Record scheduler push-trigger rollout

[seonghobae]

Summary

• update the rollout document to point at Run scheduler when base branches advance #151 merge commit 00018f7783522447a71acd08a946e3504e18ff74
• record that the Run scheduler when base branches advance #151 merge created push-triggered scheduler run 28385177585
• note that the run is registered but still queued pending runner assignment

Verification

• python3 -m pytest tests/test_pr_governance_audit_contract.py -q
• git diff --check

[opencode-agent]

Pull request overview

OpenCode model attempts did not emit a usable current-head control block, so the approval gate used deterministic current-head evidence instead of model prose.

Findings

No blocking findings.

Summary

• Result: APPROVE
• Reason: coverage-evidence passed, peer GitHub Checks completed without failures, mergeability was clean, and no unresolved human review threads remained.
• Deterministic evidence: current-head changed-file evidence (docs/org-required-workflow-rollout.md); coverage-evidence result success; peer checks from statusCheckRollup excluding this OpenCode check.
• Model outcomes: primary=failed, fallback=failed, second_fallback=failed, catalog_fallback=unknown.
• Head SHA: 8ccf38b745a8997dc57557176d4e41eaaacfce5c
• Workflow run: 28385325729
• Workflow attempt: 1

Deterministic fallback approval was used only after model-output instability and did not bypass coverage, failed-check, mergeability, or human-review gates.

Change Flow DAG

flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Docs: org-required-workflow-rollout.md"]
S1 --> I1["operator or user guidance"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Docs: org-required-workflow-rollout.md"]
R1 --> V1["docs review"]

Loading

[opencode-agent]

OpenCode Review Overview

• Head SHA: 8ccf38b745a8997dc57557176d4e41eaaacfce5c
• Workflow run: 28385325729
• Workflow attempt: 1
• Gate result: APPROVE (approval step)

Pull request overview

OpenCode model attempts did not emit a usable current-head control block, so the approval gate used deterministic current-head evidence instead of model prose.

Findings

No blocking findings.

Summary

• Result: APPROVE
• Reason: coverage-evidence passed, peer GitHub Checks completed without failures, mergeability was clean, and no unresolved human review threads remained.
• Deterministic evidence: current-head changed-file evidence (docs/org-required-workflow-rollout.md); coverage-evidence result success; peer checks from statusCheckRollup excluding this OpenCode check.
• Model outcomes: primary=failed, fallback=failed, second_fallback=failed, catalog_fallback=unknown.
• Head SHA: 8ccf38b745a8997dc57557176d4e41eaaacfce5c
• Workflow run: 28385325729
• Workflow attempt: 1

Deterministic fallback approval was used only after model-output instability and did not bypass coverage, failed-check, mergeability, or human-review gates.

Change Flow DAG

flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Docs: org-required-workflow-rollout.md"]
S1 --> I1["operator or user guidance"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Docs: org-required-workflow-rollout.md"]
R1 --> V1["docs review"]

Loading