in favour of #36