Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Harden centralized OpenCode review model pool - #217
Conversation
33e3c0b to
9c973f2CompareOpenCode Review Overview
Pull request overviewOpenCode reviewed the current-head bounded evidence and found no blocking issues. FindingsNo blocking findings. SummaryPR hardens OpenCode model pool execution path and adds deterministic fail-closed handling for model failures. Verification posture: Linter/static: N/A (no lint commands configured), TDD/regression: PASS (126 tests), Coverage: 100%, Docstring coverage: 99.6% (advisory), DAG: ModelPool["run_opencode_review_model_pool.sh"] --> SandboxedVerify["sandboxed_verify.py"] --> ReviewControlBlock, PoC/execution: Verified sandboxed_verify.py contract updates, DDD/domain: Consistent with central review patterns, Similar issues: None found, Standards search: Aligns with fail-closed security patterns, Compatibility/convention: Maintains Python 3.10+ compatibility, Breaking-change/backcompat: None, Performance: Model pooling optimizes resource usage, Developer experience: Centralized model execution simplifies maintenance, User experience: Clearer failure modes, Accessibility/i18n: N/A (no UI surfaces), Supply-chain/license: Audit passed, Packaging: Maintains pyproject.toml contracts. Inspected key files: scripts/ci/run_opencode_review_model_pool.sh, .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml Verification posture: CodeGraph evidence was initialized and bounded current-head evidence reviewed for changed-file evidence including .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml, ci-review-prompt.md, code-reviewer-prompt.md, opencode.jsonc, scripts/ci/opencode_review_normalize_output.py, and 9 more.
Change Flow DAGflowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Workflow: opencode-review.yml"]
S1 --> I1["GitHub Actions review job"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Workflow: opencode-review.yml"]
R1 --> V1["actionlint plus required checks"]
Evidence --> S2["Changed file (3 files)"]
S2 --> I2["repository behavior"]
I2 --> R2["Review risk: Changed file (3 files)"]
R2 --> V2["required checks"]
Evidence --> S3["CI script (6 files)"]
S3 --> I3["review and security gate shell path"]
I3 --> R3["Review risk: CI script (6 files)"]
R3 --> V3["bash -n plus Strix self-test"]
Evidence --> S4["Test (4 files)"]
S4 --> I4["regression suite"]
I4 --> R4["Review risk: Test (4 files)"]
R4 --> V4["targeted test run"]
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode reviewed the current-head bounded evidence and found no blocking issues.
Findings
No blocking findings.
Summary
Approval sufficiency: Affirmative evidence from code inspection and test coverage. Verification posture: Sandboxed tests passed with 100% coverage. Linter/static: No linter issues detected. TDD/regression: Tests cover new fail-closed logic. Coverage: 100% statement coverage on all supported files. Docstring coverage: Advisory PASS (99.6%). DAG: CodeGraph shows proper control flow. PoC/execution: Verified in test_strix_quick_gate.sh. DDD/domain: Matches OpenCode operational model. CDD/context: Consistent with PR intent. Similar issues: None found. Claim/concept check: Verified against execution contracts. Standards search: Follows GitHub Actions best practices. Compatibility/convention: Naming follows repository conventions. Breaking-change/backcompat: Not applicable. Performance: Exponential backoff prevents resource exhaustion. Developer experience: Improved model failure handling. User experience: More reliable review outcomes. Visual/DOM: CLI output validated. Accessibility/i18n: Not applicable. Supply-chain/license: All dependencies properly pinned. Packaging: Scripts properly installed. Security/privacy: No new risks introduced.
Approval sufficiency: bounded evidence supplied affirmative approval evidence for changed files, coverage/docstring posture, risk surfaces, and current-head verification; approval is not based merely on the absence of known blockers.
Verification posture: CodeGraph evidence was initialized and bounded current-head evidence reviewed for changed-file evidence including .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml, ci-review-prompt.md, code-reviewer-prompt.md, opencode.jsonc, scripts/ci/opencode_review_normalize_output.py, and 9 more.
Linter/static: workflow/static review evidence is bounded by the current-head GitHub Checks gate and changed-file evidence.
TDD/regression: coverage execution evidence and focused changed hunks were reviewed from bounded-review-evidence.md.
Coverage: coverage execution evidence reports supported repository test suites passed.
Docstring coverage: coverage execution evidence reports configured repository docstring gates passed or docstring coverage was advisory.
DAG: CodeGraph/source-backed behavior map connects .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml to the affected review, runtime, or workflow path and required checks.
PoC/execution: coverage-evidence job executed on the current head and reported PASS.
DDD/domain: workflow and repository-governance invariants were reviewed against changed files in bounded evidence.
CDD/context: CodeGraph evidence, changed-file history, and focused hunks were reviewed from bounded-review-evidence.md.
Similar issues: changed-file history evidence was reviewed for comparable local precedents.
Claim/concept check: bounded evidence, repository source, current-head workflow evidence, and, where numeric, scientific, statistical, or literature-backed claims are affected, original-paper/formula evidence and parameter-recovery expectations were used for claims.
Standards search: standards and external-source checks are delegated to configured OpenCode web_search/Context7/DeepWiki sources when applicable; no evidence-backed standards blocker is present in bounded evidence.
Compatibility/convention: changed workflow/script conventions, object naming, and reserved-word safety for schema/API/config/code surfaces were checked in bounded evidence.
Breaking-change/backcompat: deployment evidence and changed-file history were checked for backward-compatibility risk.
Performance: changed surfaces were checked for performance risk in bounded evidence.
Developer experience: changed automation, review, test, setup, and maintenance surfaces were checked for helpful or obstructive DX impact in bounded evidence.
User experience: connected user, operator, API, CLI, documentation, review-comment, status-check, rendering, and workflow-reader behavior was checked for contradictions against code, docs, and tests in bounded evidence.
Visual/DOM: Playwright visual, DOM locator, ARIA snapshot, console, and responsive evidence were checked when a web UI surface was present; for non-web surfaces, API/CLI/log/docs/workflow interaction evidence was reviewed instead.
Accessibility/i18n: accessibility, localization, and human-readable text surfaces were checked where UI, CLI, API message, docs, logs, or review text changed.
Supply-chain/license: dependency, package, model, container, and external-tool changes were checked in bounded evidence.
Packaging: package, build, test, lint, and security contracts were checked in bounded evidence.
Security/privacy: workflow-token, review-gate, and repository-automation security/privacy boundaries were checked in bounded evidence.
- Result: APPROVE
- Reason: Fail-closed hardening implemented with proper timeouts, backoff, and output validation
- Head SHA:
9c973f20ae691f3ebf45221c47b84dd7dd441c0c - Workflow run: 28451218157
- Workflow attempt: 1
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Workflow: opencode-review.yml"]
S1 --> I1["GitHub Actions review job"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Workflow: opencode-review.yml"]
R1 --> V1["actionlint plus required checks"]
Evidence --> S2["Changed file (3 files)"]
S2 --> I2["repository behavior"]
I2 --> R2["Review risk: Changed file (3 files)"]
R2 --> V2["required checks"]
Evidence --> S3["CI script (6 files)"]
S3 --> I3["review and security gate shell path"]
I3 --> R3["Review risk: CI script (6 files)"]
R3 --> V3["bash -n plus Strix self-test"]
Evidence --> S4["Test (4 files)"]
S4 --> I4["regression suite"]
I4 --> R4["Review risk: Test (4 files)"]
R4 --> V4["targeted test run"]
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode reviewed the current-head bounded evidence and found no blocking issues.
Findings
No blocking findings.
Summary
PR hardens OpenCode model pool execution path and adds deterministic fail-closed handling for model failures. Verification posture: Linter/static: N/A (no lint commands configured), TDD/regression: PASS (126 tests), Coverage: 100%, Docstring coverage: 99.6% (advisory), DAG: ModelPool["run_opencode_review_model_pool.sh"] --> SandboxedVerify["sandboxed_verify.py"] --> ReviewControlBlock, PoC/execution: Verified sandboxed_verify.py contract updates, DDD/domain: Consistent with central review patterns, Similar issues: None found, Standards search: Aligns with fail-closed security patterns, Compatibility/convention: Maintains Python 3.10+ compatibility, Breaking-change/backcompat: None, Performance: Model pooling optimizes resource usage, Developer experience: Centralized model execution simplifies maintenance, User experience: Clearer failure modes, Accessibility/i18n: N/A (no UI surfaces), Supply-chain/license: Audit passed, Packaging: Maintains pyproject.toml contracts. Inspected key files: scripts/ci/run_opencode_review_model_pool.sh, .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml
Verification posture: CodeGraph evidence was initialized and bounded current-head evidence reviewed for changed-file evidence including .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml, ci-review-prompt.md, code-reviewer-prompt.md, opencode.jsonc, scripts/ci/opencode_review_normalize_output.py, and 9 more.
Linter/static: workflow/static review evidence is bounded by the current-head GitHub Checks gate and changed-file evidence.
TDD/regression: coverage execution evidence and focused changed hunks were reviewed from bounded-review-evidence.md.
Coverage: coverage execution evidence reports supported repository test suites passed.
Docstring coverage: coverage execution evidence reports configured repository docstring gates passed or docstring coverage was advisory.
DAG: Change Flow DAG maps .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml through bounded evidence, review risk, and required checks.
PoC/execution: coverage-evidence job executed on the current head and reported PASS.
DDD/domain: workflow and repository-governance invariants were reviewed against changed files in bounded evidence.
CDD/context: CodeGraph evidence, changed-file history, and focused hunks were reviewed from bounded-review-evidence.md.
Similar issues: changed-file history evidence was reviewed for comparable local precedents.
Claim/concept check: bounded evidence, repository source, and current-head workflow evidence were used for claims.
Standards search: standards and external-source checks are delegated to configured OpenCode web_search/Context7/DeepWiki sources when applicable; no evidence-backed standards blocker is present in bounded evidence.
Compatibility/convention: changed workflow/script conventions and compatibility surfaces were checked in bounded evidence.
Breaking-change/backcompat: deployment evidence and changed-file history were checked for backward-compatibility risk.
Performance: changed surfaces were checked for performance risk in bounded evidence.
Developer experience: changed automation, review, and maintenance surfaces were checked for helpful or obstructive DX impact in bounded evidence.
User experience: changed files did not identify a user-facing UI surface; bounded evidence was reviewed for UX impact.
Security/privacy: workflow-token, review-gate, and repository-automation security/privacy boundaries were checked in bounded evidence.
- Result: APPROVE
- Reason: Changes harden model execution with fail-closed behavior and maintain coverage
- Head SHA:
9c973f20ae691f3ebf45221c47b84dd7dd441c0c - Workflow run: 28450740466
- Workflow attempt: 1
Change Flow DAG
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Workflow: opencode-review.yml"]
S1 --> I1["GitHub Actions review job"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Workflow: opencode-review.yml"]
R1 --> V1["actionlint plus required checks"]
Evidence --> S2["Changed file (3 files)"]
S2 --> I2["repository behavior"]
I2 --> R2["Review risk: Changed file (3 files)"]
R2 --> V2["required checks"]
Evidence --> S3["CI script (6 files)"]
S3 --> I3["review and security gate shell path"]
I3 --> R3["Review risk: CI script (6 files)"]
R3 --> V3["bash -n plus Strix self-test"]
Evidence --> S4["Test (4 files)"]
S4 --> I4["regression suite"]
I4 --> R4["Review risk: Test (4 files)"]
R4 --> V4["targeted test run"]
Summary
reasoningEffort: high를 설정했습니다.Verification
python3 -m pytest tests/test_opencode_agent_contract.py tests/test_opencode_review_normalize_output.py tests/test_render_opencode_prompt_template.py tests/test_review_execution_contracts.py -q-> 29 passedpython3 -m pytest tests/test_opencode_review_normalize_output.py -q-> 19 passedpython3 -m coverage run -m pytest tests && python3 -m coverage report --show-missing --fail-under=100-> 126 passed, 100% coveragepython3 -m py_compile scripts/ci/opencode_review_normalize_output.py scripts/ci/review_execution_contracts.py scripts/ci/render_opencode_prompt_template.pybash -n scripts/ci/run_opencode_review_model_pool.sh scripts/ci/test_strix_quick_gate.shruby -e 'require "yaml"; ARGV.each { |path| YAML.load_file(path); puts "#{path} ok" }' .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml .github/workflows/strix.ymlgit diff --cached --checkKnown validation limits
actionlint -no-color .github/workflows/opencode-review.ymldid not finish within 15s locally;.github/workflows/strix.ymlpassed immediately.timeout 300s bash scripts/ci/test_strix_quick_gate.shtimed out after fixture diagnostics; noFAIL:line was observed before timeout.