Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
feat(automation): run DiagramWeave hourly NVIDIA NIM review repair - #1094
feat(automation): run DiagramWeave hourly NVIDIA NIM review repair#1094seonghobae wants to merge 5 commits into
Conversation
Bugbot is not enabled for your account, so this pull request was not reviewed. Enable Bugbot in the Cursor dashboard to get automatic reviews on future PRs. |
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in:5 minutes Limit details: You’ve used the included review currently available. You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository. How can I continue?Wait for the limit to reset, then comment An organization admin can change what happens after included review limits in Billing. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits within each organization. For paid Pro and Pro+ reviews, CodeRabbit uses a developer's included PR review attempts over the past 7 days to set the current hourly allowance. At typical activity levels, the full plan allowance applies. Higher sustained activity can lower the allowance until earlier attempts leave the 7-day window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (7)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughDiagramWeave용 시간별 리뷰 복구 호출자를 추가했습니다. 호출자는 중앙 스케줄러를 보호된 ChangesDiagramWeave 시간별 리뷰 복구
Estimated code review effort: 3 (Moderate) | ~25 minutes Merge Risk:⚪ Minimal · up to The change adds the hourly DiagramWeave review-repair path without a current execution or production-impact risk. A minor documentation wording correction about CWE-250 is recommended, but no actionable merge-blocking risk remains. Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Caller as 시간별 DiagramWeave 호출자
participant Scheduler as 중앙 PR 리뷰 복구 스케줄러
participant Repository as ContextualWisdomLab/DiagramWeave
Caller->>Scheduler: 보호된 main과 PR 처리 제한 전달
Caller->>Scheduler: OIDC 권한과 허용된 시크릿 전달
Scheduler->>Repository: 리뷰 분석 및 bounded repair 실행
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
8ed643d to
7ffff2dCompareseonghobae
commented
Aug 19, 2026
Rebased onto current |
7ffff2d to
b08f054Compareseonghobae
commented
Aug 19, 2026
seonghobae
commented
Aug 20, 2026
Rebased DiagramWeave hourly caller onto current main@c47bee59 and preserved current Quarantine plus DiagramWeave quality paths. Exact head: b08f054. Evidence: 6 caller tests passed, actionlint, compileall, no conflict markers, and diff check passed. |
b08f054 to
13a306bCompareseonghobae
commented
Aug 20, 2026
13a306b to
c2e1646Compareseonghobae
commented
Aug 20, 2026
@opencode-agent review the exact current head $head_oid against protected base 2cce96f. Rebased this hourly caller onto current main; contract tests, changed-workflow actionlint, and diff --check were run on the exact rebased source. The caller keeps explicit target identity, bounded dispatch/retry, OIDC/approved secret scope, and no COPILOT token forwarding. Treat predecessor reviews/checks as historical and do not approve from queued or status-only evidence. |
Add a thin minute-12 caller for ContextualWisdomLab/DiagramWeave on protected main. The caller maps only established scheduler credentials, grants job-scoped OIDC, and leaves NVIDIA_NIM_API_KEY on the reusable worker.
c2e1646 to
0b7088dCompare
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
seonghobae
commented
Aug 20, 2026
Current-head repair evidence for
|
seonghobae
commented
Aug 21, 2026
Current-head merge repair pushed normally at |
| schedule: | ||
| # Minute 12 avoids pg-llm-batch (1), aFIPC (2), kaefa (3), LineageWeave (4), | ||
| # codec-carver (5), life-os (6), Wardnet (7), mightyETL (8), | ||
| # psychometrics-commons (9), OriginWeave (10), naruon (11), | ||
| # pg-erd-cloud (13), orchestrator (17), noema (19), Clearfolio (23), | ||
| # Keyverse (29), Scopeweave (31), DiskSage (37), Appguardrail (41), | ||
| # newsdom-api (43), Inkspan (47), fast-mlsirm (49), BandScope (53), | ||
| # and semantic-data-portal (59). | ||
| - cron: "12 * * * *" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
📝 Info: Minute 12 cron slot is unique among hourly callers
The new caller in diagramweave-hourly-review-repair.yml schedules at minute 12. I checked all existing *-hourly-review-repair.yml cron slots (10, 14, 16, 21, 23, 27, 37, 43, 49, 53) and minute 12 does not collide with any of them, so the staggering intent holds. The inline avoidance comment is not fully exhaustive (it omits quarantine at 14, github at 21, accounting at 27, and governance-risk-compliance at 43) but this is informational only and does not affect runtime scheduling.
Was this helpful? React with 👍 or 👎 to provide feedback.
| id-token: write | ||
| uses: ./.github/workflows/pr-review-fix-scheduler.yml | ||
| with: | ||
| target_repository: ContextualWisdomLab/DiagramWeave |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🔍 target_repository casing differs from lowercase peers
target_repository: ContextualWisdomLab/DiagramWeave uses mixed case, matching OriginWeave/nonnest2 style but differing from lowercase peers like ContextualWisdomLab/clearfolio. GitHub repo names are case-insensitive for API resolution, and the doctoring notes OPENCODE_REPOSITORY_DISPATCH_TARGETS must contain the exact target. Reviewer may want to confirm the allowlist variable uses the same casing to avoid a fail-closed mismatch at dispatch time, though this is operational config rather than a code defect.
Was this helpful? React with 👍 or 👎 to provide feedback.
seonghobae
commented
Aug 21, 2026
Exact-head lock repair pushed as 455f2e7 from 0c62585. Updated the hashed pip audit runtime from pip 26.1.2 to pip 26.2.1 with exact hashes, without changing the hourly caller implementation. pyenv pip-audit reported no known vulnerabilities and git diff check passed locally. Hosted checks and exact-head approval must be re-evaluated; no bypass or force push was used. |
| pip==26.2.1 \ | ||
| --hash=sha256:71138adf1f4ca900cdb7d289c21b7494329f2332b6d85f0e1c42108c0384ed3e \ | ||
| --hash=sha256:f6ad667e89a1fe78046c8f13232b247200f5258d7828f3f7883d660878e0813f |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
📝 Info: Unrelated pip hash refresh bundled in feature PR
requirements-pip-audit-ci-hashes.txt bumps pip 26.1.2 to 26.2.1 in a separate refresh commit. pip is transitive (via pip-api), so this reads as a regenerated lock, not a hand-edit, and is unrelated to the DiagramWeave caller feature.
Was this helpful? React with 👍 or 👎 to provide feedback.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode reviewed the current-head mergeability evidence and changed-file flow before approval, then found merge conflicts on the affected path.
Findings
1. HIGH Merge Conflict Guidance - Resolve the PR branch against the latest base branch
- Problem: GitHub reports mergeStateStatus
DIRTYfor this pull request. - Root cause: Branch
feat/diagramweave-hourly-nvidia-nim-review-repaircannot be merged cleanly intomain; the changed-file flow below shows which review/runtime path is blocked by the conflict. - Fix: Merge or rebase the latest
mainintofeat/diagramweave-hourly-nvidia-nim-review-repair, resolve conflict markers in the PR branch, rerun the focused checks, and push the same branch. - Repair commands:
gh pr checkout 1094 --repo ContextualWisdomLab/.github
git fetch origin main
git merge --no-ff origin/main # or: git rebase origin/main
git status --short
# resolve files, then git add <resolved-files># merge path: git commit# rebase path: git rebase --continue
git push origin HEAD:feat/diagramweave-hourly-nvidia-nim-review-repair
# rebase path only: git push --force-with-lease origin HEAD:feat/diagramweave-hourly-nvidia-nim-review-repair- Regression test: Keep OpenCode approval gated on mergeability so model-output failures cannot approve a conflicted PR.
Merge Conflict Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Workflow (2 files)"]
S1 --> I1["GitHub Actions review job"]
I1 --> Conflict["Merge conflict blocks this path"]
Conflict --> V1["actionlint plus required checks"]
Evidence --> S2["Changed file (4 files)"]
S2 --> I2["repository behavior"]
I2 --> Conflict["Merge conflict blocks this path"]
Conflict --> V2["required checks"]
Evidence --> S3["Docs: diagramweave-hourly-review-caller.md"]
S3 --> I3["operator or user guidance"]
I3 --> Conflict["Merge conflict blocks this path"]
Conflict --> V3["docs review"]
Evidence --> S4["Test: test_diagramweave_hourly_review_caller.py"]
S4 --> I4["regression suite"]
I4 --> Conflict["Merge conflict blocks this path"]
Conflict --> V4["targeted test run"]
- Result: REQUEST_CHANGES
- Reason: mergeStateStatus is
DIRTY; mergeable isCONFLICTING. - Head SHA:
455f2e76f15c5d0e7040777fc22ea4994d850925 - Workflow run: 33026969497
- Workflow attempt: 1
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Workflow (2 files)"]
S1 --> I1["GitHub Actions review job"]
I1 --> Conflict["Merge conflict blocks this path"]
Conflict --> V1["actionlint plus required checks"]
Evidence --> S2["Changed file (4 files)"]
S2 --> I2["repository behavior"]
I2 --> Conflict["Merge conflict blocks this path"]
Conflict --> V2["required checks"]
Evidence --> S3["Docs: diagramweave-hourly-review-caller.md"]
S3 --> I3["operator or user guidance"]
I3 --> Conflict["Merge conflict blocks this path"]
Conflict --> V3["docs review"]
Evidence --> S4["Test: test_diagramweave_hourly_review_caller.py"]
S4 --> I4["regression suite"]
I4 --> Conflict["Merge conflict blocks this path"]
Conflict --> V4["targeted test run"]
OpenCode Review Overview
Pull request overviewOpenCode reviewed the current-head mergeability evidence and changed-file flow before approval, then found merge conflicts on the affected path. Findings1. HIGH Merge Conflict Guidance - Resolve the PR branch against the latest base branch
gh pr checkout 1094 --repo ContextualWisdomLab/.github
git fetch origin main
git merge --no-ff origin/main # or: git rebase origin/main
git status --short
# resolve files, then git add <resolved-files># merge path: git commit# rebase path: git rebase --continue
git push origin HEAD:feat/diagramweave-hourly-nvidia-nim-review-repair
# rebase path only: git push --force-with-lease origin HEAD:feat/diagramweave-hourly-nvidia-nim-review-repair
Merge Conflict Evidence Mapflowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Workflow (2 files)"]
S1 --> I1["GitHub Actions review job"]
I1 --> Conflict["Merge conflict blocks this path"]
Conflict --> V1["actionlint plus required checks"]
Evidence --> S2["Changed file (4 files)"]
S2 --> I2["repository behavior"]
I2 --> Conflict["Merge conflict blocks this path"]
Conflict --> V2["required checks"]
Evidence --> S3["Docs: diagramweave-hourly-review-caller.md"]
S3 --> I3["operator or user guidance"]
I3 --> Conflict["Merge conflict blocks this path"]
Conflict --> V3["docs review"]
Evidence --> S4["Test: test_diagramweave_hourly_review_caller.py"]
S4 --> I4["regression suite"]
I4 --> Conflict["Merge conflict blocks this path"]
Conflict --> V4["targeted test run"]
Changed-File Evidence Mapflowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Workflow (2 files)"]
S1 --> I1["GitHub Actions review job"]
I1 --> Conflict["Merge conflict blocks this path"]
Conflict --> V1["actionlint plus required checks"]
Evidence --> S2["Changed file (4 files)"]
S2 --> I2["repository behavior"]
I2 --> Conflict["Merge conflict blocks this path"]
Conflict --> V2["required checks"]
Evidence --> S3["Docs: diagramweave-hourly-review-caller.md"]
S3 --> I3["operator or user guidance"]
I3 --> Conflict["Merge conflict blocks this path"]
Conflict --> V3["docs review"]
Evidence --> S4["Test: test_diagramweave_hourly_review_caller.py"]
S4 --> I4["regression suite"]
I4 --> Conflict["Merge conflict blocks this path"]
Conflict --> V4["targeted test run"]
Merge Conflict Guidance
gh pr checkout 1094 --repo ContextualWisdomLab/.github
git fetch origin main
git merge --no-ff origin/main # or: git rebase origin/main
git status --short
# resolve files, then git add <resolved-files># merge path: git commit# rebase path: git rebase --continue
git push origin HEAD:feat/diagramweave-hourly-nvidia-nim-review-repair
# rebase path only: git push --force-with-lease origin HEAD:feat/diagramweave-hourly-nvidia-nim-review-repair |
Buyer-perceivable gap
Hourly NVIDIA NIM review repair never scanned
ContextualWisdomLab/DiagramWeave. Live AI-native diagram-editor pull requests such as ContextualWisdomLab/DiagramWeave#31, ContextualWisdomLab/DiagramWeave#30, and ContextualWisdomLab/DiagramWeave#26 target protectedmainand stalled while Clearfolio, DiskSage, and fast-mlsirm received heartbeats.Change
base_branch: main, one dispatch, two-hour same-head retry.id-token: writeso the reusable scheduler can mint the OpenCode App fallback from GitHub OIDC.PR_REVIEW_MERGE_TOKENandOPENCODE_APPROVE_TOKEN. NeverNVIDIA_NIM_API_KEYon the caller. NeverCOPILOT_GITHUB_TOKEN.pull_request/push/compileallpath contracts.Do not self-approve. Merge remains subject to two-approval + last-pusher ruleset. GitHub review/Checks wait is not a blocker.
Refs ContextualWisdomLab/DiagramWeave#31, ContextualWisdomLab/DiagramWeave#30, and ContextualWisdomLab/DiagramWeave#26.
Summary by CodeRabbit
새로운 기능
main브랜치의 변경 사항을 대상으로 제한된 복구 작업과 재시도를 지원합니다.문서
테스트