🧹 [code health improvement] Refactor post_conflict_comment to extract comment body generation

[seonghobae]

🎯 What:scripts/ci/pr_auto_rebase.py의 post_conflict_comment 함수에서 긴 코멘트 생성 로직을 별도의 헬퍼 함수 generate_conflict_comment_body로 추출했습니다.
💡 Why:post_conflict_comment 함수가 길고 복잡하여 읽기 어려웠습니다. 코멘트를 생성하는 로직을 분리함으로써 함수의 책임이 명확해지고, 코드의 가독성과 유지보수성이 향상되었습니다.
✅ Verification: 리팩토링 후 전체 테스트 스위트(pytest 기반의 커버리지 100% 확인 포함)와 interrogate를 실행하여 기능의 회귀나 문제가 발생하지 않았음을 확인했습니다.
✨ Result: 코드베이스의 가독성과 유지보수성이 향상되었으며, 동작 방식이나 기존 기능에는 변경이 없습니다.

---

PR created automatically by Jules for task 10736463735672821918 started by @seonghobae

[google-labs-jules]

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.

---

For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Review limit reached

@seonghobae, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in:52 minutes

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 3d3669a5-7973-44e6-a869-6cf40fdcc5b6

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6eb06cd and aaaec28.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• scripts/ci/pr_auto_rebase.py

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[seonghobae]

RCA/feasibility: closing unmerged as non-defect maintainability churn. This branch only extracts markdown construction from post_conflict_comment; it changes no safety, correctness, availability, or measured performance behavior. With real central defects and dependency-unblocking work still open, another full CI/review/approval lane for a 13-line readability refactor has negative opportunity cost. Preserve the tested implementation and revisit only when a functional change makes this seam materially useful.

[google-labs-jules]

RCA/feasibility: closing unmerged as non-defect maintainability churn. This branch only extracts markdown construction from post_conflict_comment; it changes no safety, correctness, availability, or measured performance behavior. With real central defects and dependency-unblocking work still open, another full CI/review/approval lane for a 13-line readability refactor has negative opportunity cost. Preserve the tested implementation and revisit only when a functional change makes this seam materially useful.

Understood. Acknowledging that this work is now obsolete and stopping work on this task.